gbaji wrote:
But feel free to try to make some sort of equivalence...
Of course they are. Are you saying it's okay to physically assault someone in a boardroom but not if you're asked questions on the street or something? Assaulting someone is wrong if you're a House Rep but we can just kind of ignore it and say it's not really a big deal if you're a CEO who later runs for governor? It's "assault" (and therefore you're a criminal) if it's one guy but it's magically
not criminal assault if you're this chick instead? Or is it the magic video camera that makes it a crime but we should pretend it never happened if it wasn't taped? Because that seems to be the best defense Varus can come up with.
Personally, I'd say
both are wrong. Of course I also think neither is enough to really throw a tizzy about but if you're going to throw a tizzy about one, you should be throwing one about both.
Unless, of course, you're actually just throwing your tizzy because you don't like one person's politics but the other can be handwaved away because they're with a party you like. But I'm sure that's not really your motive at--- hahahahahahaha
Yeah, I can't even finish that one.