- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Attempted firebomb of times square
Attempted firebomb of times squareFollow
Man, if I get brainwashed by a kind of media I don't even consume, those liberals must be pretty awesome.
Bardalicious wrote:
When is the new troll shipment schedule to arrive? Our current troll appears to be broken as it is spouting the same, boring sh*t every time.
He's more like a furby that spent too much time next to a republican radio station or a Fox news political commentary.
We can try to teach him new things, but they just come out as garbled words that make no sense.
Sweetums wrote:
Man, if I get brainwashed by a kind of media I don't even consume, those liberals must be pretty awesome.
They're all-powerful. They are, in fact, God.
Edited, May 6th 2010 8:34am by Samira
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
No they don't. But thank you for playing I've been brainwashed by the liberal media game.
Sure they do. The term also originated with them.
These days, I'd bet that 90% of its usage comes from it just being easier to say/type than "Tea Partier" or "Tea Party Supporter" or whatever.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Locked,
How long is "until"?
Dumbass
Am I the president? Am I a harvard grad?
Is calling them retards worse than actually making fun of them? You know they are retarded. Perhaps you should grab a dictionary and look up what it means.
How long is "until"?
Dumbass
Quote:
Says the man calling the majority voters of the country "bedwetters" :-P
Am I the president? Am I a harvard grad?
Quote:
And who just called the mentally handicapped "retards"...
Is calling them retards worse than actually making fun of them? You know they are retarded. Perhaps you should grab a dictionary and look up what it means.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Perhaps you should grab a dictionary and look up what it means.
I tried, but all it had was this picture
OHSNAP.
When I think of varus, I think of ICP.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Quote:
Says the man calling the majority voters of the country "bedwetters" :-P
Am I the president? Am I a harvard grad?
Certainly not. You hold such people in great disdain, as all they've proven is that they know theory, not the real world. But you obviously have nothing against insulting others, so I see not why you would upset if the president or a Harvard grad did.
Quote:
Quote:
And who just called the mentally handicapped "retards"...
Is calling them retards worse than actually making fun of them? You know they are retarded. Perhaps you should grab a dictionary and look up what it means.
It's no more insulting than calling gypsies gyps, Japanese ****, or injured veterans crips. It would insult those people, sure, even if it's mechanically "correct."
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Am I the president? Am I a harvard grad?
If you don't care about civil discourse until the president says it, you don't actually care about civil discourse.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
**** to Japanese is a poor analogy compared to retarded or mentally handicapped. Just because liberals like to change the definitions and meanings of words to suit their own interests doesn't mean it's right.
And you really never answered my question. It's pretty simple, a yes or no will suffice.
Is it worse to make fun of a group or someone who uses a medical term to describe them?
When I say ****** it's not derogatory no matter how much you want it to be. It's nothing more than a accurate term to describe a group. Now if I used that term as an insult to make fun of them that would be an altogether different story.
And you really never answered my question. It's pretty simple, a yes or no will suffice.
Is it worse to make fun of a group or someone who uses a medical term to describe them?
When I say ****** it's not derogatory no matter how much you want it to be. It's nothing more than a accurate term to describe a group. Now if I used that term as an insult to make fun of them that would be an altogether different story.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
**** to Japanese is a poor analogy compared to retarded or mentally handicapped. Just because liberals like to change the definitions and meanings of words to suit their own interests doesn't mean it's right.
And you really never answered my question. It's pretty simple, a yes or no will suffice.
Is it worse to make fun of a group or someone who uses a medical term to describe them?
When I say ****** it's not derogatory no matter how much you want it to be. It's nothing more than a accurate term to describe a group. Now if I used that term as an insult to make fun of them that would be an altogether different story.
And you really never answered my question. It's pretty simple, a yes or no will suffice.
Is it worse to make fun of a group or someone who uses a medical term to describe them?
When I say ****** it's not derogatory no matter how much you want it to be. It's nothing more than a accurate term to describe a group. Now if I used that term as an insult to make fun of them that would be an altogether different story.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
When I say ****** it's not derogatory no matter how much you want it to be. It's nothing more than a accurate term to describe a group. Now if I used that term as an insult to make fun of them that would be an altogether different story.
Sure it is. What you're trying to say is that YOU don't find it offensive. However, someone else could easily take it that way. Sarah Palin, for example. Unless you're using it as satire, as Sweetums is.
knoxxsouthy wrote:
It's pretty simple, a yes or no will suffice.
Is it worse to make fun of a group or someone who uses a medical term to describe them?
Is it worse to make fun of a group or someone who uses a medical term to describe them?
That's not a yes/no question, ******.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Nor is it a medical term. 
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samy,
wiki
Quote:
The term "mental retardation" is a diagnostic term denoting the group of disconnected categories of mental functioning
Quote:
The American Association on Mental Retardation continued to use the term mental retardation until 2006.[3] In June 2006 its members voted to change the name of the organization to the "American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
wiki
Yes, now find the term "******" used as a medical term, anywhere.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
"******" used as a medical term.
There.
There.
Samira wrote:
Yes, now find the term "******" used as a medical term, anywhere.
Well, here's a type of doctor using it during a medical procedure.
Link
Yeah the words mental retaration are only in every medical encyclopedia in the world.
They can also be applied to most of the last page or two of this thread. 
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
Yes, but the word "******" as a descriptive noun is not, you obtuse hick.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
you obtuse hick.
That's offensive.
Mainly to obtuse hicks who are being compared to Varus
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
I prefer reetee, anyway. It gives a greater air of confidence as I hurl it from my ivory tower.
I prefer Short-Bus-Riding-Diaper-and-Football-Helmet-Wearing-Forest-Gump-Mother-F'uckers!
You lost varus at 'prefer.'
Recent Visitors: 284
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (284)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Attempted firebomb of times square
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC