So, the Justice Department will review the Oakland Shooting case to determine if Federal prosecution is warranted after the former transit cop was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter.
To me this makes perfect sense, as they have to now find something to do to fill their days since they won't prosecute New Black Panther Party members for voter intimidation.
Of course, that's the Justice Department. It doesn't reflect on the President at all. He would have to have appointed the people in charge over there, or something.
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Predictable Response?
Predictable Response?Follow
- A former DoJ employee accuses his former colleagues of not wanting to protect the rights of white people.
- A white transit cop shots instead of stuns a black perp. The manslaughter conviction of the cop is being reviewed by DoJ.
- Our president is black.
Where are the muzzies in all this!?
- A white transit cop shots instead of stuns a black perp. The manslaughter conviction of the cop is being reviewed by DoJ.
- Our president is black.
Where are the muzzies in all this!?
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
To me this makes perfect sense, as they have to now find something to do to fill their days since they won't prosecute New Black Panther Party members for voter intimidation.
They're prosecuting the guy who was actually doing any intimidating.
Are you upset that they're investigating a guy who killed someone or something? I'm not seeing what your point is.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
I'm not seeing what your point is.
Come on man! The guy that was killed was black and the PoTUS is black! Put it together Joph. Jesus.
Jophiel wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
To me this makes perfect sense, as they have to now find something to do to fill their days since they won't prosecute New Black Panther Party members for voter intimidation.
They're prosecuting the guy who was actually doing any intimidating.
Are you upset that they're investigating a guy who killed someone or something? I'm not seeing what your point is.
They're not pursuing the organization, or the leaders there of, that sent the militants to the polls. I'm not upset over the review of the case in which a transit cop was convicted of killing an unarmed man I just find the pattern of behavior amusing.
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
They're not pursuing the organization, or the leaders there of, that sent the militants to the polls.
And you're assuming this must have racist origins (as opposed to not finding enough evidence to prosecute or something) or you're just trying to get a rise out of someone?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
The transit cop thing boils down to this: Did the cop really reach for his tazer (and miss & pull his gun) or his gun?
I don't know, but coincidentally two years in a row I'm flying into Oakland a couple days after rioting because of it.
I don't know, but coincidentally two years in a row I'm flying into Oakland a couple days after rioting because of it.
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin
Jophed,
Are you saying they don't have racist agendas?
Are you saying they don't have racist agendas?
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Jophed,
Are you saying they don't have racist agendas?
Are you saying they don't have racist agendas?
Are we talking about the Oakland shooting or the Black Panther thing? One or the other, there's no point in bouncing back and forth.
Jophiel wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
They're not pursuing the organization, or the leaders there of, that sent the militants to the polls.
And you're assuming this must have racist origins (as opposed to not finding enough evidence to prosecute or something) or you're just trying to get a rise out of someone?
I'm not assuming anything. I'm pointing out a pattern of behavior that is suggestive at best, indicative at worst.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Are you saying they don't have racist agendas?
Are you asking me to prove a negative? 'Cause that's dumb.
Moe wrote:
I'm pointing out a pattern of behavior
If the DoJ only investigated two cases at a time I guess this might be meaningful.
Edited, Jul 9th 2010 11:10am by Jophiel
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
They're also failing to prosecute any white supremacists who might have suggested that BART cops take every opportunity to shoot unarmed black men in the back.
Because, you know, people who suggest stuff are totally convictable.
Because, you know, people who suggest stuff are totally convictable.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
They're also failing to prosecute any white supremacists who might have suggested that BART cops take every opportunity to shoot unarmed black men in the back.
Because, you know, people who suggest stuff are totally convictable.
Because, you know, people who suggest stuff are totally convictable.
They use it against white organized crime syndicates. Inciting a riot is illegal.
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Samira wrote:
They're also failing to prosecute any white supremacists who might have suggested that BART cops take every opportunity to shoot unarmed black men in the back.
Because, you know, people who suggest stuff are totally convictable.
Because, you know, people who suggest stuff are totally convictable.
They use it against white organized crime syndicates. Inciting a riot is illegal.
True, but in order to find enough evidence against the highest possible perpetrator, those investigations typically take years.
We don't know, and won't know for years if ever, whether the Black Panthers are being investigated for voter intimidation. If they were behind it, I hope that investigation is going forward and that they take all the time they need to make an airtight case.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Recent Visitors: 276
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (276)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Predictable Response?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC