Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Watch the Oil Spill Fix (Maybe)Follow

#1 May 26 2010 at 5:45 AM Rating: Good
http://mfile.akamai.com/97892/live/reflector:46245.asx?bkup=46260 (Works better if you open in Windows Media Player)

Was watching it at work. It's pretty interesting when they are actually down there fiddling around. (No audio)

I guess there is a CNN feed, too, from a different camera, if you want commentary.



Edited, May 26th 2010 7:48am by Lubriderm
#2 May 26 2010 at 6:56 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
That's pretty cool. I understand that BP wanted to turn off the live feed during the upcoming 'top kill' but the guberment says 'no'.

So we should get to watch the plugging attempt.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#3 May 26 2010 at 7:09 AM Rating: Good
The plume looked stopped at about 3 am, but I guess it only had something to do with their testing.
#4 May 26 2010 at 11:02 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Back in my field days, one of my jobs as a hazmat tech was actually responding to oil spills in Maines coastal waterways. In 1996 we had a spill of ~60,000 gallons when a tanker hit a bridge in Portland Harbor. It was, of course, all the news for days. The clean up, which I eventually was just relegated to oversight on, was so incredibly wasteful.

My agency claimed we recovered about 80% of the oil. That's bogus. I'd have said 20% at most. But they had gallons and gallons of oily water and fluffed up estimates of how much oil the sorbent booms had soaked up, blah blah blah....all assumptions used in the calculation were whacked. The whole thing was such a media show I almost puked.

Anyway, this hole in the bottom of the sea is releasing about the same quantity of oil...only every single day it goes on.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#5 May 26 2010 at 12:14 PM Rating: Decent
Elinda,

Did the spill you dealt with completely ***** up the local water life?

#6 May 26 2010 at 12:21 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Elinda,

Did the spill you dealt with completely ***** up the local water life?

Most oil spills do.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#7 May 26 2010 at 12:39 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Elinda,

Did the spill you dealt with completely ***** up the local water life?
Only temporarily. It was pretty light oil and mostly stayed afloat. So, while some areas were temporarily shut down to lobstering and clamming there were no long term effects to either the eco-system or the industry.

Our biggest protection efforts went towards a marsh. We had some success in actually declaring some areas strictly off limits as the harm to salt marshes simply from walking on them is pretty well documented. In 2006 (10 years after the event) following a lengthy damage assessment and reparations the thing was declared 'over' (the responsible party had no further responsibilities).

I had responded to other spills of lesser quantity but much more detrimental to the environment. There was a spill of about 12k gallons of #6 oil from a power plant on the NH side of the Piscataqua river once. This oil sunk quickly really making a mess of the lobstering in the area. It was however, localized.

The area covered by this Gulf spill alone, is enough to make a clean up seem unreasonable.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#8 May 26 2010 at 1:35 PM Rating: Good
It's on right now, they aren't showing the oil spewing out of the pipe anymore though so it's hard to see if it's working yet or not.
#9 May 26 2010 at 1:39 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
What amazes me is that the USA finally has a Genuine reason to invade a country over oil, and I still don't see swarms of knuckle-dragging US Special Forces shouting "HUAH!" outside my window here in England.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#10 May 26 2010 at 1:53 PM Rating: Excellent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
What amazes me is that the USA finally has a Genuine reason to invade a country over oil, and I still don't see swarms of knuckle-dragging US Special Forces shouting "HUAH!" outside my window here in England.
It's called camouflage Nobby.
#11 May 26 2010 at 1:58 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
tarv wrote:
Quote:
What amazes me is that the USA finally has a Genuine reason to invade a country over oil, and I still don't see swarms of knuckle-dragging US Special Forces shouting "HUAH!" outside my window here in England.
It's called camouflage Nobby.
Smiley: lol

NobbyRack TM
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#12 May 26 2010 at 2:04 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
They're all disguised as absurd red telephone booths and double-decker buses.
#13 May 26 2010 at 2:50 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
I find watching from The Select Committee On Energy Independence and Global Warning site has better feeds.

Got to be thankful that our House members won't be cowed by BP.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#14 May 26 2010 at 3:05 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
Also BP's and NPR's feeds.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#15 May 26 2010 at 9:47 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
For awhile, the entire view was obscured with plumes of what looks like silt ejecta. Now the cloud has diminished somewhat, and I see...some piece of equipment...and more spewing crap of indeterminate color and makeup.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#16 May 27 2010 at 6:02 AM Rating: Good
The current word is that they think everything spewing out now is the mud, but say that we won't really know anything for until afternoon (US east/central) maybe.

Here's some diagrams of what they are doing (the second two are more detailed).

Screenshot


Screenshot

Screenshot

Screenshot

Edited, May 27th 2010 8:02am by Lubriderm
#17 May 27 2010 at 9:25 AM Rating: Good
Coast Guard thinks it's working I just saw. Good news.
#18 May 27 2010 at 9:27 AM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
They're all disguised as absurd red telephone booths and double-decker buses.


And blue police boxes.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#19 May 27 2010 at 11:13 AM Rating: Decent
So now Obama's taking credit for what BP is doing to clean this up.

Why won't Obama respond to Gov. Jindals request?
#20 May 27 2010 at 12:50 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
fox news wrote:
Obama said that the federal government is "in charge" of the efforts to contain the damage from the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. He called the leak his administration's "highest priority" and said anyone claiming otherwise doesn't know the facts.

"This entire White House and this federal government has been singularly focused on how do we stop the leak and how do we prevent and mitigate the damage to our coastlines," Obama said.

The press conference comes as the White House battles the perception that it has not done enough to contain the damage from the gushing oil spill in the Gulf. Obama said response teams are using the "best science" to plug the leak, but stressed that BP, not the federal government, has the "superior technology" to get the job done. He said the federal government is taking "full advantage" of that expertise, acknowledging that the response is "absolutely not" going perfectly.

But he insisted that Washington is the one giving the orders and has the authority to order BP to change course.

"From the moment this disaster began, the federal government has been in charge of the response effort," Obama said. "BP is operating at our direction."

He added that BP will pay "every dime" for the damage it has done to the coastal communities. "BP is responsible for this horrific disaster and we will hold them fully accountable on behalf of the United States," he said.
I guess that's taking credit?
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#21 May 27 2010 at 1:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm not really seeing the confusion.

We hire subcontractors. We do so because we lack the equipment or expertise to do certain tasks (such as a massive rooftop irrigation system). We oversee the subcontractors and are ultimately in charge of the subcontractors but we're not about to start hauling pipe connections ourselves because that's not what we do.

I view the government/BP kind of the same way -- Obama is ultimately at the top of the chain but the government itself lacks the equipment or skills to unilaterally fix it. At the same time, just as we might tell a subcontractor "You need to be out tomorrow and change Zone three so it oversprays that area", the government makes broad decisions on what BP needs to be doing. Sometimes a subcontractor screws up or takes a while to arrive at a solution and it sucks but there's not much you can do about it. Likewise for BP and stopping the leak.

So, no, I don't think that Obama being "in charge" means every decision by BP was his decision (although in the public eye he may be ultimately responsible). Nor do I think that BP making the bulk of the technical decisions means the administration is just watching from the sidelines. It's a blend of the two.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#22 May 27 2010 at 1:27 PM Rating: Good
***
1,594 posts
I'm watching it here now:
http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/homepage/STAGING/local_assets/bp_homepage/html/rov_stream.html

Looks like it's just spewing mud. A few ROVs have shown up with wrenches over the past hour. If the whole thing wasn't so depressing, I'd call a live feed of ROVs at -5000 feet pretty cool..

Oh, that's the same video. Oh well.

Edited, May 27th 2010 2:28pm by Ehcks
#23 May 27 2010 at 1:31 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
I'm not really seeing the confusion.

We hire subcontractors. We do so because we lack the equipment or expertise to do certain tasks (such as a massive rooftop irrigation system). We oversee the subcontractors and are ultimately in charge of the subcontractors but we're not about to start hauling pipe connections ourselves because that's not what we do.

This is more than a bit disingenuous. The President saying "We" this and "We" that, implying that the federal government has had some great involvement in the efforts to abate & contain the damage, only now after a promising solution has been implemented is in stark contrast to the official posturing the last several weeks that has placed responsibility and blame anywhere but on the government and his administration.
#24 May 27 2010 at 1:34 PM Rating: Decent
Jophed,

Quote:
I view the government/BP kind of the same way


No you don't. You're viewing them the same way at this time because it's politically the thing to do now if you're a Dem.

Has Obama addressed Jindals request?
#25 May 27 2010 at 1:40 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
He requested Obama hold BP accountable and Obama has said that they will pay for all the damage recovery so yes? We'll have to wait and see how effective he is of course
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#26 May 27 2010 at 1:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
The President saying "We" this and "We" that, implying that the federal government has had some great involvement in the efforts to abate & contain the damage, only now after a promising solution has been implemented is in stark contrast to the official posturing the last several weeks that has placed responsibility and blame anywhere but on the government and his administration.

I was speaking more overall. I haven't listened to but a little bit of today's conference. I'm not particularly riled by what you've said but... whatever. There's no debate to be had in it since it's all perspective.

knoxxsouthy wrote:
No you don't.

Hahahaha... man, you got me there. Touché!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 221 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (221)