Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

The sad case of Phoebe PrinceFollow

#27 Mar 30 2010 at 10:40 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Debalic wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Debalic wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
I agree that standing up for yourself can change the dynamic, but becoming a criminal and assaulting someone is a bit much for me.

I agree. The soda-can drive-by is taking things way beyond in-school hassling.

Fun fact; this is actually considered assault. I knew a kid in high school who did this and was charged. Not sure if he was found guilty or not, though... it was a long time ago.

Yeah, that was my point: the soda-can drive-by is an assault, but popping some uppity ***** in the nose between classes isn't.


Ah, I interpreted it as sarcasm, my bad.
#28 Mar 30 2010 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Many schools around here have a "No bully" rule, which goes so far as to not require proof of bullying if you've been accused before. Results in expulsion of those accused of bullying. And that would be due to something similar to the OP story happening here.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#29 Mar 30 2010 at 10:44 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Generally speaking, retaliation in self-defense is permissible, but the force used must be equal to that used/threatened. That means you can throw a can back, but not beat the crap out of someone.
#30 Mar 30 2010 at 11:57 AM Rating: Good
Wow, that story is horrible.

The school should be held accountable in the fact that these kids have yet to be expelled, at least from everything I've read.
#31 Mar 30 2010 at 12:02 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Generally speaking, retaliation in self-defense is permissible, but the force used must be equal to that used/threatened. That means you can throw a can back, but not beat the crap out of someone.

Going on the premise that varus is a raving lunatic and curb-stomping is not a rational response, do you think that giving someone who's been ragging on you mercilessly for half a schoolyear a fat lip would be acceptable?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#32 Mar 30 2010 at 12:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
At that age, the absolute best revenge is to make them look stupid.

How to do that is the problem, of course.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#33 Mar 30 2010 at 12:06 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts

Debalic wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Generally speaking, retaliation in self-defense is permissible, but the force used must be equal to that used/threatened. That means you can throw a can back, but not beat the crap out of someone.

Going on the premise that varus is a raving lunatic and curb-stomping is not a rational response, do you think that giving someone who's been ragging on you mercilessly for half a schoolyear a fat lip would be acceptable?
I think I would certainly understand the motivation, but I would try not to gift my nemesis with the legal upper hand by making them into a victim.
#34 Mar 30 2010 at 12:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
This hits close to home for us here. I think the school is totally responsible for the actions of students on school property. If she was tormented like it says and nothing was done... someone needs to lose their job!
____________________________

#35 Mar 30 2010 at 1:21 PM Rating: Good
Schools definately at least mostly responsible. I chatted with my sister about this yesterday, as she brought the story to my attention being that we're both from MA.

But while I believe the school primarily to blame, as a parent I probably wouldn't stand for my child being bullied to a degree the required more than two requests for action before I pulled them out of school and/or considered relocating. It's definately not the parents fault for trying to go through the proper channels and they're in no way to blame.

It's not like it was when most of us were that age. These days there's so much red tape regarding retaliation along with the concern of weapons and school shootings (etc.) that school yard brawls aren't even in the cards anymore. It used to be a public takedown of a bully would stray their focus from you pretty much permanently. These days, doing so could end in absurd media coverage, counter-suits, crying sheep, etc.
#36 Mar 30 2010 at 1:51 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Yeah, you're right, I can't get past times time when a bloody nose or a split lip wasn't considered a criminal matter or cause for a shootin'.

This world is fucking crazy. I think I'll just take Thom up to the mountains and raise him on deer meat and thirty year old National Geographics.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#37 Mar 30 2010 at 4:02 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:


Do you think the school is legally responsible in some way for Phoebe's death?


Yupperdoodledoo.

You hand your kids off to them for the day, they're responsible for what happens to them during that time.

I'm also going to agree (in spirit, in not degree) with Virus. The best way to rid yourself of a bully is to stand up for yourself. You don't necessarily have to leave anyone unconscious and bleeding (although it does kinda help).

Were I a parent, and someone were to do to my child what was done to that girl, I'd go all Molly Maguire on their asses.
#38 Mar 30 2010 at 4:20 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
I'm gonna have to Google that reference.
#39 Mar 30 2010 at 4:21 PM Rating: Good
Deathwysh wrote:
I'm also going to agree (in spirit, in not degree) with Virus. The best way to rid yourself of a bully is to stand up for yourself. You don't necessarily have to leave anyone unconscious and bleeding (although it does kinda help).


Stand up for yourself, sure. I guess. But that's sooo much harder to do when you're 15 years old and in high school. Actually attacking the bully would be a bad idea, I think. I'm pretty sure that could only make things worse. If you humiliate or hurt them in any way, that's just going to make them hate you more and pick on you more.
#40 Mar 30 2010 at 4:30 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Actually attacking the bully would be a bad idea, I think. I'm pretty sure that could only make things worse.


Only if you end up getting your *** kicked instead. Though the unleashed rage from a bullied kid can be pretty explosive.

At least the school would have to suspend some people (likely the victim too) and maybe would have made them take it more seriously as well.

ETA: She's Irish! She already has an advantage in the brawl. Assuming the other girl isnt asian of course, because we all know asians know kung fu.

Edited, Mar 30th 2010 3:37pm by KTurner
#41 Mar 30 2010 at 4:42 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Dukeing it out via fisticuffs just isn't the way girls roll.
#42 Mar 30 2010 at 4:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Belkira wrote:
If you humiliate or hurt them in any way, that's just going to make them hate you more and pick on you more.


Not if you scare them enough.

It's hard, though, not having backup.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#43 Mar 30 2010 at 4:50 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Dukeing it out via fisticuffs just isn't the way girls roll.


True, women are WAY more vicious!
#44 Mar 30 2010 at 4:51 PM Rating: Good
NPR did a story on this a while ago and literally nothing was going to be done to the girls who harassed her. They had considered somehow requiring the girls to view the corpse in the hopes actually seeing the results of their actions would put some sense into them, however it was not done. Further, my recollection of this story was that the tormentors, instead of at least outwardly displaying remorse were (at least outwardly) giving signs they took credit for her death.

Of course the school is responsible, to some extent. However, there will be cases in which the school takes every action legally possible and still this is the result. From what I heard, they did virtually nothing.

As to the legal question, I know Universities in the US are no longer heavily responsible - like parents or guardians - but legally they used to be. I can't imagine the high school is not still very responsible.

I can't believe no teacher, no fellow student at that school stood up for her. Many of them must just be devastated by this.

The one thing about this forum which genuinely disturbs me is how katie was treated. No, it was not comparable.
#45 Mar 30 2010 at 4:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The obvious answer is to get the names and photos of her tormentors out onto the internet and then let nature take its course.

See? I'm a problem-solver.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#46 Mar 30 2010 at 5:11 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The obvious answer is to get the names and photos of her tormentors out onto the internet and then let nature take its course.

See? I'm a problem-solver.
Cyber-bully!
#47 Mar 30 2010 at 5:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Yossarian wrote:
The one thing about this forum which genuinely disturbs me is how katie was treated. No, it was not comparable.


I agree with you on both points. Unlike this girl (apparently), Katie did instigate a lot of the negative interaction.

And I'm sure someone somewhere is even now putting these girls' Facebook pictures out there.



____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#48 Mar 30 2010 at 5:58 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Katie was an odd case. She inspired my pity at one point and I drew the line at her miscarriage, but she never pulled any punches with me. She hated trolls, but she seemed to love earning people's contempt.
#49 Mar 30 2010 at 7:04 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
KTurner wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Dukeing it out via fisticuffs just isn't the way girls roll.

True, women are WAY more vicious!

I've seen high school field hockey matches that made Joe Pesci's death in Casino look like a Nerf fight.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#50 Mar 30 2010 at 7:25 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Katie...seemed to love earning people's contempt.


Its good to love what you do best.
#51 Mar 30 2010 at 10:03 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Deathwysh wrote:
I'm also going to agree (in spirit, in not degree) with Virus. The best way to rid yourself of a bully is to stand up for yourself. You don't necessarily have to leave anyone unconscious and bleeding (although it does kinda help).


Stand up for yourself, sure. I guess. But that's sooo much harder to do when you're 15 years old and in high school. Actually attacking the bully would be a bad idea, I think. I'm pretty sure that could only make things worse. If you humiliate or hurt them in any way, that's just going to make them hate you more and pick on you more.


Like Turner said, only if you're on the losing side. Just make sure you're not. I've been on both sides, losing and winning, in two cases of being bullied in school. The first time I had no chance in hell, the new girl at a rough school, no bully laws at the time, and I got jumped by 12 girls. Fortunately a teacher was nearby.

Second time it was one on one and very early on in high school where everyone was trying to figure out their place on the totem pole. One girl in particular started really pushing the boundaries in bullying some friends. We went toe to toe one morning before school started and she threw the fist punch. I finished it. She left myself and my friends alone from that day on.


There is a time and place for physical self defense. I dont condone it as an answer for everything. But certain times calls for it. The only rule to live by is to never throw the first punch, but to always throw the last.




As per the school, yes they're responsible. Some staff knew what was going on and through their negligence and silence, a girl suffered repeatedly and died as a result. The students are fully responsible and should be tried as they are. They should also be expelled.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 141 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (141)