Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Girl murders bucket of puppiesFollow

#102 Sep 15 2010 at 1:53 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Elinda wrote:
Tu quoque


Smiley: dubious



Also: there really ought to be a term for the fallacy of arguing that something isn't wrong because other things are worse. Does one exist that I'm unaware of?

Edited, Sep 15th 2010 4:00pm by Eske
#103 Sep 15 2010 at 2:19 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Eske, Star Breaker wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Tu quoque


Smiley: dubious



Also: there really ought to be a term for the fallacy of arguing that something isn't wrong because other things are worse. Does one exist that I'm unaware of?

Edited, Sep 15th 2010 4:00pm by Eske
Isn't that straw man?
#104 Sep 15 2010 at 2:31 PM Rating: Good
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Eske, Star Breaker wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Tu quoque


Smiley: dubious



Also: there really ought to be a term for the fallacy of arguing that something isn't wrong because other things are worse. Does one exist that I'm unaware of?

Edited, Sep 15th 2010 4:00pm by Eske
Isn't that straw man?


I thought a straw man was arguing about something to deflect from the actual discussion.
#105 Sep 15 2010 at 2:51 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,053 posts
/gets on her soapbox.

Doesn't matter if anyone watch the puppies drown or not. Dumping a pet along the side of the road, in the wild or drowning them is illegal and become a public nuisance when they go feral. In a city feral cats become a public health problem as they spread fleas and illnesses that affect both humans and cats.

After having to put my cat asleep last week, I'm not about to watch the video. We think my daughter house, former own was a cat lady, as she has a constant problem with feral cats hanging around it and getting in the basement though a hole in the crawl space. She is constantly looking for homes for the cats and kittens that end up living around their house as it's illegal for her to feed them and no matter how often she takes them to the SPCA, there are always new litters of unwanted kittens around where she lives.

Another problem with feral cats is inbreeding, I learn when we took in a kitten years ago and found it's jaw was malformed. Our cats are always recused cats and Godiva was a pure breed Chocolate York, who our vet thinks was abbanded by a breeder, because she wasn't able to have healty kittens they could sell. At six months she had signs of already having 2 litters. We are one of the few families our vet will allow to adoubt cats who have personality issues.

It had been empty for years before her boyfriend brought the house and he found the remains of several cats along the shelf were foundation and walls meet.

Note it's a very old house with only a narrow basement with dirt walls and floor, and since the cats they do own are outdoor cats, they don't want to cover up the hole.

/gets off her soapbox.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#106 Sep 15 2010 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
A strawman is a misrepresentation of someone's argument that is then argued against or 'knocked down' rather than address what they are actually saying.
#107 Sep 15 2010 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good
Kavekk the Pest wrote:
A strawman is a misrepresentation of someone's argument that is then argued against or 'knocked down' rather than address what they are actually saying.


I was close. In The Price is Right I'd win the showcase. Smiley: nod
#108 Sep 15 2010 at 3:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kavekk the Pest wrote:
A strawman is a misrepresentation of someone's argument that is then argued against or 'knocked down' rather than address what they are actually saying.

Or the creation of your own weak argument so you can knock it down and prove yourself right.

"Nuclear energy is safe and clean. You may be thinking of Three Mile Island but let me tell you that not a single person died in that incident."

There are far better arguments against the safety and environmental effects of nuclear power than Three Mile Island and there is even a better argument to be made about TMI but by creating the argument myself and discrediting it, I have made my main point sound more convincing.

Said for the benefit of others, not to "correct" Kavekk
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#109 Sep 15 2010 at 3:11 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
varusword75 wrote:
So what you people are saying is I shouldn't post that video of my dog eating precious little kittens?

Was he hungry or just playing with them?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#110 Sep 15 2010 at 4:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Psychopaths, now pretty much an extinct term I recall being tied tightly to empathy (the lack of it) displayed usually by committing physical savage acts and feeling no remorse for the outcome.


This is incorrect.

If you know 100 people, chances are very good that you know 2 sociopaths. They don't necessarily stand out in a crowd because of any propensity for cruelty. They don't connect with human emotion, but they don't necessarily get off on the suffering of others, either. Cruelty to animals may or may not be a symptom.

If they can fake it well enough to pass, and if their poor impulse control doesn't betray them, they can do quite well for themselves, materially at least.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#111 Sep 15 2010 at 4:34 PM Rating: Good
Samira wrote:
Quote:
Psychopaths, now pretty much an extinct term I recall being tied tightly to empathy (the lack of it) displayed usually by committing physical savage acts and feeling no remorse for the outcome.


This is incorrect.

If you know 100 people, chances are very good that you know 2 sociopaths. They don't necessarily stand out in a crowd because of any propensity for cruelty. They don't connect with human emotion, but they don't necessarily get off on the suffering of others, either. Cruelty to animals may or may not be a symptom.

