- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Prop 8 Overturned
Prop 8 OverturnedFollow
#78
Aug 05 2010 at 10:51 AM
Almalieque wrote:
Deja-Vu?
#79
Aug 05 2010 at 11:32 AM
Deja-Sylum
Has a nice ring to it.
Has a nice ring to it.
#80
Aug 05 2010 at 11:33 AM
I was thinking along the lines of "Didja vu?"
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
#81Almalieque,
Posted: Aug 05 2010 at 11:51 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Yea, seriously though, this whole thing is being blown out of proportion on both sides. It's really not that serious on both sides....
#82
Aug 05 2010 at 12:28 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Yea, seriously though, this whole thing is being blown out of proportion on both sides. It's really not that serious on both sides....
#84Almalieque,
Posted: Aug 05 2010 at 12:37 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Didn't say it was NOT serious, I said it isn't as serious as people are making it out to be, for or against it.
#85
Aug 05 2010 at 12:39 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Bard wrote:
I dunno, My side takes our rights pretty seriously.
Didn't say it was NOT serious, I said it isn't as serious as people are making it out to be, for or against it.
#86Almalieque,
Posted: Aug 05 2010 at 12:45 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Again, I'm saying this from a third party point of view, which usually has the more objective view. This isn't my opinion. Go back and reread the thread and you'll see what I'm talking about. It may be important to you or even the most important thing in life to you, but it isn't as big as people are making it. That is not based off of feelings or opinions, but pure facts.
#87
Aug 05 2010 at 12:46 PM
Bard,
No they don't. Your side will deny any person of your party's 'rights' the second it becomes inconvienent for them. Just look at how they handled that racist lady down in atlanta. Forced to resign without any sort of due process simply because it was politically expedient at the time.
The ends justify the means is what the Democrats are all about.
Quote:
My side takes our rights pretty seriously.
No they don't. Your side will deny any person of your party's 'rights' the second it becomes inconvienent for them. Just look at how they handled that racist lady down in atlanta. Forced to resign without any sort of due process simply because it was politically expedient at the time.
The ends justify the means is what the Democrats are all about.
#88
Aug 05 2010 at 12:46 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Didn't say it was NOT serious, I said it isn't as serious as people are making it out to be, for or against it.
Equal rights isn't as serious as the people who don't have them make it out to be?
I'll remember that if you're ever in a desert and need water. It's not that serious.
#89
Aug 05 2010 at 12:47 PM
Almalieque wrote:
it isn't as big as people are making it
#90
Aug 05 2010 at 12:47 PM
Almalieque,
You're not more subjective just more cowardly. You don't want to offend anyone so you pretend to take the middle road.
Edited, Aug 5th 2010 2:48pm by knoxxsouthy
You're not more subjective just more cowardly. You don't want to offend anyone so you pretend to take the middle road.
Edited, Aug 5th 2010 2:48pm by knoxxsouthy
#91
Aug 05 2010 at 12:48 PM
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Just look at how they handled that racist lady down in atlanta. Forced to resign without any sort of due process simply because it was politically expedient at the time.
Mutherfucker, you were calling for the same thing.
#92
Aug 05 2010 at 12:48 PM
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Bard,
No they don't. Your side will deny any person of your party's 'rights' the second it becomes inconvienent for them. Just look at how they handled that racist lady down in atlanta. Forced to resign without any sort of due process simply because it was politically expedient at the time.
The ends justify the means is what the Democrats are all about.
Quote:
My side takes our rights pretty seriously.
No they don't. Your side will deny any person of your party's 'rights' the second it becomes inconvienent for them. Just look at how they handled that racist lady down in atlanta. Forced to resign without any sort of due process simply because it was politically expedient at the time.
The ends justify the means is what the Democrats are all about.
#93
Aug 05 2010 at 12:48 PM
Almalieque wrote:
bard wrote:
Again, you say that because you have no stake in it.
Again, I'm saying this from a third party point of view, which usually has the more objective view. This isn't my opinion. Go back and reread the thread and you'll see what I'm talking about. It may be important to you or even the most important thing in life to you, but it isn't as big as people are making it. That is not based off of feelings or opinions, but pure facts.
. . .
#94
Aug 05 2010 at 12:49 PM
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Almalieque,
You're not more subjective just more cowardly. You don't want to offend anyone so you pretend to take the middle road.
Edited, Aug 5th 2010 2:48pm by knoxxsouthy
You're not more subjective just more cowardly. You don't want to offend anyone so you pretend to take the middle road.
Edited, Aug 5th 2010 2:48pm by knoxxsouthy
#95
Aug 05 2010 at 12:50 PM
Kaelesh,
But you're not clamouring for equal rights. You're b*tching about homosexual rights. I don't see these same people raising such a fuss about polygamy or incest being legal. Nor do you care that married couples have more rights than unmarried couples.
But you're not clamouring for equal rights. You're b*tching about homosexual rights. I don't see these same people raising such a fuss about polygamy or incest being legal. Nor do you care that married couples have more rights than unmarried couples.
#96
Aug 05 2010 at 12:52 PM
Kaelesh,
I'm not the president. Oh and very few conservative talk show hosts (beck, hannity, boorz, rush being the ones I listen to on occasion) called for her firing. That's something Obama did on his own based on the media backlash.
Edited, Aug 5th 2010 2:54pm by knoxxsouthy
I'm not the president. Oh and very few conservative talk show hosts (beck, hannity, boorz, rush being the ones I listen to on occasion) called for her firing. That's something Obama did on his own based on the media backlash.
Edited, Aug 5th 2010 2:54pm by knoxxsouthy
#97
Aug 05 2010 at 12:52 PM
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Kaelesh,
But you're not clamouring for equal rights. You're b*tching about homosexual rights. I don't see these same people raising such a fuss about polygamy or incest being legal. Nor do you care that married couples have more rights than unmarried couples.
But you're not clamouring for equal rights. You're b*tching about homosexual rights. I don't see these same people raising such a fuss about polygamy or incest being legal. Nor do you care that married couples have more rights than unmarried couples.
#98Almalieque,
Posted: Aug 05 2010 at 1:10 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I guess I'll start off with this idiot...
#99
Aug 05 2010 at 1:12 PM
Almalieque wrote:
This isn't life or death. The ability for someone to marry is not equivalent to the ability to have food and water. It's not that serious. Very few things can compare to the ability to have food, water and shelter, regardless on how serious or important the situation is.
You being forced to ride in the back of the bus isn't life or death.
Let's bring back segregation.
Edited, Aug 5th 2010 2:13pm by Bardalicious
#100
Aug 05 2010 at 1:14 PM
Almalieque wrote:
This is a perfect example.. This isn't life or death.
#101
Aug 05 2010 at 1:23 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Fact: There are people who believe that the degradation of the States will occur if there exist same sex marriage.
Are you telling me that isn't slightly exaggerated? If so, then I do indeed have a basis in reality with something to measure it against.
If not, then that means you agree with the statement, which would mean that you support prop. 8. So which one is it?
Are you telling me that isn't slightly exaggerated? If so, then I do indeed have a basis in reality with something to measure it against.
If not, then that means you agree with the statement, which would mean that you support prop. 8. So which one is it?
You can't honestly believe that it's that simple... can you?
For example: I don't think they are exaggerating when they say that they believe that this will happen.
So which little box do I fit in?
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 344
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (344)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Prop 8 Overturned
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC