Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I guess this ends the gun debate once and for allFollow

#52 Mar 29 2010 at 3:00 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
Yodabunny wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Wait! Let me get this straight. The need to use a firearm to protect one's home from criminals and potentially protect one from an authoritarian government is gone, but the need to hunt to put food on your table is as strong as ever?

Really? That's the direction you're going with this?


No, but the wish to put food on your table is a reasonable reason to own a firearm. Potentially having to kill people is not. I could build a permanent wall of fire around my home to protect myself from criminals, does that make it a good idea? Should I have the right to do that despite the dangers it potentially presents?
I would do this if I could afford the natural gas bill. Goodbye, Jehovah's Witnesses!
#53 Mar 29 2010 at 3:01 PM Rating: Excellent
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Iamadam the Prohpet wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
You mean besides taxing its populace into slavery?


It might be futile, but I can't help it.

Can you clarify this one?


Everyone knows that taxation is just a form of non-discriminate slavery.

False. It discriminates against those that actually make a taxable income.


I see, making them slaves to people who don't make a taxable income.
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#54 Mar 29 2010 at 3:01 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Yoda,So it the first amendment. The nerve of people being able to say what they want.


Ok, so you want to talk about something relevant now?

Quote:
You mean besides taxing its populace into slavery?


Not happening, not going to happen, so not relevant.

Quote:
That's exactly what you do. Just ask the Houston brothers if they were glad they had plenty of firepower.


If there were no guns, no one would have died there.
#55 Mar 29 2010 at 3:02 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
The 21st century pharaohs have the slaves begging for work.

Edited, Mar 29th 2010 9:04pm by paulsol
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#56 Mar 29 2010 at 3:05 PM Rating: Decent
Jophed,

Quote:
Parole violation.


To loud.

#57 Mar 29 2010 at 3:05 PM Rating: Decent
Yodabunny wrote:
The Constitution is an outdated document based on a time when having firearms in the home made sense. That's no longer the case in the US. I don't think we have to worry about the US government oppressing it's population anytime soon so there's no reason to have a stockpile of arms to defend yourself from the ebil guberment.

Well, I worry about the government oppressing me and my family and like-minded individuals. I also worry about defending my family and my home from people who shouldn't be there. I also know how to track, kill and clean game to provide for myself and my family. On the pro/con balance sheet of why I should get to keep guns and what I will tell people who disagree, that little trifecta slants it way over to "you can pry my gun from my cold dead fingers" or more simply "f'uck off"

Add to that the unassailably cool fact that I can now throw on a double shoulder holster rig, go down to the city park and barbecue with my kids just to **** off the liberals in St. Paul, I'm what you might call a happy camper.
#58 Mar 29 2010 at 3:07 PM Rating: Default
Iamadam the Prohpet wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Iamadam the Prohpet wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
knoxxsouthy wrote:
You mean besides taxing its populace into slavery?


It might be futile, but I can't help it.

Can you clarify this one?


Everyone knows that taxation is just a form of non-discriminate slavery.

False. It discriminates against those that actually make a taxable income.


I see, making them slaves to people who don't make a taxable income.

I'm not addressing the slavery portion, just indiscriminate.
#59 Mar 29 2010 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:

Add to that the unassailably cool fact that I can now throw on a double shoulder holster rig, go down to the city park and barbecue with my kids just to **** off the liberals in St. Paul, I'm what you might call a happy camper.
I could probably go to the park with an assault rifle and nobody would notice.

:(
#60 Mar 29 2010 at 3:11 PM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
Sweetums wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:

Add to that the unassailably cool fact that I can now throw on a double shoulder holster rig, go down to the city park and barbecue with my kids just to **** off the liberals in St. Paul, I'm what you might call a happy camper.
I could probably go to the park with an assault rifle and nobody would notice.

:(


Wow, your parks must be really really safe!
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#61 Mar 29 2010 at 3:15 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
Iamadam the Prohpet wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:

Add to that the unassailably cool fact that I can now throw on a double shoulder holster rig, go down to the city park and barbecue with my kids just to **** off the liberals in St. Paul, I'm what you might call a happy camper.
I could probably go to the park with an assault rifle and nobody would notice.

:(


Wow, your parks must be really really safe!
Haha, Texas.
#62 Mar 29 2010 at 3:17 PM Rating: Good
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Well, I worry about the government oppressing me and my family and like-minded individuals. I also worry about defending my family and my home from people who shouldn't be there. I also know how to track, kill and clean game to provide for myself and my family. On the pro/con balance sheet of why I should get to keep guns and what I will tell people who disagree, that little trifecta slants it way over to "you can pry my gun from my cold dead fingers" or more simply "f'uck off"

Add to that the unassailably cool fact that I can now throw on a double shoulder holster rig, go down to the city park and barbecue with my kids just to **** off the liberals in St. Paul, I'm what you might call a happy camper.


Honestly, it's not the parks that bother me so much as the bars....
#63 Mar 29 2010 at 3:19 PM Rating: Good
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Add to that the unassailably cool fact that I can now throw on a double shoulder holster rig, go down to the city park and barbecue with my kids just to **** off the liberals in St. Paul, I'm what you might call a happy camper.


Honestly, it's not the parks that bother me so much as the bars....[/quote]
I don't drink when I have a loaded firearm.

Any more.
#64 Mar 29 2010 at 3:20 PM Rating: Good
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
I don't drink when I have a loaded firearm.

Any more.


Also: I live in Tennessee.
#65 Mar 29 2010 at 3:22 PM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Can I be both liberal and pro-gun?
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#66 Mar 29 2010 at 3:23 PM Rating: Excellent
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
I don't drink when I have a loaded firearm.

Any more.


Well now how the hell are you supposed to get the beer bottles empty so you can shoot at them?
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#67 Mar 29 2010 at 3:24 PM Rating: Decent
bsphil wrote:
Can I be both liberal and pro-gun?

If a half-blank Kenyan Muslim can become president of the United States of America, you can be whatever you want to be princess.
#68 Mar 29 2010 at 3:25 PM Rating: Good
Iamadam the Prohpet wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
I don't drink when I have a loaded firearm.

Any more.


Well now how the hell are you supposed to get the beer bottles empty so you can shoot at them?

I drink plenty, I just don't do it while carrying a pistol.

For shooting, I prefer PCP.
#69 Mar 29 2010 at 3:29 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
gbaji wrote:
Yodabunny wrote:
The Constitution is an outdated document based on a time when having firearms in the home made sense. That's no longer the case in the US. I don't think we have to worry about the US government oppressing it's population anytime soon so there's no reason to have a stockpile of arms to defend yourself from the ebil guberment.

Gun control probably isn't the solution for the US anymore, firearms are too prevalent in the US to remove them effectively at this point. Doesn't make it right.

Countries where gun control is working have NEVER (at least recently) been allowed to openly carry firearms. In Canada for example you have to have a Fire Arms Control license to own any kind of gun, this requires that you complete a course and pay a fee, you are also severely restricted in which type of weapons you can purchase/own/sell. This means people don't just go out a buy a gun for the sake of owning one, they buy a gun because they want to hunt and they've been trained in safe use and storage. Not perfect, but we don't have the gun crime issues you have in the US because it's just not that easy to get a gun.


Wait! Let me get this straight. The need to use a firearm to protect one's home from criminals and potentially protect one from an authoritarian government is gone, but the need to hunt to put food on your table is as strong as ever?

Really? That's the direction you're going with this?

Modern policing is a wonderful thing, especially with all this wizz-bang forensics. Of course, it's all a bit more efficient if you only have one to three layers of law enforcement tops, and hardly any jurisdictional brangling. IE, having local government cops whose teeny jurisdictions making up a crazy quilt covering the nation, and who are in rivalry with State cop and National cop jurisdictions makes my head ache and my eyes pop. I mean, I get how this evolved from the historic roots of the continent, but can't you have cleaned it up a bit since then?

We went metric, got rid of our one and two cent pieces, amalgamated our local councils into a smaller number of bigger area councils and our local councils certainly don't run their own cops. US nature is breathtaking, most US individuals fantastic, but your political and executive structures drive me nuts. NUTS.


If anyone is going to go up against a modern government using a nation's armed forces, they're fucked. The civvies aren't allowed anything like what the army has, any where. Including America. If you think your constitutional right to bear arms is going to protect you from your government, and keep the government in line, you're looney tunes. The fastest way to turn around or overthrow a modern government is via mass street demonstrations, and strikes. A modern western government can't get away with shooting a peacefully demonstrating populous, and the bigger the demonstrations, the more pressure on the government to change. Ditto with strikes, which impact on the government budget and put pressure on the government from businesses. Any legal limitations on your right to demonstrate or strike is dangerous, and is made out of governmental fear.

So yeah, the only real reason to own a gun in most peaceful modern western developed nations is for leisure, sport, historical, or back-to-nature reasons.
#70 Mar 29 2010 at 3:37 PM Rating: Decent
Yoda,

Quote:
If there were no guns, no one would have died there.


Unless of course the police were going there to kill them, which is what they were afraid of and told everyone in the county they were afraid of.

The police are not your friends.
#71 Mar 29 2010 at 3:38 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,512 posts
Not a big fan of the "overthrow the government" angle, but:

A) The Viet Cong sure seemed to be able to hold their own versus a better-equipped enemy
B) The entire military isn't going to available since there will obviously be defectors at a time like that
C) What country is going to nuke its own infrastructure?
D) Tell me how well demonstrations are working for Iran
#72 Mar 29 2010 at 3:39 PM Rating: Decent
Aripya,

Quote:
So yeah, the only real reason to own a gun in most peaceful modern western developed nations is for leisure, sport, historical, or back-to-nature reasons.


lmao...I guess all the law abiding people that live in crime infested neighborhoods are just sol. Why do you hate minorities?
#73 Mar 29 2010 at 3:52 PM Rating: Decent
*****
15,952 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Aripya,

Quote:
So yeah, the only real reason to own a gun in most peaceful modern western developed nations is for leisure, sport, historical, or back-to-nature reasons.


lmao...I guess all the law abiding people that live in crime infested neighborhoods are just sol. Why do you hate minorities?

In Aus, if you are assaulted or killed, the chances are 98% that it will be by a family member, or someone that is known to you. In which case, it doesn't matter what neighbourhood you live in, or what race or class you belong to. People skills, emotional skills, family support, social services, whatever education and support it takes to make individuals know how to make functional families and functional peer interactions, that's what crime prevention is about.

Yes you have to take individual responsibility. But you have to be modelled good behaviour and taught good social skills as a child, so you can enforce your boundaries, support other people, and politely get what you need, without blowing up on other people. If your parent fall down on that modelling and skill teaching, you need to get it elsewhere. If you cross the legal line, you need to take the full consequences of your actions, including jail time if that's appropriate.

But with 90% of jail inmates diagnosed with mental illnesses, I think there's room to improve medical services to the mentally ill, to intervene before things get that bad for them. And for gad's sake legalise and medicalise most drugs. 60% of Australian jail inmates are in there on drugs offences. It's a waste of money and lives.

Edited, Mar 29th 2010 5:53pm by Aripyanfar
#74 Mar 29 2010 at 4:06 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:

It never ceases to amaze me the vast difference between the world as it actually isas I see it and the world as it appears when described in a research paper.


FTFY

Ya, there is no basis for communication with gbaji. News? Research? All conducted by people who disagree with him, ergo they are wrong. Method unseen.

Honestly, what we're talking about is social science. The uncertainties are huge. However, totally ignoring it is astoundingly simple minded.

The original question which I looked up for this thread was: does concealed carry reduce crime. I don't know, so I google scholar it. And it is 50/50. Some say it does, some say it does not. But according to our local forum loon, this research was obviously biased to the left!

It must be awful comfortable to "know" "the world as it actually is" without the benefit of information from any reliable source. Pathetic, but very comfortable. So comfortable, in fact, were I to do so, I could believe anything! Invisible pink unicorns? Why not. Sure, no one else has, um, experienced them, but they don't agree with me, ergo they are wrong :)

#75 Mar 29 2010 at 5:24 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Totem wrote:
So Yoss, if there is no measurable effect, then why not open the legal avenues for conceal carry for every honest citizen? Since, after all, it doesn't make any difference.

Totem


Just for you Totes
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#76 Mar 29 2010 at 5:35 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Yodabunny wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Wait! Let me get this straight. The need to use a firearm to protect one's home from criminals and potentially protect one from an authoritarian government is gone, but the need to hunt to put food on your table is as strong as ever?

Really? That's the direction you're going with this?


No, but the wish to put food on your table is a reasonable reason to own a firearm. Potentially having to kill people is not.


But you framed the issue in the context of some kind of changes over time. In what way was the use of a firearm for defense more "reasonable" compared to the need to use one for hunting in the past?

I would think the exact opposite would be true. Our need to use firearms to hunt for food is much much less today than it was 200+ years ago, while the need to use them for defense is pretty close to the same.


You may innately believe one to be reasonable and the other not, but the founding fathers clearly didn't agree with you. If you're going to make this argument, you need to show that the conditions of each of those uses of firearms has changed since that time. There are good arguments for gun control out there, but this really isn't one of them...


Quote:
I could build a permanent wall of fire around my home to protect myself from criminals, does that make it a good idea? Should I have the right to do that despite the dangers it potentially presents?


Has that analogy changed in the last 200+ years? Again, you're claiming changed conditions justify changed laws, but aren't making a very good case for anything other than a recitation of your own position on the issue.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 203 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (203)