- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- NC Democrat assaults student reporter
NC Democrat assaults student reporterFollow
Obligatory pictoral response to a Varus thread:
Douchebags, the lot of them. However, if the kids actually wanted to do something more than get 15 minutes of internet fame, they would have pressed charges.
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin
Jophed,
He did more than just act like an *** he broke the law. Of course if you don't have much use for the law I can see how this wouldn't bother you. This Democrat attempted to use his position to intimidate someone who asked him a question he didn't want to hear. This kind of behaviour is typical of the Democrat party and your response is just as typical. Marginalize the victim and that allows you to ignore what happened.
He did more than just act like an *** he broke the law. Of course if you don't have much use for the law I can see how this wouldn't bother you. This Democrat attempted to use his position to intimidate someone who asked him a question he didn't want to hear. This kind of behaviour is typical of the Democrat party and your response is just as typical. Marginalize the victim and that allows you to ignore what happened.
I thought he kinda seemed drunk. But then again, the news only plays the exact moment when he gets belligerent, so I don't know what the leadup was. Maybe they were hounding him before the clip they've been showing? I dunno. Nor do I care. He's already issued an apology.
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
He's already issued an apology.
All better then.
Ash,
The entire clip was on youtube, if you didn't look into it's simply because you didn't want to. I can understand that you being a radical liberal and all. All your bs about human rights and what not doesn't exactly hold up when someone who's political ideology you hold acts this way, especially if they're up for re-election.
Hey let's just ignore it and pretend it didn't happen. This is big for the Democrats. This guy was supposed to be a lock before this incident. This is the reason you liberals don't care about these kids rights being trampled on, nothing else.
The entire clip was on youtube, if you didn't look into it's simply because you didn't want to. I can understand that you being a radical liberal and all. All your bs about human rights and what not doesn't exactly hold up when someone who's political ideology you hold acts this way, especially if they're up for re-election.
Hey let's just ignore it and pretend it didn't happen. This is big for the Democrats. This guy was supposed to be a lock before this incident. This is the reason you liberals don't care about these kids rights being trampled on, nothing else.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
This is big for the Democrats.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
He did more than just act like an *** he broke the law.
That's for the local authorities and judicial system to decide if they feel it's worth pursuing.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
This is big for the Democrats.
He's not on for another 2 hours or so.
Unrelated to Mr. Newly Not Single, I'm still just a little surprised by the implicit pass given to a U.S. Congressman on tape assaulting someone. I don't expect overstated outrage, but an honest treatment has to at least yield some concern, which I'm not seeing displayed here. Are you people really that polarized that you can't be bothered to call a spade a spade and acknowledge obvious lawbreaking when you are confronted with it?
Ash,
Rush doesn't come on until noon; not that I expect someone who ignores other viewpoints to understand.
Did you hear the congressmans apology? I guess having a "bad day" means you can grad the person annoying you around the neck and put them in a headlock.
Like I said you're all about human rights as long as it's the right people receiving them.
Rush doesn't come on until noon; not that I expect someone who ignores other viewpoints to understand.
Did you hear the congressmans apology? I guess having a "bad day" means you can grad the person annoying you around the neck and put them in a headlock.
Like I said you're all about human rights as long as it's the right people receiving them.
Jophiel wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
He did more than just act like an *** he broke the law.
That's for the local authorities and judicial system to decide if they feel it's worth pursuing.
See, that's just false. It's not even disingenuous. The authorities don't determine whether a law has been broken. They may choose whether or not to prosecute, but that has absolutely no bearing on whether or not a crime has been committed.
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Are you people really that polarized that you can't be bothered to call a spade a spade and acknowledge obvious lawbreaking when you are confronted with it?
Meh. I said he acted like an ***. Are you just mad that the cops aren't all over him or something? People grab other people's arms every day without being thrown in jail for it. If the cops think this is worth chasing or the film makers want to press charges, it'll happen. If not, it won't.
I sort of suspect, and I might be completely wrong here, that the "students" won't press any charges because it'll come out that they weren't just students at all.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
My political bias allows me to forgive this act of poor judgment without a second thought. I mean, maybe if it was a slightly more egregious example of assault, but seriously. An old dude grabs my wrist with his withered Grampa claw and I assume he's demented, not that I've been assaulted. In summary: that clip was boring. I expected rape.
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
I'm still just a little surprised by the implicit pass given to a U.S. Congressman on tape assaulting someone.
What annoys me, though, is the implication that this has some grander meaning for the Democratic Party as a whole, by the usual crowd.
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
The authorities don't determine whether a law has been broken.
I see you only read in short bursts and skipped the words "judicial system". Are you under the impression that the judicial system does not decide if you're guilty of breaking the law or not?
Are you perhaps Niobia's famed internet lawyer?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophed,
This guy needs to resign immediately. That will suffice. Law abiding citizens don't grab people around the neck who annoy them.
Do you think these students might not want to end up getting b*tt f*cked by the media like Joe the plumber was?
This guy needs to resign immediately. That will suffice. Law abiding citizens don't grab people around the neck who annoy them.
Do you think these students might not want to end up getting b*tt f*cked by the media like Joe the plumber was?
Jophiel wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
The authorities don't determine whether a law has been broken.
I see you only read in short bursts and skipped the words "judicial system". Are you under the impression that the judicial system does not decide if you're guilty of breaking the law or not?
And perhaps you're being intentionally obtuse. I break the law every time I drive a car and I'm not found guilty of it. It doesn't mean I haven't broken the law. Guilt and innocence are technical terms with implications attached that aren't necessarily addressed by stating that laws were broken.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Do you think these students might not want to end up getting b*tt f*cked by the media
A cushy gig with a GOP media outlet, paid speaking jobs and a book deal?
I'm sure they'd cry at night if they thought that was coming for them.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Do you think these students might not want to end up getting b*tt f*cked by the media like Joe the plumber was?
They should probably shut their little ***** mouths then. We're running **** now, so get used to having your rights trampled on, pUssy. At the point of a mother-fUcking gun.
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Guilt and innocence are technical terms with implications attached that aren't necessarily addressed by stating that laws were broken.
Who gives a fUck? He broke the law pretty benignly, in any event. That's why he won't be charged. I say give him a pass.
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
What annoys me, though, is the implication that this has some grander meaning for the Democratic Party as a whole, by the usual crowd.
That's pretty much just Varus. The rest are just hand-wringing that we're not hooting like monkeys.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
What annoys me, though, is the implication that this has some grander meaning for the Democratic Party as a whole, by the usual crowd.
That's pretty much just Varus. The rest are just hand-wringing that we're not hooting like monkeys.
What a surprise radical liberals defending a fascist.
You're delusional if you don't think the Democrats are covering this up because of this guys chance at re-election in a year when the Dems are set to lose big.
You're delusional if you don't think the Democrats are covering this up because of this guys chance at re-election in a year when the Dems are set to lose big.
Hey, remember when that kid that pretended to be a pimp to make ACORN look bad broke into a senator's office disguised as a phone company employee to try to tap her phone?
Yeah, nothing was done to him, either.
Yeah, nothing was done to him, either.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's okay when GOP'ers assault people because they just pay them off...
Political Wire wrote:
The New York Times reports that in 2007 an eBay employee accused California gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman (R) of becoming angry and forcefully pushing her in the company's executive conference room.
"The employee, Young Mi Kim, was preparing Ms. Whitman for a news media interview that day. Ms. Kim, who was not injured in the incident, hired a lawyer and threatened a lawsuit, but the dispute was resolved under the supervision of a private mediator. Two of the former employees said the company paid a six-figure financial settlement to Ms. Kim, which one of them characterized as 'around $200,000.'"
"The employee, Young Mi Kim, was preparing Ms. Whitman for a news media interview that day. Ms. Kim, who was not injured in the incident, hired a lawyer and threatened a lawsuit, but the dispute was resolved under the supervision of a private mediator. Two of the former employees said the company paid a six-figure financial settlement to Ms. Kim, which one of them characterized as 'around $200,000.'"
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
You're delusional if you don't think the Democrats are covering this up
Recent Visitors: 625
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (625)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- NC Democrat assaults student reporter
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC