- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Attempted firebomb of times square
Attempted firebomb of times squareFollow
Is ar-tard still acceptable, or am I dating myself?
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Debalic wrote:
Is ar-tard still acceptable, or am I dating myself?
Are they mutually exclusive?
knoxxsouthy wrote:
wiki
You stopped reading too soon.
Quote:
The noun "******" is particularly seen as pejorative
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
wiki
You stopped reading too soon.
Quote:
The noun "******" is particularly seen as pejorative
He's not versed in reading past the word he's looking for.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samy,
You mean I can read? Who knew.
Quote:
He's not versed in reading past the word he's looking for.
You mean I can read? Who knew.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
You mean I can read? Who knew.
Not me. I assumed you just face-rolled the keyboard.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
You mean I can read? Who knew.
Not me. I assumed you just face-rolled the keyboard.
Which makes sense, in an infinite-monkeys-typing kind of way.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Debalic wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
You mean I can read? Who knew.
Not me. I assumed you just face-rolled the keyboard.
Which makes sense, in an infinite-monkeys-typing kind of way.
This isn't shakespeare we're talking about, it is a varus post.
3 monkeys are more than sufficient.
Two could share a keyboard.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
No they don't. But thank you for playing I've been brainwashed by the liberal media game.
Sure they do. The term also originated with them.
Could you show the class where in that page you linked it says that Tea Partiers referred to themselves as "teabaggers"? One person using the sexual pun isn't the same sort of "haha. They don't know what it means and they're calling themselves teabaggers!" funny, is it? And if using tea bags as a symbol of opposition to current government policy makes one a teabagger, then aren't you one as well?
Quote:
These days, I'd bet that 90% of its usage comes from it just being easier to say/type than "Tea Partier" or "Tea Party Supporter" or whatever.
No. It's used by those who know it's going to offend people to offend people. I've *never* heard anyone on the right refer to themselves or those in the tea party movement as "teabaggers". There was a brief period where the media was referring to them by that label, amid much smirks. Again, with no evidence that this was ever a label they applied to themselves. And today, I hear pretty much only the nutty left use the term derogatively towards members of the tea party movement.
But hey! Fiction is more fun than fact I guess...
Edited, May 6th 2010 1:19pm by gbaji
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Attempted firebomb of times square → '******' discussion
I've clearly missed out on the thread by jumping in now.
I've clearly missed out on the thread by jumping in now.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
gbaji wrote:
And if using tea bags as a symbol of opposition to current government policy makes one a teabagger, then aren't you one as well?
lolwut?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
bsphil wrote:
Attempted firebomb of times square → '******' discussion
I've clearly missed out on the thread by jumping in now.
I've clearly missed out on the thread by jumping in now.
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Jophed,
What can't you read?
Quote:
lolwut?
What can't you read?
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
And if using tea bags as a symbol of opposition to current government policy makes one a teabagger, then aren't you one as well?
lolwut?
Isn't there a picture of you doing your own "tea party" with a tea bag from the Boston get together? That makes you a teabagger, right?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
Isn't there a picture of you doing your own "tea party" with a tea bag from the Boston get together? That makes you a teabagger, right?
Well, that was more of a joke regarding Shadowrelm than any sort of protest but... sure? Shit, I don't care if you call me that.
Wait... let me pretend to be all offended and dismayed and we can talk about how horrible you were for daring to say that.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
This thread is like the McLaughlin Group on LSD.
NOYOUSHUTUP!
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
NOYOUSHUTUP!
gbaji wrote:
I suppose if you just keep profiling angry white gun toting bible thumpers as the likely suspects in this sort of thing, maybe eventually you'll be right...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutaree
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/05/10/national/main6471181.shtml
Eviscerate the Prolietariate! 911 tacos for everyone!
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
Wow. It would take a few years for most people to eat 911 tacos.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
yossarian wrote:
gbaji wrote:
I suppose if you just keep profiling angry white gun toting bible thumpers as the likely suspects in this sort of thing, maybe eventually you'll be right...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutaree
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/05/10/national/main6471181.shtml
Is that seriously the best you can do? The great "angry white gun toting bible thumper" threat consists of a small extended semi-inbred family who plan to do great and violent things whilst apparently sitting on their couches and munching on pork rinds and not much else? Well, it's a good thing that homeland security got right on top of that and took them out before they did anything. Heck. We took them out before they even had a plan to do something. They were just planning on having a plan to plan to do something "bad"...
Funny that we miss a guy who's traveled to Pakistan a half dozen times and met with known terrorists cause that's not on the profile I guess, but we got these guys, so that's something!
You're kidding, right?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
Is that seriously the best you can do? The great "angry white gun toting bible thumper" threat consists of a small extended semi-inbred family who plan to do great and violent things whilst apparently sitting on their couches and munching on pork rinds and not much else? Well, it's a good thing that homeland security got right on top of that and took them out before they did anything. Heck. We took them out before they even had a plan to do something. They were just planning on having a plan to plan to do something "bad"...
Are you truly so blindly outraged at the Democrats that you're going to claim the Hutaree weren't really planning on committing acts of domestic terrorism within the United States? Or maybe you think we should focus exclusively on threats coming from brown people; after all, while the Hutaree might kill a few dozen cops or blow up some government buildings, it's okay, because it's American terrorism. That's just good old armed revolution, in the spirit of the founding fathers.
Majivo wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Is that seriously the best you can do? The great "angry white gun toting bible thumper" threat consists of a small extended semi-inbred family who plan to do great and violent things whilst apparently sitting on their couches and munching on pork rinds and not much else? Well, it's a good thing that homeland security got right on top of that and took them out before they did anything. Heck. We took them out before they even had a plan to do something. They were just planning on having a plan to plan to do something "bad"...
Are you truly so blindly outraged at the Democrats that you're going to claim the Hutaree weren't really planning on committing acts of domestic terrorism within the United States?
I believe gbaji's reasoning in another thread was that they weren't acts of terrorism, per se, because terrorism is supposed to be random and they wanted to hit specific governmental targets.
Might have been another of our nutters, but pretty sure it was the G-man.
Recent Visitors: 282
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (282)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Attempted firebomb of times square
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC