gbaji wrote:
Yodabunny wrote:
The Constitution is an outdated document based on a time when having firearms in the home made sense. That's no longer the case in the US. I don't think we have to worry about the US government oppressing it's population anytime soon so there's no reason to have a stockpile of arms to defend yourself from the ebil guberment.
Gun control probably isn't the solution for the US anymore, firearms are too prevalent in the US to remove them effectively at this point. Doesn't make it right.
Countries where gun control is working have NEVER (at least recently) been allowed to openly carry firearms. In Canada for example you have to have a Fire Arms Control license to own any kind of gun, this requires that you complete a course and pay a fee, you are also severely restricted in which type of weapons you can purchase/own/sell. This means people don't just go out a buy a gun for the sake of owning one, they buy a gun because they want to hunt and they've been trained in safe use and storage. Not perfect, but we don't have the gun crime issues you have in the US because it's just not that easy to get a gun.
Wait! Let me get this straight. The need to use a firearm to protect one's home from criminals and potentially protect one from an authoritarian government is gone, but the need to hunt to put food on your table is as strong as ever?
Really? That's the direction you're going with this?
Modern policing is a wonderful thing, especially with all this wizz-bang forensics. Of course, it's all a bit more efficient if you only have one to three layers of law enforcement tops, and hardly any jurisdictional brangling. IE, having local government cops whose teeny jurisdictions making up a crazy quilt covering the nation, and who are in rivalry with State cop and National cop jurisdictions makes my head ache and my eyes pop. I mean, I get how this evolved from the historic roots of the continent, but can't you have cleaned it up a bit since then?
We went metric, got rid of our one and two cent pieces, amalgamated our local councils into a smaller number of bigger area councils and our local councils certainly don't run their own cops. US nature is breathtaking, most US individuals fantastic, but your political and executive structures drive me nuts. NUTS.
If anyone is going to go up against a modern government using a nation's armed forces, they're fu
cked. The civvies aren't allowed anything like what the army has, any where. Including America. If you think your constitutional right to bear arms is going to protect you from your government, and keep the government in line, you're looney tunes. The fastest way to turn around or overthrow a modern government is via mass street demonstrations, and strikes. A modern western government can't get away with shooting a peacefully demonstrating populous, and the bigger the demonstrations, the more pressure on the government to change. Ditto with strikes, which impact on the government budget and put pressure on the government from businesses. Any legal limitations on your right to demonstrate or strike is dangerous, and is made out of governmental fear.
So yeah, the only real reason to own a gun in most peaceful modern western developed nations is for leisure, sport, historical, or back-to-nature reasons.