Calling The Cops On Your KidFollow

Pot leads to POTATO CHIPS

Edited, Jul 11th 2010 12:29am by Sweetums

Actually, Guen, I didn't really start replying to anything else in this thread other than the...




...post you made. I made the mistake, which I admitted to, of not considering alcohol a drug/narcotic/whatever.

I was mostly griping about...well...what I quoted...hence...the quoting.

Alcohol is socially accepted, alcoholism isn't... Alcohol isn't chemically addictive. Mentally addictive, yes. Just not chemically. Bringing in juvenile drinking doesn't really say anything. That is why I quoted what I did and posted what I did. You argue about the definition of drugs, but exclude cocaine on the grounds of "only talking about depressants!" which has ******* to do with what I quoted in the first place and I could care less about. I did find it amusing, though.

So....yeah. I guess feel free to call my posts stupid, if it makes you feel better. I'd do the same, but I think everyone else has that covered.

Does physical dependency count as chemically addictive? Because alcohol withdrawl can kill a person.

Yeah, I told Exo the same thing last page. I'm guessing he's just lapsed from being cuddly, lovable and dumb to being a full-blown fUcking ******. It's a pity, because he was always my favorite gay poster from East of the Mississippi aside from Coddy.

Really though, between this and the other drug thread, it's obvious a lot of folks just devour propaganda. The fact that anyone can rail against pot while others defend alcohol evidences this.

Fact is, drugs aren't the problem, at all. Drugs aren't ruining all these addicts lives, everywhere. Frailty is, insecurity is, a lack of appropriate coping mechanisms are. A lack of honest education is. The drugs just aren't that dangerous without the prerequisite damage that causes one to abuse them.

People who really grate on my nerves get the same reaction as the people I enjoy and the people I am indifferent about. I call out stupidity where it is demonstrated. You just happen to pop up more frequently than others.

Juvenile drinking is not one of the leading causes of alcoholism in adults. There is no known cause of alcoholism in adults. Thanks for playing the "Ooh! I can type stupid things!" game. Fortunately your husband is smarter than you are. He can formulate a coherent thought. This is one of the more accurate things I have seen in recent years on the matter:


My position is now, and has been as long as I can remember, that the government has no business criminalizing the creation/cultivation, possession or use of "controlled substances". This extends from nicotine to alcohol to marijuana to psychedelics to white drugs, etc., etc. and so forth. The government is not a nanny and has no business criminalizing anything that I can engage in in the privacy of my own home (or elsewhere) without impacting anyone else's rights. Criminalizing a consensual act is nothing more than fear-mongering and playing to the emotions of a moralistic society. The majority of the population should not be denied the ability to engage in harmless actions because a small subset of that population are too weak to cope with life.

Now, all that being said, go wiggle your tits a little and get a bigger tip. Your husband deserves something nice for putting up with what I can only imagine are your inane ramblings at home.

I challenge you to find evidence that this has ever happened. My guess is that is has happened at least once in the trillions of miles put on cars every year in this world, but I doubt you will find evidence of it. If the rationale you are trying to put forward has any merit, however, you must extend that to driving in general and we must then outlaw the act of driving period, as the potential outcome is injuring someone else. Common sense isn't and you demonstrate that. Kudos.

There is a law against driving under the influence. Why should being under the influence in the first place be criminalized? You're expanding the conversation to places that no sane person would disagree with because you can't refute the premise of the original point without doing so.

Ah, I see. So hang it all up and say nothing because we're all in the same boat. Got it.

Stupid is as stupid does, guenny.

These are the posts that make me wish you had something intelligent to say.

I have never seen katie tell anyone to shake their tits. Whatever she got away with in my absence when you showed up I'll take as the sincerest form of flattery.

Poor Moe.



It was Katie's classic line to always finish her degradation of me to say something along the lines of exploiting myself for money by table dancing. If you want to be proud of taking the lowest of roads, thumbs up to you, man. If my job is the only ammo you repetitively use, it's a little pathetic, and like I said, redundant of the lowest of the lifeforms to ever grace this message board.

I mean, honestly, I don't care if everyone thinks I'm stripper with an IQ of about 95. I'm just glad you all think I'm so surpassed by my beauty to contain anything in my brain. We all know that looks are what define a woman's capabilities, anyway.

Perhaps you've forgotten that her husband is BT.

Drug laws, seatbelt laws, etc. are laws because someone, some where is making money off this stuff being illegal.

Also, I'm against these kinds of laws. Might bring about some much needed Darwinism.

Also also, this thread makes me want a pina colada.

Also also also, the thought of you with a few drinks in you makes me want a hummer.

It's true. She does have a smaller chest than you would imagine.

I go out of my way to minimize my chest, most of the time, actually, because contrary to popular belief, I'm not a slutty attention *****. And cleavage = men drooling = no thank you.