Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Follow-up: lesbian high schooler's promFollow

#27 Mar 24 2010 at 3:29 PM Rating: Decent
Nadenu,

Quote:
Once upon a time, black people had to sit at the back of the bus. Someone challenged that rule.


That's right. Now they just call 911 if they want to get taken somewhere. Paying bus fares is for chumps.

#28gbaji, Posted: Mar 24 2010 at 3:33 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) False. She was told she could not go to the prom wearing a tuxedo instead of a dress, and that she should not bring her girlfriend as her date. Whatever other conversations may have occurred are irrelevant to the core issue at hand. Had she complied with those two requirements, she could have attended the dance and danced with anyone she pleased (just as all attendants can).
#29 Mar 24 2010 at 3:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Nadenu,

Quote:
Once upon a time, black people had to sit at the back of the bus. Someone challenged that rule.


That's right. Now they just call 911 if they want to get taken somewhere. Paying bus fares is for chumps.


You don't even try any more.
#30 Mar 24 2010 at 3:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Just as she's perfectly free to marry anyone she chooses, as long as they have a *****.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#31 Mar 24 2010 at 3:37 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I knew someone would go the "she should've just followed the rules" route. I really thought it'd be Varrus.


Sigh...

If a non-lesbian had insisted that she be allowed to take a female friend as her date and wear a tuxedo, both in violation of the rules, would you still take the position you're taking? Why you take a position on something is just as important as the position you take.

If the dress code and requirements that couples buying tickets together (there's more to being a "date" at the prom than just who you hang out with) are bad, then they are bad regardless of the sexual orientation of the person involved. Sadly, far too many people just don't get this.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#32 Mar 24 2010 at 3:40 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Samira wrote:
Just as she's perfectly free to marry anyone she chooses, as long as they have a *****.


Irrelevant to this issue. There are a host of things in our society that take note of someone's sex. Can we please not lump them all into one incredibly simplistic argument? She's free to use a public restroom, as long as it's the women's restroom, right? Do we start talking about womens' soccer leagues next? Maybe complain that bars offer ladies night? How about we look just as the issue in front of us and not insist on painting it into a larger context?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#33 Mar 24 2010 at 3:45 PM Rating: Decent
Gbaji,

Quote:
How about we look just as the issue in front of us and not insist on painting it into a larger context?


Because it doesn't fit into the homosexual agenda. Just another attack by the radical liberal left on traditional values.

#34 Mar 24 2010 at 3:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I was inspired by your echo, actually.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#35 Mar 24 2010 at 3:46 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Gbaji,

Quote:
How about we look just as the issue in front of us and not insist on painting it into a larger context?


Because it doesn't fit into the homosexual agenda. Just another attack by the radical liberal left on traditional values.
Like you'd adhere to traditional values. Smiley: lol
#36 Mar 24 2010 at 3:51 PM Rating: Decent
Sweet,

Quote:
Like you'd adhere to traditional values.


Like i'd be caught at a high school dance. When I was in school we partied on the beach like normal teenagers.
#37 Mar 24 2010 at 4:14 PM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Like i'd be caught at a high school dance.


Note: I'm totally reading this as "I would go, but you wouldn't catch me there." I don't feel I'm far off...
#38 Mar 24 2010 at 4:28 PM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:
Sigh...

If a non-lesbian had insisted that she be allowed to take a female friend as her date and wear a tuxedo, both in violation of the rules, would you still take the position you're taking?


Yes.

gbaji wrote:
Why you take a position on something is just as important as the position you take.

If the dress code and requirements that couples buying tickets together (there's more to being a "date" at the prom than just who you hang out with) are bad, then they are bad regardless of the sexual orientation of the person involved. Sadly, far too many people just don't get this.


I agree. You, on the other hand, seem to think we should all just follow the rules put in place like good little sheep and not rile anyone up.
#39 Mar 24 2010 at 4:29 PM Rating: Good
knoxxsouthy wrote:
Sweet,

Quote:
Like you'd adhere to traditional values.


Like i'd be caught at a high school dance. When I was in school we partied on the beach like normal teenagers.


I assume you weren't in Knoxville at the time, then?
#40 Mar 24 2010 at 4:56 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Sigh...

If a non-lesbian had insisted that she be allowed to take a female friend as her date and wear a tuxedo, both in violation of the rules, would you still take the position you're taking?


Yes.


You're lying. Sorry. There's just no nice way to say it.

Quote:
gbaji wrote:
If the dress code and requirements that couples buying tickets together (there's more to being a "date" at the prom than just who you hang out with) are bad, then they are bad regardless of the sexual orientation of the person involved. Sadly, far too many people just don't get this.


I agree. You, on the other hand, seem to think we should all just follow the rules put in place like good little sheep and not rile anyone up.


There is a huge range between "blindly following the rules because they are the rules", and "ignore any rule you don't like". Can we agree on that? I'm not saying you must follow all rules, but that there is a process for changing them that should be respected. She choose not to do that and/or choose to refuse to abide by the result. She did so out of sheer selfishness and a sense that because she's a lesbian the rules should not apply to her.


When did "riling people up" become an acceptable way to create change? When did people just assume that because someone choose the path of "riling people up", that the cause they are pursuing must be just? That's the kind of assumption I am taking issue with here. It's a freaking prom run by a school. It's not like she's fighting a grand cause against the Gestapo or something. It's a school board issue at best. But somehow this gets turned into an issue of rights? You don't have a right to attend an event dressed however you want. You do not have a right to buy tickets to an event if you refuse to follow the rules for buying said tickets.

No amount of being a lesbian changes that. Or it shouldn't...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#41 Mar 24 2010 at 4:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
No amount of being a lesbian changes that.


Oh, so not even the 12-oz can?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#42 Mar 24 2010 at 4:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
gbaji wrote:
You're lying. Sorry. There's just no nice way to say it.

You're an idiot. Sorry. There's just no nice way to say it.


Edited, Mar 24th 2010 8:01pm by Uglysasquatch
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#43 Mar 24 2010 at 5:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

I really don't think I deserved to be no-rated, just read this fucking thread.


#44 Mar 24 2010 at 5:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
gbaji wrote:
You're lying. Sorry. There's just no nice way to say it.
You're an idiot. Sorry. There's just no nice way to say it.

You have to understand. Since Gbaji is a hypocrite who constantly changes his opinions and reactions to support his ideology, he assumes everyone else is also a hypocrite who changes their opinions and reactions on a whim to match an ideology.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#45 Mar 24 2010 at 5:53 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
gbaji wrote:
You're lying. Sorry. There's just no nice way to say it.
You're an idiot. Sorry. There's just no nice way to say it.

You have to understand. Since Gbaji is a hypocrite who constantly changes his opinions and reactions to support his ideology, he assumes everyone else is also a hypocrite who changes their opinions and reactions on a whim to match an ideology.


It's not about me. Belkira said what she said only because if she admitted the obvious truth, which we all know to be true, it would weaken her position in this discussion. Is anyone seriously suggesting that if this girl wasn't a lesbian that her argument would have been given any weight? Would the ACLU have taken her case? Of course not! Their very argument rested on the free speech aspect of expressing her homosexuality by attending the prom in a tuxedo and taking a same-sex date. Absent her sexual orientation there would have been no case, there would have been no story, we'd all have never heard of it, and Belk would not have had to lie about what she would have said if someone had brought it up.


The entire issue rests on the fact that she is a lesbian. If she'd been straight, no one would have blinked an eye about her being denied a request to wear a tuxedo or bring a girlfriend as a date. It is interesting how the truth tends to garner the strongest reactions from some posters though. It's almost like knowing that you're wrong pisses you off or something...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#46 Mar 24 2010 at 6:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
It's not about me.

No, it really is. Many of your arguments revolve around you using some imaginary world to make a point ("But you KNOW if he said X, you'd say Y! It's true and you know it!") and I can only assume it's because since your own values and reactions are so prone to shift on an ideological breeze that you just innately believe that everyone else shares your faults.

Quote:
Belkira said what she said only because if she admitted the obvious truth, which we all know to be true, it would weaken her position in this discussion.

Exhibit A
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#47 Mar 24 2010 at 6:02 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
Gbaji is the tattered, xeroxed 'zine to Glenn Beck's Wall Street Journal.
#48 Mar 24 2010 at 6:12 PM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
On a side note, I hear she got a 30k scholarship from Ellen Degeneress, so she didn't make out all that bad.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#49 Mar 24 2010 at 6:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Sweetums wrote:
Gbaji is the tattered, xeroxed 'zine to Glenn Beck's Wall Street Journal.

Think Gbaji will change his sig to a Goldline ad?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#50 Mar 24 2010 at 6:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
The entire issue rests on the fact that she is a lesbian. If she'd been straight, no one would have blinked an eye about her being denied a request to wear a tuxedo or bring a girlfriend as a date. It is interesting how the truth tends to garner the strongest reactions from some posters though. It's almost like knowing that you're wrong pisses you off or something...


I'll stipulate that the relevant issue is that she's a lesbian. Okay, that's the relevant point.

Oddly, it doesn't weaken the argument at all. In fact it strengthens it, because she wanted to bring her girlfriend to the prom. It's kind of a date night, if you recall. Not exclusively couples, but mainly couples, there being recognized as couples, arriving together, dressing in tacky but complementary outfits, blah blah. That's what it's about. She has a constitutionally protected right to express herself, even if it makes the vice principal at East Jesus High School feel all funny in his righteous parts.

And hey, looky here, the court agrees with me.

Huh. I'm sure that judge doesn't know the law, though. Not really. Not the way you do. Smiley: oyvey





____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#51gbaji, Posted: Mar 24 2010 at 6:31 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) And yet. In this case I'm right, aren't I?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 174 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (174)