Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Giving fetuses unapproved drugs to prevent lesbianismFollow

#52 Jul 01 2010 at 8:41 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Barkingturtle wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Lesbianism is neither a disease, nor unsightly.


Not only that, but I'd venture to guess that chicks with enormous ***** actually enjoy life more.
It's not the size that matters...right guyz?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#53 Jul 01 2010 at 8:44 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:


I know I just blew your minds.
You're a honky-tonk woman:)
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#54 Jul 01 2010 at 8:45 AM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Doesn't the fact that these people think they can cure this while the child is in the womb prove that a child is born gay rather than it being a learned behaviour?

I know I just blew your minds.

Do you even remember which side you're arguing for anymore?


Come, now. We all know varus plays for both sides. Smiley: tongue
#55 Jul 01 2010 at 8:49 AM Rating: Decent
Ugly,

I'm arguing a side?


#56 Jul 01 2010 at 8:51 AM Rating: Decent
Elinda,

Quote:
It's not the size that matters...right guyz?



****...
#57 Jul 01 2010 at 9:15 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
It's not the size that matters...right guyz?



****...
Well BT was campaigning for large *****. I was suggesting that large isn't necessary. I'm not sure how that makes me a candidate for slutdom. However, you're not following any kind of rational or logical train-of-thought again today, so...whatever.

*****....






Edited, Jul 1st 2010 5:22pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#58 Jul 01 2010 at 9:17 AM Rating: Good
Aripyanfar wrote:
Lesbianism [not] unsightly.

Have you met many non-**** actor lesbians before? It's unsightly as all get out most of the time.
#59 Jul 01 2010 at 9:22 AM Rating: Decent
Elinda,

Quote:
I was suggesting that large isn't necessary.


I feel so sorry for you right now. Smiley: frown
#60 Jul 01 2010 at 9:28 AM Rating: Good
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
I was suggesting that large isn't necessary.


I feel so sorry for you right now. Smiley: frown


The implications of your statement are that you have first-hand knowledge what it feels like to have a specific size inside of you, and have a preference for 'large'.
#61 Jul 01 2010 at 9:31 AM Rating: Decent
Than,

I just feel sorry for women who have to put up with small d*cks. Is there something you need to get off your chest Tiny?

#62 Jul 01 2010 at 9:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Thanacus wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Elinda wrote:
I was suggesting that large isn't necessary.

I feel so sorry for you right now. Smiley: frown

The implications of your statement are that you have first-hand knowledge what it feels like to have a specific size inside of you, and have a preference for 'large'.

Varus isn't really good at implication, subtlety or nuance.

Reading any of those in to a Varus post implies failure.
#63 Jul 01 2010 at 9:34 AM Rating: Good
knoxxsouthy wrote:
I just feel sorry for women who have to put up with small d*cks. Is there something you need to get off your chest Tiny?

Every lock has a key made to fit it, Dirk. There's such a thing as having too much wang.
#64 Jul 01 2010 at 9:36 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Thanacus wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
I was suggesting that large isn't necessary.


I feel so sorry for you right now. Smiley: frown


The implications of your statement are that you have first-hand knowledge what it feels like to have a specific size inside of you, and have a preference for 'large'.
The implications were that a large **** may provide for more or better orgasms. I don't know if that's true or not, nor if my **** is small normal or large. I'm gonna go with small because everything about me is small. Yet, I don't lack in the ****** dept.

My follow up statement, that 'size doesn't matter' was commentary to BT's post, but directed at men...as the measure of one's peen is often counted as manly/sexy/virile.

Being that I've been married for over a quarter century, I really only have valid comments about the one ***** inside me, and it is average in size but far above average in performance;) Also, I thought it common knowledge, at least to women, that the size of a guys wiener is not necessarily the determining factor in sexually satisfying a partner.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#65 Jul 01 2010 at 9:38 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Than,

Is there something you need to get off your chest Tiny?

As opposed to your moobs?

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#66 Jul 01 2010 at 9:39 AM Rating: Decent
Elinda,

Quote:
Also, I thought it common knowledge, at least to women, that the size of a guys wiener is not necessarily the determining factor in sexually satisfying a partner


You're 100% right...the size of a mans tongue can be equally as important.Smiley: tongue
#67 Jul 01 2010 at 9:44 AM Rating: Excellent
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Thanacus wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Elinda wrote:
I was suggesting that large isn't necessary.

I feel so sorry for you right now. Smiley: frown

The implications of your statement are that you have first-hand knowledge what it feels like to have a specific size inside of you, and have a preference for 'large'.

Varus isn't really good at implication, subtlety or nuance.

Reading any of those in to a Varus post implies failure.


No, reading any of those in to a Varus post implies boredom to the point of poking a dead carcass with a stick.

knoxxsouthy wrote:
Than,

I just feel sorry for women who have to put up with small d*cks. Is there something you need to get off your chest Tiny?


Not really. I'm comfortable enough with myself to not worry about anything other than making my wife happy.

Don't worry, one day you'll find that; someone large enough to make you squeal like a schoolgirl again.
#68 Jul 01 2010 at 11:37 AM Rating: Default
Thanacus wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Varus isn't really good at implication, subtlety or nuance.

Reading any of those in to a Varus post implies failure.


No, reading any of those in to a Varus post implies boredom to the point of poking a dead carcass with a stick.

Which pretty well defines failure. Don't correct me, you're not smart enough.
#69 Jul 01 2010 at 3:44 PM Rating: Decent
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Thanacus wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Varus isn't really good at implication, subtlety or nuance.

Reading any of those in to a Varus post implies failure.


No, reading any of those in to a Varus post implies boredom to the point of poking a dead carcass with a stick.

Which pretty well defines failure. Don't correct me, you're not smart enough.


Not really. It shows a lack of interest in any other possible activities available to me at the time. Given that the environment I'm currently in restricts those options--should I wish to retain the benefits of the environment--I find it to be an amusing aside to my normal day.

Also: no u!
#70 Jul 01 2010 at 3:59 PM Rating: Decent
Thane,

Quote:
I find it to be an amusing aside to my normal day


I should start a radio talk show I'm so entertaining.
#71 Jul 01 2010 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Thanea,

Quote:
I find it to be an amusing aside to my normal day


I should start a radio talk show I'm so entertaining.


Rush, datchoo?
#72 Jul 01 2010 at 4:59 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Lesbianism is neither a disease, nor unsightly.


So it's a choice, a sin.

Being gay is a choice just like depression is a choice. It's a spectrum that varies due to different chemical/biological/dna/hereditary, etc. a number of different variables that affect it. It can be a person's choice to be gay, or depressed. Then on the other end of the spectrum it's not so much a choice as it is hereditary, chemical, or whatever. It's no longer a choice but more of an influence of different factors that change a person's sexual wiring to be gay or bisexual, etc.

People do choose to be gay. But people are also born gay. Is it a disease? I think it can be. I don't think it always is. I think it varies on a case to case basis. I don't think it's bad nor unsightly. Does it need to be cured? I think it's unnecessary research time and resources that should go towards something that affects a person's lifespan and/or lifestyle much more, like cancer or aids. I look at it like being color blind, someone might not see the same colors but they might have better night vision because of it.

It's hard to call it a disease because people look at it in a negative aspect. A disease can actually be a good thing. It can help bring a family together or increase someone's appreciation of life or broaden someone's perspective. There are two problems with calling it a disease; people think it needs to be cured and people use it as an excuse for their actions or state of being.


Quote:
Disease: a disordered or incorrectly functioning organ, part, structure, or system of the body resulting from the effect of genetic or developmental errors, infection, poisons, nutritional deficiency or imbalance, toxicity, or unfavorable environmental factors; illness; sickness; ailment.



I would be surprised if being gay never fit that description in anyone's case. Just like depression.

The funny thing about being normal is nobody is. With all the variations in physical and mental aspects of humans nobody can be normal, nobody. And yet people discriminate against the most obvious aspects like race or sexual orientation.

Should lesbianism be cured? Not if it affects my libido.

#73 Jul 01 2010 at 6:00 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Gay is not a disease.

Don't mean to burst your bubble, or anything.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#74 Jul 01 2010 at 6:23 PM Rating: Decent
I want my baby's crap to smell like fresh picked oranges.
#75 Jul 01 2010 at 10:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Gay is no more a disease than liking pistachio ice cream is a disease. It's a matter of taste, and some people find it damn delicious.
#76 Jul 01 2010 at 10:29 PM Rating: Good
catwho wrote:
Gay is no more a disease than liking pistachio ice cream is a disease. It's a matter of taste, and some people find it damn delicious.
Gee, thanks for calling everyone who likes pistachio ice cream gay.

</sarcasm>
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 354 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (354)