Almalieque wrote:
Belkira wrote:
A thread is created and Alma posts in it with a point, statement, or argument that I disagree with. When I engage him with it, he runs roughshod over the entire thing, pointing out semantics
Correct word usage in defining statements,especially statements that may change national practices, is very important. I made the mistake of saying "repetition" when I meant "reputation". That incorrect word usage makes a difference. The difference with me is, I intended to say "reputation" and not "repetition" and I admitted to that.
Posters in this forum refuse to do the same. People will intentionally use more "powerful" words in attempt to strengthen their argument. When I point out the incorrect usage, they refuse to acknowledge it or make any changes, only to say "semantics".
Belkira wrote:
"and over arcing tangents that either have been already discussed, the meaning of which is already agreed upon or understood, or are largely irrelevant to the point at hand."
From my experience, when people label my posts as "irrelevant", they are questions that people don't want to answer because the answer will contradict their arguments.
The problem is, you call "semantics" over things that you really understand, but you just want to pick apart some small thing. Like using a phrase that is common for something, and you pick it apart. I found myself seriously using the phrase "adult human individual" over and over so that you wouldn't go back and pull other aspects of an argument that were already settled into it. It's tedious and ridiculous.
Alma wrote:
My posts seem "off topic" because I get attacked from all angles. I only respond to posts and people ask me different questions. Other posters only read half of the responses, causing them not to follow correctly. Multiple times people will question why I'm referring to a certain topic, but I can always refer to or pinpoint the posts that led to the current conversation. The problem is people are not following every post. They even admit to not reading them all.
No, that's not the problem. The problem is, when someone talks to you, you run off on tangents and seem to think they are incredibly important.
Alma wrote:
Exactly which part don't you understand?
The point. But it doesn't matter, because I'm not delving back into it again.
Alma wrote:
This is what questions me.. I never insult anyone until someone insults me.. That's why I asked if you wanted to get in the insult game. You seem agitated by "see if you can figure out why", but something like BT referring me to an ape, insulting my friends and made false and ignorant assumptions of my ancestry does nothing?
I'm keeping it real. I make mistakes, I'm not perfect and I admit to my errors. The REAL problem is that no one else on this forum tends to demonstrate that quality. People like to "pick" on me as if it somehow bothers me, then gets upset because I don't care.
The reality is that people see the same type of flaws in other posters but only focus on me because of my points of views.
You are constantly condescending. You may not throw out an actual insult, but you talk down to people like they're stupid. Yes, I'm "agitated" by someone in the middle of a discussion telling me I'm wrong, then suggesting I "try to figure out why, ok?" like you're brilliant and I'm licking a window. As for BT's insults, that's BT. He's not trying to carry on any type of a discussion, he just likes getting a rise out of people. But when you ask someone to "figure out why," you are effectively doing what you accuse others of, simply saying someone is wrong, but not telling them why or where.
People admit to their mistakes on here. They really do. You don't see it, because you point out "mistakes" and "flaws," where there really aren't any.
The actual reality is that you sort of sound like a jerk, and people don't like that much. You also like to control everyone around you.
Edited, Aug 15th 2010 6:55pm by Belkira