- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Obamacare will save us all. Unless your this women.
Obamacare will save us all. Unless your this women.Follow
Yeah, I believe this was a deliberate deception. I believe everything Rush says.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Would that really even count, though? Wouldn't that be her child's income and not her own?
Without bothering to click the link, I'd just like to say I'm not that woman so I'm feelin' faaaaannnn-tastic!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Without bothering to click the link, I'd just like to say I'm not that woman so I'm feelin' faaaaannnn-tastic!
Your loss of premium has made you snarky and less informative.
For ****'s sake, the correct word is "you're". How the hell do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you repeatedly make the same mistake despite having it pointed out to you multiple times?
Also seen not saving her life: an insurance company.
#8gbaji,
Posted: Apr 12 2010 at 5:34 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) That analogy would be relevant if the insurance company had the legal authority to force you to buy their insurance and/or could take money out of your pay in order to provide said health coverage system. It would also be more relevant if the US congress had not just pushed through a massive new expense on the US people based on the assumption that the government doesn't do these sorts of things...
gbaji wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
Also seen not saving her life: an insurance company.
That analogy would be relevant if the insurance company had the legal authority to force you to buy their insurance and/or could take money out of your pay in order to provide said health coverage system. It would also be more relevant if the US congress had not just pushed through a massive new expense on the US people based on the assumption that the government doesn't do these sorts of things.
Once the ellipsis thing was pointed out, it really does become irritating.
Well, it's stupid on its face. Were she covered by health care, either government or private, this would be a non-story.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Samira wrote:
Well, it's stupid on its face. Were she covered by health care, either government or private, this would be a non-story.
Edited, Apr 12th 2010 6:44pm by Sweetums
You know, if you had Universal Healthcare, this wouldn't have happened.
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Sweetums wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
Also seen not saving her life: an insurance company.
That analogy would be relevant if the insurance company had the legal authority to force you to buy their insurance and/or could take money out of your pay in order to provide said health coverage system. It would also be more relevant if the US congress had not just pushed through a massive new expense on the US people based on the assumption that the government doesn't do these sorts of things.
Once the ellipsis thing was pointed out, it really does become irritating.
He has immensely irritating mannerisms, doesn't he? The other one that especially gets on my nerves is where he uses a period instead of a comma.
"Look. Over there, there's a horse!"
Samira wrote:
Well, it's stupid on its face. Were she covered by health care, either government or private, this would be a non-story.
Erm? The whole point is that she *was* covered by government health care. And they denied to cover her because another part of the government decided to pay benefits for her child, which the first part of the government determined to count as "income" and thus decided that she should be able to afford health care on her own. See how that might be relevant?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
Also seen not saving her life: an insurance company.
That analogy would be relevant if the insurance company had the legal authority to force you to buy their insurance and/or could take money out of your pay in order to provide said health coverage system. It would also be more relevant if the US congress had not just pushed through a massive new expense on the US people based on the assumption that the government doesn't do these sorts of things.
Once the ellipsis thing was pointed out, it really does become irritating.
He has immensely irritating mannerisms, doesn't he? The other one that especially gets on my nerves is where he uses a period instead of a comma.
"Look. Over there, there's a horse!"
#16gbaji,
Posted: Apr 12 2010 at 6:11 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) "Look", by itself, is a completely valid one word sentence. As are most verbs. My use of the word "Again" as a single sentence can be said to be incorrect, but it's still just a stylistic thing, designed to place importance on the one word (in that case, I'm emphasizing the fact that I'm repeating something I've already told some bone headed poster several times earlier).
gbaji wrote:
Deal with it... ;)
Donate. One day it could be your family.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Deal with it... ;)
Mostly boredom. The board isn't entertaining me enough today.
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Deal with it... ;)
Mostly boredom. The board isn't entertaining me enough today.
Quote:
"Look", by itself, is a completely valid one word sentence. As are most verbs. My use of the word "Again" as a single sentence can be said to be incorrect, but it's still just a stylistic thing, designed to place importance on the one word (in that case, I'm emphasizing the fact that I'm repeating something I've already told some bone headed poster several times earlier).
Deal with it... ;)
Deal with it... ;)
Yes, your style is what annoys me. I'm glad you caught up.
gbaji wrote:
Samira wrote:
Well, it's stupid on its face. Were she covered by health care, either government or private, this would be a non-story.
Erm? The whole point is that she *was* covered by government health care. And they denied to cover her because another part of the government decided to pay benefits for her child, which the first part of the government determined to count as "income" and thus decided that she should be able to afford health care on her own. See how that might be relevant?
ERM? The whole point is that she is NOT covered by private insurance, because it is not affordable and/or she couldn't get coverage.
God, you just can't possibly be this stupid. I refuse to believe it.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
#22gbaji,
Posted: Apr 12 2010 at 7:28 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Are you suggesting that we should hold a health care payer to a different standard depending on whether it's the government, or a private business?
gbaji wrote:
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
He has immensely irritating mannerisms, doesn't he? The other one that especially gets on my nerves is where he uses a period instead of a comma.
"Look. Over there, there's a horse!"
"Look", by itself, is a completely valid one word sentence. As are most verbs. My use of the word "Again" as a single sentence can be said to be incorrect, but it's still just a stylistic thing, designed to place importance on the one word (in that case, I'm emphasizing the fact that I'm repeating something I've already told some bone headed poster several times earlier).
Deal with it... ;)
Edited, Apr 12th 2010 8:33pm by Sweetums
gbaji wrote:
It's also interesting to me how such things get commented on most in threads where those commenting on them don't really have an adequate answer for the subject at hand. Classic distraction technique really. I honestly wonder how many of you do this deliberately, or if it's just a pattern of debate you've learned to copy and now repeat without really being aware of what you're doing.
It couldn't possibly be because this is the 175,000th thread on health care and people are more interested in wandering off the path and discussing other shit, no matter how trivial, than putting on their Srs Bizness caps and hunkering down to discuss some segment on Rush Limbaugh.
Nope. Must be some sneaky debating shenanigans!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
Without bothering to click the link, I'd just like to say I'm not that woman so I'm feelin' faaaaannnn-tastic!
Since ThiefX is such a lazy fuck he can't be bothered to paste any relevant text, I'll go ahead and make it happen.
Quote:
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: WHARRGARBL
END TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: WHARRGARBL
END TRANSCRIPT
Pretty much sums up anything Rush has to say on, well, anything.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
ThiefX wrote:
Obamacare will save us all. Unless your this women.
Translation for ThiefX:
Your actually getting worst.
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Recent Visitors: 236
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (236)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Obamacare will save us all. Unless your this women.
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC