Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Early birdFollow

#77 Aug 10 2010 at 7:27 PM Rating: Good
I think we can dispense with "technically".
#78 Aug 11 2010 at 5:42 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Yeah, yeah. I forget the damn "h" in the name. Whatever.

Guenny wrote:
No sh*t gbaji. If you breed two purebred German shepherds (and at least spell the breed correctly, since you claim you're such an expert) and they whelp 8 black and tan dogs and a single white shepherd, that puppy is still a German shepherd.


That's not what happens though. What happens is that you breed two pure bred German Shepherds, and out of one of 5 litters, one of them has slightly whitish hairs in the wrong part of the coat. You then breed that dog with another dog with similar discoloration. Do this for several generations, and you'll eventually breed back to a pure white dog. And every step along the way, you've gotten farther away from the breed standards for German Shepherds.

You get there by breeding for a recessive trait. It takes specific effort and many generations to bring that trait to such prominence in a single dog. Which is exactly what some breeders have done to get the pure white dogs. But that doesn't make the result a member of the breed anymore than if they'd bred for short stubby legs (I've seen this btw!), or for a curled tail, or for any other trait which you could breed for if you wanted to, but which aren't part of the standards which define the breed.

Quote:
You can call it whatever you want but just because it disqualifies it under the "breed standard" in certain "kennel clubs" doesn't make it not a German shepherd.


Certain kennel clubs? Are you serious? No major kennel club recognizes pure white Shepherds. Way to make the norm seem like the fringe and vice versa...

Quote:
My German shepherd puppy has the angles of a wolf, and good lord is that against the standard, but she is still AKC and a @#%^ing German shepherd you ******.


Calling me names doesn't make my position any less valid. It's not even my position either, so I'm not sure why you're getting all upset about it. It's not like I set the breed definition for German Shepherds or anything. Don't freaking shoot the messenger.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#79 Aug 11 2010 at 6:04 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Debalic wrote:
Hell, next gbaji will claim that albinos aren't technically humans.


And since two people mentioned the same silly point: Breed and species are not the same thing. Breed might be more analogous to "ethnicity", but even that isn't correct since we don't specifically breed humans for ethnic traits. Albinism is a completely different thing.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#80 Aug 11 2010 at 6:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
That's not what happens though. What happens is that you breed two pure bred German Shepherds, and out of one of 5 litters, one of them has slightly whitish hairs in the wrong part of the coat. You then breed that dog with another dog with similar discoloration. Do this for several generations, and you'll eventually breed back to a pure white dog. And every step along the way, you've gotten farther away from the breed standards for German Shepherds.


That is one possibility, I guess. However this is a single recessive gene. Two parents pass the same gene to the offspring, and you have yourself a white German Shepherd.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#81 Aug 11 2010 at 8:11 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
That's not what happens though. What happens is that you breed two pure bred German Shepherds, and out of one of 5 litters, one of them has slightly whitish hairs in the wrong part of the coat. You then breed that dog with another dog with similar discoloration. Do this for several generations, and you'll eventually breed back to a pure white dog. And every step along the way, you've gotten farther away from the breed standards for German Shepherds.


That is one possibility, I guess. However this is a single recessive gene. Two parents pass the same gene to the offspring, and you have yourself a white German Shepherd.


The odds of that happening without previous generations being bred for that specific recessive trait are pretty darn unlikely. Incredibly unlikely, in fact. In 50 years of my mom breeding German Shepherds, not one pup has *ever* been even mostly white, or even partially white, much less "pure white". While it's technically possible, given enough random births among otherwise standard German Shepherds for this to happen (genetics works that way afterall), it's got to be incredibly incredibly rare.

I also doubt seriously that it's just a single gene. Hair color is usually influenced by multiple genes, doubly so with Shepherds given they have two different types of hair. If it was just one recessive gene, even with multiple possible replacements, you'd still expect a statistically significant number of all white dogs to result randomly. And that just doesn't happen.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#82 Aug 11 2010 at 8:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Pandas and piebalds are a different genetic profile. I'm not the expert, but everything I read about white Shepherds referred to "the gene", so whatever.

Edited to add: this is pretty typical of the stuff I could find about it:

Quote:
Whites: The White German Shepherd is, contrary to some peoples beliefs, a purebred German Shepherd Dog, and they are not a rare specimen, nor are they albinos. White Shepherds have not been proven to be either more or less healthy than their coloured counterparts. The White gene is a recessive gene, and it can be carried by coloured dogs - ie. if two black and tan dogs, which both carry the gene, are bred, there can be some white puppies in the litter. Also, because of it's recessive nature, 2 white dogs bred together can produce nothing but white dogs, and a white dog bred to a coloured dog who does not carry the white gene can not produce any white dogs. There is a long history behind the White German Shepherd which can be better learned at the following links: The American White Shepherd Assocation, The White German Shepherd Club of Canada.



Ask your mom about it, if you get a chance. I'm curious now - genetics is an interesting field.


Edited, Aug 11th 2010 7:54pm by Samira
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#83 Aug 11 2010 at 10:04 PM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
I did a lot of reading, and in fact, the first (or second) "German Shepherd" was actually sired by a white shepherd. I can't be bothered at the moment to find the site, but I also remember reading that many famous dogs like Rin Tin Tin and Lassie sired white pups in their line. So gbaji stfu.

Also, just for a matter of fact, the breed hasn't even existed for 2 centuries, and, if you can imagine, a lot of the stigma against "white german shepherds" and "unpure genetics" was propaganda by the **** party. Regardless, gbaji, I know you will never go against what any standardized rulebook says, so I have no way of convincing you that white coated GSD's aren't "non-bred or "full-bred" or whatever that means" (sic).

Edited, Aug 11th 2010 11:10pm by Guenny
#84 Aug 11 2010 at 11:30 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Lassie was a collie, not a German shepherd.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#85 Aug 12 2010 at 12:00 AM Rating: Good
Sometimes even the tightest bloodlines throw litters with white puppies, or coated puppies, or sable puppies or bi-color or black and tans. It's a lottery. I imagine gbaji's mom just avoids talking to him, assuming the old cUnt has any sense left after spending the last four decades with him in her basement, and thus he's only caught snippets of her wisdom.

I mean, I wouldn't suggest she's just wrong or explained it to her dimwit son inadequately or anything. The woman must be a saint.
#86 Aug 12 2010 at 12:01 AM Rating: Good
Debalic wrote:
Lassie was a collie, not a German shepherd.


A collie is just a subtype of German Shepherd.
#87 Aug 12 2010 at 5:59 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Lassie was a collie, not a German shepherd.


A collie is just a subtype of German Shepherd.


Probably had plastic surgery and a good makeup artist.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#88 Aug 12 2010 at 3:30 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Not to mention great hair extensions.
#89 Aug 12 2010 at 3:37 PM Rating: Good
If there was anything that BT would know about, it's mutts.

When are you guys going to squirt out some puppies of your own?
#90 Aug 12 2010 at 3:42 PM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
If there was anything that BT would know about, it's mutts.

When are you guys going to squirt out some puppies of your ownhatch the Antichrist?
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#91 Aug 12 2010 at 3:44 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Iamadam the Prohpet wrote:
Kaelesh wrote:
If there was anything that BT would know about, it's mutts.

When are you guys going to squirt out some puppies of your ownhatch the Antichrist?

Too late, I believe the Antichrist is sitting in my lap. With German and Italian ancestry, violent tendencies and a devilish grin, this kid is gonna rock the world.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#92 Aug 12 2010 at 3:53 PM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
Debalic wrote:
Too late, I believe the Antichrist is sitting in my lap. With German and Italian ancestry, violent tendencies and a devilish grin, this kid is gonna rock the world.


Guenny has both of those ancestries beat (although the German one is close). She's a succubus from the depths of Hell.

Unless BT is from Tibet, we're all screwed.
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#93 Aug 12 2010 at 4:18 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Samira wrote:
Pandas and piebalds are a different genetic profile. I'm not the expert, but everything I read about white Shepherds referred to "the gene", so whatever.


It's pretty common to just talk about a genetic trait in terms of a "gene" for said trait, even when there's often really a combination of several gene strands involved.

Quote:
Edited to add: this is pretty typical of the stuff I could find about it:


Yeah. People who think that shorts should be acceptable dinner attire are equally passionate about their position. At the end of the day, a whole lot of distinctions in the world are seemingly arbitrary, but that's what makes them the "thing" we label them. For whatever reason, the breed standards for German Shepherds specifies a set of color markings which exclude an all white dog. It's not like coat color distinctions only exist in this one breed. Try insisting that an all white Golden Retriever is a Golden Retriever, and you'll get similar arguments.

