- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Prop 8 Overturned
Prop 8 OverturnedFollow
#1027
Aug 17 2010 at 1:11 PM
I'm so happy that this thread is still going.
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
#1028
Aug 17 2010 at 1:14 PM
Iamadam the Prohpet wrote:
I'm so happy that this thread is still going.
I've relieved myself from the argumenst at hand, and am currently counting the number of times BT has referenced his own **** and/or balls on the asylums front page threads. This could take awhile.
EDIT: **** it, I don't have the time for this ****. Lets say seventeen. Seventeen sound good to everyone ? Seventeen it is.
Edited, Aug 17th 2010 1:43pm by Tarub
#1029
Aug 17 2010 at 1:19 PM
Tarub wrote:
Iamadam the Prohpet wrote:
I'm so happy that this thread is still going.
I've relived myself from the argumenst at hand
Mmmmmhmmmm
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
#1030
Aug 17 2010 at 1:20 PM
Jophiel wrote:
Posting on the 21st page of a thread.
You do realize that if 50 forum regulars just did this, and nothing but this, we could have an infinitely long thread!
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#1031
Aug 17 2010 at 1:21 PM
Let's keep going. I'm approaching 10K.
#1032
Aug 17 2010 at 1:24 PM
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Posting on the 21st page of a thread.
You do realize that if 50 forum regulars just did this, and nothing but this, we could have an infinitely long thread!
There's only one 21st page, man.
#1033
Aug 17 2010 at 1:27 PM
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Posting on the 21st page of a thread.
If one person did it, we'd have an infinitely long thread. They'd just have to do it an infinite number of times.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1034
Aug 17 2010 at 1:29 PM
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Posting on the 21st page of a thread.
You do realize that if 50 forum regulars just did this, and nothing but this, we could have an infinitely long thread!
There's only one 21st page, man.
/bonk
One time for each page. And no. One poster doing this would be spamming, right?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#1035
Aug 17 2010 at 1:30 PM
Yeah, we all know no one here could ever spam their way up to a high post count. That would be unprecedented!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1036
Aug 17 2010 at 1:31 PM
I'm sorry, but... relived?
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
#1037
Aug 17 2010 at 1:33 PM
He wizzed it into a cup.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#1038
Aug 17 2010 at 1:33 PM
Samira wrote:
I'm sorry, but... relived?
I missed the e. I fixed it for you.
#1039
Aug 17 2010 at 1:33 PM
Or he's a zombie.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
#1040
Aug 17 2010 at 1:38 PM
Samira wrote:
Or he's a zombie.
Now we get to the truth.
#1041
Aug 17 2010 at 1:41 PM
Samira wrote:
I'm sorry, but... relived?
We can't forget about that important argumenst!
You know, while we're pointing out quoted typos.
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
#1042
Aug 17 2010 at 1:42 PM
Jophiel wrote:
Yeah, we all know no one here could ever spam their way up to a high post count. That would be unprecedented!
Ah. But if one person spammed, it would be KaoSmashed. But since we've (you technically) already established that simply posting in a thread that you're posting on that page, just once per page, is acceptable, then we should be able to get 50 people to each post once per page and it wouldn't be spamming!
What could possibly go wrong? The plan is perfect! ;)
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#1043Almalieque,
Posted: Aug 17 2010 at 1:46 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) After rereading that sentence objectively, I admit that I can see how you misunderstood what I said, but I'm telling you exactly what that sentence says now. So there shouldn't be any conversation about it.
#1044
Aug 17 2010 at 1:53 PM
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Posting on the 21st page of a thread.
You do realize that if 50 forum regulars just did this, and nothing but this, we could have an infinitely long thread!
#1045
Aug 17 2010 at 1:54 PM
Thanks for playing, chump.
#1046
Aug 17 2010 at 2:03 PM
Almalieque wrote:
When I said "I differentiate supporting a killer for a fair trial", I mean that the lawyer is fighting for a guilty person in attempt to ensure that the outcome is fair for the individual, i.e. a plea bargain.
I failed to use the proper legal jargon which confused you. I don't watch Law and Order and I despise court shows, i.e. Judge Judy, with a passion. Luckily the person that I was actually talking to understood what I was saying or at least responded as if she did.
I failed to use the proper legal jargon which confused you. I don't watch Law and Order and I despise court shows, i.e. Judge Judy, with a passion. Luckily the person that I was actually talking to understood what I was saying or at least responded as if she did.
Then the person you were talking to and yourself are ******* idiots. That's not what a plea bargin is. If you don't know **** about the law, just shut the **** up about it. It's disgusting just how bad you murder every subject that comes up when you have no knowledge about it.
Stick to things you understand, like crayons.
#1047
Aug 17 2010 at 2:11 PM
Kaelesh wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
When I said "I differentiate supporting a killer for a fair trial", I mean that the lawyer is fighting for a guilty person in attempt to ensure that the outcome is fair for the individual, i.e. a plea bargain.
I failed to use the proper legal jargon which confused you. I don't watch Law and Order and I despise court shows, i.e. Judge Judy, with a passion. Luckily the person that I was actually talking to understood what I was saying or at least responded as if she did.
I failed to use the proper legal jargon which confused you. I don't watch Law and Order and I despise court shows, i.e. Judge Judy, with a passion. Luckily the person that I was actually talking to understood what I was saying or at least responded as if she did.
Then the person you were talking to and yourself are @#%^ing idiots. That's not what a plea bargin is. If you don't know sh*t about the law, just shut the @#%^ up about it. It's disgusting just how bad you murder every subject that comes up when you have no knowledge about it.
Stick to things you understand, like crayons.
Hey, fuck you, man. It's far from the only egregious thing I've passed over to get him to admit he was at fault even once; next you'll say I'm a moron for not knowing how to use the word "personnel" because I didn't correct him a few pages back. You have to be focused - notice how he still hasn't responded to BT calling him on exactly the same thing?
#1048
Aug 17 2010 at 2:12 PM
Kaelesh wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
When I said "I differentiate supporting a killer for a fair trial", I mean that the lawyer is fighting for a guilty person in attempt to ensure that the outcome is fair for the individual, i.e. a plea bargain.
I failed to use the proper legal jargon which confused you. I don't watch Law and Order and I despise court shows, i.e. Judge Judy, with a passion. Luckily the person that I was actually talking to understood what I was saying or at least responded as if she did.
I failed to use the proper legal jargon which confused you. I don't watch Law and Order and I despise court shows, i.e. Judge Judy, with a passion. Luckily the person that I was actually talking to understood what I was saying or at least responded as if she did.
Then the person you were talking to and yourself are @#%^ing idiots. That's not what a plea bargin is. If you don't know sh*t about the law, just shut the @#%^ up about it. It's disgusting just how bad you murder every subject that comes up when you have no knowledge about it.
Stick to things you understand, like crayons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plea_bargain wrote:
A plea bargain (also plea agreement, plea deal or copping a plea) is an agreement in a criminal case whereby the prosecutor offers the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty, usually to a lesser charge or to the original criminal charge with a recommendation of a lighter than the maximum sentence.
Kavekk wrote:
Thanks for playing, chump.
You're welcome. I just love playing "Stump the Idiot". It must be embarrassing to get stumped by an Ape with sub-human intelligence.
#1049
Aug 17 2010 at 2:15 PM
Kavekk wrote:
Hey, **** you, man. It's far from the only egregious thing I've passed over to get him to admit he was at fault even once; next you'll say I'm a moron for not knowing how to use the word "personnel" because I didn't correct him a few pages back. You have to be focused - notice how he still hasn't responded to BT calling him on exactly the same thing?
How did I misuse "personnel"?
What BT statement did I not respond to? Besides, everyone admits, including himself, that he has no merit in his posts, so why would I even take him seriously?
#1050
Aug 17 2010 at 2:19 PM
First BT called me unrefined and now you're calling me an ape. Let's get our racism in order here, okay? The British stereotype is the stuffy, emotionally stunted anachronism in the top hat who nonetheless has a certain class and sophistication about them, whereas the black stereotype is that of a thuggish troglodyte, half-man and half-beast, who, while possessing great athletic ability, is pretty lacking in the thinking department.
Right, sorted.
Right, sorted.
#1051
Aug 17 2010 at 2:24 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Kavekk wrote:
Hey, @#%^ you, man. It's far from the only egregious thing I've passed over to get him to admit he was at fault even once; next you'll say I'm a moron for not knowing how to use the word "personnel" because I didn't correct him a few pages back. You have to be focused - notice how he still hasn't responded to BT calling him on exactly the same thing?
How did I misuse "personnel"?
What BT statement did I not respond to? Besides, everyone admits, including himself, that he has no merit in his posts, so why would I even take him seriously?
The same way you misuse every word, my stupid, stupid friend: consistently.
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 231
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (231)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Prop 8 Overturned
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC