Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Peace baby...Follow

#27 Sep 29 2010 at 4:22 PM Rating: Good
Var wrote:
Yeah well liberals murder babies and then eat the fetus.
mmmm, delicious brown fat.


Wait, does that make liberals irish, or the irish liberals?
#28 Sep 29 2010 at 7:32 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Of course peace will happen.

Right after you turn it into a glass parking lot.

At the risk of showing agreement with a varus, the only thing I think would bring peace to the Middle East is a (few) hydrogen bomb(s).
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#29 Sep 29 2010 at 7:51 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,969 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Yeah well liberals murder babies and then eat the fetus.




No, silly man; that's the Jews, during Passover.



You are totaly giving ignorant Klansmen a bad rep by getting this wrong, btw.
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#30 Sep 29 2010 at 7:52 PM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
Debalic wrote:
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Of course peace will happen.

Right after you turn it into a glass parking lot.

At the risk of showing agreement with a varus, the only thing I think would bring peace to the Middle East is a (few) hydrogen bomb(s).
I'm surely hoping you don't think this to be the solution...
#31 Sep 29 2010 at 8:04 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Quadkit wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Of course peace will happen.

Right after you turn it into a glass parking lot.

At the risk of showing agreement with a varus, the only thing I think would bring peace to the Middle East is a (few) hydrogen bomb(s).
I'm surely hoping you don't think this to be the solution...
The entire Middle East? Of course not.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#32 Sep 29 2010 at 8:10 PM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Quadkit wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Of course peace will happen.

Right after you turn it into a glass parking lot.

At the risk of showing agreement with a varus, the only thing I think would bring peace to the Middle East is a (few) hydrogen bomb(s).
I'm surely hoping you don't think this to be the solution...
The entire Middle East? Of course not.
Call me a hippy, but throwing around a weapon which has the potential to destroy life on Earth as we know it to bring peace to a warring region doesn't seem like such a neat-o plan.
#33 Sep 29 2010 at 8:25 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Hey. Eliminate the warring people and the land they're warring over and, presto! no more warring.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#34 Sep 29 2010 at 8:32 PM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
Debalic wrote:
Hey. Eliminate the warring people and the land they're warring over and, presto! no more warring.
/facepalm
#35 Sep 29 2010 at 8:47 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Quadkit wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Hey. Eliminate the warring people and the land they're warring over and, presto! no more warring.
/facepalm
I'd suggest something biological so we could save the natural resources, but it's so much harder to contain, so nukes it be.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#36 Sep 29 2010 at 8:58 PM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Quadkit wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Hey. Eliminate the warring people and the land they're warring over and, presto! no more warring.
/facepalm
I'd suggest something biological so we could save the natural resources, but it's so much harder to contain, so nukes it be.
What better place to start the zombie apocalypse? Go big or go home.
#37 Sep 29 2010 at 9:12 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
BrownDuck wrote:
Israel, like the U.S. is running under an umbrella of unchecked ignorance and hatred. Despite the good will efforts of a few, there will never be a true option for peace so long as Israel keeps painting themselves the victim, rather than the bully.


To be fair though, Israel is surrounded by nations full of people who are also under a similar umbrella. You do make a relevant comparison though. One of the concerns that the Israelis have is that the Palestinians (specifically Muslim Palestinians) have become so anti-Semite that if they allow their population to grow too much they fear that their country will become a muslim country with Judaism eliminated entirely. And while that may come off as bigotry, one needs only look at nearly every single nation surrounding Israel to see this.

They are right to oppose the so-called "right of return", which is one of the major stopping points for any major state-forming agreements. If the full right were recognized, then millions of Muslims could flood into Israel and effectively take over the country and make it into a Muslim state. So what appears at first glance to be religious intolerance on the part of the Israeli Jews is really just a response to religious intolerance on the part of Palestinian Muslims.

We see the same kind of dynamic here in the US when dealing with border issues with Mexico. It's easy to paint the mostly white US citizens who opposed the open border philosophy as bigots who don't want brown skinned (specifically Mexican) people filling their streets. However, when you look at the goals of some of these groups (particularly Mecha) who are pushing for amnesty and open immigration and anything else that'll let more of "their people" into the country, you almost can't blame them. When you have an organization who literally seek to flood the southwestern US with as many Mexicans as possible so they can break away from the US, form into "Azatlan", and then either remain a free state or join Mexico, it's more than unfair to simply paint opposition as bigotry.

If you don't think this is real, you've never talked to Latinos who've been bullied by those guys. I have a friend who was president of a local Latino student union at one of the campuses here. In just a couple of years they were infiltrated and then taken over by Mecha operatives who turned it from a group of people planning fun culturally relevant events into a politically focused body with an incredibly bigoted purpose. This has been playing out at campuses across the south west for a couple decades now. And it's more or less ignored by a mainstream media so focused on finding racism and bigotry among white people, and so unwilling to even acknowledge that it can exist in people who aren't white, or aren't a majority.


We need to stop pretending that by being tolerant of others' intolerance we're somehow creating a better world. We're not. We're just empowering the next wave of oppressive regimes and bigoted leaders and violence and hatred. The same thing we're doing wrong in the Middle East is being done wrong in Paris and London and Los Angeles as well. The violence just hasn't yet reached such a strong head. Yet.

Edited, Sep 29th 2010 8:13pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#38 Sep 30 2010 at 3:09 AM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
One of the concerns that the Israelis have is that the Palestinians (specifically Muslim Palestinians) have become so anti-Semite that if they allow their population to grow too much they fear that their country will become a muslim country with Judaism eliminated entirely.


This has nothing to do with anti-semitism, and everything to do with democracy. If the right of return was granted, Palestinian Muslims would vastly outnumber Jewish Israeli. In a democracy, it seems kinda normal that the majority of the population would not want to live under a state-religion which wasn't theirs. It's not anti-semite, it's the same reason as to why you don't want the US to become a Muslim country, or why I wouldn't want the UK to become a Sikh state.

Second, everyone knows the refugees can't come back. It's stupidly obvious. What they will/might do is allow a few of them to come back, as a symbolic gesture. But even the Palestinians know damn well that the vast majority of the refugees won't come back. What the hell would they come back to anyway? It's not like their 60 year old house is still standing empty in a field somewhere...

This is also the reason why Israel hasn't annexed the West bank and Gaza and made them officially part of Israel. If they did, demography would mean that pretty soon the majority of the population in this new "Greater Israel" would be Palestinian Muslims. Since it's a democracy, this would mean the end of Israel as a Jewish state. The only alternative would be to have an apartheid state, where Muslim Palestinians don't have the right to vote. But while this is palatable to some in Israel (Lieberman and the ultra-orthodox), it thankfully isn't to most of the population.

Which is why there is no other choice but to give Palestine its independence. There is simply no other alternative. And the more you wait, the more blood is shed, the more anger grows, and the harder it gets. And yet, there is no alternative... And everyone in Israel and in Palestine, knows that.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#39 Sep 30 2010 at 4:08 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Elinda,

I know Jesus didn't lead an army to overthrow and convert every city he came in contact with.

I know Jesus doesn't tell us it's ok to murder someone because they might disagree.



But he does tell them to hack off their penises! "For there are eunuchs, that were so born from their mother's womb: and there are eunuchs, that were made eunuchs by men: and there are eunuchs, that made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it." (Matthew 19:12 ASV)



On an interesting side note, Varus's overwhelming ignorance is evidence to support the study mentioned in this article.
#40 Sep 30 2010 at 4:41 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Anyone notice that I havnt posted in this thread yet?
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#41 Sep 30 2010 at 11:42 AM Rating: Good
I have become more hopeful. Probability is very low, but I think it is growing. For now.
#42 Sep 30 2010 at 2:10 PM Rating: Good
Quadkit wrote:
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Quadkit wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Hey. Eliminate the warring people and the land they're warring over and, presto! no more warring.
/facepalm
I'd suggest something biological so we could save the natural resources, but it's so much harder to contain, so nukes it be.
What better place to start the zombie apocalypse? Go big or go home.
Now there's a plan I can stand behind.
#43REDACTED, Posted: Oct 01 2010 at 12:18 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#44 Oct 01 2010 at 3:23 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
gbaji wrote:
One of the concerns that the Israelis have is that the Palestinians (specifically Muslim Palestinians) have become so anti-Semite that if they allow their population to grow too much they fear that their country will become a muslim country with Judaism eliminated entirely.


This has nothing to do with anti-semitism, and everything to do with democracy. If the right of return was granted, Palestinian Muslims would vastly outnumber Jewish Israeli. In a democracy, it seems kinda normal that the majority of the population would not want to live under a state-religion which wasn't theirs. It's not anti-semite, it's the same reason as to why you don't want the US to become a Muslim country, or why I wouldn't want the UK to become a Sikh state.


Yes. And the fear (as I clearly stated in the sentence you quoted) is that if the Muslim Palestinians gain a majority, they'll use that majority to change the democracy of Israel into one more like those in the surrounding Muslim states, with Muslim religious leaders having great influence over the government. Once that happens, the democracy will be gone and Judaism will at best be a second class religion, and most likely will be outlawed. The Jews will leave, and they'll have lost their country.


Can we agree that the two groups cannot share a country? It doesn't work for either. But of the two, Palestinian Muslims are vastly better off in a Jewish controlled Israel than Jews would be in a Muslim controlled Israel (or whatever they'd presumably change the name to once they had control).

Quote:
Second, everyone knows the refugees can't come back. It's stupidly obvious. What they will/might do is allow a few of them to come back, as a symbolic gesture. But even the Palestinians know damn well that the vast majority of the refugees won't come back. What the hell would they come back to anyway? It's not like their 60 year old house is still standing empty in a field somewhere...


Part of the demands connected to the "right of return" would require returning the property and providing for those who returned. It's quite obvious that the plan here is to flood Israel with refugees which they'll have to pay to support and shift the population sufficiently so that Islam can gain dominance as the majority religion. There is no other reason to be so adamant about specific conditions for a right of return. It's not about just being able to move back, it's specifically about crushing the Israeli economy and control of their own country in the process.

That's why it'll never happen. The Palestinians put absolutely unreasonable requirements on it.

Quote:
This is also the reason why Israel hasn't annexed the West bank and Gaza and made them officially part of Israel. If they did, demography would mean that pretty soon the majority of the population in this new "Greater Israel" would be Palestinian Muslims. Since it's a democracy, this would mean the end of Israel as a Jewish state. The only alternative would be to have an apartheid state, where Muslim Palestinians don't have the right to vote. But while this is palatable to some in Israel (Lieberman and the ultra-orthodox), it thankfully isn't to most of the population.

Which is why there is no other choice but to give Palestine its independence. There is simply no other alternative. And the more you wait, the more blood is shed, the more anger grows, and the harder it gets. And yet, there is no alternative... And everyone in Israel and in Palestine, knows that.


Amazingly, you and I are in agreement. Here's the thing though. Israel has on at least 3 separate occasions offered exactly that. They've offered every single thing that the Palestinians wanted *except* the right of return. They've offered to give all the land taken back. They've offered to pull their own settlers out. They've offered to help fund for any costs involved. They have done everything they possibly could to help the Palestinians gain that "dream" of a state of their own. And they have been rejected.


There's a point at which one must acknowledge that a significant cause of the conflict is the fact that there are powerful factions within the Palestinian movement who don't want the conflict to end. They want their people to be stuck in this eternal refugee condition. They like it because it gives them power and influence which they might not keep if a stable state were created. If you want to find why this situation hasn't been resolved peacefully, look to the Palestinian leaders. They are the ones who find some excuse to back out of any agreement that comes along, no matter how much it meets everything they claim that they really want.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#45 Oct 01 2010 at 3:44 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Yes. And the fear (as I clearly stated in the sentence you quoted) is that if the Muslim Palestinians gain a majority,


What they would do should they gain a majority is irrelevant. The whole point of Israel is that it's a Jewish state. The only way to keep that is to keep a Jewish majority in the country.

It's not about what Palestinians would do should they become the majority. Even if they tuned it into a perfectly liberal, democratic, tolerant country, it still wouldn't be acceptable. There are already plenty of countries like this around the world. It's about Jewish people being the majority. Which is fine, I don't especially have a problem with that, but that's the reality.

Quote:
Part of the demands connected to the "right of return" would require returning the property and providing for those who returned.


You don't really get it. The return of the refugees is symbolic. They want it acknowledged. They want recognition of Nakba. It's about History and narrative. The Palestinians, both those in the West Bank and those in the caps of Lebanon and Jordan, know full well the return will never happen. That's not the problem. It hasn't been for 30 years.

Quote:
Here's the thing though. Israel has on at least 3 separate occasions offered exactly that.


They've never, ever, offered anything remotely close that.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#46 Oct 01 2010 at 4:19 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Yes. And the fear (as I clearly stated in the sentence you quoted) is that if the Muslim Palestinians gain a majority,


What they would do should they gain a majority is irrelevant.


It's incredibly relevant if you are a Jew living in Israel.

Quote:
The whole point of Israel is that it's a Jewish state. The only way to keep that is to keep a Jewish majority in the country.


Sure. Or at least a majority who respect the idea that Israel is a Jewish state. Um... Jewish state or not, Israel does not impose Jewish religious rules on its citizens, whereas nearly all Muslim states do. So it's a bit unfair to simply call it a Jewish state as though we're comparing apples to oranges.

It's closer to saying that the UK is an Anglican State. Aside from some state functions and ceremony and whatnot, the majority of the citizenry wouldn't know that there's technically an "official state religion". That's not even remotely similar to what we're seeing in Muslim controlled states right now.

Quote:
Quote:
Part of the demands connected to the "right of return" would require returning the property and providing for those who returned.


You don't really get it. The return of the refugees is symbolic. They want it acknowledged. They want recognition of Nakba. It's about History and narrative. The Palestinians, both those in the West Bank and those in the caps of Lebanon and Jordan, know full well the return will never happen. That's not the problem. It hasn't been for 30 years.


And you are being naive. They don't just want acknowledgment. They want to actually return. They have been very very clear about this. It's not like they are being coy about this in any way. Only the most deluded western liberals could possibly think that they just want recognition and acknowledgment and then all will be fine.

Quote:
Quote:
Here's the thing though. Israel has on at least 3 separate occasions offered exactly that.


They've never, ever, offered anything remotely close that.


Yup. Deluded western liberal. Pop up from under that rock you've been hiding under and you might see that the world isn't what you think it is.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#47 Oct 01 2010 at 6:56 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

One of my best friends family was displaced by the Jews, which forced his family (which had lived on the west bank for over 500yrs) to move to the US. Does that count? He has a great sense of humour about the jews. Of course he's as miserly as they are.

Having spent quite a bit of time with some jews wouldn't you agree they tend to be extremely price conscious on every little thing? Didn't really talk to them about politics because they were always focused on making, or saving, money.

Your best friend is a Palestinian?! Does the RNC know this?!

I think homeland Security should be alerted.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#48 Oct 02 2010 at 11:25 AM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

One of my best friends family was displaced by the Jews, which forced his family (which had lived on the west bank for over 500yrs) to move to the US. Does that count? He has a great sense of humour about the jews. Of course he's as miserly as they are.

Having spent quite a bit of time with some jews wouldn't you agree they tend to be extremely price conscious on every little thing? Didn't really talk to them about politics because they were always focused on making, or saving, money.
Why wouldn't they want to come to the US? It's by far the best country on the planet, why do you hate this country?
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#49 Oct 02 2010 at 12:57 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
It's by far the best country on the planet,


Hehe /pat.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#50 Oct 02 2010 at 6:28 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
paulsol wrote:
Quote:
It's by far the best country on the planet,


Hehe /pat.
/whoosh
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 417 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (417)