Yeah, yeah. I forget the damn "h" in the name. Whatever.
Guenny wrote:
No sh*t gbaji. If you breed two purebred German shepherds (and at least spell the breed correctly, since you claim you're such an expert) and they whelp 8 black and tan dogs and a single white shepherd, that puppy is still a German shepherd.
That's not what happens though. What happens is that you breed two pure bred German Shepherds, and out of one of 5 litters, one of them has slightly whitish hairs in the wrong part of the coat. You then breed that dog with another dog with similar discoloration. Do this for several generations, and you'll eventually breed back to a pure white dog. And every step along the way, you've gotten farther away from the breed standards for German Shepherds.
You get there by breeding for a recessive trait. It takes specific effort and many generations to bring that trait to such prominence in a single dog. Which is exactly what some breeders have done to get the pure white dogs. But that doesn't make the result a member of the breed anymore than if they'd bred for short stubby legs (I've seen this btw!), or for a curled tail, or for any other trait which you could breed for if you wanted to, but which aren't part of the standards which define the breed.
Quote:
You can call it whatever you want but just because it disqualifies it under the "breed standard" in certain "kennel clubs" doesn't make it not a German shepherd.
Certain kennel clubs? Are you serious? No major kennel club recognizes pure white Shepherds. Way to make the norm seem like the fringe and vice versa...
Quote:
My German shepherd puppy has the angles of a wolf, and good lord is that against the standard, but she is still AKC and a @#%^ing German shepherd you ******.
Calling me names doesn't make my position any less valid. It's not even my position either, so I'm not sure why you're getting all upset about it. It's not like I set the breed definition for German Shepherds or anything. Don't freaking shoot the messenger.