Traditional marriage destroyed!
*checks her marriage, which seems to be still intact*
Or not.
Score one for equality, and liberty and justice for all.
Edited, Oct 2nd 2010 8:57pm by Kaolian Lock Thread: LAST!
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Prop 8 Overturned
Prop 8 OverturnedFollow
#2
Aug 04 2010 at 3:07 PM
Damn that momentary distraction that caused me to lose this race! Damn it to hell!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3
Aug 04 2010 at 3:07 PM
I was just about to post this.
Finally! One step closer to the inevitable. :)
Finally! One step closer to the inevitable. :)
#4
Aug 04 2010 at 3:16 PM
Um... Was anyone unsure what the outcome of the case at this level in this court would be? Really? It's meaningless. Wait! Let me make a prediction for you... It'll be appealed to the 9th and... gasp... they'll rule it unconstitutional as well! And it'll be just as surprising when that happens (ie: not).
Wake me up when it gets to the US Supreme Court. That's really the only court decision that's going to matter.
Wake me up when it gets to the US Supreme Court. That's really the only court decision that's going to matter.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#5
Aug 04 2010 at 3:19 PM
gbaji wrote:
Um... Was anyone unsure what the outcome of the case at this level in this court would be?
Of course not. I've been arguing in favor of gay marriage for yyyeeeaaaarrrrssss.....
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#7
Aug 04 2010 at 3:35 PM
If gays shouldn't be allowed to marry then may California fall into the ocean.
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"
#8
Aug 04 2010 at 3:36 PM
Fine. Be that way.
http://www.zam.com/forum.html?forum=4&mid=1280956019187959327&page=1&howmany=50#msg1280956708267001543
http://www.zam.com/forum.html?forum=4&mid=1280956019187959327&page=1&howmany=50#msg1280956708267001543
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.
#9
Aug 04 2010 at 3:39 PM
gbaji wrote:
It's meaningless.
Naw. At the very least it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.
Partially because we have yet another person who says your arguments are full of ****.
#10
Aug 04 2010 at 3:43 PM
I think my husband and I are goind to go get gay married in CA this weekend.
#11
Aug 04 2010 at 3:46 PM
I should be eloquent and rational about this, but I'm too busy doing the "In your face!!!" dance of victory.
#12
Aug 04 2010 at 3:56 PM
CBD wrote:
gbaji wrote:
It's meaningless.
Naw. At the very least it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.
Partially because we have yet another person who says your arguments are full of sh*t.
A judge in what is likely the most liberal district in the country? It's the equivalent of walking into a fundie church and finding someone who'll say that creationism should be taught in schools. Like I said: Meaningless.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#13
Aug 04 2010 at 4:01 PM
gbaji wrote:
CBD wrote:
gbaji wrote:
It's meaningless.
Naw. At the very least it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.
Partially because we have yet another person who says your arguments are full of sh*t.
A judge in what is likely the most liberal district in the country? It's the equivalent of walking into a fundie church and finding someone who'll say that creationism should be taught in schools. Like I said: Meaningless.
Sure, but one of the lawyers arguing for Prop 8 to be overturned is pretty conservative, so there's that.
#14
Aug 04 2010 at 4:10 PM
gbaji wrote:
CBD wrote:
gbaji wrote:
It's meaningless.
Naw. At the very least it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.
Partially because we have yet another person who says your arguments are full of sh*t.
A judge in what is likely the most liberal district in the country? It's the equivalent of walking into a fundie church and finding someone who'll say that creationism should be taught in schools. Like I said: Meaningless.
amirite?
#15
Aug 04 2010 at 4:11 PM
gbaji, you should be in Hillcrest (the "gay" section in San Diego for you non-locals) right now. The revelry is spilling out onto the streets, from what I understand.
#16
Aug 04 2010 at 4:11 PM
Thumbelyna Quick Hands wrote:
gbaji, you should be in Hillcrest (the "gay" section in San Diego for you non-locals) right now. The revelry is spilling out onto the streets, from what I understand.
#17
Aug 04 2010 at 4:14 PM
Lady Bardalicious wrote:
Thumbelyna Quick Hands wrote:
gbaji, you should be in Hillcrest (the "gay" section in San Diego for you non-locals) right now. The revelry is spilling out onto the streets, from what I understand.
What's the codeword for ovulation?
#18
Aug 04 2010 at 4:14 PM
gbaji wrote:
CBD wrote:
gbaji wrote:
It's meaningless.
Naw. At the very least it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.
Partially because we have yet another person who says your arguments are full of sh*t.
A judge in what is likely the most liberal district in the country? It's the equivalent of walking into a fundie church and finding someone who'll say that creationism should be taught in schools. Like I said: Meaningless.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
#19
Aug 04 2010 at 4:17 PM
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Sure, but one of the lawyers arguing for Prop 8 to be overturned is pretty conservative, so there's that.
A blind monkey could have tried this case and gotten the same result. Anyone could have won it. You could have literally stood up and said "I don't believe a single word of this petition, but here is it" and closed the case and still won. Let's not pull a muscle patting ourselves on the back here...
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#20
Aug 04 2010 at 4:17 PM
gbaji wrote:
A judge in what is likely the most liberal district in the country?
At least you're admitting that you don't really know anything now.
#21
Aug 04 2010 at 4:22 PM
gbaji wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Sure, but one of the lawyers arguing for Prop 8 to be overturned is pretty conservative, so there's that.
A blind monkey could have tried this case and gotten the same result. Anyone could have won it. You could have literally stood up and said "I don't believe a single word of this petition, but here is it" and closed the case and still won. Let's not pull a muscle patting ourselves on the back here...
"Ourselves...?"
Regardless of Debbie Downer over here, it's still a legal victory. Yes, I think a blind monkey should've been able to win this case. Mostly because it seems ******* common sense to me to allow all adult citizens of this country to marry any other consenting adult, regardless of their sex.
I'm sorry you're sad that your side didn't win, gbaji. But it's nice to see equality upheld.
#22
Aug 04 2010 at 4:23 PM
Most non religious based conservatives would support gay marriage. Some of them would argue that special rules for married couples, tax breaks, shared benefits etc, should be removed across the board, but Gbaji's position is somewhat rare. The idea that government has a role in encouraging people into certain social situations should be anathema to libertarians.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#23
Aug 04 2010 at 4:24 PM
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
gbaji wrote:
CBD wrote:
gbaji wrote:
It's meaningless.
Naw. At the very least it makes me all warm and fuzzy inside.
Partially because we have yet another person who says your arguments are full of sh*t.
A judge in what is likely the most liberal district in the country? It's the equivalent of walking into a fundie church and finding someone who'll say that creationism should be taught in schools. Like I said: Meaningless.
He was appointed by HW Bush, with a Democrat controlled congress. When will people stop assuming that judges are automatically conservative or liberal based on which executive appointed them?
There's also a whole host of politics involved which would increase the likelihood of any judge, liberal or conservative, to find this way as well.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#24
Aug 04 2010 at 4:29 PM
Well he was stated as specifically being conservative, so that's probably why people concluded that.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#25
Aug 04 2010 at 4:33 PM
gbaji wrote:
There's also a whole host of politics involved which would increase the likelihood of any judge, liberal or conservative, to find this way as well.
#26
Aug 04 2010 at 4:33 PM
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Well he was stated as specifically being conservative, so that's probably why people concluded that.
Edited, Aug 4th 2010 7:34pm by Uglysasquatch
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 366
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (366)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Prop 8 Overturned
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC