Professor shintasama wrote:
Quote:
And you think it's wrong of them to think that those who did this didn't know from day one that this would be unpopular and tried to ram it through before anyone could figure out what was going on?
Building it at that site? Yes. Probably. But not for the reasons you seem to think.
The point being that had they involved more people in the decision making process, and had it truly been about building a cross-religious/cross-cultural center, the decision about where to build it could have been made with those other people's input. Their input would have been "you shouldn't build it there". And if the objective was to build bridges, this would have led to an alternative location which everyone could agree with and there would not have been a controversy in the first place.
Instead of dumping the decision on the people and creating a huge controversy and stoking the fires of anti-Islamic sentiment, the result would have been actual healing and bridge building and cross-religious interaction on a joint venture. Had this been done, we would have had a positive outcome.
But it wasn't. And it wasn't the fault of the people who are complaining about it now.
Quote:
Quote:
Either way, you're on the wrong side of this.
Who's oppressing a minority? You don't have a right to build any building you want anywhere you want for any purpose you want. That's why we have things like city planning boards, zoning laws, chamber of commerce oversight, and whatnot. This is purely about a decision made which did not take into account how the majority of people would feel about it.
So yeah. It's relevant to point out how the majority feels about it.