Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Bewbs and UFollow

#52 May 04 2010 at 11:54 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
RDM seemed to be laboring under the impression that monkeys have boobs.


Well, there's a bartender at my favorite bar. Her nickname is monkey...

Edited, May 4th 2010 12:54pm by BrownDuck
#53 May 04 2010 at 12:20 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Big boobed female humans evolved because it helped secure a mate?? ...prolly blonde hair too.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#54 May 04 2010 at 1:21 PM Rating: Good
The idea that tits aren't inherently sexual is a propaganda piece put forth by feminists and is as much bullsh;t as most of the rest of the things they say.
#55 May 04 2010 at 1:25 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Nearly all the places I vacation, the women sunbathe and swim topless. They're often with their kiddy-blinkies and nobody bats an eyelid.

Sure they're nice to look at, and when the future-ex Mrs Nobby gets out the puppies, I know blokes are going to enjoy an eyeful, but it doesn't bother me, her or anyone else. (Apart from the husbands of flat-chested wimminz who get accused of staring).

Bewbs are awesome, natural, sexually attractive, and make any beach or pool look prettier. Pfft.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#56 May 04 2010 at 1:28 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
The idea that tits aren't inherently sexual is a propaganda piece put forth by feminists and is as much bullsh;t as most of the rest of the things they say.
My hypothesis is that breast-size was somehow related to the number of children born and/or to survive to adulthood. There has to be something, most likely something physiological, that originally made the species favor larger ********

I can't find any modern-day evidence supporting this though.

Moe what is your definition of a feminist?












Edited, May 4th 2010 9:29pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#57 May 04 2010 at 1:35 PM Rating: Good
Elinda wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
The idea that tits aren't inherently sexual is a propaganda piece put forth by feminists and is as much bullsh;t as most of the rest of the things they say.
My hypothesis is that breast-size was somehow related to the number of children born and/or to survive to adulthood. There has to be something, most likely something physiological, that originally made the species favor larger ********

I can't find any modern-day evidence supporting this though.

It may have been true in antiquity, but modern medicine has eliminated much of natural selection and would therefore negate that potential draw.
Elinda wrote:
Moe what is your definition of a feminist?

Watch PCU.
#58 May 04 2010 at 1:36 PM Rating: Decent
Elinda wrote:
My hypothesis is that breast-size was somehow related to the number of children born and/or to survive to adulthood. There has to be something, most likely something physiological, that originally made the species favor larger ********

I can't find any modern-day evidence supporting this though.


As I already quoted:

Quote:
Theories range from the belief that breasts serve as signaling devices announcing fertility and fat deposits sufficient to withstand the rigors of pregnancy and breastfeeding to "genital echo theory": females developed pendulous breasts around the time hominids began walking upright in order to provoke the excitation males formerly felt when gazing at the fatty deposits on the buttocks.

Theorists supporting genital echo theory have noted that swellings like those of chimpanzees and bonobos would interfere with locomotion in a bi-pedal primate, so when our distant ancestors began walking upright, they reason that some of the female's fertility signaling moved from the rear office, as it were, to the front showroom. In a bit of historical ping-pong, the dictates of fashion have moved the swelling back and forth over the centuries with high heels, Victorian bustles, and other derrière enhancements.


Both theories are presented, but I find the explanation behind the latter more plausible.
#59 May 04 2010 at 3:53 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I realize most men are attracted to bewbs. I've just never understood it. They're just big lumps of fat. Yum.
#60 May 04 2010 at 7:18 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
Assassin Nadenu wrote:
I realize most men are attracted to bewbs. I've just never understood it. They're just big lumps of fat. Yum.

so is bacon.

Smiley: schooled
#61 May 04 2010 at 7:27 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Dunno if anyone mentioned this already (tl;dr) but in "The Naked Ape", Desmond Wilcox surmised that it's a sexual stimulant based on humans' transition to mating face to face.

When mating like other primates and apes, pert round buttocks are the visual frame to the *******. When we moved to face to face rumpy-pumpy, bewbs evoke the roundness of the **** baggage. (I paraphrase).

That was his line in the late '60s and was widely accepted.

____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#62 May 04 2010 at 7:59 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Bardalicious wrote:
Assassin Nadenu wrote:
I realize most men are attracted to bewbs. I've just never understood it. They're just big lumps of fat. Yum.

so is bacon.

Smiley: schooled


What the hell kind of bacon are you eating??
#63 May 04 2010 at 8:52 PM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Elinda wrote:
Moe what is your definition of a feminist?

Watch PCU.


Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#64 May 04 2010 at 9:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Huh, if we all pooled our resources we could buy the domain youboob!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#65 May 04 2010 at 10:09 PM Rating: Decent
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Huh, if we all pooled our resources we could buy the domain youboob!


networksolutions.com wrote:
Congratulations!
Your search was successful
titsorgtfo.tv is available
showusyourbewbs.com is available


Just sayin...
#66 May 05 2010 at 2:56 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
All of this discussion conveniently ignores the fact that the vast majority of those women parading in Maine have no business going topless in public. I think a case could easily be made they have no business going topless in private either, but I'm willing to concede that sometimes the bra needs to come off to wash off that froumda cheese seeping from the back fat rolls. Nobody likes a smelly roll of back fat, yes?

Totem
#67 May 05 2010 at 5:56 AM Rating: Good
Fat girls need love, too, Bama.
#68 May 05 2010 at 6:41 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Totem wrote:
All of this discussion conveniently ignores the fact that the vast majority of those women parading in Maine have no business going topless in public. I think a case could easily be made they have no business going topless in private either, but I'm willing to concede that sometimes the bra needs to come off to wash off that froumda cheese seeping from the back fat rolls. Nobody likes a smelly roll of back fat, yes?

Totem
Oh poor poor Totes. You miss so much beauty in the world with your close-minded view of wominz (and other soft-side stuff).
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#69 May 05 2010 at 7:02 AM Rating: Good
I'm a fan of boobs, but have always found cleavage inherently sexier. The reality never quite being as good as the fantasy & all.

That being said, they're just boobs.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#70 May 05 2010 at 7:05 AM Rating: Good
Omegavegeta wrote:
The reality never quite being as good as the fantasy & all.

I find boobs much more universally saliva-inducing than bacon, so this fits for me...

BECAUSE IT'S BOOBS!
#71 May 05 2010 at 7:14 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
The reality never quite being as good as the fantasy & all.

I find boobs much more universally saliva-inducing than bacon, so this fits for me...

BECAUSE IT'S BOOBS!
The best of both worlds.

Personally, i think it would look (and smell) more appetizing if the bacon were cooked.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#72 May 05 2010 at 7:25 AM Rating: Good
Elinda wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
The reality never quite being as good as the fantasy & all.

I find boobs much more universally saliva-inducing than bacon, so this fits for me...

BECAUSE IT'S BOOBS!
The best of both worlds.

Personally, i think it would look (and smell) more appetizing if the bacon were cooked.

Smiley: nod
#73 May 05 2010 at 8:13 AM Rating: Good
Have a hotty tan in one.
???
Profit.

____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#74 May 05 2010 at 10:14 AM Rating: Good
**
907 posts
There's also the incorrect notion that bigger boobs = more milk for your offspring. That could be a partial factor in their evolution. I know a few guys that big boobs look "like they could hold a lot of milk".
#75 May 05 2010 at 10:36 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Deadbeet wrote:
There's also the incorrect notion that bigger boobs = more milk for your offspring. That could be a partial factor in their evolution. I know a few guys that big boobs look "like they could hold a lot of milk".


Ah, good old reverse-Darwinism. Ignorance furthering humanity's evolution. Sounds like this is the winning theory.

Maybe it'll fade out like "child-bearing hips" did.
#76 May 05 2010 at 5:54 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Maybe it's because I don't have a daughter, or a wife that would slap me for staring at them but at what point does a man become old enough that telling women to keep their shirts on seem like a good idea?


Argument of weird shaped and sagging tits aside, t'its are f'ucking wonderful.

Edited, May 5th 2010 7:54pm by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 615 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (615)