Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Muslim is the new Jew.Follow

#102 Sep 01 2010 at 1:19 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
gbaji wrote:


Quote:
I think you're sticking your head in the sand if you don't think that, as Ari implied in her OP, Muslims are being targetted far more and on a much larger scale than anyone else right now.


Where?


Aghanistan in particular, and the wider ME in general sorta springs to mind.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#103 Sep 01 2010 at 3:26 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
I have facts and data to support the very accurate assertion that muslims are required by their "prophet" to engage in acts of violence against non-believers


Enlighten us, please. Especially the "data" supporting the assertion that Muslims are required to kill non-believers. Because I live amongst a pretty vibrant Muslim community, and I'd love to know why I haven't been stabbed to death yet.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#104 Sep 01 2010 at 4:28 AM Rating: Excellent
****
4,158 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:

Enlighten us, please. Especially the "data" supporting the assertion that Muslims are required to kill non-believers. Because I live amongst a pretty vibrant Muslim community, and I'd love to know why I haven't been stabbed to death yet.


'Cos if they stabbed you to death, there would be no point keeping the corner shop open till late stocked to the gunwhales with boxes of 20 B&H, big blue Rizlas, yummy veggie samosas and packets of Walkers Cheese and Onion, D'uh!

Thats what Mohammed down at our corner shop says of me anyway. Smiley: grin

Also, varus is an ignorant ****.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#105 Sep 01 2010 at 9:12 AM Rating: Excellent
gbaji wrote:
No, it's not. It's being conflated with the ground zero mosque in order to make it appear as though the opposition to that mosque is based on the same bigotry, just on a much larger scale.


It is the same bigotry. It's all because of 9/11.

gbaji wrote:
The vandalism at the Murfreesboro site started long before the ground zero mosque became a national issue. They are unrelated. Certainly, the opposition to the building of the ground zero mosque did not "spread" somehow to other areas, as some are trying to imply.


They are related! You'd have to be an idiot to think they're not. I'm not saying that the Mosque in Murfreesboro is being targeted because of the "Ground Zero Mosque," but that they are both being targeted for the same bigotted reasons.

gbaji wrote:
Without being too obvious, if a group of Christians had destroyed the WTC in the name of their religion, I suspect you'd see the same kind of opposition to a giant mega church being built there as well.


I highly doubt that. In either case, though, why is the Mosque in Murfreesboro an issue? It has nothing to do with the WTC.

gbaji wrote:
The opposition to the ground zero mosque is based on the inappropriateness of building such a large structure dedicated to the same religion which led those attackers to destroy the WTC within sight of the remains of said building(s).


You seem to forget about a little thing called freedom of religion. If that's inappropriate, then I want to see all of the Christian churches anywhere near any women's clinics being protested because of the abortion bombings done in that religion's name. Smiley: rolleyes

gbaji wrote:
It's a national issue exactly because it has implications on a national level. The people of NY were not the only people attacked on 9/11. The entire country was. Regardless of the motives or meaning associated with the building of that mosque in the US by those building it, it will be seen as a victory by the very groups who attacked us on that day if it's raised at that location.


No, you moron. It's a victory for those very groups who attacked us that day if we go against our own freedoms and deny them that right. That's exactly what the terrorists want, and you're an idiot if you can't see that.

gbaji wrote:
Where?


And that, right there, is why you're sticking your head in the sand. You honestly have to ask? Smiley: oyvey
#106 Sep 01 2010 at 9:37 AM Rating: Excellent
A brilliant young man brought this image to my attention.

Screenshot
#107 Sep 01 2010 at 9:38 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
A lot of people just don't get the scope.

of course the red circle probably overlaps with the blue area at least a little, but that overlap is as significant as criminals in every part of our society.

Edited, Sep 1st 2010 10:41am by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#108 Sep 01 2010 at 9:46 AM Rating: Good
Sir Xsarus wrote:
of course the red circle probably overlaps with the blue area at least a little, but that overlap is as significant as criminals in every part of our society.


Yeah, it can't really be statistically significant, since if it was there would've been a lot more terror attacks in the US...
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#109 Sep 01 2010 at 1:41 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
I hope you noticed that.

Actually I'm certain that there are many regulars here who have noticed that.

But there are a depressing fuckton of people in Australia, America, and elsewhere who haven't noticed that.

They can't see the historic parallels at all.
Christianity is the new Mithraism, etc.

Sh*t's all the same and all fake anyway.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#110 Sep 01 2010 at 7:31 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
bsphil wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
I hope you noticed that.

Actually I'm certain that there are many regulars here who have noticed that.

But there are a depressing fuckton of people in Australia, America, and elsewhere who haven't noticed that.

They can't see the historic parallels at all.
Christianity is the new Mithraism, etc.

Sh*t's all the same and all fake anyway.

What, the fact that Christians and Muslims (and Jews, for that matter) all worship the same deity?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#111 Sep 01 2010 at 8:40 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
paulsol wrote:
gbaji wrote:


Quote:
I think you're sticking your head in the sand if you don't think that, as Ari implied in her OP, Muslims are being targetted far more and on a much larger scale than anyone else right now.


Where?


Aghanistan in particular, and the wider ME in general sorta springs to mind.


You don't suspect that the people being "targeted" in Afghanistan might just have something else other than their religion involved? Or is this another time when you ignore the whole "Leaders of the country sheltered the terrorist group who pulled off the 9/11 attacks" thing?

Also, I interpreted Belk's statement to be talking about Domestic treatment of Muslims. Since we were talking about things like opposition to building mosques and whatnot, that seemed more relevant.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#112gbaji, Posted: Sep 01 2010 at 9:01 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Then it should be easy to answer. Show me the statistics of Muslims being attacked or oppressed purely because they are Muslim. I always love when people just assume something so hard that they can't even contemplate that maybe their assumption is wrong.
#113 Sep 01 2010 at 9:08 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Quote:
You're kidding right? What they want is to be able to show their friends that 10 years after they attacked us on 9/11, the people in the US are surrendering to their version of Islam.


Am I reading this correctly? You're saying that the purpose of this mosque, two blocks away from ground zero, legally owned for years by a Muslim foundation and already used for religious ceremonies and services, is being turned into a mosque as a way to show their friends that the US is surrendering to Islam?

Note you said, in completely clear terms, that the builders of this mosque are showing their friends that the US has surrendered to their version of Islam.

gbaji, with this statement alone, discounting your years of idiotic posting, you have proved yourself and idiot and bigot on the same levels of varus. You are NOT worth debating.
#114 Sep 01 2010 at 10:23 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
gbaji wrote:




You don't suspect that the people being "targeted" in Afghanistan might just have something else other than their religion involved? Or is this another time when you ignore the whole "Leaders of the country sheltered the terrorist group who pulled off the 9/11 attacks" thing?


I can see a lot of people getting killed, some of whom maybe Taleban, probably none of which are Al Qeada, most of which are civilians, and all of which are muslims. In a muslim country, by (mostly Christian) occupying troops.



gbaji wrote:
Also, I interpreted Belk's statement to be talking about Domestic treatment of Muslims. Since we were talking about things like opposition to building mosques and whatnot, that seemed more relevant.



One of the things that 'we' in the West tend to not understand, is that muslims are muslims. They don't see themselves as 'seperate' just because of geographic distance. Unfortunately this misunderstanding is just one of many that has led to situation the world finds itself in today.
Gbaji wrote:

Then it should be easy to answer. Show me the statistics of Muslims being attacked or oppressed purely because they are Muslim. I always love when people just assume something so hard that they can't even contemplate that maybe their assumption is wrong.


I dont know if anyones keeping count, but finding cases like this isn't too hard.

If you want to look further afield, like I said, look to Afghanistan, Iraq, Gaza etc etc.

Edited, Sep 2nd 2010 4:24am by paulsol
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#115 Sep 01 2010 at 10:57 PM Rating: Good
Quote:

You're kidding right? What they want is to be able to show their friends that 10 years after they attacked us on 9/11, the people in the US are surrendering to their version of Islam. And to prove it, they need only show a picture of the crescent moon on top of a tall mosque overshadowing the hole in the ground where the WTC used to be. And *you* are an idiot if you don't see that they don't care about the things you care about. Stop trying to judge a group of radical fundamentalist terrorists by your own standards. They certainly don't.


You've said some rock stupid things Gbaji, but that's in your top 10.
#116 Sep 01 2010 at 11:00 PM Rating: Excellent
gbaji wrote:
So there are no responses possible to the 9/11 attacks which cannot be labeled by you are "bigotry"? That seems simple minded.


I honestly have no idea what that means.

Quote:
No, they aren't. Can you grasp the concept that two similar things can happen for different reasons? And in this case, the only thing similar about them is that they both involve mosques.


Quote:
Which should be your first clue that the motivation for the opposition to those two mosques is... wait for it... different. They are not related, as you claimed above.


Smiley: facepalm

You used to attempt to sound smart. It's like you're not even trying anymore.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/22/AR2010082202895.html?hpid=topnews wrote:
MURFREESBORO, TENN. -- For more than 30 years, the Muslim community in this Nashville suburb has worshipped quietly in a variety of makeshift spaces -- a one-bedroom apartment, an office behind a Lube Express -- attracting little notice even after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

But when the community's leaders proposed a 52,900-square-foot Islamic center with a school and a swimming pool this year, the vehement backlash from their neighbors caught them by surprise. Opponents crowded county meetings and held a noisy protest in the town square that drew hundreds, some carrying signs such as "Keep Tennessee Terror Free."


So... it's almost like they don't want the Ground Zero Mosque built because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks... and people in Murfreesboro don't want the Murfreesboro Mosque built because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

But no, that can't be right. Because gbaji says they aren't related at all. Smiley: rolleyes

Quote:
If you truly want to show you respect people, and want to earn their respect as well, you have to start by giving them some respect in the first place. Regardless of intent, building the mosque at that location is a bad idea.


Sure. They shouldn't build a mosque on the same site that had a mosque built on it when the terror attacks happened. That would be silly.

ETA: Maybe I'm wrong about this. I heard somewhere that this property was owned by the developers long before the attacks, is that wrong?

Quote:
You're kidding right? What they want is to be able to show their friends that 10 years after they attacked us on 9/11, the people in the US are surrendering to their version of Islam. And to prove it, they need only show a picture of the crescent moon on top of a tall mosque overshadowing the hole in the ground where the WTC used to be. And *you* are an idiot if you don't see that they don't care about the things you care about. Stop trying to judge a group of radical fundamentalist terrorists by your own standards. They certainly don't.


http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/08/report_taliban_using_mosque_co.html wrote:
Newsweek is reporting that the Taliban is using controversy over the “Ground Zero mosque” to raise money and recruit new fighters, both inside and outside Afghanistan.

It’s proved such an effective tool that “it now heads the list of talking points in Taliban meetings with fighters, villagers, and potential recruits,” the weekly says.

“By preventing this mosque from being built, America is doing us a big favor,” a Taliban operative named Zabihullah told the weekly. “It’s providing us with more recruits, donations, and popular support.”


Not my standards. This mosque is not the taliban or Al-Qaeda's version of Islam. By saying it is, you sound like varus. Congratulations.

Oh, and yes, that's pretty fucking bigoted to judge an entire religion on the actions of a few.

Quote:
Then it should be easy to answer. Show me the statistics of Muslims being attacked or oppressed purely because they are Muslim. I always love when people just assume something so hard that they can't even contemplate that maybe their assumption is wrong.


Honestly, I don't have statistics about Muslims being treated badly because getting yelled at, snubbed, ignored at a store, or refused service isn't really reported. But it happens. You are honestly going to sit there and pretend it doesn't? While people are vandalizing the building site for mosques, debating whether or not a mosque should be built in New York, and knifing cab drivers because they are Muslim? Are you blind...?

Edited, Sep 2nd 2010 12:05am by Belkira
#117 Sep 02 2010 at 6:34 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,053 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Are you blind...?


Mr. Smiley: tinfoilhat is always blind when it comes to justice.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#118 Sep 02 2010 at 12:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Debalic wrote:
bsphil wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
I hope you noticed that.

Actually I'm certain that there are many regulars here who have noticed that.

But there are a depressing fuckton of people in Australia, America, and elsewhere who haven't noticed that.

They can't see the historic parallels at all.
Christianity is the new Mithraism, etc.

Sh*t's all the same and all fake anyway.

What, the fact that Christians and Muslims (and Jews, for that matter) all worship the same deity?
And they're all also just rehashings of older deities. Always surprises me that people can look at identical stories with different names and claim with certainty that one is correct and that all others (most of them older, at that) are false.

Religion is silly.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#119 Sep 02 2010 at 5:52 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Quote:
You're kidding right? What they want is to be able to show their friends that 10 years after they attacked us on 9/11, the people in the US are surrendering to their version of Islam.


Am I reading this correctly?


No. You apparently aren't. Let me put back the statement I responded to, and clarify it for you:

Quote:
Quote:
No, you moron. It's a victory for those very groups who attacked us that day if we go against our own freedoms and deny them that right. That's exactly what the terrorists want, and you're an idiot if you can't see that.

You're kidding right? What they want is to be able to show their friends that 10 years after they attacked us on 9/11, the people in the US are surrendering to their version of Islam.


The terrorists want the mosque to be built in that specific location so that they can show their friends that 10 years after they attacked us on 9/11, the people of the US are surrendering to their version of Islam.

I was responding to a statement arguing that somehow the terrorists "win" by us not allowing the mosque to be built at that exact site. At least try to follow the flow of the conversation.

Quote:
You're saying that the purpose of this mosque, two blocks away from ground zero, legally owned for years by a Muslim foundation and already used for religious ceremonies and services, is being turned into a mosque as a way to show their friends that the US is surrendering to Islam?


No. I'm not. I'm frankly unsure how you managed to read what I wrote and think this. I was very clearly responding to a statement about what the terrorists, specifically those who belong to the groups who attacked us on 9/11 think about this.

Quote:
Note you said, in completely clear terms, that the builders of this mosque are showing their friends that the US has surrendered to their version of Islam.


Lol. No, I didn't. What should have been completely clear, was that I was talking about the terrorists. I didn't even mention the builders of the mosque at all and neither did the statement I responded to. You apparently can't grasp the subtleties of pronoun and antecedent in the English language. How the hell did you think that?

Quote:
gbaji, with this statement alone, discounting your years of idiotic posting, you have proved yourself and idiot and bigot on the same levels of varus. You are NOT worth debating.


Lol... what a difference a pronoun makes!

Edited, Sep 2nd 2010 4:53pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#120 Sep 02 2010 at 6:13 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
gbaji wrote:
So there are no responses possible to the 9/11 attacks which cannot be labeled by you are "bigotry"? That seems simple minded.


I honestly have no idea what that means.


It means that just because one response to 9/11 may be bigoted does not mean that *all* responses to 9/11 must be. You said that they were both bigotry, and it was all about 9/11. I asked if there was a response to 9/11 which you *wouldn't* label as bigotry. Seemed like a reasonable question.

Quote:
Quote:
No, they aren't. Can you grasp the concept that two similar things can happen for different reasons? And in this case, the only thing similar about them is that they both involve mosques.


Quote:
Which should be your first clue that the motivation for the opposition to those two mosques is... wait for it... different. They are not related, as you claimed above.


Smiley: facepalm

You used to attempt to sound smart. It's like you're not even trying anymore.


Unless every single mosque built in the US over the last 10 years has faced the same opposition, then we must conclude that it is not the mere building of a mosque which results in said response. Thus, the one thing they have in common can't be the reason they're being opposed. Thus, they are not both being opposed for the same reason.

Get it? It's called logic. Or are you suggesting that bigots only oppose mosque building in two locations in the entire US, and one of them happens to be some town in TN that none of us have ever heard of much less spell without a cut and paste. So ground zero and a town in TN? No where else?

Methinks there is something more to it, and you've shown no reason to suggest that the something more is the same something more in both locations. Just saying "it's bigotry" isn't enough.

Quote:
So... it's almost like they don't want the Ground Zero Mosque built because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks... and people in Murfreesboro don't want the Murfreesboro Mosque built because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.


The question to ask is why there *isn't* opposition in all the other locations in which mosques have been built. Because if it was that simple, they'd have been opposed "because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks" too. You are presenting an incredibly simplistic argument that fails at the most basic of examination.


Quote:
Sure. They shouldn't build a mosque on the same site that had a mosque built on it when the terror attacks happened. That would be silly.

ETA: Maybe I'm wrong about this. I heard somewhere that this property was owned by the developers long before the attacks, is that wrong?


Yes. You are wrong. IIRC, it was a burlington coat factory store. It was damaged in the 9/11 attack and put up for sale. The group in question managed to put in a bid to buy and develop it while bypassing several of the normal steps that would be involved. I'm not even going to get into the political aspects involved with the fast tracking of the purchase and approval for development, while building anything on the WTC site itself has stalled, but there are some pretty fishy goings-on there as well.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/08/report_taliban_using_mosque_co.html wrote:
Newsweek is reporting that the Taliban is using controversy over the “Ground Zero mosque” to raise money and recruit new fighters, both inside and outside Afghanistan.


Um... Duh. Because they know how powerful of a propaganda tool it will be if built.

Quote:
It’s proved such an effective tool that “it now heads the list of talking points in Taliban meetings with fighters, villagers, and potential recruits,” the weekly says.

“By preventing this mosque from being built, America is doing us a big favor,” a Taliban operative named Zabihullah told the weekly. “It’s providing us with more recruits, donations, and popular support.”


Lol... And I'm sure that guy is being completely honest. If you can't trust the Taliban to tell you what you should do, then who can you trust? It's not the opposition to the mosque which gets them support, it's the fact that it's an ongoing issue which hasn't been resolved yet. They are building support to get what they want (the mosque built on that site). It's not rocket science to noodle out why.


Quote:
Quote:
Then it should be easy to answer. Show me the statistics of Muslims being attacked or oppressed purely because they are Muslim. I always love when people just assume something so hard that they can't even contemplate that maybe their assumption is wrong.


Honestly, I don't have statistics about Muslims being treated badly because getting yelled at, snubbed, ignored at a store, or refused service isn't really reported. But it happens. You are honestly going to sit there and pretend it doesn't? While people are vandalizing the building site for mosques, debating whether or not a mosque should be built in New York, and knifing cab drivers because they are Muslim? Are you blind...?


Are Muslims victims of crimes in the US at a rate higher than other groups? I would think that if one is trying to argue that Muslims are being oppressed that they really ought to be able to provide statistics which bear this out. Doubly so if a position on an issue rests on the assumption that they are.

Isn't it possible that you're just being told that this is happening so that you'll support a given political "side" of the issue? How about getting some information for yourself and making up your own mind?

Edited, Sep 2nd 2010 5:15pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#121 Sep 02 2010 at 6:38 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Quote:
It’s proved such an effective tool that “it now heads the list of talking points in Taliban meetings with fighters, villagers, and potential recruits,” the weekly says.

“By preventing this mosque from being built, America is doing us a big favor,” a Taliban operative named Zabihullah told the weekly. “It’s providing us with more recruits, donations, and popular support.”


Lol... And I'm sure that guy is being completely honest. If you can't trust the Taliban to tell you what you should do, then who can you trust? It's not the opposition to the mosque which gets them support, it's the fact that it's an ongoing issue which hasn't been resolved yet. They are building support to get what they want (the mosque built on that site). It's not rocket science to noodle out why.
Except that having that mosque built there is exactly what the Taliban wouldn't want. They want us to look like we're oppressing Muslims, whether or not we actually are. That makes it easier to recruit - especially among the marginal elements here.

I'm not sure why you seem to think that the Taliban wins anything in the eyes of the pool of potential recruits in any situation other than "we look less reasonable than the Taliban".
#122 Sep 02 2010 at 6:50 PM Rating: Excellent
gbaji wrote:
It means that just because one response to 9/11 may be bigoted does not mean that *all* responses to 9/11 must be. You said that they were both bigotry, and it was all about 9/11. I asked if there was a response to 9/11 which you *wouldn't* label as bigotry. Seemed like a reasonable question.


Yeah, your sentence made absolutely no sense. Something was mistyped, and I wasn't sure what you were saying. In any case, you're assuming an awful lot. I'm sure there are plenty of reactions to 9/11 that aren't bigoted except, you know, the bigoted ones.

Quote:
Unless every single mosque built in the US over the last 10 years has faced the same opposition, then we must conclude that it is not the mere building of a mosque which results in said response. Thus, the one thing they have in common can't be the reason they're being opposed. Thus, they are not both being opposed for the same reason.


While I don't have time to find out exactly how many Mosques have been built since 9/11 and see if each and every one was protested against, there is this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/08/us/08mosque.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2 wrote:
In Murfreesboro, Tenn., Republican candidates have denounced plans for a large Muslim center proposed near a subdivision, and hundreds of protesters have turned out for a march and a county meeting.

In late June, in Temecula, Calif., members of a local Tea Party group took dogs and picket signs to Friday prayers at a mosque that is seeking to build a new worship center on a vacant lot nearby.

In Sheboygan, Wis., a few Christian ministers led a noisy fight against a Muslim group that sought permission to open a mosque in a former health food store bought by a Muslim doctor.


Get it? It's called the truth. Maybe you should try that out instead of "it's obvious?"

Oh, wait, of course you won't.

Quote:
The question to ask is why there *isn't* opposition in all the other locations in which mosques have been built. Because if it was that simple, they'd have been opposed "because of the 9/11 terrorist attacks" too. You are presenting an incredibly simplistic argument that fails at the most basic of examination.


Apparently it doesn't. Since there are other mosques being protested. Imagine that.... Smiley: rolleyes


gbaji wrote:
Yes. You are wrong. IIRC, it was a burlington coat factory store. It was damaged in the 9/11 attack and put up for sale. The group in question managed to put in a bid to buy and develop it while bypassing several of the normal steps that would be involved.


My mistake. Thanks for clearing that up, I'm not sure where I heard the other.


Quote:
Lol... And I'm sure that guy is being completely honest. If you can't trust the Taliban to tell you what you should do, then who can you trust? It's not the opposition to the mosque which gets them support, it's the fact that it's an ongoing issue which hasn't been resolved yet.


Yes, exactly. They're saying, "Look at that! Those Americans hate all Muslims, look at how they treat you! Now, put on this vest and hold this little button in your hand like this..."
#123gbaji, Posted: Sep 02 2010 at 8:41 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Because they aren't doing what they are doing to "be reasonable". You're making the same mistake Neville Chamberlain made just prior to WW2. He assumed that the people he was dealing with wanted the same thing he did (peace). So he spent significant efforts attempting to get agreements for peace. All the while the other guys had no intention of keeping the agreements.
#124 Sep 02 2010 at 8:49 PM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
gbaji wrote:
Why do you think this? Seriously. Stop and think about this. The Taliban doesn't want a giant super-mosque built within a couple hundred feet of the site of the attack on US soil which they helped cause to happen? Really? What possible reasoning could allow you to arrive at that conclusion?
gbaji wrote:
Don't be stupid. They don't want world peace. They don't want religious tolerance and a free society. Trying to avoid offending them on these grounds is moronic.
Contradictory statements (ignoring all of the errors).

gbaji wrote:
Same deal here. You're making the mistake of assuming that the Taliban wants peaceful and friendly relations with us. They don't. Thus, no amount of showing how nice we are will do anything other than convince them that they can get us to keep bending over and taking it from them. And not amount of *not* being nice to them will make them hate us more. They are likely laughing at the stupidity of the Americans who keep trying to be nice to them despite all the very very not-nice things they've done to us, and the more not-nice things they would like to do to us if we just let them.
Nobody thinks the Taliban want peace. What gave you that stupid idea? They're going to hate America no matter what happens, so why are we bothering trying to cater to how the Taliban or Al-Qaeda will react? Why does anyone in the country give a sh*t what they think? Why should we be compromising our first amendment rights in not allowing the mosque to be built so that we don't "appease" the terrorists?

Here's a newsflash for you: Mosques have been built all around the country already and have existed without incident. If something were to happen from there, we will intervene and go from there. Until then, in this country, we are all innocent until proven guilty. By the by, 'terrorist' is not a synonym for 'Muslim', dipsh*t.

Edited, Sep 2nd 2010 9:57pm by bsphil
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#125 Sep 02 2010 at 9:13 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
gbaji wrote:
Because they aren't doing what they are doing to "be reasonable". You're making the same mistake Neville Chamberlain made just prior to WW2. He assumed that the people he was dealing with wanted the same thing he did (peace). So he spent significant efforts attempting to get agreements for peace. All the while the other guys had no intention of keeping the agreements.

Same deal here. You're making the mistake of assuming that the Taliban wants peaceful and friendly relations with us. They don't. Thus, no amount of showing how nice we are will do anything other than convince them that they can get us to keep bending over and taking it from them. And not amount of *not* being nice to them will make them hate us more. They are likely laughing at the stupidity of the Americans who keep trying to be nice to them despite all the very very not-nice things they've done to us, and the more not-nice things they would like to do to us if we just let them.

Don't be stupid. They don't want world peace. They don't want religious tolerance and a free society. Trying to avoid offending them on these grounds is moronic.

I'll bet you don't know what they *do* want.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#126 Sep 02 2010 at 9:51 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Quote:
Don't be stupid. They don't want world peace. They don't want religious tolerance and a free society. Trying to avoid offending them on these grounds is moronic.
No one is trying to avoid offending the Taliban or al'quaida. What people are trying to avoid is setting up a culture of hate towards the Islamic community.

The reason building the mosque hurts the Taliban is because it builds bridges with the Islamic community that doesn't want to kill us. Terrorist groups can't point to it to get recruits, where if it's super protested and in the end doesn't happen, they can point to that as America hating them.

Building a mosque there in no way helps terrorist groups, it only hurts them.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 184 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (184)