In total, about 100 killings may be linked to the serial killers between about 1984 and 1993, according to the LA Times article:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/04/local/la-me-serial-killers-20100804
I think we have expectations that serial crime on this scale will be detected as such and appropriate warnings issued.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- multiple serial killers were in LA...undetected
multiple serial killers were in LA...undetectedFollow
The Robert Pictin case in BC showed that the authorities are all to ready to ignore crimes against marginalized sectors of society.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
yossarian wrote:
In total, about 100 killings may be linked to the serial killers between about 1984 and 1993, according to the LA Times article:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/04/local/la-me-serial-killers-20100804
I think we have expectations that serial crime on this scale will be detected as such and appropriate warnings issued.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/04/local/la-me-serial-killers-20100804
I think we have expectations that serial crime on this scale will be detected as such and appropriate warnings issued.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Sir Xsarus wrote:
The Robert Pictin case in BC showed that the authorities are all to ready to ignore crimes against marginalized sectors of society.
So what I don't know about the Pickton case:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Pickton
is if the police actually knew/suspected there was a series of killings, at all, or not before arresting him.
What the BC police are very sorry about is that they did not catch him sooner. The LA police still maintain they did the best they could at the time - and did not detect any patterns to any of the killings. No warnings, no suspected patterns reported to the press. Maybe this was the same in BC.
Elinda wrote:
yossarian wrote:
In total, about 100 killings may be linked to the serial killers between about 1984 and 1993, according to the LA Times article:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/04/local/la-me-serial-killers-20100804
I think we have expectations that serial crime on this scale will be detected as such and appropriate warnings issued.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/04/local/la-me-serial-killers-20100804
I think we have expectations that serial crime on this scale will be detected as such and appropriate warnings issued.
As Xsarus points out, maybe this happens everywhere, but if I heard this happened within the US, I would immediately guess LA. LA has always had the lowest ratio of police to citizens of any major city in the US and probably in the developed world. The tradeoff has historically been that the police use more force - act more like a paramilitary organization - then other police forces. Thus there is a much more adversarial relationship between some segments of the population and the police.
It happens in all major metro areas, though. Green River, BTK, Joel Rifkin or whatever his name was, the recent serial arrested in Detroit, the guy a couple of years ago in the NO area. As long as they prey on prostitutes, runaways and drug users, they can get away with it for a very long time.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
With the picktin case, police knew girls were disappearing, but the officers who said they thought it was a serial kidnapper/killer were ignored and marginalized. The fact that there were no bodies made this easier.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Following on what Yossarian was saying about the L.A. area, apparently jurisdictional cooperation is not all it could be in the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan Area. That was allegedly a major problem in solving and prosecuting the Hillside Strangler case.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
The world would be a less exciting place without at least some operating serial killers. Also, this country would actually have too many hookers, and some of them would struggle to find enough food to make it through the long winter months and they might die. Los Angeles, for instance, with its streets lined in mounds of dead cUnt, would come to a standstill as folks pulled to the side of the and took advantage of the intercourse gratis. Plus, think of all the money pimps put back into the local economy. Serial killers really do the eco-system and the economy a valuable service by thinning the herd.
Samira wrote:
It happens in all major metro areas, though. Green River, BTK, Joel Rifkin or whatever his name was, the recent serial arrested in Detroit, the guy a couple of years ago in the NO area. As long as they prey on prostitutes, runaways and drug users, they can get away with it for a very long time.
Yeah, but is it because of the nature of the victim, or the lack of people representing the victim's interests, postmortem?
BrownDuck wrote:
Samira wrote:
It happens in all major metro areas, though. Green River, BTK, Joel Rifkin or whatever his name was, the recent serial arrested in Detroit, the guy a couple of years ago in the NO area. As long as they prey on prostitutes, runaways and drug users, they can get away with it for a very long time.
Yeah, but is it because of the nature of the victim, or the lack of people representing the victim's interests, postmortem?
One follows from the other, I guess. No one vaults up onto their white horse to avenge your average crack ho. They tend not to have political connections, or family powerful enough (or together enough, presumably) to keep the cops' focus on their sister/mom/ex's murder.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Barkingturtle wrote:
I hate to toot my own horn, but the world would be a less exciting place without at least some operating serial killers. Also, this country would actually have too many hookers, and some of them would struggle to find enough food to make it through the long winter months and they might die. Los Angeles, for instance, with its streets lined in mounds of dead cUnt, would come to a standstill as folks pulled to the side of the and took advantage of the intercourse gratis. Plus, think of all the money pimps put back into the local economy. Serial killers really do the eco-system and the economy a valuable service by thinning the herd.
I never realised you were so public spirited.
Recent Visitors: 190
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (190)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- multiple serial killers were in LA...undetected
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC