Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Ladies with Seamen! Don't Ask, and certianly Don't TellFollow

#102 May 10 2010 at 7:11 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,969 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
3) I. . . have a distaste for abortion


You probably just haven't tried the right condiments.



Smiley: lol







Smiley: glare


I don't like it but would never vote in favor of outlawing it.



Abortion, not condiments.
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#103 May 10 2010 at 7:28 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Moebius,

Quote:
As long as they know which holes the pee pee goes in MIRITE?


What part of "I love all of God's creatures and creations" do you not understand? You can love the sinner and hate the sin.

Bullshit. I mean, the concept does exist, but on your case, you're flat out lying.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#104 May 10 2010 at 7:28 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,969 posts
Assassin Nadenu wrote:
I think this bears repeating -

<3 Bijou.


Smiley: inlove
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#105 May 10 2010 at 7:36 PM Rating: Good
Why don't you like abortion, Bijou?
#106 May 10 2010 at 7:58 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Yodabunny wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
little monkey in chief


Is this racist enough to get Virus banned...again...please?

Kaolian has said that Varrus is the ONLY poster that other posters are welcome to karma-camp and will receive no repercussions for doing so.

This is Kaolian's resolution of the balancing act that Varrus continues to make obnoxious, ban-worthy posts, but that Varrus provides a useful service in keeping Asylum threads churning along as other posters react to him.

That said, there is probably a line where, yes, an admin will ban him again for a particular post.
#107 May 10 2010 at 8:24 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Yodabunny wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
little monkey in chief


Is this racist enough to get Virus banned...again...please?

Kaolian has said that Varrus is the ONLY poster that other posters are welcome to karma-camp and will receive no repercussions for doing so.

This is Kaolian's resolution of the balancing act that Varrus continues to make obnoxious, ban-worthy posts, but that Varrus provides a useful service in keeping Asylum threads churning along as other posters react to him.

That said, there is probably a line where, yes, an admin will ban him again for a particular post.

If the "I wish they'd blow up Chicago" post didn't do it, who knows.
#108 May 10 2010 at 9:40 PM Rating: Excellent
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,969 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Why don't you like abortion, Bijou?


Because I can't have one, and if I can't have one nobody ELSE should have one either.Smiley: mad










But, seriously:

The factors leading to this are many; included are my spritual beliefs and my own parenthood. I do not, however, believe that one's faith should dictate law. I would, for instance, do my best to talk a friend out of an abortion but would never condemn her in any way if she had one.

The systems in place concerning adoptions, foster care etc are too much of a ********** to preclude forcing pregnant women to carry to term anyway. If ever there was a system in place to properly - not adequately - PROPERLY care for unwanted kids I might change my mind, but I doubt it.

In have dicussed the point with anti-abortionists. I like to ask them that if abortion were to be illegal - with the caveat that all anti-abortionists carry a numbered card like a draft card and get the unwanted babies in a lottery - would they still support it? The answer is always no. Virulent anti-abortion advocates have shown time and again that they are interested in control, not children.

/sermon
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#109 May 10 2010 at 9:46 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
Aripyanfar wrote:
Yodabunny wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
little monkey in chief


Is this racist enough to get Virus banned...again...please?

Kaolian has said that Varrus is the ONLY poster that other posters are welcome to karma-camp and will receive no repercussions for doing so.

This is Kaolian's resolution of the balancing act that Varrus continues to make obnoxious, ban-worthy posts, but that Varrus provides a useful service in keeping Asylum threads churning along as other posters react to him.

That said, there is probably a line where, yes, an admin will ban him again for a particular post.
What's the point in banning him?
#110 May 10 2010 at 9:55 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,601 posts
Bardalicious wrote:
If the "I wish they'd blow up Chicago" post didn't do it, who knows.
It did do it, he was banned for that.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#111 May 10 2010 at 10:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Bardalicious wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Yodabunny wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
little monkey in chief


Is this racist enough to get Virus banned...again...please?

Kaolian has said that Varrus is the ONLY poster that other posters are welcome to karma-camp and will receive no repercussions for doing so.

This is Kaolian's resolution of the balancing act that Varrus continues to make obnoxious, ban-worthy posts, but that Varrus provides a useful service in keeping Asylum threads churning along as other posters react to him.

That said, there is probably a line where, yes, an admin will ban him again for a particular post.

If the "I wish they'd blow up Chicago" post didn't do it, who knows.


I could easily ban him again. If I chose to take the effort I could easily keep him banned. The fact of the matter is, whatever else you say about him he gives some of you a target to rant at, thereby increasing posts. More posts means more lurkers, and mroe chance that those lurkers might post. Usually when he's in "banned" mode there is a drop in posts. Don't get me wrong, I'll ban his *** anyways if he crosses enough of a line, but until then, this IS the Asylum.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#112 May 10 2010 at 10:33 PM Rating: Decent
*
139 posts
Kao wrote:
I'll ban his *** anyways if he crosses enough of a line, but until then, this IS the Asylum


Obligatory meme.
#113 May 10 2010 at 10:34 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Bardalicious wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Yodabunny wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
little monkey in chief


Is this racist enough to get Virus banned...again...please?

Kaolian has said that Varrus is the ONLY poster that other posters are welcome to karma-camp and will receive no repercussions for doing so.

This is Kaolian's resolution of the balancing act that Varrus continues to make obnoxious, ban-worthy posts, but that Varrus provides a useful service in keeping Asylum threads churning along as other posters react to him.

That said, there is probably a line where, yes, an admin will ban him again for a particular post.

If the "I wish they'd blow up Chicago" post didn't do it, who knows.


I could easily ban him again. If I chose to take the effort I could easily keep him banned. The fact of the matter is, whatever else you say about him he gives some of you a target to rant at, thereby increasing posts. More posts means more lurkers, and mroe chance that those lurkers might post. Usually when he's in "banned" mode there is a drop in posts. Don't get me wrong, I'll ban his *** anyways if he crosses enough of a line, but until then, this IS the Asylum.

so what you're saying is that if I ever get banned for moderate stupidity, I can regain posting privileges by evolving into an epic troll.
#114 May 11 2010 at 1:56 AM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,969 posts
Bardalicious wrote:
so what you're saying is that if I ever get banned for moderate stupidity, I can regain posting privileges by evolving into an epic troll.




Well...not you.














Smiley: grin
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#115 May 11 2010 at 7:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Bardalicious wrote:

so what you're saying is that if I ever get banned for moderate stupidity, I can regain posting privileges by evolving into an epic troll.


There can be only one. First you have to chop off the head of the old one and takes its powers.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#116 May 11 2010 at 8:01 AM Rating: Decent
Bard,

Quote:
If the "I wish they'd blow up Chicago" post didn't do it, who knows


Actually that's not what I said. I did say (paraphrasing) IF a major city were to be the target of a terrorist attack i'd rather it be chicago, la, or NY.

Now how often do you the yankees, canucks, and toothless brits on this site talk down the south? Not to mention the virulent Christian bashing.





Debo,

**************** I mean, the concept does exist, but on your case, you're flat out lying.[/quote]

I bet the thought that I have close black friends blows your mind as well.

#117 May 11 2010 at 8:11 AM Rating: Good
knoxxsouthy wrote:
I bet the thought that I have close black friends blows your mind as well.

So you are a racist who can point out the token? Most people don't include the guys they sell crack to in their close friends. Lonely much?
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Now how often do you the yankees, canucks, and toothless brits on this site talk down the south? Not to mention the virulent Christian bashing.

I don't bash Christians and I still think you're this site's version of the clap.

I grew up in the South, so when I call the majority of people who live there backwards hicks it comes from a place of understanding and zen.
#118 May 11 2010 at 8:27 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Bardalicious wrote:

so what you're saying is that if I ever get banned for moderate stupidity, I can regain posting privileges by evolving into an epic troll.


There can be only one. First you have to chop off the head of the old one and takes its powers.


To be fair, cutting off Varus's head and posting pictures would probably get you banned.

Or Guru.
#119 May 11 2010 at 8:29 AM Rating: Decent
Moebius,

Quote:
So you are a racist who can point out the token?


I grew up learning to play ball in the hood. I think it's safe to say I have quite a few more brothers as friends than you. So like you said I come from a place of understanding. How many stabbings did you have to deal with at your high school?

And I will talk down this thug mentality that these so called gangstas have been pushing on society for the last 20yrs. So should you, unless of course it's something you condone.





Edited, May 11th 2010 10:30am by knoxxsouthy
#120 May 11 2010 at 8:36 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
The military is a democracy? I never knew that.

Except for the democratically elected Commander-in-Chief of the US military per the United States Constitution.

That guy doesn't matter at all.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#121 May 11 2010 at 8:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
The military is a democracy? I never knew that.

Except for the democratically elected Commander-in-Chief of the US military per the United States Constitution.

That guy doesn't matter at all.


Fine, Miss Marple. I should have phrased it "run as a democracy".

Put on a clean pair of white gloves and run along, now.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#122 May 11 2010 at 8:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Haha... I'm not sure how I wound up responding to a Page 1 post. Whatever. Fuck all y'all.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#123 May 11 2010 at 8:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
Fine, Miss Marple. I should have phrased it "run as a democracy".

I was agreeing with you, goofus.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#124 May 11 2010 at 8:51 AM Rating: Decent
Jophed,

Quote:
I was agreeing with you


It's a good thing you cleared that up. Wouldn't want any of these pea brains to think they'd gotten on your bad side.
#125 May 11 2010 at 8:52 AM Rating: Excellent
knoxxsouthy wrote:
I grew up learning to play ball in the hood. I think it's safe to say I have quite a few more brothers as friends than you. So like you said I come from a place of understanding. How many stabbings did you have to deal with at your high school?

I have no black friends here. I have no Asian friends here. I have no ethic friends of any sort here in Minnesota (well, there are the Irish, but they're hard to avoid). I must be a racist.

knoxxsouthy wrote:
And I will talk down this thug mentality that these so called gangstas have been pushing on society for the last 20yrs. So should you, unless of course it's something you condone.

It's been longer than 20 years, but why quibble about something you obviously fail to comprehend.

You're no better than those "gangstas" are. You approach your perceived liberties from a thuggish position, with the mentality of entitlement. You're not a conservative, you're a prick who can't even manage to articulate well the points you're trying to be a prick about. You're nothing more than a prop, a stage piece around which events unfold with no impact to their narrative. You add nothing to the discourse and you provide nothing for which critical examination is required. I can't recall a single salient point made by you in all the years you have been making new accounts.
#126 May 11 2010 at 8:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Wouldn't want any of these pea brains to think they'd gotten on your bad side.

I'm sure there's nothing Samira fears more.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 258 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (258)