Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

International Burn a Koran DayFollow

#152 Sep 13 2010 at 8:28 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Professor shintasama wrote:
Quote:
And you think it's wrong of them to think that those who did this didn't know from day one that this would be unpopular and tried to ram it through before anyone could figure out what was going on?
No, I think regardless of whether it was fast tracked or not, when people found out it would be just as unpopular.


Building it at that site? Yes. Probably. But not for the reasons you seem to think.


The point being that had they involved more people in the decision making process, and had it truly been about building a cross-religious/cross-cultural center, the decision about where to build it could have been made with those other people's input. Their input would have been "you shouldn't build it there". And if the objective was to build bridges, this would have led to an alternative location which everyone could agree with and there would not have been a controversy in the first place.


Instead of dumping the decision on the people and creating a huge controversy and stoking the fires of anti-Islamic sentiment, the result would have been actual healing and bridge building and cross-religious interaction on a joint venture. Had this been done, we would have had a positive outcome.


But it wasn't. And it wasn't the fault of the people who are complaining about it now.

Quote:
Quote:
Either way, you're on the wrong side of this.
Once again, bullsh*t. The majority's feelings don't give them the right to unjustly oppress minorities.


Who's oppressing a minority? You don't have a right to build any building you want anywhere you want for any purpose you want. That's why we have things like city planning boards, zoning laws, chamber of commerce oversight, and whatnot. This is purely about a decision made which did not take into account how the majority of people would feel about it.


So yeah. It's relevant to point out how the majority feels about it.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#153 Sep 13 2010 at 8:46 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Quote:
It's the messages it sends internationally that people care about.
Yeah, the message that the United States stands for freedom and equality and not condemning people for things they had no part in is a bad message to send out. Good thing there's no chance of that anymore. Smiley: thumbsup

Edited, Sep 13th 2010 9:48pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#154 Sep 13 2010 at 9:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Still waiting on that cite. For something that's the "real" reason everyone is upset, I'm not sure why this is taking so long. I mean, everyone had to find out somehow so they could get upset for this "real" reason, right?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#155 Sep 13 2010 at 9:50 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,158 posts

Quote:
So you just think 71% of the country is bigoted?


Thats the same figure that supported the Iraq war, and look how that turned out.

Also. I really think that the Islamic centre/mosque/whatever you want to call it should be built. And the building of it should be supported by everyone who understands that it was Islam that was hijacked on 9/11 by a bunch of radical nutters who used it as an excuse to stage the attack.

To blame all muslims for the actions of the few on that day is obviously wrong, yet that is completely what is happening. It was their religeon that was attacked as well as the towers, and to build a mosque in the area should be applauded and supported by all who understand that tolerance and understanding is the only constructive way forward. Bigotry and intolerance, for what else could you call book burning and the anti muslim rhetoric that is everywhere at the moment, can only lead to more pain and suffering.

The way the anti mosque, book burning idiots are allowing themselves to be led around by nose, by the a few hardcore racists and the media establishment whose sole desire is to stir up a ********* of a story is fUcking sickening.



You all ought to grow up before its too late imo.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#156 Sep 13 2010 at 9:54 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Quote:
It has *always* been about that. What level of stupidity and ignorance makes you think it's anything else? No one cares why the Imam wants to build it there. There may be speculation about his motives, but at the end of the day it doesn't matter. It's the appropriateness of building that mosque in that location and the messages it sends internationally that people care about.


You ************* HYPOCRITE. Then why in the world do you argue for half a page that people are up in arms about the building permit speed when you know damn well that people are angry ONLY because it's a Muslim building? Good Lord, I know you love your strawmen, and that one took the cake, but there was no point to it if you're just going to throw it out the window several posts later. Stop channeling Varus!
#157 Sep 14 2010 at 12:34 AM Rating: Good
Is it insensitive to build a mosque near the site of the WTC?

Yup.

But that isn't a good enough reason not to build it. The Imam did nothing wrong, at all. Did the city? Maybe. But it is all perfectly legal. What would be illegal would be going back on it & it would send the wrong message to Muslims living in this country.

People can protest it & gnash their teeth all they want, but it doesn't change anything about this process.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#158 Sep 14 2010 at 1:03 AM Rating: Good
Clearly gbaji is of the opinion that this hallowed ground should be filled with more **** shops, because we are a nation of Pornsbyterians.
#159 Sep 14 2010 at 3:08 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Prayer room inside a cultural centre =/= Mosque.

And this:
paulsol wrote:
Screenshot


werds...
#160 Sep 14 2010 at 3:36 AM Rating: Excellent
You know, some of the 9/11 victims were also Muslims. Like Paulsol said, when the terrorists high-jacked those planes, they also high-jacked Islam. American Muslims, who were peaceful, law-abiding, discreet citizens, have seen their everyday lives change radically after those attacks. Probably more than any other US community group. Especially in the way they, and their religion, are perceived by their fellow Americans. Every time you conflate Islam and these terrorists, you're basically labelling a sizeable population of the US as "terrorists".

America will have to learn to live with Islam. Whether it's right next to ground zero, or in Tennessee. The only alternative is to alienate a sizeable proportion of their population, and I can't see how this would do anyone any good.

The last thing I'm curious about is who these "anti- GZM" protesters are protesting at. Surely not the government, as we wouldn't it to impede on private property. Surely not the Imam in question, as anti-Islam rhetoric and Koran-burning are not usually the most effective ways to convince a Muslim he's being insensitive. The NYC Planning Council? The media? God? So... who?
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#161 Sep 14 2010 at 5:38 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Screenshot
.
#162 Sep 14 2010 at 6:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Omegavegeta wrote:
Did the city? Maybe.

But still no evidence.

A brief look into St. Nicholas Church shows that rebuilding on its prior site requires integration with the continually delayed 9/11 memorial site (including a bomb screening center built underground directly below it) and a site nearby requires a land transfer with the New York Port Authority. The original church itself was physically crushed under the collapsing Tower Two, not just struck by debris a few blocks away from a far corner of the site. Comparing the two situations is absolutely ridiculous. Obviously it must be a deliberate attempt to slow down the awesome spread of a tiny Eastern Orthodox chapel via bureaucracy and red tape!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#163 Sep 14 2010 at 10:53 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Well, if you consider the designated prayer sites inside the World Trade Center buildings, for the Muslims who worked there, then yes, they were damaged during 9/11.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#164REDACTED, Posted: Sep 14 2010 at 11:24 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ash,
#165 Sep 14 2010 at 11:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
that doesn't mean we have to lie to ourselves about who they are and what they believe in.

Heh.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#166 Sep 14 2010 at 11:32 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Ash,

Sorry Muslims are a small minority of the US population. And while american muslims may not be terrorists they sure as h*ll don't have any influence on the majority of muslims in this world who do agree with the sharia law for all or die attitude.

We may have to learn to live with them but that doesn't mean we have to lie to ourselves about who they are and what they believe in.


"Americans need to keep their meddling asses out of others' affairs"?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#167REDACTED, Posted: Sep 14 2010 at 11:38 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Debo,
#168 Sep 14 2010 at 11:47 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Screenshot
Screenshot
Â
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#169 Sep 14 2010 at 12:03 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
http://snarla.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/venn-diagram-al-qaeda-islam-muslims.jpg?w=500&h=412
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#170 Sep 14 2010 at 12:24 PM Rating: Good
varusword75 wrote:
Debo,

And we'll be able to as soon as liberals let us start drilling again.



Edited, Sep 14th 2010 1:38pm by varusword75


So, you have no idea how the oil market works then?
#171 Sep 14 2010 at 12:46 PM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:
When did I ever say who's fault it was that the building purchase and construction permits were fast tracked?


Right here:

Quote:
The negative response is because people found out, after the fact, that the city of NY had bypassed normal procedures in order to help a group of Muslims obtain a building right next to ground zero, and obtain building permits to rebuild it into a large Islamic community center and mosque. All of this done without anyone else knowing about it.


You didn't speculate WHY the city did so, but you DID plant the blame for fast tracking the permit(s) squarely on the city. You're so delusional you can't even keep your own thoughts straight any more. How lovely.
#172 Sep 14 2010 at 12:57 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
You also haven't backed that up. I can't find any source about the this supposed bypassing of normal procedures for the mosque.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#173 Sep 14 2010 at 1:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Yeah, Gbaji's been all over with that claim and hasn't even attempted to cite it at all. I suspect he heard this "fact" on the radio or TV and is repeating it without any further investigation. He managed to mention the St. Nicholas church (although it doesn't at all prove what he thought it did) so he got this thread of thought from someplace but from where is anyone's guess.

Edited, Sep 14th 2010 2:04pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#174 Sep 14 2010 at 1:34 PM Rating: Good
****
4,512 posts
It's ok, I'm still waiting on a cite that a medical professional will move internationally for the sake of a pay raise. Or something like that.

"An elephant never forgets."
#175 Sep 14 2010 at 2:17 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Is it insensitive to build a mosque near the site of the WTC?

Yup.

No. You have to be daft to believe that.

Would it be insensitive to build a Mediterranean Cafe in the same spot? Of course not. Because even though though the terrorists likely cooked and ate Mediterranean food the two aren't related. To call a Islamic cultural center insensitive means you are equating Islam and terrorism. I suppose nine years of news media exploiting people to think terrorist when they hear Muslim and Muslim when they hear terrorist didn't help.

Anyone who believes it to be insensitive has admitted prejudice.

Edited, Sep 14th 2010 3:18pm by Allegory
#176 Sep 14 2010 at 2:18 PM Rating: Excellent
CBD wrote:
"An elephant never forgets."


Screenshot
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 267 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (267)