Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

AZ has another bill.Follow

#202 May 21 2010 at 11:03 AM Rating: Good
Omegavegeta wrote:
Quote:
Yes really. It happened; whether or not you recognize that the event had any significance or not makes little difference.


I know it happened & it was certainly significant, but Katrina didn't happen because God's a homophobe.


No, it happened because Bob hates black people.
#203 May 21 2010 at 11:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
...under strict and specific direction and mandate (often unfunded) from the federal government.

If this were true to the extent that you imply, we wouldn't have to debate Kansas teaching its youth that the earth is 5,000 years old.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#204 May 21 2010 at 11:29 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Omegavegeta wrote:
Quote:
Yes really. It happened; whether or not you recognize that the event had any significance or not makes little difference.


I know it happened & it was certainly significant, but Katrina didn't happen because God's a homophobe.
He probably doesn't like jazz.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#205 May 21 2010 at 11:33 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
...under strict and specific direction and mandate (often unfunded) from the federal government.

If this were true to the extent that you imply, we wouldn't have to debate Kansas teaching its youth that the earth is 5,000 years old.

How do you figure? That the federal government has strict & specific pervasive mandates on schools, what they teach and who they teach doesn't preclude local involvement in curricular details. Nor does local involvement in curricular details justify federal intervention or invalidate my statement.
#206 May 21 2010 at 11:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Omega,

Quote:
but really?


Yes really. It happened; whether or not you recognize that the event had any significance or not makes little difference.



On the contrary, ascribing cosmic meaning to a natural disaster can have a huge, usually negative, impact.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#207 May 21 2010 at 12:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Just that the federal intervention isn't as pervasive as you make it sound.

One of the biggest criticisms with NCLB, beyond its lack of funding, was that states were basically left to their own to devise how they'd test students and how to report it without any overriding standards they had to meet in regards to testing. They had to report certain results but how they got those results was largely up to them.

Given that you don't give any details beyond "they have strict & specific pervasive mandates", it's hard to really argue the point.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#208 May 21 2010 at 12:15 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Samira wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Omega,

Quote:
but really?


Yes really. It happened; whether or not you recognize that the event had any significance or not makes little difference.



On the contrary, ascribing cosmic meaning to a natural disaster can have a huge, usually negative, impact.



Tornado Alley seems to overlap the Bible Belt pretty well... God hates those Religious folk...
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#209 May 21 2010 at 12:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Just the poor ones. God loves the wealthy, clearly.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#210 May 21 2010 at 12:40 PM Rating: Decent
Omega,

Quote:
I know it happened & it was certainly significant, but Katrina didn't happen because God's a homophobe.


The homosexual community says the same thing about sodom and gomorrah.
#211 May 21 2010 at 12:45 PM Rating: Good
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Omega,

Quote:
I know it happened & it was certainly significant, but Katrina didn't happen because God's a homophobe.


The homosexual community says the same thing about sodom and gomorrah.


Screenshot
#212 May 21 2010 at 1:48 PM Rating: Decent
Tulip,

Yeah we know; that's exactly what most liberals think about Christianity in general. But lets not upset those muslims.

#213 May 21 2010 at 2:40 PM Rating: Good
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Tulip,

Yeah we know; that's exactly what most liberals think about Christianity in general. But lets not upset those muslims.



Actually, it's what most liberals think of rabid, outspoken, insane Christians. Let's make sure you get it right.
#214 May 21 2010 at 3:06 PM Rating: Decent
Tulip,

You mean all true Christians. You can't be a Christian and support abortion, it's that simple.

#215 May 21 2010 at 3:34 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Elinda wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:

Yeah, it's totally a smarter way to go to say "Let's throw more money at a failing system because we fear change and the teachers' unions make such compelling commercials telling us to focus on the kids and not their sh;tty teachers."
How do you measure 'failing'?


Dunno...

Omega wrote:
The US is 15th out of 27 developed countries in reading comprehension, 24/29 in Math, & 21/30 in Sciences.


Maybe that?

Edited, May 21st 2010 2:35pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#216 May 21 2010 at 3:37 PM Rating: Excellent
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Tulip,

You mean all true Christians. You can't be a Christian and support abortion, it's that simple.



If you think that all that defines a Christian is their stance on abortion and gay rights, that's just pathetic and sad.
#217 May 21 2010 at 3:48 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I understand that it wasn't your argument but I found it telling that Gbaji's examples weren't even "A parent might want a school that focuses more on math than science" but "what about prayer? And keeping gays away from prom? And Sex ed? 'Social indoctrination'?..."


Um... Because I was speaking about the problems we have with the existing system Joph. Specifically, problems with issues outside of just curriculum focus (since that was the topic of this thread if you recall). The biggest problem with the public school system is that every child who cannot afford to attend a private school, or doesn't want or cannot attend a religious school, must attend a specific single public school (with some rare exceptions for charter schools and such). This makes issues about what is taught much bigger than they should be. More relevantly, it makes issues of what parents don't want their kids taught a much bigger issue.

You were presenting an argument based on all the time and trouble it would cause to switch to a full voucher system, so I countered with all the time and trouble we're spending right now debating all of these issues. While students certainly would benefit by being able to choose to attend a school with a greater math focus or art focus, we don't tend to spend as much time publicly debating that as we do whether or not a school should be able to tell a gay student she can't bring her partner to the prom. Unless you can show me how many threads we have in the last year on the subject of art vs math in school?


Quote:
He's not asking for better education -- he even admits that it won't be better education.


Oh come on Joph! WTF?

I said that even if we accept your assertion that education wont be improved, the benefits in other areas still make it worth doing. I happen to believe that the long term result will be a better overall education quality, but my position is so much stronger than your's that I "win" even if that isn't the case. Way to spin things though!


Quote:
What he wants are conservative placation hives. He's envisioning a cottage industry of new schools popping up, funded by taxpayer vouchers which offer not a better education but a comfortable political ideology for the parents.


That's what we have now. The difference is that right now, all the publicly funded schools teach the same political ideology. You support this because it happens to match yours. Gee. How convenient for you!


Are you that afraid of allowing students to be taught something other than the liberal party line? What do you think will happen here Joph? It's always funny how the principle of diversity fades from the liberal mind as soon as it includes any ideas that they don't themselves believe in...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#218 May 21 2010 at 3:55 PM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,969 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Tulip,

You mean all true Christians. You can't be a Christian and support abortion, it's that simple.



You can be a Christian and choose not to rail against it, though.


Stop pretending you actualy live out any Christian virtues in your daily life. It is clear that you do not.
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#219 May 21 2010 at 4:04 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
That's what we have now. The difference is that right now, all the publicly funded schools teach the same political ideology. You support this because it happens to match yours. Gee. How convenient for you!


Are you that afraid of allowing students to be taught something other than the liberal party line? What do you think will happen here Joph? It's always funny how the principle of diversity fades from the liberal mind as soon as it includes any ideas that they don't themselves believe in...


Yeah, I don't get this. I was never taught a "liberal political ideology" in high school. Can you point to something that shows this? Becasue I see this argument bandied about quite often, and I can't recall being indoctorinated in public school.
#220 May 21 2010 at 4:06 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Tulip,

You mean all true Christians. You can't be a Christian and support abortion, it's that simple.


lolwut? Of course you can. You won't align with most major sects of Christianity, but being a Christian just means you follow Christ. It's up to the individual to decide how to follow him. You, for example, think of yourself as a Christian but don't align with many of the views of the major sects; but you're still a purported follower of Christ.
#221 May 21 2010 at 4:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Are you that afraid of allowing students to be taught something other than the liberal party line?

OMG SOCIAL INDOCTRINATION!!!!!!!

Social indoctrination is the new "slippery slope" for Gbaji :D

No, I'm not "afraid". But neither am I willing to say "Oh boy, let's scrap this system for a system that doesn't do a better job of teaching our children but will make Pubbies happy!"

You're going to need a better reason than that.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#222 May 21 2010 at 4:40 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
gbaji wrote:
That's what we have now. The difference is that right now, all the publicly funded schools teach the same political ideology. You support this because it happens to match yours. Gee. How convenient for you!


Are you that afraid of allowing students to be taught something other than the liberal party line? What do you think will happen here Joph? It's always funny how the principle of diversity fades from the liberal mind as soon as it includes any ideas that they don't themselves believe in...


Yeah, I don't get this. I was never taught a "liberal political ideology" in high school. Can you point to something that shows this? Becasue I see this argument bandied about quite often, and I can't recall being indoctorinated in public school.


Your knee-jerk acceptance of a range of far left ideas would seem to be strong evidence that you have been subject to some indoctrination. It's also not just about one example Belk. It's a general trend over time across a large population. I'm often surprised when posting on this forum at just how firmly and broadly the ideas of positive rights are embedded in the minds of the forum members. For those who've studied history, this is a new idea (within the last 150 years or so), and is by no means an accepted one, yet for those who've been taught them, it's like there isn't any doubt at all that positive rights are rights and must be protected and there is not only no swaying from that position, but they can't even comprehend the possibility that this might be incorrect, or even consider the issue from another point of view.


If that's not indoctrination, what is? I work very hard to derive my positions on issues from clearly defined principles which I can express and defend. Most of those who take opposition positions not only cannot do this, but refuse to even acknowledge that their lack of ability to do this is relevant. How then did they come to hold the positions they hold? I can't accept that such a large number of people simply randomly choose to so strongly embrace certain socio-economic political positions and happened to all arrive at the exact same ones.

I suppose I could go scouring the web for specific examples, but IMO the end result speaks for itself. I see it every day on this forum. I see people who hold positions very strongly, but can't actually explain *why* those positions are important, much less define what principles those positions are derived from. They just do. Well, at some point, someone must have taught them those positions. They must have been reinforced in their minds over and over. And when I watch educators discuss political positions on various shows it's not hard to see where those positions come from. All one has to do is watch a liberal professor give a definition of something as simple as racism to see that there's an active effort out there in our education system to apply politics to how students view certain issues.

Is it every school? No. But it's a number of them. And that number is growing. Take a gander at who is running the education systems in most of our largest cities. It's not hard to see. Look at their positions. Take a gander at the ratio of liberal to conservative in our education system. It's not hard to see. One can assume that this somehow magically doesn't affect the decisions about what is taught to the students, but that would be a pretty naive assumption, and as I've already pointed out, the results in terms of nearly-dogmatic adherence to some pretty far left positions is quite evident.


I'm not sure what evidence, much less proof, I could provide you of this. The hardest thing to detect is teachings you hold to be true which may not be. We learn things growing up from people we respect and carry them with us through our lives. We tend to resist strongly changing our minds about those things. Even when presented with absolutely incontrovertible proof, we'll tend to accept that right then, but then revert to what we were taught. We "forget" that someone showed us we were wrong. Maybe it's our minds playing tricks on us. I don't know. But I see this all the time...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#223 May 21 2010 at 4:43 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
No, I'm not "afraid". But neither am I willing to say "Oh boy, let's scrap this system for a system that doesn't do a better job of teaching our children but will make Pubbies happy!"


It would give parents and students more choices about their education Joph. Why is that wrong? How can having the freedom to make a decision be a bad thing?

Quote:
You're going to need a better reason than that.


Really? I need a better reason than "Doing this will give parents more choice about their kids education"? Why? What better reason is there?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#224 May 21 2010 at 4:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
It would give parents and students more choices about their education Joph. Why is that wrong? How can having the freedom to make a decision be a bad thing?

So far you've failed to actually address real education. Prayer, yeah. Homosexuals, sure. I guess maybe a fear of learning about contraceptives counts. Sort of. Not really.

Why should I assume it's a "good thing" that private schools pop up, marketed not on their academic excellence or how they'll make your kids smarter but on your fears of "social indoctrination"?

Hey, call me wacky, but before I'm looking to start a whole new school industry, I'd kind of like it to be based on something besides Gbaji's pathetic fears of scary liberals. That's just me though.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#225 May 21 2010 at 4:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Your knee-jerk acceptance of a range of far left ideas would seem to be strong evidence that you have been subject to some indoctrination.

And you claim not to listen to the conservative radio. But obviously your knee-jerk acceptance of a range of far right ideas would seems to be strong evidence that you have been subject to some indoctrination.

That was easy! Let's play that game some more!
Quote:
The hardest thing to detect is teachings you hold to be true which may not be. We learn things growing up from people we respect and carry them with us through our lives. We tend to resist strongly changing our minds about those things. Even when presented with absolutely incontrovertible proof, we'll tend to accept that right then, but then revert to what we were taught. We "forget" that someone showed us we were wrong. Maybe it's our minds playing tricks on us. I don't know. But I see this all the time...

Do you understand now, Belkira? You've totally been indoctrinated but you don't know it because you're so indoctrinated that you've tricked yourself into believing that you're not indoctrinated. And you'll never believe that you haven't been indoctrinated because that's just how strong the indoctrination is. Only Gbaji's Pubbie voucher schools can save you now!

Edited, May 21st 2010 5:56pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#226 May 21 2010 at 4:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Gbaji wrote:
Your knee-jerk acceptance of a range of far left ideas would seem to be strong evidence that you have been subject to some indoctrination.


This reminds me of nothing as much as the "repressed memories" hysteria from a few years back. I saw an interview with an "expert" who stated, paraphrasing here, "If you don't remember being abused as a child, you probably were."

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 270 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (270)