Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

We would rather be ruined than changedFollow

#52 Mar 03 2010 at 4:13 PM Rating: Good
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
So in your mind you can't conceive of a person with a natural ability for let's say, medicine, being unable to become a doctor if only he works hard enough, regardless of any other circumstance?

Absolutely. That's just silly. The person could find happiness as a nurse, an EMT, a paramedic, a military field medic, a CNA, a nurse practitioner, a hospital administrator or any number of other medical related careers. More than simply an aptitude for medicine would come in to play. No outside factors should preclude that person from enjoying a career in medicine, however, should that person work hard to overcome them.
#53 Mar 03 2010 at 4:18 PM Rating: Good
Their arms are cut off just below the shoulder.
#54 Mar 03 2010 at 4:19 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Bionic surgeon, duh.

No need to wash your hands - just autoclave them and get on with it!

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#55 Mar 03 2010 at 4:21 PM Rating: Good
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Their arms are cut off just below the shoulder.

He could be an orderly and push carts with his waist down hospital halls.

EDIT: Why do you hate otherly-abled persons?

Edited, Mar 3rd 2010 4:21pm by MoebiusLord
#56 Mar 03 2010 at 4:39 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:

Absolutely. That's just silly. The person could find happiness as a nurse, an EMT, a paramedic, a military field medic, a CNA, a nurse practitioner, a hospital administrator or any number of other medical related careers. More than simply an aptitude for medicine would come in to play. No outside factors should preclude that person from enjoying a career in medicine, however, should that person work hard to overcome them.
Let's say they didn't want to be anything but a doctor. If more than an aptitude for medicine comes into play, can't any one of those factors have the potential to affect his outcome?
#57 Mar 03 2010 at 4:44 PM Rating: Good
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Let's say they didn't want to be anything but a doctor. If more than an aptitude for medicine comes into play, can't any one of those factors have the potential to affect his outcome?

Moebiuslord wrote:
Recognition that every individual has an innate level, above which he or she can not rise, is the first step to true happiness.

I do not believe that a person can be stopped if they want to work for something that they have the innate ability to become with hard work.
#58 Mar 03 2010 at 4:57 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
So the essence of happiness is the eventual acceptance of mediocrity despite the potential for greatness? Smiley: lol
#59 Mar 03 2010 at 4:59 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I do not believe that a person can be stopped if they want to work for something that they have the innate ability to become with hard work.


If they're a white man born to the right family, absolutely. If they're not....really not so much.

That said, the insipid whining self pity of people living in the wealthiest, most privileged society in the history of the world rings a little hollow when faced with the day to day struggle for existence faced by most of the people alive at the same time.


____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#60 Mar 03 2010 at 5:11 PM Rating: Good
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
So the essence of happiness is the eventual acceptance of mediocrity despite the potential for greatness? Smiley: lol

I think that's either a bit of misreading or misrepresentation. I won't make a value judgment as to which.

I'm curious, though, do you have any specific examples or is the entire thing just an attempt to trap me in something? So far all we have is vague hypotheticals.
#61 Mar 03 2010 at 5:12 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
If they're a white man born to the right family, absolutely. If they're not....really not so much.

How sad for you that you feel the need to wrap people up in little boxes just because of their skin color. I suppose the Clarence Thomas should feel thankful for the skin darkening surgery he had.
#62 Mar 03 2010 at 5:26 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

How sad for you that you feel the need to wrap people up in little boxes just because of their skin color. I suppose the Clarence Thomas should feel thankful for the skin darkening surgery he had.


Is it your assertion that young Clarence Thomas had an innate talent for licking the balls of old white men? Because then, I'd have to concede that he lived the great American dream of being a high yellow house nigger for a particularly powerful set of owners.

Obama's the example, dummy
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#63 Mar 03 2010 at 5:32 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Their arms are cut off just below the shoulder.


Wouldn't not having arms have something to do with your own "ability"?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#64 Mar 03 2010 at 6:36 PM Rating: Decent
*****
18,463 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
I'm curious, though, do you have any specific examples or is the entire thing just an attempt to trap me in something? So far all we have is vague hypotheticals.
Oh, I have several examples, but none I think would actually convince you. I was trying to understand your position (my brother thinks much the same way), but then I realized that you are constrained by your worldview and simply fall into the "don't see it" category. If you have been blessed enough where your best efforts net you gains, then fantastic, but it's a simplistic formula that hasn't held up for the vast majority of the world's population.
#65 Mar 03 2010 at 7:39 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
If you have been blessed enough where your best efforts net you gains, then fantastic, but it's a simplistic formula that hasn't held up for the vast majority of the world's population.


At the risk of speaking for Moe, if your best efforts fail to net you gains, then either you aren't really trying as hard as you could, or it is an ability issue, or you are setting your expectations higher than you should (again based on your abilities).

I'd also suggest that it can't possibly be true that it hasn't held up for the vast majority of the world's population. I suspect starvation rates would be much much higher than they are if that was really the case. Expectations have to be realistic within the environment one is working in. But within that context, relative success is absolutely based on ability and effort.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#66 Mar 03 2010 at 7:56 PM Rating: Decent
*****
18,463 posts
gbaji wrote:
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
If you have been blessed enough where your best efforts net you gains, then fantastic, but it's a simplistic formula that hasn't held up for the vast majority of the world's population.


