- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Democrat class on display...
Democrat class on display...Follow
Hey, if Stephen Colbert is good enough to speak before President Bush at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner, obviously he's good enough to speak before a bunch of jamokes in Congress.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
varusword75 wrote:
Bush did it to.
Right! I'm glad you agree with me. Maybe someday we'll work on your fawning glorification of men who assault women but small victories in your progress are still important.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
varusword75 wrote:
Joph,
Hey what a surprise you fail at reading comp 101, again.
Just because W did something doesn't mean it was the right thing. Despite what liberals think there were quite a few things W was sub-par at; immigration reform, to much govn spending, tax cuts not comprehensive enough, and so on.
I am glad that you think W was right about something. Now if we can just get you to understand the difference between right and wrong we'll get somewhere.
Edited, Sep 24th 2010 2:55pm by varusword75
Hey what a surprise you fail at reading comp 101, again.
Just because W did something doesn't mean it was the right thing. Despite what liberals think there were quite a few things W was sub-par at; immigration reform, to much govn spending, tax cuts not comprehensive enough, and so on.
I am glad that you think W was right about something. Now if we can just get you to understand the difference between right and wrong we'll get somewhere.
Edited, Sep 24th 2010 2:55pm by varusword75
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
varusword75 wrote:
Just because W did something doesn't mean it was the right thing.
Right!
Quote:
there were quite a few things W was sub-par at
A-men!
See!? We're building bridges here! We agree that Bush did it and that Bush sucked at a lot of stuff! Hooray!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
varusword75 wrote:
Joph,
Is that it? Bush did it to.
Is that it? Bush did it to.
Bush did it to what?
Wait. I don't really want to know.
Elinda,
No, it's alright to knock out a crazed ********* who's thrashing wildly at you. Unless of course you don't believe men should have the right to defend themselves against crazy b*tches.
No, it's alright to knock out a crazed ********* who's thrashing wildly at you. Unless of course you don't believe men should have the right to defend themselves against crazy b*tches.
varusword75 wrote:
No, it's alright to knock out a crazed ********* who's thrashing wildly at you.
Hey, however you have to rationalize it to yourself when you punch women in the face. I'm not sure the cop will agree though.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
No, it's alright to knock out a crazed ********* who's thrashing wildly at you.
Hey, however you have to rationalize it to yourself when you punch women in the face. I'm not sure the cop will agree though.
varusword75 wrote:
Elinda,
No, it's alright to knock out a crazed ********* who's thrashing wildly at you. Unless of course you don't believe men should have the right to defend themselves against crazy b*tches.
No, it's alright to knock out a crazed ********* who's thrashing wildly at you. Unless of course you don't believe men should have the right to defend themselves against crazy b*tches.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
As a woman, Varrus would hit you. As a man, Varrus would hit on you. Who has it worse?
Edited, Sep 24th 2010 5:52pm by Allegory
Edited, Sep 24th 2010 5:52pm by Allegory
Varus. Your anger is an energy. Just imagine what you could do with your life if you directed your energy somewhere useful....
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.
paulsol wrote:
Varus. Your anger is an energy. Just imagine what you could do with your life if you directed your energy somewhere useful....
It must be a scary world to varus where women are free to go about in public, have opinions, etc. You'd think he would be more in favor of extremist Muslim cultures who keep women covered and quiet.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
I wonder if reply to thread works in IE9?
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
I wonder if reply to thread works in IE9?
Professor shintasama wrote:
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
I wonder if reply to thread works in IE9?
It was. I didn't think anyone was using that thread...
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
varusword75 wrote:
Are you saying these rude democrat b*tches weren't the crazy ragged hair foaming at the mouth liberals who simply lost it and attacked the wrong guy?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
varusword75 wrote:
Funny how CNN didn't bother to get anyone elses opinion on what happened.
Zomg! Funny how FOX doesn't have stories about how the women flipped out ninja style and attacked this poor helpless man even though Angle supporters outnumbered Reid's 4:1 at the event. Sooooo funny!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
varusword75 wrote:
This is why this story is bs and in fact another glaring example of how democrats behave.
So is this a ******** story, or is it a glaring example of how democrats behave? Or maybe it's a ******** glaring example of how democrats behave?
I love your thought process, though. Well, "thought" and "process" both being loosely defined.
Varrus' 101 to making a thread:
- Link a story you haven't read, but which you think might show democrats in a bad light.
- Get upset when story is shown to portray republicans in a bad light.
- Attack democrats in said story, preferably through the use of a derogatory epithet not used since the early 90s.
- Attack liberal media for not also attacking democrats in said story.
- ********** to gay ****.
- Invent some facts and re-write the story so it fits your original narrative.
- Whip your ***** with a leather glove while reciting Hail Mary.
- Blame Obama.
Red,
Of course it could be as simple as the template you go by;
GOP = bad
Conservative = bad
Of course it could be as simple as the template you go by;
GOP = bad
Conservative = bad
varusword75 wrote:
Red,
Of course it could be as simple as the template you go by;
GOP = bad
Conservative = bad
Of course it could be as simple as the template you go by;
GOP = bad
Conservative = bad
Its telling that you still think GOP = conservative.
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.
Recent Visitors: 308
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (308)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Democrat class on display...
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC