Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Suicide attempt worthy of The Internet (was forum=28)Follow

#202 Mar 15 2010 at 10:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
Guenny wrote:
Especially since I wanted him to ban me.
It's really not that hard to just not come here and post if you don't want to.


Sure; but that hardly makes any kind of statement at all.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#203 Mar 15 2010 at 10:51 AM Rating: Excellent
Guenny wrote:
-BT gets mute for using posters first name & vague thread about Craigslist ads
-I post reply, "LOL REALLY? MYSPACE ISN'T ALLOWED EITHER? LOL AM I BANT TOO??"
-Kaosmash my post, with threatened with a ban if I don't "step back into line"
-Kao also threatened stoning (not the good kind)

I do understand that he apologized for the misunderstanding and I'm glad, but he still is a pretty big idiot and it's hard not to argue with logic like "You quoted 20 posts that broke the filter!" as one of my major, common rule infractions.

I appreciate your input and understanding, Flea, but ever since I've been with BT, Kao has had much sharper teeth for me. I was standing up for myself because I'm tired of mute/ban threats from Kao. Yeah, it may be same story, different day, but @#%^, empty threats from an impotent internet nerd really argggh.

Especially since I wanted him to ban me. :( Que sera, maybe next time.

Your mother was one of those who said "my sweet angel would never do something like that" a lot, wasn't she?

Unless you're 5 years old, petulance of the degree you display is never a cute thing. Could it be that ever since you've been with BT you've been ever so slightly more the abrasive sea nut? Bob forbid you do a little soul searching on this one and digest the fact that even though Kao may be an impotent interwebs douchenozzle you're acting like a sandy-snatched internet tween lashing out because the person you're currently annoyed with isn't sitting across the table from you and thus can't reach over and keep his pimp hand strong.

I'm not sure what your life experience has been (though hooking up with BT I can only infer certain specific types of abuse at the hand of a twisted uncle somewhere in your past), but I've been on the receiving end of the enforcement of the letter of the law. Terms of Use, ToS, etc., are there in case an authority figure wants to abuse them. They are there in case someone gets out of control. They are detailed and long because if someone wants you gone, the best way to get you gone is to call you on one of the many rules you've broken.

If you don't like getting called on the rule violations (regardless of how ticky-tack you find them), either don't break them (falls in with maybe you should know what they are) or don't ask dumbassed questions you can't answer before hand.
#204 Mar 15 2010 at 10:51 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Guenny wrote:
-BT gets mute for using posters first name & vague thread about Craigslist ads
-I post reply, "LOL REALLY? MYSPACE ISN'T ALLOWED EITHER? LOL AM I BANT TOO??"
-Kaosmash my post, with threatened with a ban if I don't "step back into line"
-Kao also threatened stoning (not the good kind)

I do understand that he apologized for the misunderstanding and I'm glad, but he still is a pretty big idiot and it's hard not to argue with logic like "You quoted 20 posts that broke the filter!" as one of my major, common rule infractions.

I appreciate your input and understanding, Flea, but ever since I've been with BT, Kao has had much sharper teeth for me. I was standing up for myself because I'm tired of mute/ban threats from Kao. Yeah, it may be same story, different day, but @#%^, empty threats from an impotent internet nerd really argggh.

Especially since I wanted him to ban me. :( Que sera, maybe next time.
An internet nerd with the power to ban you isn't really impotent. I never got that you wanted to be banned. In fact, I was under the impression you were trying to avoid being affected by any admin actions directed toward BT that would unfairly impact you, which turned out to be a nonissue because he got his wrist slapped and that's it.

See? Getting banned is harder than you think. Still, I'm falling into making this about BT. If you really want to get banned, you know how. We all do. If you only threaten and never do, in theory you're no better than your perception of Kao.
#205 Mar 15 2010 at 10:53 AM Rating: Good
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
An internet nerd with the power to ban you isn't really impotent. I never got that you wanted to be banned. In fact, I was under the impression you were trying to avoid being affected by any admin actions directed toward BT that would unfairly impact you, which turned out to be a nonissue because he got his wrist slapped and that's it.

See? Getting banned is harder than you think. Still, I'm falling into making this about BT. If you really want to get banned, you know how. We all do. If you only threaten and never do, in theory you're no better than your perception of Kao.

If you're unclear as to the particular words/phrases/insinuations which can get you banned, PM me. I have had the list specifically enumerated on multiple occasions.
#206 Mar 15 2010 at 10:56 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Samira wrote:
You weren't here for the dark and empty time of Skeeter, were you, Guenny?

Also including reference to the stoning remark, even as a joke, reduces the legitimacy of your very real complaint.

I think you're right, for the most part. People tend to see couples as one unit and to treat them the same, regardless of merit.



I've had several, legitimate complains that were ignored. And I'm not just talking about in this thread. I'm done caring. Last night I was having a good deal of fun twisting Kaolian's panties, because yes, everyone, I have had my experiences with Kaolian. Let's not forget that he was asked a variety of times to take it to PMs and instead he took the opportunity to flex his e-peen all over the asylum and scare everyone into submission again.

I accepted pretty much from the beginning that by being with "Barkingturtle" that it would be few and far between that I would be shown any respect. I don't care. It's the ******* internet, people. I'm not taking this near as seriously as anyone seems to think.
#207 Mar 15 2010 at 10:58 AM Rating: Good
Guenny wrote:
I accepted pretty much from the beginning that by being with "Barkingturtle" that it would be few and far between that I would be shown any respect. I don't care. It's the @#%^ing internet, people. I'm not taking this near as seriously as anyone seems to think.

What's the Godwin's equivalent for "zomgitstehwebs"?
#208 Mar 15 2010 at 10:59 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
Oh and trust me, last night we were scouring hard for the Melody pictures. If anyone has a copy and wants to PM them to me, you know what I'll do.
#209 Mar 15 2010 at 11:00 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Guenny wrote:
I accepted pretty much from the beginning that by being with "Barkingturtle" that it would be few and far between that I would be shown any respect. I don't care. It's the @#%^ing internet, people. I'm not taking this near as seriously as anyone seems to think.

What's the Godwin's equivalent for "zomgitstehwebs"?


Hard to understand, I suppose, for people who don't have a life outside of it.
#210 Mar 15 2010 at 11:02 AM Rating: Good
Guenny wrote:
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Guenny wrote:
I accepted pretty much from the beginning that by being with "Barkingturtle" that it would be few and far between that I would be shown any respect. I don't care. It's the @#%^ing internet, people. I'm not taking this near as seriously as anyone seems to think.

What's the Godwin's equivalent for "zomgitstehwebs"?


Hard to understand, I suppose, for people who don't have a life outside of it.

I think the hardest thing to understand was your reply. What are you saying?
#211 Mar 15 2010 at 11:10 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
I'm too scared to reply to your posts because you break the filter in your sig. Sorry, Moe.
#212 Mar 15 2010 at 11:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Guenny wrote:
I'm too scared to reply to your posts because you break the filter in your sig. Sorry, Moe.

And I accept the potential consequences for doing it.

I'm just glad you keep posting, really. It's good to see the reason for BT going soft.
#213 Mar 15 2010 at 11:18 AM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Guenny wrote:
I'm too scared to reply to your posts because you break the filter in your sig. Sorry, Moe.

And I accept the potential consequences for doing it.

I'm just glad you keep posting, really. It's good to see the reason for BT going soft.


Oh trust me, I take full credit for turning him into the kind, mature, responsible, sober man that he is. I'm a miracle worker.

ohshi-

Edited, Mar 15th 2010 11:18am by Guenny
#214 Mar 15 2010 at 11:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Guenny wrote:
I'm a miracle worker.


/Petition Ginny's title, assuming she doesn't get banned before then:
Anne Sullivan.

/Petition Change BT's title to Helen Keller.
#215 Mar 15 2010 at 11:22 AM Rating: Excellent
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
Guenny wrote:
I'm a miracle worker.


/Petition Ginny's title, assuming she doesn't get banned before then:
Anne Sullivan.

/Petition Change BT's title to Helen Keller.


I laughed.


But I couldn't hear it.Smiley: crymore
#216 Mar 15 2010 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Samira wrote:
you're right, for the most part. People tend to see couples as one unit and to treat them the same, regardless of merit.
Amen. When I dated that asshat it really devalued my stock. That's why I traded up and am now a harmless forum matron.
#217 Mar 15 2010 at 11:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Samira wrote:
you're right, for the most part. People tend to see couples as one unit and to treat them the same, regardless of merit.
Amen. When I dated that asshat it really devalued my stock. That's why I traded up and am now a harmless forum matron.


Your avatar says otherwise.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#218 Mar 15 2010 at 11:31 AM Rating: Good
Samira wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Samira wrote:
you're right, for the most part. People tend to see couples as one unit and to treat them the same, regardless of merit.
Amen. When I dated that asshat it really devalued my stock. That's why I traded up and am now a harmless forum matron.


Your avatar says otherwise.



If you stare at Flea's Avatar long enough it's no longer sexy but a bit creepy with that eye thing going on.

Edited, Mar 15th 2010 12:35pm by toohotforu
#219 Mar 15 2010 at 11:32 AM Rating: Excellent
The One and Only toohotforu wrote:
Samira wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Samira wrote:
you're right, for the most part. People tend to see couples as one unit and to treat them the same, regardless of merit.
Amen. When I dated that asshat it really devalued my stock. That's why I traded up and am now a harmless forum matron.


Your avatar says otherwise.



If you stare at Flea's Avatar long enough its no long sexy but a bit creepy with that eye thing going on.

If you stare at your avatar long enough it's no longer sexy, but a bit annoying with that crooked bow and fluffy petticoat thing going on.
#220 Mar 15 2010 at 11:33 AM Rating: Good
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
The One and Only toohotforu wrote:
Samira wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Samira wrote:
you're right, for the most part. People tend to see couples as one unit and to treat them the same, regardless of merit.
Amen. When I dated that asshat it really devalued my stock. That's why I traded up and am now a harmless forum matron.


Your avatar says otherwise.



If you stare at Flea's Avatar long enough its no long sexy but a bit creepy with that eye thing going on.

If you stare at your avatar long enough it's no longer sexy, but a bit annoying with that crooked bow and fluffy petticoat thing going on.


UGH! You're right!

Edited, Mar 15th 2010 12:34pm by toohotforu
#221 Mar 15 2010 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Samira wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Samira wrote:
you're right, for the most part. People tend to see couples as one unit and to treat them the same, regardless of merit.
Amen. When I dated that asshat it really devalued my stock. That's why I traded up and am now a harmless forum matron.


Your avatar says otherwise.
That avatar is a sainted mother of six!
#222 Mar 15 2010 at 5:43 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Samira wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Samira wrote:
you're right, for the most part. People tend to see couples as one unit and to treat them the same, regardless of merit.
Amen. When I dated that asshat it really devalued my stock. That's why I traded up and am now a harmless forum matron.


Your avatar says otherwise.
That avatar is a sainted mother of six!


Maybe so, but it's not one of her better pictures. Demonic mixed with mild retardation comes to mind.
#223 Mar 15 2010 at 5:47 PM Rating: Decent
Ken Burton's Reject
*****
12,834 posts
Oh BT, it's a good thing you play with hand grenades and not darts. Off the mark doesn't begin to describe your post. Firstly, never said you were looking to get Pigtails hated. I said that you normally only stalk and attack the hated of the forums repeatedly in the manner you've done with Pigtails. You can't make them hated, they make themselves that way when they spaz out and start trying to counter-attack your trolling. My apologies if that wasn't made clear.

I have no desire to white knight or save people. If that were the case, I'd just sit in =10 and defend every semi-literate @#%^ who doesn't get that Google is your friend. No, this time, I was trying to unlatch your troll teeth from the buttocks of a poster I actually enjoy posting with. I didn't get your obsession, and still don't. I don't even see the reactions she was having as being that great as to encourage the stiffening of your loins so that you could saunter off as the conquering internet hero and ravage your mini-me female clone, trying to fulfill that lingering desire to truly @#%^ yourself.

As for the kitten thing, I prefer using a catapult and a shotgun to save them from death by falling.

And Exo is right, being trolled by Kao sucks ***. Been there, done that, barely held onto Scholar. But it was still worth it for the lulz.

Ginny I- You know what forget it. Honestly, your mentoring by BT is far from complete, Padawan. As others have pointed out, you sound more like a petulant tween whose parents have forgotten exists. Basically, you're Meg Griffin but with more angst. yay.



Edited, Mar 15th 2010 6:49pm by Pawkeshup
____________________________
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/pawkeshup
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/pawkeshup
Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/pawkeshup
Blog: http://pawkeshup.blogspot.com
Olorinus the Ludicrous wrote:
The idea of old school is way more interesting than the reality
#224 Mar 15 2010 at 6:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
So lame, misspelling someone's name deliberately.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#225 Mar 15 2010 at 6:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
I have banned over 10,000 accounts. Most were PM spammers. Many were regualr forum spammers, scammers, RMTers, sockpuppets. Others were people who just decided to go out in a blaze of glory, thinking to martyr themselves for forum history or some such, though all they do in the end is get erased from the legend. I have banned people with multi year, thousands of posts contributions to this site because they decided they no longer wished to be here. I have banned one post wonders for simply sharing an IP with the wrong godraiden. I've banned jilted ex's trying to destroy their onetime friends, ex guildies, ex wives and husbands.

I've even banned another admin.

I recognize that in many situations, my first instincts are to remove the problem. Each and every time I press that button, I stop and think about the effects that will have, and what it will do to the forum as a whole. In the area of people with more than 1,000 posts, I err on the side of caution, and I try to give them multiple oppertunities to aviod a ban, because whatever else their faults might be, until that button is pressed they are a piece of the forum, and impossible to replace after. But the needs of the forum come first, and if a ban is required I won't lose any sleep over issueing one.

I guess the point here is when it comes to bans, be careful what you ask for. I didn't ban you because you hadn't in my oppinion done anything to warrent it yet, and I believe that you offer something to the forum that outweighs any annoyance I might personally experiance. Never mistake my inaction on a ban for lack of ability or willingness to carry it out.

If your goal is juat aquireing a ban for your own amusement, let me know and quit wasteing my time. I will make that occur for you immidiatly if you so desire.

Administrator Kaolian
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#226 Mar 15 2010 at 6:35 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Whoa whoa whoa, what's going on in this thread? Why oh why would anyone ever antagonize ol' Kao? He's a peach.

Seriously though, can someone give me a synopsis? Is it even worth it?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 175 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (175)