At the end of the day, the standards are what define the breed. Without them, it's just a "dog". Some might argue that's peachy, but people buy different breeds for the traits. If someone wants to buy a white german shepherd, they're free to. It's not like there's a law making it illegal for them to call their dog whatever they want. But they're not going to be able to show it, and no one outside a relatively small circle of white shepherd enthusiasts will breed their dogs with yours. Most people don't care about that, so it's a non issue. But for those who do, it's kinda important...

Quote:
Ask your mom about it, if you get a chance. I'm curious now - genetics is an interesting field.


Sure. I see her every week. I'll bring it up. Did I mention she has a degree in biology?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#94 Aug 12 2010 at 4:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Screenshot


I really and truly do.
#95 Aug 12 2010 at 4:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
So does my brother, but I know as much as he does about genetics.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#96 Aug 12 2010 at 4:45 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Samira wrote:
So does my brother, but I know as much as he does about genetics.
Bad example. You're really smart.

With dog breeds though it's not really about genetics but about pedigree. Breed isn't something recognized in the Animal Kingdom.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#97 Aug 12 2010 at 4:47 PM Rating: Excellent
gbaji wrote:
[quote=Samira]
If someone wants to buy a white german shepherd, they're free to.


But wait. I thought they didn't exist. How can you buy imagination?

You're a fUcking idiot and your mom should have had her cUnt chewed off by German Shepherds before she found the stud sired you.

Are Shepherds with down pasterns no longer Shepherds? How about if my dog loses an ear? I mean, they'd be excused from the ring for failing to meet the standard. Good luck showing your coated Shepherd, or your dog with one ********. What is a Shepherd with one nut called? Is that a collie?

#98 Aug 12 2010 at 5:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Only if it's a border collie. Otherwise it's one nut too many.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#99 Aug 12 2010 at 8:17 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Elinda wrote:
Samira wrote:
So does my brother, but I know as much as he does about genetics.
Bad example. You're really smart.


Actually, I thought she was saying that having a degree in biology doesn't automatically mean you know more about genetics than the average person who maybe learned about it in a class or two along the way. But maybe I misunderstood...

Quote:
With dog breeds though it's not really about genetics but about pedigree. Breed isn't something recognized in the Animal Kingdom.


Breed is specifically about traits which are bred into the animal in question. Pedigrees are used by breeders to determine which animals are present in the last X generations, allowing for them to examine which traits are present and/or prominent. Showing dogs is important to this process, because the judges are experts at looking at the traits being bred for. A pedigree with more champions in the lineage will mean dogs which are more likely to carry the traits that the breed is supposed to have. Obviously, you're also looking at dogs with health problems which you want to avoid as well.

For most people, a pedigree just means that the dog is certified to be a "pure bred" animal of the breed in question. An annoying trend in pedigrees is handing them out like they're just certificates (which I suppose is all they are to most customers), with just a verification that the dog is pure bred, and maybe with the names of the ***** and stud written down somewhere. Serious breeders will generate pedigrees going back 5 or 7 generations, and maintain large collections of breed books listing all of the registered dogs for that breed. I think my mom has AKC books for Shepherds going back to the 1960s (it's a *huge* collection, and likely worth a hell of a lot). Every single german shepherd registered with the AKC anywhere will appear in those books.

The AKC semi recently began putting their information online (at a pretty serious cost), so times are changing even in the dog world... ;)
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#100 Aug 12 2010 at 9:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
gbaji wrote:
Actually, I thought she was saying that having a degree in biology doesn't automatically mean you know more about genetics than the average person who maybe learned about it in a class or two along the way. But maybe I misunderstood...


Depending on the particular branch of biology, I've very likely had as many genetics classes as the average bio major. I took them because I was interested, not because I had to. I can talk the talk about them thar alleles and ****.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#101 Aug 12 2010 at 10:25 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Showing dogs is important to this process, because the judges are experts at looking at the traits being bred for. A pedigree with more champions in the lineage will mean dogs which are more likely to carry the traits that the breed is supposed to have.


FUcking naive. Champions are dogs whose owners hired the most popular handler, or the one with the biggest tits.

Speaking of, if your mom is a breeder in California, chances are we know a lot of the same people. Ask her how Jerry's doing. Art, too.

Edited, Aug 12th 2010 9:25pm by Barkingturtle
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 775 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (775)