Read the article, and the comments, and I think this among the comments summed things up best:
A commenter wrote:
These kids are like students in a classroom trying to antagonize the teacher into doing or saying something she shouldn't for the express purpose of getting her into trouble. Students have done that to teachers, and the teacher needed to send them out of the room, rather than getting riled up by them.
The congressman should've dealt with them in the same way that a teacher would by not entertaining their monkey business by standing there talking to them. Say no comment, or something that's nondescript and noncommittal and move on before they have the time to say anything else next time congressman. Don't let them draw you into their nonsense.
Honestly, I'd have more sympathy for the kids if they had come up with a better first question than "Do you support the Obama agenda?" Of
course a Democratic Congressman is going to get annoyed by such a vague question that isn't even really about him. Why not, "What are your positions on economic reforms? Do you support the AZ immigration law? What do you think should be done about the oil spill?"
If they're high school students, then the Congresscritter needs to get a reality check (and possibly jail time for assaulting a minor.) If they're college students, then, well, they're idiots and deserve to flunk their class.