Sir Xsarus wrote:
Not really. Again the issue never came up. No one would even have thought of SSM at that point, so there was never a discussion around whether it should be allowed or not.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Prop 8 Overturned
Prop 8 OverturnedFollow
#852
Aug 14 2010 at 11:42 AM
This is proven by the fact that SSM wasn't banned until the 1980's.
#853
Aug 14 2010 at 1:08 PM
Xsarus wrote:
Not necessarily, But there needs to be some other rational in place or it does. That's the whole idea behind reexamining old laws. You look at the reasons they are in place, and then see if they still apply. If there is no reason for a law, it shouldn't exist, which is reason enough to get rid of it. You don't want to defend SSM, but if you want to have a law there, there has to be a rational, and there currently isn't one. You can insist that I'm arguing wrong till you're blue in the face, but thankfully you don't set the standards for lawmaking and the courts. You also still haven't made any arguments against SSM. I'm curious, so I read that third page, but it was just you arguing about nothing. I'm also surprised that as a right leaning person you would prefer more restriction as the default state rather then less.
I don't have to argue with you till my face turns blue. If it worked the way you claim it does, then once again, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Why would it matter who sued who? Why even bother with law suits and courts? The law is old and based on something that is irrelevant. I'll tell you why, because that's not how it works. So until the government decides to overturn the ban with no discussion or debate, you will be wrong. No matter how silly the rule is, there has to be some form of discussion.
You're right, you didn't find an argument against SSM, that's because I never made one. You asked for my take on the subject. I referred you to that.
Xsarus wrote:
Not really. Again the issue never came up. No one would even have thought of SSM at that point, so there was never a discussion around whether it should be allowed or not. People believed being gay was wrong, and that was it. You keep trying to insist that people thought about SSM and then decided to bad it, that simply never happened. That's why I criticized your understanding of history, you're making up stuff that isn't real.
The discussion never came up because no one ever had a problem with it, which means that they agreed with the current law. That's why I asked Jophiel were there SSM protests, of course there weren't. If people felt the same way about SSM as they did the other topics that were addressed, i.e. taxation without representation, then SSM would not be banned. You all tried the excuse that the laws were just grandfathered in through tradition
Of course they thought homosexuality was wrong or they wouldn't have banned it in the first place. That same logic was probably applied to the ban of SSM. People also think killing, stealing and lying is wrong, what is your point? That doesn't mean there aren't supporting statements to uphold that belief.
That's the difference between a good argument and a bad argument. Why do you think the ban on homosexuality was lifted yet here we are today and SSM is still banned? Don't you think if the two were based off the same logic that once one was lifted, then the other would be as well?
You have yet told me how I know ZERO about my history, I'm still waiting, in reference to the United States Constitution comment.
#854
Aug 14 2010 at 1:23 PM
Jophiel wrote:
I don't think anyone (Alma included) knows what he's arguing about.
#855
Aug 14 2010 at 1:43 PM
Almalieque wrote:
You have yet told me how I know ZERO about my history, I'm still waiting, in reference to the United States Constitution comment.
You probably have quite a while to wait. It'll take about another year for anyone to find amidst all your whining because you can't handle being called stupid. It's like watching a five year-old get all upset because they got called a "poo-poo head."
#856
Aug 14 2010 at 3:28 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
BT wrote:
And no, I didn't realize "Allazkhazam had a repetition in the ffxi world of being full of idiots." Hahahahahahahaha.
Wow, have you even visited other ffxi sites? All you see is "lolalla". Even posters come on this forum and say that.
No I haven't visited other FFXI sites, I have a functional ***** you fUcking ape.
And you think I have any issue with people ridiculing Allkhazoo? This place ridicules itself by employing Usagichan, for Christ's sake. This site basically sh*ts in its own mouth by not making me guru.
Anyway, I believe you. I'm sure Alla does have a really bad repetition around the FFXI world. I haven't, as you claim, ever seen anyone come here and claim as much because typically people don't come in here and write like primates. And speaking of, I'm curious: Can you type with your little monkey feet?
I don't think you care as I don't care either or I wouldn't be here. From my experiences, people who insulted alla on it's own forum are not frequent posters. Usually around updates, patches and expansions there will be some poster giving their 2 cents while at the same time ridiculing alla. It usually ends with the fact that the poster also has an alla account and is currently posting here as well. Then that person usually shuts up and goes back where s/he came from.
Wow, you are fUcking stupid. I can't talk down enough for you to even comprehend me. You just spewed geek gibberish at me.
Alma, I've been making fun of you because you said this place had a "repetition of being full of idiots" while in defense of attacks on your intellect. You aren't making a compelling case by failing to notice.
You're actually making me feel kind of guilty. It's like I'm raping Helen Keller or something.
#857
Aug 14 2010 at 4:01 PM
CBD wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
You have yet told me how I know ZERO about my history, I'm still waiting, in reference to the United States Constitution comment.
You probably have quite a while to wait. It'll take about another year for anyone to find amidst all your whining because you can't handle being called stupid. It's like watching a five year-old get all upset because they got called a "poo-poo head."
Not at all. Unlike the rest of this forum, I admit to my own stupidity. If I say something wrong, then I want to know why it was wrong, not just "you're wrong". That is how you learn. I was told that I was wrong and if that is true then I want to know how.
#858
Aug 14 2010 at 4:07 PM
Barkingturtle wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
BT wrote:
And no, I didn't realize "Allazkhazam had a repetition in the ffxi world of being full of idiots." Hahahahahahahaha.
Wow, have you even visited other ffxi sites? All you see is "lolalla". Even posters come on this forum and say that.
No I haven't visited other FFXI sites, I have a functional ***** you fUcking ape.
And you think I have any issue with people ridiculing Allkhazoo? This place ridicules itself by employing Usagichan, for Christ's sake. This site basically sh*ts in its own mouth by not making me guru.
Anyway, I believe you. I'm sure Alla does have a really bad repetition around the FFXI world. I haven't, as you claim, ever seen anyone come here and claim as much because typically people don't come in here and write like primates. And speaking of, I'm curious: Can you type with your little monkey feet?
I don't think you care as I don't care either or I wouldn't be here. From my experiences, people who insulted alla on it's own forum are not frequent posters. Usually around updates, patches and expansions there will be some poster giving their 2 cents while at the same time ridiculing alla. It usually ends with the fact that the poster also has an alla account and is currently posting here as well. Then that person usually shuts up and goes back where s/he came from.
Wow, you are fUcking stupid. I can't talk down enough for you to even comprehend me. You just spewed geek gibberish at me.
Alma, I've been making fun of you because you said this place had a "repetition of being full of idiots" while in defense of attacks on your intellect. You aren't making a compelling case by failing to notice.
You're actually making me feel kind of guilty. It's like I'm raping Helen Keller or something.
I'm sorry if you're too slow to comprehend my response. Maybe if you spent less time breaking filters and making monkey jokes, you'll see that all of your points were addressed. Then again, anyone who says "geek gibberish" is self-proclaiming as being an idiot..
#859
Aug 14 2010 at 4:17 PM
Almalieque wrote:
I'm sorry if you're too slow to comprehend my response.
Repetition repetition repetition.
#860
Aug 14 2010 at 4:34 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Unlike the rest of this forum, I admit to my own stupidity.
Haha! Aw. You're cute.
Almalieque wrote:
If I say something wrong, then I want to know why it was wrong, not just "you're wrong".
The stupidity comes from your complete inability to acknowledge how what you're saying is wrong. You don't give a flying crap, you just assume you're right and everyone else is making **** up.
Almalique wrote:
Expound.
No. I'm going to go get drunk instead.
#861
Aug 14 2010 at 4:38 PM
Barkingturtle wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
I'm sorry if you're too slow to comprehend my response.
Repetition repetition repetition.
You some how beat out Belkira and Xsarus in amusement. Because of this, I'm giving you the honor of placing your comment in my signature as definitely the most "lol" comment so far in this thread.
Feel free to ask me to further explain this to you if it seems too "incoherent" for you.....
#862Almalieque,
Posted: Aug 14 2010 at 4:44 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Of course you wont, that would mean that you actually have something worthy to say.
#863
Aug 14 2010 at 4:56 PM
I got a quote Almalieque that might interest you.
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and be known as one. - Abraham Lincoln
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and be known as one. - Abraham Lincoln
#864
Aug 14 2010 at 4:59 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
I'm sorry if you're too slow to comprehend my response.
Repetition repetition repetition.
You some how beat out Belkira and Xsarus in amusement. Because of this, I'm giving you the honor of placing your comment in my signature as definitely the most "lol" comment so far in this thread.
Feel free to ask me to further explain this to you if it seems too "incoherent" for you.....
No, I don't need you to explain anything to me, you silly little monkey. I just sit here and play with my organ and watch you dance, if you catch my drift. You don't, it's okay.
You seem under the impression you've been countering "points" I've been making. I'm not making points. I'm making fun of how dumb you are, right in front of your ape face, and you're too fUcking stupid to see it. You have a repetition for being barely literate, and you've really done nothing to improve that repetition in this thread.
Edited, Aug 14th 2010 3:59pm by Barkingturtle
#865Almalieque,
Posted: Aug 14 2010 at 5:29 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I'm sorry but, I'm only going to put one of your quotes in my signature. Don't make me have to decide which one of your stupidly contradicting comments to use.
#866
Aug 14 2010 at 5:32 PM
This is getting repetitive.
#867
Aug 14 2010 at 6:20 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Why don't you follow Criminy's suggested quote as you're only making yourself look more and more foolish in every attempt to defend your posts.
/woosh
#869Almalieque,
Posted: Aug 14 2010 at 7:05 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) This has been repetitive a long time ago....
#870
Aug 14 2010 at 7:09 PM
Almalieque wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
This is getting repetitive.
This has been repetitive a long time ago....
#871
Aug 14 2010 at 8:58 PM
MDenham wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
This is getting repetitive.
This has been repetitive a long time ago....
I suck at grammar, so please tell me the correct way of writing that sentence.
#872
Aug 14 2010 at 8:59 PM
catwho wrote:
- A person under the age of majority for marriage, because they cannot sign legally binding contracts without parental permission. (Personally, I don't think anyone under the age of 18 ought to get married, even if they've got a baby on the way, because you're still a stupid teenager before 18 and marriage is a big life decision. But hey, in redneck states where you can still marry your first cousin, you can also get married at 14 if you knock your girlfriend up.)
I'm going to assume this is a lapse in thinking on your part, and that you don't really believe a legally designated age has absolutely any correlation to a person's intellectual capacity, whether above or below said age.
#873
Aug 14 2010 at 9:05 PM
Almalieque wrote:
MDenham wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
This is getting repetitive.
This has been repetitive a long time ago....
I suck at grammar, so please tell me the correct way of writing that sentence.
Not to be repetitious, but the correct way to write that sentence is to realize beforehand you shouldn't. Understanding your limitations, however, I'd never ask so much of you.
#874
Aug 14 2010 at 9:19 PM
Almalieque wrote:
MDenham wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
This is getting repetitive.
This has been repetitive a long time ago....
I suck at grammar, so please tell me the correct way of writing that sentence.
Seriously. Grammar in English isn't that hard, especially when it's supposedly your native language.
#875
Aug 14 2010 at 9:58 PM
No no no keep the argument going. I want to have a 20 page thread started before my big 10K ding.
#876
Aug 14 2010 at 10:13 PM
MDenham wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
MDenham wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Barkingturtle wrote:
This is getting repetitive.
This has been repetitive a long time ago....
I suck at grammar, so please tell me the correct way of writing that sentence.
Seriously. Grammar in English isn't that hard, especially when it's supposedly your native language.
Neither is Algebra, yet many people can't add double integers such as 17 and 36 in their heads. You get responses like "geek gibberish".
Back to the topic though, I understand the usage of "get", but does that mean the word "been" is the incorrect word to use? I mean surely saying "This was repetitive a long time ago" is also correct? Or is that wrong as well?
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 445
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (445)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Prop 8 Overturned
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC