Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Reply To Thread

Muslim is the new Jew.Follow

#127 Sep 02 2010 at 10:00 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
They are not doing what they are doing because they think that Muslims in the US are oppressed. That's the most idiotic take on this I can imagine.
Nice misinterpretation. What I said amounts to that they look better in situations where they can spin it like that. Hence my line of "whether or not they actually are".

EDIT to add: They're not stupid. They'll take any opportunity we even appear to give them that they think can be used to make themselves look attractive to recruits. The key is to do what we can to negate whatever PR-type successes they can gin up as a means of cutting off the inflow of recruits, not just taking out people once they've joined. The fastest way to kill weeds isn't to just use a lawnmower on them - it's to take out the roots as well.

Quote:
Quote:
I'm not sure why you seem to think that the Taliban wins anything in the eyes of the pool of potential recruits in any situation other than "we look less reasonable than the Taliban".


Because they aren't doing what they are doing to "be reasonable". You're making the same mistake Neville Chamberlain made just prior to WW2. He assumed that the people he was dealing with wanted the same thing he did (peace). So he spent significant efforts attempting to get agreements for peace. All the while the other guys had no intention of keeping the agreements.

Same deal here. You're making the mistake of assuming that the Taliban wants peaceful and friendly relations with us. They don't. Thus, no amount of showing how nice we are will do anything other than convince them that they can get us to keep bending over and taking it from them. And not amount of *not* being nice to them will make them hate us more. They are likely laughing at the stupidity of the Americans who keep trying to be nice to them despite all the very very not-nice things they've done to us, and the more not-nice things they would like to do to us if we just let them.
The key here isn't being nice to the Taliban. It's being nice to the people who are on the fence as to whether or not they want to join the Taliban, on the chance that it stifles the Taliban's growth. If it doesn't work, we still have all our current options, in all their explosive glory. If it does work...

And there's a big, big difference between "the Taliban is reasonable" and "we look less reasonable than the Taliban (who are a bunch of raging nutcases, so looking less reasonable is possible but takes a lot of concerted stupidity)". Now, which one did I say? Oh, yeah, the one I had to tack snarky commentary onto because you're being intentionally obtuse.

Quote:
Don't be stupid. They don't want world peace. They don't want religious tolerance and a free society. Trying to avoid offending them on these grounds is moronic.
And assuming that everyone in areas exposed to the Taliban and its ilk is a lost cause is at least equally moronic, which is what you're doing.

That said, I've made it clear before that my preferred solution to the Taliban - and, really, most of Islam - can be summed up in three words: "glass parking lot".

Edited, Sep 2nd 2010 9:03pm by MDenham
#128 Sep 03 2010 at 3:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Also, stop confusing the Talibans with Al-Qaeda. They are not the same thing. The Talibans only really care about Afghanistan. The vast majority of them couldn't care less what happens with this stupid Mosque. And when the US is bombing and occupying their country, the planning laws in Lower Manhattan are the least of their ******* concerns.

The Mosque is a US domestic issue. It has nothing to do with terrorism, Al-Qaeda, or the War on Terror. And it's not even a bloody Mosque, it's a cultural centre. 3 blocks away from the Ground Zero. The whole controversy surrounding this issue directly relates to internal US dynamics, not to the outside world.

Al-Qaeda might care about this place, might, but even then what they think is irrelevant. Build it and maybe they'll claim a victory. Don't build it and maybe they'll claim oppression. Who gives a ****?? You really think the poor kids in the Yemeni desert, the teenagers in Afghanistan, the pupils in the pakistani Maddrassas, do you really think any of them would be swayed by the whatever the outcome of this whole charade?

The decision relating to that Cultural Centre in Lower Manhattan should be made purely with US values in mind. Which is hilarious in many ways, as the opponents of the construction of this Mosque seem to be asking the government to interfere in what is essentially private planning laws. Isn't that the government taking away your freeeeeeedoms?? Shouldn't private citizens be freeeeeee to build whatever they like wherever they like as long as it's legal and in accordance with the planning laws? Isn't that what "private property" is all about? Or are you guys just a bunch of massive cowering whining hypocrites?
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#129 Sep 03 2010 at 4:31 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
A mosque (or community centre) would be a huge step up from the rest of the businesses around that neighbourhood anyway, seeing as most of them are liquor stores or strip clubs.

And yeah. What Red said.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#130 Sep 03 2010 at 6:07 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
gbaji wrote:


Because they aren't doing what they are doing to "be reasonable". You're making the same mistake Neville Chamberlain made just prior to WW2. He assumed that the people he was dealing with wanted the same thing he did (peace). So he spent significant efforts attempting to get agreements for peace. All the while the other guys had no intention of keeping the agreements.

Same deal here. You're making the mistake of assuming that the Taliban wants peaceful and friendly relations with us. They don't. Thus, no amount of showing how nice we are will do anything other than convince them that they can get us to keep bending over and taking it from them. And not amount of *not* being nice to them will make them hate us more. They are likely laughing at the stupidity of the Americans who keep trying to be nice to them despite all the very very not-nice things they've done to us, and the more not-nice things they would like to do to us if we just let them.


Don't be stupid. They don't want world peace. They don't want religious tolerance and a free society. Trying to avoid offending them on these grounds is moronic.


Aaaaaand, Godwin'sed.
#131 Sep 03 2010 at 7:49 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
To be fair, this thread was implicitly Godwinsed from the start.
#132 Sep 03 2010 at 7:55 AM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Al-Qaeda might care about this place, might, but even then what they think is irrelevant. Build it and maybe they'll claim a victory. Don't build it and maybe they'll claim oppression. Who gives a sh*t??

QFT.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#133 Sep 03 2010 at 8:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Al-Qaeda might care about this place, might, but even then what they think is irrelevant. Build it and maybe they'll claim a victory. Don't build it and maybe they'll claim oppression. Who gives a sh*t??
Amen. The funny thing is that I'm supposed to be afraid of al'Qaeda's spin job. Oh no! You mean an organization will attempt to spin a situation to best meet their goals?

Although, ironically, now that some people have made such a huge deal of this, al'Qaeda will be able to declare it a tremendous victory if it's built rather than if everyone said "Eh, that's America and freedom of religion for you".

"My brothers, even though it made America scream and cry and stammer and wet their pants in fearful anger... still we built this mosque right on top of Ground Zero! Praise Allah!"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#134 Sep 03 2010 at 8:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
You're making the same mistake Neville Chamberlain made just prior to WW2. He assumed that the people he was dealing with wanted the same thing he did (peace).

Gbaji knows as much about WWII as he does the Boston Tea Party.

i.e. what he learned in the 9th grade.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#135 Sep 04 2010 at 1:14 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
So does this mean Muzzies will get their own country too? Umm, never mind. They already own half the planet. Don't worry though, we are busy reducing their population over here.
#136 Sep 04 2010 at 1:25 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Oh hi Totem! Glad to see you, I think we need you in here. Get some of your mates together and invade us here too. I mean that most sincerely.
#137 Sep 04 2010 at 1:45 AM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
Trust me on this, Ari, the people I work for would have the vast majority of the tards on this board on the ground, hands behind their heads, fingers spread, and legs crossed just praying someone moves without being told to. Braaaaaaap! One less liberal/terrorist/Left leaning "intellectual"/Muslim to have to keep checking on over their shoulders for that knife to stab them in the back later when they are released because of the ROE placed on them by the liberal/terrorist/Left leaning "intellectual"/Muslims.

Good to hear from you though, buddy.
:D
#138 Sep 04 2010 at 2:12 AM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Totem wrote:
Trust me on this, Ari, the people I work for would have the vast majority of the tards on this board on the ground, hands behind their heads, fingers spread, and legs crossed just praying someone moves without being told to.

Your boss is into BDSM?
#139 Sep 04 2010 at 5:10 AM Rating: Decent
*****
16,160 posts
If by BDSM you mean bound, dragged, shot, and murdered, yes. Seriously, these boys do not play around. World class athletes with all the latest weapons. Instead of being focused on scoring a touchdown or making a basket, they concentrate on lethality. Frightening bunch. Makes me glad they are on our side.

Totem
#140 Sep 04 2010 at 6:39 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Funny Allegory. You're their boss.
#141 Sep 04 2010 at 9:03 AM Rating: Good
Totem wrote:
If by BDSM you mean bound, dragged, shot, and murdered, yes. Seriously, these boys do not play around. World class athletes with all the latest weapons. Instead of being focused on scoring a touchdown or making a basket, they concentrate on lethality. Frightening bunch. Makes me glad they are on our side.

Totem


Yeah, me too. It'd be a crying shame to have such a fine bunch of upstanding gentleman annihilated mid-flight by an AIM missile to the face.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 358 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (358)