Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Allegory takes a little trip (was forum=28)Follow

#52 Jul 08 2010 at 12:11 AM Rating: Decent
I grew up in the 60's and have seen it all. Strangely, all I ever did was drink beer. Drugs never appealed to me. Nor did I need to escape reality. I've watched many of my friends do them and seen the results of it. How many of you went to a Grateful dead concert durring the peak times of the group? They passed around dishes, frisbees full of drugs at them. When you watch a Co-worker go off the deep end at work from years of LSD use you shiver at what can lay dormant for years after giving up drugs. It can be a ticking time bomb waiting to go off. Believe me having to hold down a ranting guy that has spiders crawling on him in the middle of your shift is eye opening. You can glamorize it enjoy them. Smoke your pot. Remember that its huring you in some way. I know it's your life. But, I think your all fools for doing it.
nuf said!
#53 Jul 08 2010 at 1:18 AM Rating: Good
There's very little "glamor" involved in drug use. Pot makes everything "better" &, at least for me, prevents me from being bored (as it makes the "boring" much more entertaining. RE: FFXI). While, admittedly, i'm certainly not on my "A-Game" while stoned, my tolerance is such that I'm not "Bill & Ted" or "Cheech & Chong" level stupid either.

Tripping is a whole other deal though. It expands your consciousness (for better or for worse) & is quite the "spiritual" journey. I think everyone should, at the very least, eat some mushrooms at some point & see for themselves.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#54 Jul 08 2010 at 8:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Tailmon wrote:
When you watch a Co-worker go off the deep end at work from years of LSD use you shiver at what can lay dormant for years after giving up drugs. It can be a ticking time bomb waiting to go off. Believe me having to hold down a ranting guy that has spiders crawling on him in the middle of your shift is eye opening.



This doesn't even begin to describe what a hallucinogenic flashback is like. If it happened at all, your coworker suffered a psychotic break with reality. Could still have been drug related, but if so it was something like meth or alcohol.

Hallucinogenic flashbacks are purely visual, as in halos and trails. What you describe is straight out of a scare film circa 1963.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#55 Jul 08 2010 at 9:16 AM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
Tailmon wrote:
When you watch a Co-worker go off the deep end at work from years of LSD use you shiver at what can lay dormant for years after giving up drugs. It can be a ticking time bomb waiting to go off. Believe me having to hold down a ranting guy that has spiders crawling on him in the middle of your shift is eye opening.



This doesn't even begin to describe what a hallucinogenic flashback is like. If it happened at all, your coworker suffered a psychotic break with reality. Could still have been drug related, but if so it was something like meth or alcohol.

Hallucinogenic flashbacks are purely visual, as in halos and trails. What you describe is straight out of a scare film circa 1963.



It may have been more than just LSD that he did all those years back but. It was years ago. I knew him to be clean and did not do any drugs or pot many years after. Drink some beer yes but. One moment hes working at the machine and the next hes thrashing on the floor clawing his skin open screaming. Things like LSD gather in the brain and sit there. One day they go pop and so does your sanity. He's in a mental instution locked up and still is all these years later. He is not the only person I know that went this way back then. Chasing down people that are on a "Bad Trip" is never fun and dangerous for an EMS crew also. You learn fast to let the cops handle them and then strap them on the gurney with lots of straps and then they still can break loose.

As for the casual user of pot? Meh, its your life I cant stop you nor do I care. But, Come to work stoned, Wrung out, bloodshot eyes and can't do your job? Jepordizing my safety and your own? I won't stand for it. When your dealing with 20 juvenile felons? Falling asleep at night? Being totally innatentive when your dealing with them and they can smell it on you? Not good for you or me. I want to stay safe, keep the kids safe, and not have to turn you in for sleeping on the job. I've even known some C0-workers to abuse vicoden and pain killers there.
Like most people here I tried pot. All my friends did Even cops and court judges. But it was a shared joint here and there. One day I had more than that "Happy feeling" I felt like I was drowning. It took many hours for it to pass as did my ever wanting to do pot again.

Like I said. Doing drugs even pot is up to you. I consider people that do it fools. I've learned my lessons in life. One of them is to not do drugs.

Edited, Jul 8th 2010 11:17am by Tailmon
#56 Jul 08 2010 at 9:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Things like LSD gather in the brain and sit there.


Based on what source, exactly?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#57 Jul 08 2010 at 9:18 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Samira wrote:
And...?

It's up to person B to manage his relationship with person A, assuming any relationship other than a dependent child. I would agree that it is irresponsible of parents to be in an altered state if they bear sole responsibility for small children.


If you lived out in the middle of no where by yourself, then your point would have more foundation. The problem is, a community doesn't work like that. Your personal actions may and will affect others. The people in the neighborhood directly affects the value of the community.

Exodus wrote:
I fully agree. We should ban everything that could place yourself in harms way, as we all know that it would affect the people around you as well.

I'll start making a list of things:

Driving, sky diving, scuba diving, drugs, soda, fast food, video games, the internet, air travel, drinking too much water, hunting, construction work, electricity usage/repair, cooking (grill, stove, oven, and microwave)...

Feel free to add anything you want to that list, as just about anything could kill you. Also, not just drugs, but -anything- done excessively could lead to obsessive behavior that could harm you and the people around you.


Even though you're "joking", I will address this.

All of those aforementioned scenarios have control measures to greatly reduce the safety hazards allowing personnel to have daily involvement with minimal negative side effects.

The problem lies in "hard drugs" that are nothing but harmful, that can kill you or severely alter you in short amount of time. The contradiction in trying to implement safety measures in "hard drugs" is that people are taking the drugs for the exact reasons that are causing the serious side effects. Else, they would be just taking "gateway drugs".

Majivo wrote:
Luckily we don't make legislation based on what you want to see as you walk down the street, or else (cross-thread shenanigans) we'd be outlawing certain haircuts or clothing. It's also interesting how you say it applies for gateway drugs, then list off crack and meth. As it is, there's a public interest in barring public drunkenness; no one wants to get the crap beat out of them by some pissed-off drunk. On the other hand, why not let people high on marijuana walk around? The worst they're going to do is ask for some food off you.


I'm confused on your crack/meth gateway drug comment.

What about having unwrapped open bottles of beer, drinking in public and not being drunk? Isn't that also illegal?

Aethein wrote:
And I still don't see why you think someone wanting to hallucinate is stupid.
What harm is there in someone using LSD or shrooms or other such drugs and experience those hallucinations if they take the proper precautions so they don't end up jumping off of a building or running in front of a train chasing bats or sh*t like that.


It's more about not being in the right state of mind than hallucinating. I can't change your opinion on anything, but all I can say is that you are implying that curiosity outweighs stupidity and that's not true. Rather you agree with the definition or not, that word exists.
#58 Jul 08 2010 at 9:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
If you lived out in the middle of no where by yourself, then your point would have more foundation. The problem is, a community doesn't work like that. Your personal actions may and will affect others. The people in the neighborhood directly affects the value of the community.


Okay, I agree with that. In my opinion it applies much more to drugs other than hallucinogens, however.

Having said that, it's a bad idea to use any drug irresponsibly. I just don't define "irresponsibly" as "at all", and I think that's where we disagree.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#59 Jul 08 2010 at 10:01 AM Rating: Decent
Several studies and more over the years. I suppose one can go look them up again for the doubting masses.

What are the long-term effects of taking LSD?
The use of LSD can result in long-term effects for both one-time and regular users of the drug. Possible negative effects are “flashbacks” of the drug experience, as well as prolonged anxiety, depression or psychosis. These reactions usually decrease over time, and end within a few months after LSD was last taken, but may continue for years.

Flashbacks are the spontaneous and unpredictable replay of an aspect of the LSD trip, occurring some time after the initial effects of the drug have worn off. Visual or emotional experiences that were originally seen or felt while under the influence of LSD are re-experienced. Flashbacks usually last only a few seconds or minutes, but may happen over and over again. Only some people who take LSD have flashbacks, but frequent users of the drug are said to be at greater risk. Flashbacks may be triggered by smoking marijuana or drinking alcohol, or by emotional stress or fatigue.

Depression or anxiety may follow a bad trip. Psychosis may develop after using LSD, although it is thought that this reaction may be more likely to occur in people with latent, or underlying, mental health problems.

The effects of LSD are very strong and profound. Many people have claimed to have discovered their inner selves under the influence of LSD. One interesting analogy was made by Professor Jeffrey M. Blum of the University of Buffalo School of Law:

"The problems posed by LSD, for example, in some ways resemble those presented by scuba diving. Each is seen as a form of exploration that opens new vistas. Hence participants often find the activity enormously stimulating and inspiring. Each activity poses a small but significant risk of serious personal harm, these being death in one and aggravation of pre-existing states of mental instability for the other. Untrained, unsupervised use of unchecked substances or equipment are ill-advised in both cases." (Blum, 1990)

Some users of LSD experience what is clinically referred to as LSD psychosis, schizophrenic-like disorders that seem to be triggered by using the drug. However, in careful analysis of LSD psychosis patients, it appears that those who have strong family histories of major psychosis or psychopathology are more vulnerable than those who do not (Tsuang et al., 1982). Vardy et al. (1983) reported similar findings, as well as that LSD psychotics have significantly higher rates of parental alcoholism than control groups. In a survey of five-thousand individuals who had used LSD a total of twenty-five-thousand times, Cohen (1960) found 1.8 psychotic episodes per thousand ingestions, 1.2 attempted suicides, and 0.4 completed suicides -- figures consistent with the those of the general population. Regarding dangers of psychosis in therapeutic uses of LSD, Pahnke et al. (1970) notes:

#60 Jul 08 2010 at 10:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
In a survey of five-thousand individuals who had used LSD a total of twenty-five-thousand times, Cohen (1960) found 1.8 psychotic episodes per thousand ingestions, 1.2 attempted suicides, and 0.4 completed suicides -- figures consistent with the those of the general population.


Right.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#61 Jul 08 2010 at 10:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I once knew this one dude who drank a big jug of LSD and then they found him weeks later sitting in a cornfield thinking he was an orange.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#62 Jul 08 2010 at 1:02 PM Rating: Good
Suicide only has a 33% pass rate, eh? Looks like quite an exclusive little club.
#63 Jul 08 2010 at 1:07 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Suicide only has a 33% pass rate, eh? Looks like quite an exclusive little club.


Third time's the charm.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#64 Jul 08 2010 at 2:36 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Suicide only has a 33% pass rate, eh? Looks like quite an exclusive little club.


Technically, it's 25%, assuming they aren't including successes in the "attempted" group. That's actually a pretty high success rate for suicide I think. LSD users are serious about their death!

Pretty much all drugs alter brain chemistry and behavior over time. While I don't think that the effects are so significant as to justify illegalization in many cases, I also think it's deceptive when people insist that it's "perfectly safe", especially when talking about pot. Marijuana users just think they aren't changing or being affected, but they are. And those who see them from the outside can see it pretty plainly. Ever had a conversation with someone who smoked pot regularly for a couple decades and thought "What a smart person?". Ever? Probably not...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#65 Jul 08 2010 at 3:21 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
I've never had the same thought about anyone who drank alcohol regularly for a few decades, either. It might be true, but it's not really relevant when it's at such a low degree. Besides which, if we're being anecdotal, it could just be that anyone who regularly smokes pot for a few decades wasn't that bright to start off.
#66 Jul 08 2010 at 3:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
gbaji wrote:
Ever had a conversation with someone who smoked pot regularly for a couple decades and thought "What a smart person?". Ever? Probably not...


In that order? No. But I have some very intelligent and accomplished friends who smoke pot, so there you go.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#67 Jul 08 2010 at 3:47 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Samira wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Ever had a conversation with someone who smoked pot regularly for a couple decades and thought "What a smart person?". Ever? Probably not...


In that order? No. But I have some very intelligent and accomplished friends who smoke pot, so there you go.


How often and for how long? I'm talking specifically to the guys who smoke pot every day (often several times a day) and insist that it's perfectly safe and spout off all kinds of statistics "proving" this. Um... It's not. You're going to continue to act like and think like a stoner even when not stoned because that'll become your "normal" state given enough time.

I've seen plenty of people who were smart and ambitious about their futures in their teens, started smoking pot, thought it was great and harmless and whatnot, and ten years later they're still smoking pot and thinking it's great and harmless, and ten years after that they're still smoking pot and thinking it's great and harmless. Of course, they're still working part time at the local Sizzler or something and never finished that education they started, and well that dream they had when they were younger, it just didn't happen, but it's not their fault, and it's not the pot, it's just things out of their control which caused their life to end out the way it did. Pot's perfectly safe! And it makes life just fine, so don't worry about it man!


Yeah. Seen that. A lot. In moderation, do whatever you want. Just don't make it your life. Unfortunately, far too many kids, responding to insistence that pot is harmless, do make it their life. And they never really live life as a result.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#68 Jul 08 2010 at 3:53 PM Rating: Good
Of course. The drug of choice for truly successful people is oxytocin or blow.

Edited, Jul 8th 2010 5:53pm by catwho
#69 Jul 08 2010 at 3:54 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
gbaji wrote:
Samira wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Ever had a conversation with someone who smoked pot regularly for a couple decades and thought "What a smart person?". Ever? Probably not...


In that order? No. But I have some very intelligent and accomplished friends who smoke pot, so there you go.


How often and for how long? I'm talking specifically to the guys who smoke pot every day (often several times a day) and insist that it's perfectly safe and spout off all kinds of statistics "proving" this. Um... It's not. You're going to continue to act like and think like a stoner even when not stoned because that'll become your "normal" state given enough time.

I've seen plenty of people who were smart and ambitious about their futures in their teens, started smoking pot, thought it was great and harmless and whatnot, and ten years later they're still smoking pot and thinking it's great and harmless, and ten years after that they're still smoking pot and thinking it's great and harmless. Of course, they're still working part time at the local Sizzler or something and never finished that education they started, and well that dream they had when they were younger, it just didn't happen, but it's not their fault, and it's not the pot, it's just things out of their control which caused their life to end out the way it did. Pot's perfectly safe! And it makes life just fine, so don't worry about it man!


Yeah. Seen that. A lot. In moderation, do whatever you want. Just don't make it your life. Unfortunately, far too many kids, responding to insistence that pot is harmless, do make it their life. And they never really live life as a result.


I've seen that situation unfold a few times myself. Moderation certainly is the name of the game.

I don't know that it's due to "insistence that pot is harmless", however. In those situations, it strikes me more as an excuse/mantra that helps one sleep at night. To keep one from having to confront the addiction, I guess.

As many people, if not more, follow that same behavioral pattern but with alcohol. They may not argue that it's "harmless" like one might with pot, but they certainly have their own set of excuses and rationalizations. I think that if there wasn't a belief that pot was harmless, its addicts would simply use other excuses in that fashion.

Edited, Jul 8th 2010 5:56pm by Eske
#70 Jul 08 2010 at 3:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
gbaji wrote:
How often and for how long? I'm talking specifically to the guys who smoke pot every day (often several times a day) and insist that it's perfectly safe and spout off all kinds of statistics "proving" this.


Sure, that's different. I don't know, would be the answer to both questions. I assume about as often as they drink, which is to say, socially.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#71 Jul 08 2010 at 3:58 PM Rating: Good
I've been an every day smoker for roughly fifteen years, since I was about fifteen, and I'm hungry. Ravenously so; like a man with only four inches of intestine or a glossy-eyed, fly-bitten Ethiopian child.
#72 Jul 08 2010 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
Oh yeah, and people are always commenting to themselves how smart I am after we have engaging discourse.
#73 Jul 08 2010 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,159 posts
gbaji wrote:
How often and for how long? I'm talking specifically to the guys who smoke pot every day (often several times a day) and insist that it's perfectly safe and spout off all kinds of statistics "proving" this. Um... It's not.

And once again, gbaji is superior to statistics and fact.
#74 Jul 08 2010 at 4:27 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Majivo wrote:
gbaji wrote:
How often and for how long? I'm talking specifically to the guys who smoke pot every day (often several times a day) and insist that it's perfectly safe and spout off all kinds of statistics "proving" this. Um... It's not.

And once again, gbaji is superior to statistics and fact.


Exactly how many statistics and "facts" have been quoted in this thread stating that smoking 2-3 bowls of pot a day is completely harmless and will have no lasting impact on your life? Zero, right?

My point is that there are no such statistics, but many people do claim that there are, or at least pretend that there are. As Eske properly pointed out, it's mostly an excuse, but I'm pretty sure if more people treated pot a bit more cautiously as a drug, there would be fewer people falling into "stonerville". Something which is fun when you're in your teens isn't quite so fun or cute when you get into your late 30s. In fact, I'd argue that there's not much uglier in this world than an aging stoner. Maybe aging heroic addicts, but that's a rarer and special case.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#75 Jul 08 2010 at 4:41 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
gbaji wrote:
Exactly how many statistics and "facts" have been quoted in this thread stating that smoking 2-3 bowls of pot a day is completely harmless and will have no lasting impact on your life? Zero, right?
I don't think anyone is saying that in the first place, and I'm not entirely sure where you got it from either.

If you smoke high quantities of pot on a daily basis you're bound to **** yourself over just like drinking yourself into a coma on a daily basis ***** up your body.
Not really very shocking facts.
#76 Jul 08 2010 at 4:50 PM Rating: Good
His Excellency Aethien wrote:


If you smoke high quantities of pot on a daily basis you're bound to @#%^ yourself over just like drinking yourself into a coma on a daily basis @#%^s up your body.
.


Nah. Ingested properly pot has zero negative physical side effects. Alcohol, on the other hand, will kill you.

What a stupid fUcking thread on this stupid fUcking board with the usual stupid fUcking suspects. It's bogus to ask for statistics proving pot isn't harmful. FUcking prove it is. How about some statistics that show it's harmful beyond the legal ramifications?

You won't find any reliable ones, because it's just not true.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 189 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (189)