Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Delaware politicsFollow

#152 Sep 20 2010 at 5:56 PM Rating: Good
varusword75 wrote:
Conservatives have no intention of altering anyones actions.
Speak for yourself. "Work or get the fuck out of this country" has a nice ring to it.
#153 Sep 20 2010 at 6:11 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
MDenham wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Conservatives have no intention of altering anyones actions.
Speak for yourself. "Work or get the fuck out of this country" has a nice ring to it.


And the second that conservatives advocate passing a law automatically deporting any citizen who isn't employed, you'll have a point.

What conservatives are actually opposed to is the creation of laws which make it easier for people to not work and not suffer any of the natural consequences of that condition. I'll point out again the tendency for the left to fail to recognize the difference between acting in a way which hurts someone and failing to act in a way which helps them. If I *don't* provide you with welfare benefits, I'm not creating laws to hurt you, I'm simply not creating laws to help you. Those really are two very significantly different things.

Conservatives believe in individual liberty coupled with individual responsibility. You are supposed to take responsibility for your life, not the government. We don't hold that position because we hate people and want them to suffer. We hold that position because we understand that the degree to which the government takes responsibility for your life is also the same degree to which the government controls your life. We understand the relationship between liberty and government intervention.


My point is that some liberals do as well. Which is precisely why the "causes" of the left are so carefully framed in purely helpful terms. The bulk of liberals are constantly told that what they're doing is helping this group or that group. They're told not to think about government "size" since that's not what this is about, right? It's all about feeding the hungry, helping the helpless, and fighting against social injustice inherent in the world around them. Ignore the big government man behind the curtain! He's not something you need concern yourself with. Just keep your blinders firmly attached and look at the important causes in front of you!


At the end of the day, intention is wonderful, but we really ought to look at results as well, right?

Edited, Sep 20th 2010 5:12pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#154 Sep 20 2010 at 6:22 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
And the second that conservatives advocate passing a law automatically deporting any citizen who isn't employed, you'll have a point.


Poor old Sarkozy.
#155 Sep 20 2010 at 7:37 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
gbaji wrote:
And the second that conservatives advocate passing a law automatically deporting any citizen who isn't employed, you'll have a point.
I believe one just did.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#156 Sep 20 2010 at 9:07 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
I believe one just did.

He's no true Scotsman.
#157 Sep 20 2010 at 9:07 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
gbaji wrote:
And the second that conservatives advocate passing a law automatically deporting any citizen who isn't employed, you'll have a point.
I believe one just did.


Er? Who?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#158 Sep 20 2010 at 11:16 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
MDenham wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Conservatives have no intention of altering anyones actions.
Speak for yourself. "Work or get the fuck out of this country" has a nice ring to it.


And the second that conservatives advocate passing a law automatically deporting any citizen who isn't employed, you'll have a point.
Who said anything about trying to make a point? I like the idea.
#159 Sep 20 2010 at 11:35 PM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
gbaji,

Is there not also a dangerous line to be drawn for corporate control? I don't think there's any real question as to the existence of the class war, or the hand of "business interests" in the US government... Are you not ignoring the big business man behind the curtain in this sense?
#160 Sep 21 2010 at 12:01 AM Rating: Good
***
1,877 posts
Gbaji wrote:
You are supposed to take responsibility for your life, not the government. We don't hold that position because we hate people and want them to suffer.


Well that is sig worthy if I do say so myself. ;P
#161 Sep 21 2010 at 8:52 AM Rating: Default
Gbaji,

Quote:
group or that group. They're told not to think about government "size" since that's not what this is about, right? It's all about feeding the hungry, helping the helpless, and fighting against social injustice inherent in the world around them.


Don't forget preserving the climate against the evils of humanity.


p.s. Did you hear we're not supposed to call it global warming anymore?

#162 Sep 21 2010 at 8:55 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
p.s. Did you hear we're not supposed to call it global warming anymore?


Global warming was always a misnomer. Anthropomorphic climate change didn't carry the same ring so it didn't get picked up as easily by the masses - however, that seems to be the label most commonly used by scientists discussing the matter.
#163 Sep 21 2010 at 9:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
LockeColeMA wrote:
Anthropomorphic climate change

Anthropogenic. Unless you mean to add arms and legs to it and put it in a children's cartoon.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#164 Sep 21 2010 at 9:36 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Jophiel wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Anthropomorphic climate change

Anthropogenic. Unless you mean to add arms and legs to it and put it in a children's cartoon.
That would give my daughter nightmares.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#165 Sep 21 2010 at 9:41 AM Rating: Good
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Anthropomorphic climate change

Anthropogenic. Unless you mean to add arms and legs to it and put it in a children's cartoon.
That would give my daughter nightmares.


Don't let her watch Fern Gully, then.
#166 Sep 21 2010 at 10:41 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Jophiel wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Anthropomorphic climate change

Anthropogenic. Unless you mean to add arms and legs to it and put it in a children's cartoon.


That smiling baby sun in Teletubbies? That's what's happening, Joph. Be afraid. VERY afraid.
#167 Sep 21 2010 at 12:12 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Anthropomorphic climate change

Anthropogenic. Unless you mean to add arms and legs to it and put it in a children's cartoon.
That would give my daughter nightmares.
It's exactly what I would expect to see from the horror show that is anthro-con.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#168 Sep 21 2010 at 5:35 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Quadkit wrote:
gbaji,

Is there not also a dangerous line to be drawn for corporate control? I don't think there's any real question as to the existence of the class war, or the hand of "business interests" in the US government... Are you not ignoring the big business man behind the curtain in this sense?


No. We have laws which limit the control a business can have. We restrict their influence and control in a given market. We restrict the ways in which they can shift money around. And ultimately they are bound by the laws of economics. I'm not denying that out of control corporations can do bad things, but not nearly so much as out of control governments.

At the end of the day, the government has the power to check the corporations. But the only check on government's power is continued vigilance on the part of the citizenry. Which is kinda what the Tea Party is about, isn't it? What we have going on is the odd situation of a group of people yelling and attacking another group for doing something which we should really all be doing (keeping an eye on government power and making sure it doesn't get out of control). Debating specifics is fine, but to attack the entire broadly held position just seems counterproductive.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#169 Sep 21 2010 at 10:08 PM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
gbaji,

Yet can you honestly stand and say, with a straight face, that those regulations are being followed? Tylenol, Walmart, BP, how many more examples do you need before it's a problem?
#170 Sep 21 2010 at 11:05 PM Rating: Good
****
4,901 posts
gbaji wrote:
No. We have laws which limit the control a business can have. We restrict their influence and control in a given market. We restrict the ways in which they can shift money around. And ultimately they are bound by the laws of economics. I'm not denying that out of control corporations can do bad things, but not nearly so much as out of control governments.

At the end of the day, the government has the power to check the corporations. But the only check on government's power is continued vigilance on the part of the citizenry. Which is kinda what the Tea Party is about, isn't it? What we have going on is the odd situation of a group of people yelling and attacking another group for doing something which we should really all be doing (keeping an eye on government power and making sure it doesn't get out of control). Debating specifics is fine, but to attack the entire broadly held position just seems counterproductive.


That's rich. I hope you laughed as much writing it as I did reading it.
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
#171 Sep 22 2010 at 2:46 AM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Conservatives have no intention of altering anyones actions.
Republicans are by nature authoritarian. That means they have plenty of intention to tell you what you can and can't do.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#172 Sep 22 2010 at 3:07 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Allegory,


Anytime someone starts talking about "fairness" in the govn I cringe. The govn is not supposed to be governed by those attempting to achieve some sort of intangible utopic dream society. It's supposed to be based on laws they agree on that apply to everyone equally. This just goes back to the whole freedom vs fairness argument liberals have been having with conservatives since time began.


Oh, you don't think that having laws that are agreed on that apply to everyone equally is a fair and utopian idea?
#173 Sep 22 2010 at 11:52 AM Rating: Default
Aripya,

Quote:
Oh, you don't think that having laws that are agreed on that apply to everyone equally is a fair and utopian idea?


I think it's a great idea. Now why don't you take that back to your Dems buddies and we can start enacting this dream of equality by shutting down the irs and instituting a flat tax.

Do you think 60% of the people should be able to agree that 5% should pay all the taxes?

Right now our tax laws don't apply to everyoe equally and the Dems have no intention of ever changing this.

#174 Sep 22 2010 at 11:56 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
And the Republicans do? They'll never do a flat tax either as it'll mean raising taxes on the bulk of their constituents. The GOP plays "Fuck the middle class" as well as the Dems do.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#175 Sep 22 2010 at 3:47 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
bsphil wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Conservatives have no intention of altering anyones actions.
Republicans are by nature authoritarian. That means they have plenty of intention to tell you what you can and can't do.



And that's exactly what you have been taught to assume. But when we actually look at the policies and actions of the two parties, we find that the opposite is actually true. That's kinda the point I'm making here, that people are taught to assume that "conservative=authoritarian" and "liberal=liberty" so just repeating the assertion is meaningless. Perhaps if you actually looked around you, it might help to see the truth.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#176 Sep 22 2010 at 3:55 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
And that's exactly what you have been taught to assume. But when we actually look at the policies and actions of the two parties, we find that the opposite is actually true. That's kinda the point I'm making here, that people are taught to assume that "conservative=authoritarian" and "liberal=liberty" so just repeating the assertion is meaningless. Perhaps if you actually looked around you, it might help to see the truth.


Oddly enough, when I look around, I find that conservatives are very authoritarian on the issues that I care about. They want to make abortion illegal. They want to keep homosexuals in the closet (ie same-sex marriage and DADT). The liberal point of view is more about freedom.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 289 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (289)