Hmmm how strange!!! :: Free Realms

Quote Reply

#102 Jun 25 2010 at 10:51 PM Rating: Decent

bsphil

Edited by bsphil

21,739 posts

gbaji wrote:

Quote:

Had you just said "Look, I know fuck all about how they get it but some do get jobs and welfare so obviously it's possible" then I doubt anyone would have said a peep.

You didn't just type that with a straight face Mr. "Provide me peer reviewed sources or you're wrong". Seriously? You would have been the first one to "peep". Heck. I could write your response for you. Half the people on this forum could. It's that predictable.

It's a reasonable statement to make, which is why I'd severely doubt that you'd ever make it. If you had it would have been a rare moment of agreement.

Instead, you drone on with hyperbole and no evidence to back any of your outlandish claims, continuing to spin a web of nonsense only to turn around and finish with "Hey now that doesn't make sense, does it? Think about it..." in a hypocritical act of what you must think 'gotcha' journalism is.

Fuck yourself.

____________________________

His Excellency Aethien wrote:

Almalieque wrote:

If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.

Take the hint guys, please take the hint.

gbaji wrote:

I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#103 Jun 25 2010 at 11:24 PM Rating: Decent

Debalic

Prodigal Son

20,643 posts

Bardalicious wrote:

Joph is stuck in a **** loop :(

He's practicing for the baby. Granted, he's done it before but Joph Jr. is out of diapers (I'm assuming).

____________________________

publiusvarus wrote:

we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#104 Jun 26 2010 at 12:53 AM Rating: Good

Bijou

View User Forum

GBATE!! Never saw it coming

9,969 posts

gbaji wrote:

The problem with that law is that the "listB, and ListC" documents aren't tracked and are relatively easy to fake. There's also no copies of the documents made

Not required, true; but certainly allowed. In my personal experience as an employee and employer over the last 25 years, these documents have always been copied and kept with the employed persons' files. Failure to do so on the part of the employer is functionaly retarded, particularily because the effort to do so is so small.

____________________________

remorajunbao wrote:

One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#105 Jun 27 2010 at 12:54 PM Rating: Good

Xsarus

View User Forum

10,601 posts

gbaji wrote:

naatdog wrote:

I usually enjoy reading the back and for but it bugs me when gbaji makes a completely false statement. It has been the law in the US since 1986 (Immigration Control and Reform Act) that every employer complete a form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification form) for every hire. An employer is subject to a $200,000 fine for each violation.

Funny, and Xsarus was insisting that there were no immigration reforms focused on the companies who hire illegals. So there's a $200,000 fine for the company, but what happens to the employee? Anything?

That's funny, I thought I posted that the majority of what I hear about immigration reform is focused on the individual. I am however sorry that I missed a bill passed back when I was a kid. But I guess that's insisting about an absolute point if you can make an argument against it AMIRIGHT?! Smiley: oyvey

____________________________

01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#106 Jun 27 2010 at 1:00 PM Rating: Good

TirithRR

Worst. Title. Ever!

17,302 posts

Friar Bijou wrote:

gbaji wrote:

The problem with that law is that the "listB, and ListC" documents aren't tracked and are relatively easy to fake. There's also no copies of the documents made

Not required, true; but certainly allowed. In my personal experience as an employee and employer over the last 25 years, these documents have always been copied and kept with the employed persons' files. Failure to do so on the part of the employer is functionaly retarded, particularily because the effort to do so is so small.

My employer made copies of the documents I provided when I started work.

But prior to being hired full time, when I was in college I worked there for a few summers. The first summer I didn't have the copy of my Social Security Card and they just told me to bring it in at a later time and filled out the paperwork anyway.

____________________________

Can't sleep, clown will eat me.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#107 Jun 27 2010 at 1:10 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1618186764728

Sage

5,684 posts

TirithRR the Eccentric wrote:

Friar Bijou wrote:

gbaji wrote:

The problem with that law is that the "listB, and ListC" documents aren't tracked and are relatively easy to fake. There's also no copies of the documents made

Not required, true; but certainly allowed. In my personal experience as an employee and employer over the last 25 years, these documents have always been copied and kept with the employed persons' files. Failure to do so on the part of the employer is functionaly retarded, particularily because the effort to do so is so small.

My employer made copies of the documents I provided when I started work.

But prior to being hired full time, when I was in college I worked there for a few summers. The first summer I didn't have the copy of my Social Security Card and they just told me to bring it in at a later time and filled out the paperwork anyway.

I never presented my actual SS card when I was hired by the university. It is locked away at my parents house in the fireproof safe with all the other valuables. Instead I just had my parents fax a copy of it and that was it.

▲ Page top

Hmmm how strange!!!Follow