Samira wrote:
A plea bargain is always initiated by the side with the power to do so: the side that has a bargain to offer. That would be the prosecutor.
It isn't semantics. It's reality. And if you were using your head for anything besides a vehicle for puzzled expressions, you should have been able to suss that out for yourself, seriously.
Almalieque The Great wrote:
A plea bargain is an agreement. The emphasis was on the actual agreement, not who actually initiates it. I knew that much when I looked the word up.
At this point people are dissecting words just to find some error just to say "you're wrong". Yet, somehow, when I correct people for saying "equality" as opposed to "fairness", people yell SEMANTICS...
1. I didn't pull the "Semantics Card" in reference to who actually initiates the plea bargain, I said that I already knew that much information when I originally looked the word up. My gripe was that you all have abandoned the concept purposely just to try to find some erroneous writing that might imply something incorrect.
2. The plea bargain is an agreement between the two parties, that was the emphasis, not that the prosecutor is the one to initiate it. That's why I said that I didn't know that the prosecutors can do agreements with themselves, because the emphasis was on the agreement.
This is where the defendant's lawyer is fighting to reduce any fines, penalties,etc. in order to make it as fair as possible for the client. This is opposed to the lawyer fighting for the client's innocence, which is why I differentiated the two in the first place.