« Previous 1 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 104 Next »

This thread is locked

Prop 8 OverturnedFollow

#1777 Aug 29 2010 at 1:27 PM Rating: Good

View User Forum

ZAM Administrator

10,601 posts

Almalieque wrote:

If you say so, obviously I missed where you had done so.

clearly.

Almalieque wrote:

I thought that's what the contracts kind of did, mimic a marriage. I don't know, haven't done any research on it.

I don't know what you're referring to here.

Almalieque wrote:

I didn't even click on the link because I'm not getting involved in that argument. If it's the 20-30+ page thread that I'm referring to, then I assure you it's in there multiple times.

I would check page 14. Didn't click the link, but that sounds about right. If you attempt to quote anything from that thread, I'm not going to respond to it, so I'm telling you that up front.

I basically ignored that thread, so I was just curious. Haven't seen anything yet though.

____________________________

01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ

#1778 Aug 29 2010 at 1:55 PM Rating: Default

The All Knowing

10,265 posts

Sir Xsarus wrote:

Almalieque wrote:

If you say so, obviously I missed where you had done so.

clearly.

Almalieque wrote:

I thought that's what the contracts kind of did, mimic a marriage. I don't know, haven't done any research on it.

I don't know what you're referring to here.

Almalieque wrote:

I didn't even click on the link because I'm not getting involved in that argument. If it's the 20-30+ page thread that I'm referring to, then I assure you it's in there multiple times.

I would check page 14. Didn't click the link, but that sounds about right. If you attempt to quote anything from that thread, I'm not going to respond to it, so I'm telling you that up front.

I basically ignored that thread, so I was just curious. Haven't seen anything yet though.

1. Yea, must have been 20 pages ago or something

2. I meant civil unions.. not sure how they work, but I did find this interesting read while looking for it http://www.cm-life.com/2009/10/12/marriage-is-a-civil-contract-recognized-by-the-state-not-a-right/

3. Ok, but I'm sure it's the thread if its referencing to prep 8 and I'm in it as I only engaged in two debates.

#1779 Aug 29 2010 at 2:29 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1630282721753

View User Forum

Sage

14,174 posts

K-k-k-kill yourself.

#1780 Aug 29 2010 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good

View User Forum

ZAM Administrator

10,601 posts

.

Edited, Aug 29th 2010 3:58pm by Xsarus

____________________________

01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ

#1781 Aug 29 2010 at 3:24 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1680481127345

View User Forum

Sage

21,262 posts

If marriage is a civil contract recognized by the state, it should not be up to the state which contracts it can choose to recognize. Either it recognizes them all, or it recognizes none.

#1782 Aug 29 2010 at 6:58 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1592341547422

Scholar

4,512 posts

Haha, that see page 14 nonsense again? You know what's on page 14? Alma saying... nothing really.

Almalieque wrote:

I would wager that the decision of the discrimination had nothing to do with homosexuality in particular, but the normality of the relationship between one legal sound man and one legal sound woman, with the other restrictions attached. That is my argument anyway.
...
I *believe* that the restrictions of marriage is due to the normality of relationships between people. If that is the case, then I support the restrictions. If that is not the case, then I argue that it should be the case.

Just for the sake of laughing at it again.

#1783 Aug 29 2010 at 7:11 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1709511392366

Sage

6,471 posts

CBD wrote:

Haha, that see page 14 nonsense again? You know what's on page 14? Alma saying... nothing really.

Almalieque wrote:

I would wager that the decision of the discrimination had nothing to do with homosexuality in particular, but the normality of the relationship between one legal sound man and one legal sound woman, with the other restrictions attached. That is my argument anyway.
...
I *believe* that the restrictions of marriage is due to the normality of relationships between people. If that is the case, then I support the restrictions. If that is not the case, then I argue that it should be the case.

Just for the sake of laughing at it again.

You have to admit, he's got a way with words.

I mean, not the right way. But it's some sort of way. I think.

Edited, Aug 29th 2010 9:12pm by Eske

#1784 Aug 29 2010 at 7:37 PM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1716164190383

View User Forum

Sage

19,999 posts

Eske, Star Breaker wrote:

You have to admit, he has his way with words.

I mean, not the right way. But it's some sort of way. I think.

1) Fixed.
2) Is he leaving marks on the words?
3) If he isn't, is it still rape?

#1785 Aug 29 2010 at 7:50 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1709511392366

Sage

6,471 posts

MDenham wrote:

Eske, Star Breaker wrote:

You have to admit, he has his way with words.

I mean, not the right way. But it's some sort of way. I think.

1) Fixed.
2) Is he leaving marks on the words?
3) If he isn't, is it still rape?

#1786 Aug 29 2010 at 7:55 PM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

Liberal Conspiracy

TILT

Almalieque wrote:

2. I meant civil unions.. not sure how they work, but I did find this interesting read while looking for it http://www.cm-life.com/2009/10/12/marriage-is-a-civil-contract-recognized-by-the-state-not-a-right/

The courts have explicitly stated that marriage is a right. They have also made clear that when discussing "marriage", they are referring to the legally recognized civil state. This doesn't mean you can't write an column for a newspaper and be incorrect about it but that just means that Nathan Inks is wrong. And that the "Central Michigan Life" website needs better editors since Inks is a staff writer.

____________________________

Belkira wrote:

Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.

#1787 Aug 30 2010 at 11:06 AM Rating: Good

Official Shrubbery Waterer

14,659 posts

Is it too late to mention that this thread is completely, wholly, and without reservation #12?

____________________________

Jophiel wrote:

I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#1788 Aug 30 2010 at 11:09 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1630282721753

View User Forum

Sage

14,174 posts

Demea wrote:

Is it too late to mention that this thread is completely, wholly, and without reservation #12?

FUCK YEAH!

#1789 Aug 30 2010 at 11:59 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1618186764728

Sage

5,684 posts

Is this what it feels like to be a part of something?

#1790 Aug 30 2010 at 12:44 PM Rating: Good

Official Shrubbery Waterer

14,659 posts

Edit: Unfunny joke is not funny. Is it too late in the day for more coffee?

Edited, Aug 30th 2010 1:45pm by Demea

____________________________

Jophiel wrote:

I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#1791 Aug 30 2010 at 2:24 PM Rating: Good

View User Forum

No Gag Reflex

10,802 posts

Now I'm wondering what Demea's joke was.

And from what DSD has always said, it is never too late for coffee. It is never too early for coffee. Coffee is always on time.

#1792 Aug 30 2010 at 2:29 PM Rating: Good

Official Shrubbery Waterer

14,659 posts

Thumbelyna Quick Hands wrote:

Now I'm wondering what Demea's joke was.

And from what DSD has always said, it is never too late for coffee. It is never too early for coffee. Coffee is always on time.

Speaking of which, where has she been hiding lately? And Nexa, Flea, and Tare.

Did they all begin labor simultaneously?

____________________________

Jophiel wrote:

I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#1793 Aug 30 2010 at 5:44 PM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

Liberal Conspiracy

TILT

Flea didn't feel like paying for premium and finds the site wholly unworkable on her phone without the mobile site. And then doesn't bother getting on from home after work when she could use her laptop.

____________________________

Belkira wrote:

Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.

#1794 Sep 01 2010 at 4:44 AM Rating: Default

View User Forum

Sage

4,158 posts

bump.

____________________________

"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#1795 Sep 01 2010 at 7:07 PM Rating: Decent

Prodigal Son

20,643 posts

It's getting harder and harder for me to ignore this goddam thread.

Thanks, paul.

____________________________

publiusvarus wrote:

we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.

#1796 Sep 01 2010 at 10:47 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1716164190383

View User Forum

Sage

19,999 posts

This thread can't die yet - it hasn't reached page 40 or been unceremoniously locked while four people are in the middle of posting to it!

#1797 Sep 02 2010 at 6:23 AM Rating: Good

Sage

3,053 posts

Doing my small bit in keeping this thread alive.

____________________________

In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.

#1798 Sep 02 2010 at 6:49 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1649636385462

Sage

15,512 posts

/vigil candle for the thread

#1799 Sep 02 2010 at 7:01 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1626654137761

Scholar

418 posts

My best friend's girlfriend's brother delivers for a Chinese place downtown and he said one of the other delivery guys always makes the trip to take Justice Stevens his #7 lunch special on Wednesdays. That's Beef and Broccoli with Wonton soup and a spring roll. Justice Kennedy loves his spring rolls. Anyway, my buddy called me yesterday evening to say that Bao Dai (that's the guy that deliver's to Justice Stevens) said he overheard to of his clerks talking about the Prop 8 case and that when it gets to the court it's going to be like Citizen's United all over again and the court will overturn any restrictions on marriage all the way back to Reynolds. They'll even overturn the bans on first-cousin marriages that exist in a couple of particularly backwards conservative states. Unfortunately, apparently they will not overturn laws related to marrying livestock which really upset my friend since he wants to dump Sherrie and marry a ewe named Sally that lives on his grandmother's farm in Cumberland.

I thought this was worth passing along. You heard it hear first!

#1800 Sep 02 2010 at 7:36 AM Rating: Good

View User Forum

Skelly Poker Since 2008

16,781 posts

naatdog wrote:

My best friend's girlfriend's brother delivers for a Chinese place downtown and he said one of the other delivery guys always makes the trip to take Justice Stevens his #7 lunch special on Wednesdays. That's Beef and Broccoli with Wonton soup and a spring roll. Justice Kennedy loves his spring rolls. Anyway, my buddy called me yesterday evening to say that Bao Dai (that's the guy that deliver's to Justice Stevens) said he overheard to of his clerks talking about the Prop 8 case and that when it gets to the court it's going to be like Citizen's United all over again and the court will overturn any restrictions on marriage all the way back to Reynolds. They'll even overturn the bans on first-cousin marriages that exist in a couple of particularly backwards conservative states. Unfortunately, apparently they will not overturn laws related to marrying livestock which really upset my friend since he wants to dump Sherrie and marry a ewe named Sally that lives on his grandmother's farm in Cumberland.

I thought this was worth passing along. You heard it hear first!

Can you substitute egg drop soup for won ton soup?

____________________________

Alma wrote:

I lost my post

#1801 Sep 02 2010 at 7:38 AM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

ZAM Administrator

10,601 posts

Smiley: disappointed

____________________________

01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ

« Previous 1 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 104 Next »

This thread is locked

You cannot post in a locked topic!

Recent Visitors: 250 All times are in CST

Anonymous Guests (250)

© 2024 Fanbyte LLC