Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Whatever Elinda. For ctrl-f to work, it has to be spelled correctly.
I erred anyways. Lockecole did call the dude a bigot.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- MI assistant AG speaks out against...
MI assistant AG speaks out against...Follow
Spell check too. Kinda defeats the purpose eh.
I erred anyways. Lockecole did call the dude a bigot.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
lmao...and so the template goes; if you say or do anything contrary to the radical homosexual agenda you must obviously be a closet ****.
Yea, varus(a.k.a knoxsouthy). You proved that some time ago.
REMEMBER THIS?:
You can't run from what you are forever, varus.
I especially like how he wears his heart out on his sleeve. What an open, sensitive guy!
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#54REDACTED,
Posted: Oct 01 2010 at 8:05 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Wonder if this assistant AG should go ahead and sue anderson cooper for stalking, harassment, and defamation. I mean it's been how many nights now he's attacked this citizen who's merely engaging in his first amendment rights to protest someone pushing a perceived radical agenda on a traditionally conservative institution.
varusword75 wrote:
Wonder if this assistant AG should go ahead and sue anderson cooper for stalking, harassment, and defamation. I mean it's been how many nights now he's attacked this citizen who's merely engaging in his first amendment rights to protest someone pushing a perceived radical agenda on a traditionally conservative institution.
varusword75 wrote:
Wonder if this assistant AG should go ahead and sue anderson cooper for stalking, harassment, and defamation.
Sure. He needs more good press.
You have a strange hard-on for Anderson Cooper. Is it the silver hair?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
So you're in favor of chasing Democrats but not this guy? Seems a bit hypocritical. Shouldn't you be cheering the reporting on this guy and Whitman and saying you want to see it extended to Democrats you feel aren't being investigated?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Ooh, varus, I don't know if you can say this:
And then go and say this:
I dare say you might be coming dangerously close to tarnishing your spotless record of unbiased and rational-minded posting. Better be careful...you've got an image to uphold, y'know.
Quote:
Condoning is a far cry from what i'm doing. Saying he has the right to protest an elected public school official is not quite the same as saying I condone it. Just the same as saying I understand why he's doing what he's doing doesn't mean I support his methods.
But hey as long as you get the chance to scream bigot at the top of your lungs about some conservative you happen to disagree with you go right ahead.
But hey as long as you get the chance to scream bigot at the top of your lungs about some conservative you happen to disagree with you go right ahead.
And then go and say this:
varusword75 wrote:
Wonder if this assistant AG should go ahead and sue anderson cooper for stalking, harassment, and defamation. I mean it's been how many nights now he's attacked this citizen who's merely engaging in his first amendment rights to protest someone pushing a perceived radical agenda on a traditionally conservative institution.
I dare say you might be coming dangerously close to tarnishing your spotless record of unbiased and rational-minded posting. Better be careful...you've got an image to uphold, y'know.
varusword75 wrote:
Eske,
And if I hadn't said "I wonder IF" at the beginning of the second quote you might have a point.
And if I hadn't said "I wonder IF" at the beginning of the second quote you might have a point.
Actually, that's a separate sentence. The one which I highlighted has no conditional attached to it.
So it looks like I still do have a point.
varusword75 wrote:
Eske,
Same paragraph; merely expounding on the original statement. Thanks for playing though
Same paragraph; merely expounding on the original statement. Thanks for playing though
I'm sorry, but that's not how the english language works.
If AC starts videotaping this guy after hours, then maybe there would be some merit to a charge of stalking. But so far, what he's been doing is...reporting.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
varusword75 wrote:
Eske,
yuh uh es muy bueno.
yuh uh es muy bueno.
I don't think bueno was the word you were looking for there. Unless you were trying to tell Eske he was very good.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Eske,
yuh uh es muy bueno.
yuh uh es muy bueno.
I don't think bueno was the word you were looking for there. Unless you were trying to tell Eske he was very good.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Eske,
yuh uh es muy bueno.
yuh uh es muy bueno.
I don't think bueno was the word you were looking for there. Unless you were trying to tell Eske he was very good.
That and his Spanish is terrible. Come on Varus, at least get one language right. /shakeshead
Criminy wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Eske,
yuh uh es muy bueno.
yuh uh es muy bueno.
I don't think bueno was the word you were looking for there. Unless you were trying to tell Eske he was very good.
That and his Spanish is terrible. Come on Varus, at least get one language right. /shakeshead
#70Almalieque,
Posted: Oct 02 2010 at 7:31 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) For the love of God (or whatever you may or may not believe in) there is no comparison to someone's skin complexion to their sexual life style. Please quit doing that or accept the fact that you sound silly saying otherwise.
Almalieque wrote:
For the love of God (or whatever you may or may not believe in) there is no comparison to someone's skin complexion to their sexual life style. Please quit doing that or accept the fact that you sound silly saying otherwise.
Obviously if you believe otherwise then I could see how you'd disagree.
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
For the love of God (or whatever you may or may not believe in) there is no comparison to someone's skin complexion to their sexual life style. Please quit doing that or accept the fact that you sound silly saying otherwise.
Obviously if you believe otherwise then I could see how you'd disagree.
It doesn't matter if you're born that way or not. For example, you being born with Schizophrenia or Tourettes are not direct comparisons with being born a certain skin complexion. One is a physical trait and the other is a behavioral trait or personality trait.
If the impacts or outcomes are similar you can still compare things that are not exactly the same alma. Patterns and parallels can be seen in many diverse societal activities.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Sir Xsarus wrote:
If the impacts or outcomes are similar you can still compare things that are not exactly the same alma. Patterns and parallels can be seen in many diverse societal activities.
I don't necessarily disagree with that, but under that logic, that opens the comparison to countless different things, yet it's always "black americans" and hardly anything else. If you're using the comparison under your logic, why not use different comparisons?
The reason why that doesn't happen is because society has accepted that the discrimination against black americans is wrong, so if you can make the comparison to that, then by default this means that the new said discrimination is also wrong. If you picked other comparisons, then it might degrade your argument. This is why people don't like making comparisons to ~philia, bestiality, etc., even though they are making the same exact arguments as homosexuals.
So, until I see others start utilizing the countless other comparisons, to include ~philia and bestiality, I will stand by my point.
[quote=AlmaliequeFor the love of God (or whatever you may or may not believe in) there is no comparison to someone's skin complexion to their sexual life style. Please quit doing that or accept the fact that you sound silly saying otherwise.[/quote]
But there is a valid comparison.
See? I can pass my opinions off as fact, too.
But there is a valid comparison.
See? I can pass my opinions off as fact, too.
Almalieque wrote:
Quadkit wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Princess,
This perfectly radical que*r is trying to force his twisted deviant lifestyle ideology onto the college.
Quote:
This perfectly reasonable human being is trying to get his alma-matter to be more accomodating to a segment of their populaton.
This perfectly radical que*r is trying to force his twisted deviant lifestyle ideology onto the college.
For the love of God (or whatever you may or may not believe in) there is no comparison to someone's skin complexion to their sexual life style. Please quit doing that or accept the fact that you sound silly saying otherwise.
HOWEVER, I wasn't making the comparison between the two. I was making the comparison between the two movements. Both are groups (whether based on "lifestyle" or whatever) fighting for equal treatment in society.
Recent Visitors: 510
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (510)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- MI assistant AG speaks out against...
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC