North Koreans responsible for GoM oil spill!Follow

The initial claims you made when you were all breathless and wet in the crotch because you just read A BLOG!! that said he was lending all sorts of campaigning and financial support.

Are you really looking to embarrass yourself about this one again? It'll be fun and all but I doubt this is how to you want wind down this thread, looking like a retarded conspiracy nut yet again.

You're the one equating this to some kind of conspiracy theory Joph. All I did was point out what he had done and who he'd hung out with and given support to.

At some point, it certainly does say something about someone when we look at those he chooses to associate with and find a long list of radical leftists. There's no conspiracy at work. It's the kinds of people he has worked with in his life. We can assume that he doesn't agree with them politically, but why? Why would he be chosen to sit on specific foundation boards if it wasn't believed by those running them that he held ideals similar to theirs? Why would he choose to be in those positions unless he *did* agree with them? The Odinga thing was just one in a list of such associations Joph. If it were the first and only time he'd been involved with a radical socialist, it could certainly be excused or brushed off. But this has been a consistent occurrence in his personal and professional life.


I'm not sure why you feel you have to work so hard to fight against this. Based on years of your posts, you clearly agree with most of the same radical socialist positions. It's just odd that you have to deny that the people you support politically agree with you. Makes one assume that you know that their positions, while agreeable to you, are not so agreeable to most people, so you have to lie about it. That's very strange to me. Why not say "I like Obama because he's going to fight for all the socialist things I agree with"? If you think those things are worth doing, why not think they're worth being honest about?


Dunno... I've just never understood why those who so clearly support ideas like redistribution of wealth, massive social spending and government control/regulation of industry, will fall over themselves to insist that the candidates they support don't support those same things. Um... What?

Facts are facts, but we all make mistakes when we are young.

Edited, May 6th 2010 8:38am by Lubriderm

Jophed,



So you admit there's evidence. At least that's a start.

Today's Word Varus Doesn't Understand is: conspiracy.

If not for gross hyperbole he'd have little to say.

Yeah. Education. Remember when what's-his-name spent weeks going through every record they had about those meetings and discovered that they talked about education? Boy, that rocked my world.

Funny thing though: even though you insisted at the time that the Republicans only cared about his educational connections and what that said about his ideology or somesuch, not once was Obama accused of "Paling around with education reformers."

Jophed,

Don't you mean indoctrination.

His family/schools/etc indoctrinated taught him that it meant education. Not his fault see?

Edited, May 7th 2010 2:09pm by Xsarus

To be fair, Ayers approach to education reform is a form of domestic terrorism all by itself.

Or Jesus and the Apostles. What is your point, exactly?

See, it was a totally valid analogy, there were two things in every case.

You need to remember that this is the guy, that when I criticized him for making the assertion that taxes are always harmful, told me that was because I was considering the whole picture, instead of ignoring most of what was going on. If you ignore most of the analogy, it's true that in both cases there are two people! They're even both male