Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

700 new planets foundFollow

#27 Jul 27 2010 at 10:54 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Debalic wrote:
Yeah, and when the AI robots develop their own secret base on Triton and come back in a hundred years to enslave humanity....WHAT THEN?!
We send them a cultural synopsis of Japan and ask them to sort out what the hell is going on there before continuing their invasion?

Dude, most of the robotic and AI tech comes from Japan. They know what the deal is already...
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#28 Jul 27 2010 at 2:50 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Majivo wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Lady Bardalicious wrote:
is gbaji condoning the government spending money on what could be seen as an unnecessary project?


In the context of long term species survival nothing is more necessary than manned spaceflight. I think in much longer terms than most people is all.

Bullsh*t, you're just a science geek like the rest of us. It's so long-term that we could do this at ridiculously less expense in a thousand years.


It's quite possible that in a thousand years we wont be able to do it. I'm not ignoring the possibility that we'll develop some sort of super cheap energy source and anti-gravity technology which will make spaceflight trivial if we just wait, but I'm also not assuming that will be the case. Also, spaceflight, specifically the aspects which are "hard", tends to push the very technology needed to accomplish it.

As Timelord pointed out, a permanent moonbase can be a net positive in terms of energy and cost. It also makes a great springboard to the rest of the solar system. And we don't need to wait for some magical future technology to get there.

Oh. And of course I'm a science geek like the rest of us! Duh...

Edited, Jul 27th 2010 1:51pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#29 Jul 27 2010 at 6:34 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Lady Bardalicious wrote:
is gbaji condoning the government spending money on what could be seen as an unnecessary project?


In the context of long term species survival nothing is more necessary than manned spaceflight.
False, but most of the things that are "more necessary" would also be useful in large-scale manned spaceflight.
#30 Jul 27 2010 at 6:40 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,684 posts
**** the poor, destitute, homeless, sick, unemployed

I WANNA BE A SPACE MAN.
#31 Jul 27 2010 at 8:03 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
MDenham wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Lady Bardalicious wrote:
is gbaji condoning the government spending money on what could be seen as an unnecessary project?


In the context of long term species survival nothing is more necessary than manned spaceflight.
False, but most of the things that are "more necessary" would also be useful in large-scale manned spaceflight.


Maybe you're being a bit obscure with your point, but the human race can survive just fine with the technology we have today (far less in fact). Right up until the moment when a big bright light appears in the sky and wipes us all out (or some other global calamity strikes). You're confusing "comfort of existence" with "species survival" I think. Or you're speculating about other things which "might" happen, I suppose.

The *only* thing that prevents that eventual and inevitable death of our species is if we can master manned spaceflight and leave our planet at some point. Technically, we need to eventually be able to travel to other solar systems as well (since the Sun's not going to survive eternally either). And even more technically, we may have to travel to other galaxies (ours may not survive "forever" either), but that's way farther out, and in any case, those rely on first mastering manned spaceflight.

We can speculate about other things which might wipe us out, but the one thing we know absolutely will is failing to ever send people into space and colonize other worlds. Thus, there is "nothing more necessary than manned spaceflight" for long term species survival. Unless you can list off something which is more necessary? Something which we know for 100% will kill us as a species if we don't do? Cause I can't think of any.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#32 Jul 27 2010 at 8:09 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Lady Bardalicious wrote:
@#%^ the poor, destitute, homeless, sick, unemployed


At the risk of a derail (too late!), they'll be around whether we spend money on space exploration or not. We spend 15-20B dollars a year on NASA. We spend 150B or so on welfare programs, and another 800B or so each year on health care (and that amounts about to go up dramatically). We could spend zero on NASA, and it wont put a dent in any of those problems. We could double the budget for NASA and it wouldn't have a single adverse effect on those problems.

It's not one or the other. I just think it's dumb to over focus on the problems of the moment, and ignore building any sort of future. You'll never run out of problems.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#33 Jul 27 2010 at 11:58 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
MDenham wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Lady Bardalicious wrote:
is gbaji condoning the government spending money on what could be seen as an unnecessary project?


In the context of long term species survival nothing is more necessary than manned spaceflight.
False, but most of the things that are "more necessary" would also be useful in large-scale manned spaceflight.


Maybe you're being a bit obscure with your point, but the human race can survive just fine with the technology we have today (far less in fact). Right up until the moment when a big bright light appears in the sky and wipes us all out (or some other global calamity strikes). You're confusing "comfort of existence" with "species survival" I think. Or you're speculating about other things which "might" happen, I suppose.

The *only* thing that prevents that eventual and inevitable death of our species is if we can master manned spaceflight and leave our planet at some point.
The "inevitable" on that is only true on the time scale of the Sun's expansion.

The survival of humanity to that point is entirely possible without manned spaceflight, even with the assumption that global catastrophes will occur that would wipe out an insufficiently shielded ecosystem.

Really, the first step is a culture that's capable of building and willing to live within megastructures (NOTE: I'm talking structures on the order of tens of thousands of cubic miles in volume at a minimum). Once you have that down, multi-generational manned spaceflight becomes a lot less problematic, which may be necessary if there isn't any means of going faster than light.

To be honest, though, once you're building structures on that scale, you have the engineering know-how available to probably just pilot the Earth out of its present orbit once problems occur.

Edited, Jul 27th 2010 10:59pm by MDenham
#34 Jul 28 2010 at 12:11 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Technically, you don't need manned long distance space flight if your cryo is good.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#35 Jul 28 2010 at 12:13 AM Rating: Good
Well, someone's been playing Sim City 2000.
#36 Jul 28 2010 at 12:28 AM Rating: Good
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Well, someone's been playing Sim City 2000.
Not in several years (I think the last time I played SC2K was in '01 or '02).

I should see if I can find a copy of Stand on Zanzibar just for the sake of it being something interesting to read.
#37 Jul 28 2010 at 3:21 AM Rating: Good
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Well, someone's been playing Sim City 2000.


Civ 4, surely.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#38 Jul 28 2010 at 4:40 AM Rating: Good
I was thinking of the cinematic in SC2K you get when you build enough launch arcologies and they all fly up into space.

I've er... I've never played Civ4. Smiley: bah
#39 Jul 28 2010 at 4:53 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
I was thinking of the cinematic in SC2K you get when you build enough launch arcologies and they all fly up into space.

I've er... I've never played Civ4. Smiley: bah
you should. It's pretty awesome.

Or wait for Civ5.
#40 Jul 28 2010 at 4:56 AM Rating: Good
Be honest, guys, am I turning into an old man before my time, neglecting the near past for the slightly further past? Will I soon start using the word "halcyon" in everyday conversation? What's happening to me?
#41 Jul 28 2010 at 5:49 AM Rating: Good
Kavekk, you will love Civ4. I think you can get it, with all the expansions, for like a tenner.

Civ 5 will be amazing, but it won't come out for another year or so.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#42 Jul 28 2010 at 7:02 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Kavekk, you will love Civ4. I think you can get it, with all the expansions, for like a tenner.

Civ 5 will be amazing, but it won't come out for another year or so.


I love Civ 4. Still fire it up every now and then. And the screenshots from Civ 5 (and the info about it too) are amazing. Can't wait!
#43 Jul 28 2010 at 10:48 AM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
Nadenu wrote:
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Kavekk, you will love Civ4. I think you can get it, with all the expansions, for like a tenner.

Civ 5 will be amazing, but it won't come out for another year or so.


I love Civ 4. Still fire it up every now and then. And the screenshots from Civ 5 (and the info about it too) are amazing. Can't wait!

I heard that they are taking religion out of Civ5.

How am I supposed to pay for my expansion/war now? :(
#44 Jul 28 2010 at 10:52 AM Rating: Good
Lady Bardalicious wrote:
How am I supposed to pay for my expansion/war now? :(


The old fashioned way: you cut taxes.
#45 Jul 28 2010 at 10:53 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
Lady Bardalicious wrote:
How am I supposed to pay for my expansion/war now? :(


The old fashioned way: you cut taxes.

I think religion is the old fashioned way.
#46 Jul 28 2010 at 10:54 AM Rating: Decent
This is why I don't like you. You have such a ****** sense of humor.
#47 Jul 28 2010 at 11:03 AM Rating: Good
It also validates several generations of science fiction writers who have gone on the presumption that there are habitable, Earth-like planets out there, just waiting to have stories written about them.
#48 Jul 28 2010 at 11:04 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
This is why I don't like you. You have such a sh*tty sense of humor.
I'm sorry that you bungled my blatantly simple prompt for humor.
#49 Jul 28 2010 at 11:16 AM Rating: Good
Nadenu wrote:
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Kavekk, you will love Civ4. I think you can get it, with all the expansions, for like a tenner.

Civ 5 will be amazing, but it won't come out for another year or so.


I love Civ 4. Still fire it up every now and then. And the screenshots from Civ 5 (and the info about it too) are amazing. Can't wait!


I've actually been playing the hell out of Civ 4 for the last week and a half. I'm not terribly good at it, but I still love it.

Civ 5 will be freaking awesome. Just another reason why September can't get here fast enough.
#50 Jul 28 2010 at 11:20 AM Rating: Decent
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Civ 5 will be freaking awesome. Just another reason why September can't get here fast enough.


I hope the squares on my calander turn into hexagons in September.
#51 Jul 28 2010 at 11:37 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
I just wish I could beat Rogue. Smiley: frown I loved that game.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 168 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (168)