Kaelesh wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Kaelesh wrote:
Of fucking course there would be. Are you dense or just trying to mess with someone?
Well, Jophiel says other wise and I'm taking his side since he seems light years more intelligent than you.
Joph and I disagreed over the length of time, otherwise, we said the same thing, you stupid cu
nt.
Wow, the sad thing is, you're being serious... The time difference was the entire point of the statement. Two of us get it and one doesn't. Can you guess who doesn't? I give you a clue, it's you.
Kaelish wrote:
The etymology of the word homophobe doesn't rest in my hands, so who gives a sh*t what my definition of the word is.
Well it wouldn't matter if the word only had a single meaning. Since the word has several meanings, the exact definition that you are referring to makes all the difference, especially since this word is commonly used for additional meanings.
Elinda wrote:
This is a 'free' country. Our ability to do as we choose is limited by the government for the good of all. Why should two people of the same sex not be allowed to marry under the same legal definition as two people of the opposite sex?
Please answer the question by page 50.
Oh, you must mean my position that I first stated on page 3, not once but twice? I suggest you go educate yourself first.
CatWHo wrote:
Alma, Alma, Alma.
You're in need of more smut than I am if you think that butt-licking is limited to gay people.
Anyone you talk to on the street, of any gender, who is in a relationship - or not - could have munched on *** the night before. And you have no way of knowing at all.
Almalieque wrote:
You're an idiot even for a troll. There are many things that I'm disgusted by that I'm not afraid of. I think someone getting their butt-licked or vice-versa is pretty disgusting. I don't care what sex combination it is.
Why are people making stuff up to argue?