If they can fake it well enough to pass, and if their poor impulse control doesn't betray them, they can do quite well for themselves, materially at least.


If you know a hundred conservatives, chances are you have made some bad decisions know far more than two have a lot of friends, good for you.
#112 Sep 15 2010 at 4:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
If you know 100 people on =4, chances are very good that you know 40+ sociopaths.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#113 Sep 15 2010 at 5:02 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
If you know 100 people on =4, chances are very good that you know 40+ sociopaths.


Oh come on, we don't have that many socks.
#114 Sep 15 2010 at 5:36 PM Rating: Decent
*
77 posts
Quote:
Oh come on, we don't have that many socks.


How many socks does Varus have at this point?
#115 Sep 15 2010 at 6:08 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Eske, Star Breaker wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Tu quoque


Smiley: dubious



Also: there really ought to be a term for the fallacy of arguing that something isn't wrong because other things are worse. Does one exist that I'm unaware of?

Edited, Sep 15th 2010 4:00pm by Eske
I guess you gotta go back to the beginning again. I wasn't arguing that one form of animal abuse is worse than another. Nor I was arguing that killing these puppies wasn't wrong. I was arguing that the outrage is misplaced - even hypocritical. There's an internet lynch mob that's willing to string up and hang a girl in another country for killing some unwanted animals as instructed by her grandma. Yet, I can bet most of them complacently agree to the torture of millions of animals daily.

Go hug your puppy now.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#116 Sep 15 2010 at 6:12 PM Rating: Default
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
Elinda wrote:
Eske, Star Breaker wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Tu quoque


Smiley: dubious



Also: there really ought to be a term for the fallacy of arguing that something isn't wrong because other things are worse. Does one exist that I'm unaware of?

Edited, Sep 15th 2010 4:00pm by Eske
I guess you gotta go back to the beginning again. I wasn't arguing that one form of animal abuse is worse than another. Nor I was arguing that killing these puppies wasn't wrong. I was arguing that the outrage is misplaced - even hypocritical. There's an internet lynch mob that's willing to string up and hang a girl in another country for killing some unwanted animals as instructed by her grandma. Yet, I can bet most of them complacently agree to the torture of millions of animals daily.

Go hug your puppy now.


Which is pretty much the definition of "Tu quoque" Give me the shovel, that hole is deep enough already.
#117 Sep 15 2010 at 6:12 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,149 posts
ElneClare wrote:
We think my daughter house, former own was a cat lady, as she has a constant problem with feral cats hanging around it and getting in the basement though a hole in the crawl space.

I learn when we took in a kitten years ago and found it's jaw was malformed. Our cats are always recused cats and Godiva was a pure breed Chocolate York, who our vet thinks was abbanded by a breeder, because she wasn't able to have healty kittens they could sell. At six months she had signs of already having 2 litters. We are one of the few families our vet will allow to adoubt cats who have personality issues.

It had been empty for years before her boyfriend brought the house and he found the remains of several cats along the shelf were foundation and walls meet.

Note it's a very old house with only a narrow basement with dirt walls and floor, and since the cats they do own are outdoor cats, they don't want to cover up the hole.

/gets off her soapbox.


Uhm, What?
____________________________
Dandruffshampoo wrote:
Curses, beaten by Professor stupidopo-opo.
Annabella, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Stupidmonkey is more organized than a bag of raccoons.
#118 Sep 15 2010 at 6:15 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
The One and Only ShadorVIII wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Eske, Star Breaker wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Tu quoque


Smiley: dubious



Also: there really ought to be a term for the fallacy of arguing that something isn't wrong because other things are worse. Does one exist that I'm unaware of?

Edited, Sep 15th 2010 4:00pm by Eske
I guess you gotta go back to the beginning again. I wasn't arguing that one form of animal abuse is worse than another. Nor I was arguing that killing these puppies wasn't wrong. I was arguing that the outrage is misplaced - even hypocritical. There's an internet lynch mob that's willing to string up and hang a girl in another country for killing some unwanted animals as instructed by her grandma. Yet, I can bet most of them complacently agree to the torture of millions of animals daily.

Go hug your puppy now.


Which is pretty much the definition of "Tu quoque" Give me the shovel, that hole is deep enough already.
I've not a clue what Tu queque means. I was responding to this.

Quote:
Also: there really ought to be a term for the fallacy of arguing that something isn't wrong because other things are worse. Does one exist that I'm unaware of?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#119 Sep 15 2010 at 6:18 PM Rating: Default
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
ElneClare wrote:
We think my daughter house, former own was a cat lady,


Hmmmm.... you aren't, by any chance, aurally challenged are you. Just wondering, as I have some friends that learned ASL, and for some reason the wording of this put me in mind of it.

I hope you aren't offended by my asking, its just that the sentence kinda struck me.
#120 Sep 15 2010 at 6:19 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
The One and Only ShadorVIII wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Eske, Star Breaker wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Tu quoque


Smiley: dubious



Also: there really ought to be a term for the fallacy of arguing that something isn't wrong because other things are worse. Does one exist that I'm unaware of?

Edited, Sep 15th 2010 4:00pm by Eske
I guess you gotta go back to the beginning again. I wasn't arguing that one form of animal abuse is worse than another. Nor I was arguing that killing these puppies wasn't wrong. I was arguing that the outrage is misplaced - even hypocritical. There's an internet lynch mob that's willing to string up and hang a girl in another country for killing some unwanted animals as instructed by her grandma. Yet, I can bet most of them complacently agree to the torture of millions of animals daily.

Go hug your puppy now.


Which is pretty much the definition of "Tu quoque"
According to the first google definition I passed. Yes, I appealed to hypocrisy. If the shoe fits, eh. It's a bit more civil than name calling.





Edited, Sep 16th 2010 2:20am by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#121 Sep 15 2010 at 6:23 PM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
Elinda wrote:

ShadorVIII wrote:

Which is pretty much the definition of "Tu quoque" Give me the shovel, that hole is deep enough already.


I've not a clue what Tu queque means. I was responding to this.



If you're going to debate with people, you really should learn the names and definitions of common logical fallacies, at the very least so you can know what assinine mistakes you're making.
#122 Sep 15 2010 at 6:23 PM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
ElneClare wrote:
We think the former owner of my daughter's house was a cat lady, as she has a constant problem with feral cats hanging around it and getting into the basement though a hole in the crawl space. I found out about this when we took in a kitten years ago and found out it's jaw was malformed.

Our cats are always rescue cats and Godiva was a pure breed Chocolate York, who our vet thinks was abandoned by a breeder because she wasn't able to have healthy kittens they could sell; at six months she had signs of already having 2 litters. We are one of the few families our vet will allow to adopt cats who have personality issues.

The house had been empty for years before her boyfriend bought it and he found the remains of several cats along the shelf where the foundation and walls meet.

Note it's a very old house with a narrow basement that has dirt walls and floor, and since the cats my daughter and her bf owns are outdoor cats they don't want to cover up the hole.

/gets off her soapbox.


Presenting new ElneClaire posts in a non-drowsy formula.



Edited, Sep 16th 2010 2:10pm by Shaowstrike
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#123 Sep 16 2010 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
The One and Only ShadorVIII wrote:
ElneClare wrote:
We think my daughter house, former own was a cat lady,


Hmmmm.... you aren't, by any chance, aurally challenged are you. Just wondering, as I have some friends that learned ASL, and for some reason the wording of this put me in mind of it.

I hope you aren't offended by my asking, its just that the sentence kinda struck me.


Yes I am, though my hearing test normal, I cannot distinguish the difference between several phonemes. Few people actually realize that I am aurally challenged. Most just think I have a New England accent, since I can't pronounce works like car and park since they both have |c| and |r| phonemes in them. Jonwin is one of 2 who on hearing me talk asked if I was deaf. The lower language functions center in my brain has a hard time distinguishing phonemes and at times words sound much like static to me, so I am self taught to read lips.

To compensate for the lower language center's failure to tell certain sounds apart, the higher language centers will develop more, to make up for it. Thus I have excellent reading skills and vocabulary that I struggle with since I can't spell phonetically.

Sentence should have read: We think my daughter's house, former owner was a cat lady.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#124 Sep 16 2010 at 12:07 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
The One and Only ShadorVIII wrote:
Elinda wrote:

ShadorVIII wrote:

Which is pretty much the definition of "Tu quoque" Give me the shovel, that hole is deep enough already.


I've not a clue what Tu queque means. I was responding to this.



If you're going to debate with people, you really should learn the names and definitions of common logical fallacies, at the very least so you can know what assinine mistakes you're making.
...or you could just speak English. This is not a debate forum. The asinine look is you using latin phrases in a showy attempt at snobbery. Rote memorization of foreign terms, even those from an extinct language, doesn't take a whole lots of smarts - just perseverance.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#125 Sep 16 2010 at 12:32 PM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
Elinda wrote:
This is not a debate forum.


Au contraire. Event if this is not a de jure debate forum, it certainly is a de facto one.

Elinda wrote:
According to the first google definition I passed. Yes, I appealed to hypocrisy. If the shoe fits, eh. It's a bit more civil than name calling.


And yet you still fail to grasp that arguing that some (or even most) people who hold position "x" are being hypocritical does not invalidate position "x".

Edited, Sep 16th 2010 2:38pm by ShadorVIII
#126 Sep 16 2010 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Au contraire. Event if this is not a de jure debate forum, it certainly is a de facto one.


You're Shador, ipso facto you're a slimy little fuck.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 185 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (185)