At the risk of speaking for Moe, if your best efforts fail to net you gains, then either you aren't really trying as hard as you could, or it is an ability issue, or you are setting your expectations higher than you should (again based on your abilities).

I'd also suggest that it can't possibly be true that it hasn't held up for the vast majority of the world's population. I suspect starvation rates would be much much higher than they are if that was really the case. Expectations have to be realistic within the environment one is working in. But within that context, relative success is absolutely based on ability and effort.
Yes, I guess you would. I suppose this is just one more place where a limited worldview nets a limited opinion. I don't doubt that this has proved true for you in your lives, but assuming your experiences are universal is sort of prideful, isn't it? I'm sure there's a better word with less religious connotations, but that's the one leaps to mind offhand.
#67 Mar 03 2010 at 8:04 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Arrogant? Mindless?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#68 Mar 03 2010 at 8:05 PM Rating: Decent
*****
18,463 posts
Samira wrote:
Arrogant? Mindless?

Smiley: lol Yes, either of those will do. Thanks.
#69 Mar 03 2010 at 8:28 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Yes, I guess you would. I suppose this is just one more place where a limited worldview nets a limited opinion.


You've yet to show how our opinion is "limited" in any way, aside from that you don't agree with it.

Quote:
I don't doubt that this has proved true for you in your lives, but assuming your experiences are universal is sort of prideful, isn't it?


Isn't that what you're doing? The difference being that I'm not insisting that everyone else must sacrifice their prosperity on the assumption that I'm right.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#70 Mar 03 2010 at 8:40 PM Rating: Decent
*****
18,463 posts
gbaji wrote:
You've yet to show how our opinion is "limited" in any way, aside from that you don't agree with it.
You're mistaking me for Joph. I know better than to waste my time trying to prove a point to you, although I'll admit that answering one of your questions was a rookie error.
#71 Mar 03 2010 at 8:43 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
gbaji wrote:
Wouldn't not having arms have something to do with your own "ability"?

I think you have the wrong poster.
#72 Mar 03 2010 at 8:47 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
gbaji wrote:
You've yet to show how our opinion is "limited" in any way, aside from that you don't agree with it.
You're mistaking me for Joph. I know better than to waste my time trying to prove a point to you, although I'll admit that answering one of your questions was a rookie error.


Two of them now! Muahahaha!!! ;)


For the record though, Ebert's point is pretty moronic. His response to mistakes made by government which end out costing him more money is to support yet more government and more opportunities for it to make mistakes which cost him more money. What's the definition of insanity again?


Liberals are like the Charlie Brown to the Government's Lucy. No matter how many times government fails to do what it promises to do, they keep continuing to believe that "this time", it wont ***** them over...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#73 Mar 03 2010 at 10:41 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
I'd also suggest that it can't possibly be true that it hasn't held up for the vast majority of the world's population. I suspect starvation rates would be much much higher than they are if that was really the case. Expectations have to be realistic within the environment one is working in. But within that context, relative success is absolutely based on ability and effort.


If I'm picking up what Moe is putting down, Moe is saying that it's only ability that holds one back. So long as they try their best and have the innate ability, the environment shouldn't matter. Which, I believe, is the problem that most of us have with that idea, considering that the environment does play a large part in why certain individuals with the drive, the ability, and the hard work don't make it as far as their abilities would take them otherwise.

Again, perhaps I misunderstood, but I would think that the environment is exactly one of those "outside forces" that people think are "conspiring against them" that Moe is talking about.
#74 Mar 04 2010 at 12:04 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,211 posts
His Excellency MoebiusLord wrote:
It may sound callous, but the world needs ditch diggers, too.


At that, some people like being ditch diggers. I'm aware of at least one who's job day in day out is essentially digging holes (sort of, working on leveling foundations). He loves his job, and is proud of what he can accomplish which is making it flat between the gravel/sand that they put there.

I do think if someone has talent and works hard they will be able to work their way up in the world. Eventually they will reach their goal. Whether that involves being a brain surgeon, or a greeter at Walmart.
#75 Mar 04 2010 at 12:18 AM Rating: Good
***
2,324 posts
It hasn't been too bad for me until recently. Taxes going up, cost of everyday items going up, they took away our annual homestead rebate here in Jersey to name a few crappy things.

My wife has been in and out of work, and the extra hours I have been financially used to.. have been dissipating..

Listening to the news lately they say its getting better. The stock market is trading stronger and there's hope etc..

Me I think it's going to get worse. I drive a truck simple as can be. there's never been a time that I've really been out of work but now my hours have been cut down to the point that I actually have some time to post here..

As much as I have enjoyed all these luxuries... pool.. hotrod.. motorcycles.. I gotta say I've been looking into a more realistic situation for my wife and I. I might even be forced to buy a sedan with a high mpg rating.

Change sucks, but if you cant adapt you fail.
#76 Mar 04 2010 at 1:06 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Their arms are cut off just below the shoulder.


Patient : 'Doctor, doctor! I can't feel my legs!'

Doctor : 'Not surprising Sir, we've just cut your arms off'.

/rimshot.

____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 193 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (193)