Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Personal finances and insuranceFollow

#27 Feb 24 2010 at 5:10 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
I wish they'd just do away with paper checks, personally. The things are fraught with fraud.
#28 Feb 24 2010 at 5:13 PM Rating: Decent
Gbaji,

Checks?? Really??

You're pulling our leg aren't you?

#29 Feb 24 2010 at 5:17 PM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
I'm beginning to wonder if Gbaji is like an American version of 'James May'
#30 Feb 24 2010 at 5:59 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
The reason for using cash/check/debit instead of a credit card is two:

1. One fewer source of marketing. Credit cards sell your purchasing information to third parties, who in turn bug the hell out of you to buy other stuff. It's annoying, and personally I view it as an invasion of privacy which you can't avoid because allowing it is a ubiquitous requirement for getting the card in the first place.

2. If you're one of those people who isn't so great at remembering to pay bills (which is me btw), you're just asking for trouble...

The reason for using a check instead of a debit card is that it's harder to commit fraud with a check than a card. I'll point out that this has changed over time, and my original statement on this was from nearly a decade ago. At the time I made the statement, many point of sale counters treated debit cards identically to credit cards. Meaning that no PIN was needed (and most places don't ask for ID still). If you challenge a credit card purchase, you don't lose any money until the challenge is done. If you challenge a debit card purchase your money is gone until you prove you didn't make the purchase.


Checks historically represent a greater degree of protection. There are many many times more people doing card based fraud than paper check fraud. At the end of the day, a paper check has to physically look like the original to work and the folks checking are trained to spot forgeries. A plastic card is a plastic card. It's trivially easy to make a fake one that looks exactly like a real one, and you only have to fool some kid making minimum wage. It's also trivially easy to scan other people's cards and get the information needed to make a duplicate. At its most simple, a kid in a random store can simply copy your cards number and then input that number in manually anytime he wants to make a purchase on your card. Doing the same with a paper check will not work unless he's a pretty good forger.


Over the last decade, protections on debit cards have gotten better. I've had and used one for a couple years now. Of course, I use a second checking account which I never keep more than a few thousand dollars in and I use for nothing other than debit card purchases. I would still never configure my primary checking account for debit card purchase. The "lose your money first and get it back after going through hoops" aspect of debit cards makes that problematic.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#31 Feb 24 2010 at 6:09 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
So you're wildly misinformed. Why didn't you just say so?

Checks aren't now, nor have they ever been, less of a fraud risk then debit cards. Also, there isn't anyone who examines checks to make sure they "look the way they should". I could write you a check on a pancake and as long I had the transit and account info correct and had signed it and identified you as the person to be paid, it would be cashed.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#32 Feb 24 2010 at 6:10 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
I would rather deal with card fraud than check fraud.

Lose my card? Call the bank or card company, tell them to cancel my card, dispute charges. It's not too hard to dispute them, either.

Lose some checks? Get them stolen? Somebody decides to play a game of check washing? Orders checks with your information? Well, fuck. Good luck. Your bank account number is now all over the place.

Also, checks don't have the federal protections that electronic transactions do.


Edited, Feb 24th 2010 6:22pm by Sweetums
#33 Feb 24 2010 at 6:16 PM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
I love direct debit and chip and pin. All my bills are paid at the same time every month so I cannot forget.

In the UK, you gain discounts for paying by direct debit and are now charged for submitting cheques. I can think of no rational reason to use cheques.

Edit just to say, Sweetums should visit Derby. They call everyone M'duck around there Smiley: smile

Edited, Feb 25th 2010 12:18am by GwynapNud
#34 Feb 24 2010 at 6:22 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Sweetums wrote:
I would rather deal with card fraud than check fraud.

Lose my card? Call the bank or card company, tell them to cancel my card, dispute charges. It's not too hard to dispute them, either.


You're kidding, right? It's not about losing your physical card. That's the difference here. A check requires a physical piece of paper. A card does not. Someone scans your card without you knowing (or copies the scan at a POS). He uses that number to then electronically make thousands of dollars of purchases, all without any way to trace them. By the time you know about it, your bank account has been emptied and your legitimate payments have bounced.

To do the same with a check, he's got to actually physically make a check that looks like a check to the person accepting it. Yes. He can use the routing numbers as well, but most businesses will not accept that as a form of payment online (for exactly the reason that it's easy to get scammed that way). Also, said online purchase can be traced.

It's about ease and safety. Online purchases can be traced. It's not like I can order something online using someone else's card or check and have it shipped to my home address or anything, right? The safest, easiest, and most common form of fraud is someone duplicating the payment method (or stealing it) and then physically running around to stores and buying stuff. That way, other than the potential of store video, there's no way to trace it back to the purchaser.

Checks are far and away the hardest to pull off in that situation. The procedures for accepting a check require an ID check. The procedures for accepting a card simply require the person swiping the card. Only in recent years have most POS required PINs for card transactions. 10 years ago, very very few of them did, which was when I made the original statement to which Smash is referring.

Quote:
Lose some checks? Get them stolen? Somebody decides to play a game of check washing? Orders checks with your information? Well, fuck. Good luck. Your bank account number is now all over the place.


You can do far less with someone's checkbook than with their debit card. And this was much more true 10 years ago. My primary point back then was that most cashiers treated debit cards exactly like credit cards (no ID or PIN), meaning that theft of a debit card was a free ride to wipe out someone's checking account. Theft of a checkbook is a lot harder to take advantage of.


As I said above, the security on debit cards has gotten better over the last decade. But at the time, you were pretty much risking your entire bank account just owning one, even if you never used it. The mere existence of an electronic method for any random POS box in the country to draw funds directly from your bank account with virtually zero protection was pretty bad.

Edited, Feb 24th 2010 4:23pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#35 Feb 24 2010 at 6:27 PM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
gbaji wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
I would rather deal with card fraud than check fraud.

Lose my card? Call the bank or card company, tell them to cancel my card, dispute charges. It's not too hard to dispute them, either.


You're kidding, right? It's not about losing your physical card. That's the difference here. A check requires a physical piece of paper. A card does not. Someone scans your card without you knowing (or copies the scan at a POS). He uses that number to then electronically make thousands of dollars of purchases, all without any way to trace them. By the time you know about it, your bank account has been emptied and your legitimate payments have bounced.


Now, unless I'm missing something and its different in the US from the UK, you are covered against fraud when using a debit card with chip and pin.
Also you have to be pretty stupid to put enough cash in your current account to have thousands drained. I know my bank monitors my spending habits habits. I have been called for payments made outside the norm, or in different locations to those expected. So in actual fact banking with a card is potentially more secure than a cheque.

#36 Feb 24 2010 at 6:28 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
I could write you a check on a pancake and as long I had the transit and account info correct and had signed it and identified you as the person to be paid, it would be cashed.


Really? Try it sometime Smash. Let me know how that works out for you. I'm quite certain no store will accept a check written on a pancake (or anything else that doesn't look like a bank issued check for that matter). You're repeating one of those urban myths, which while technically legally true, doesn't actually happen in real life. It's like arguing that since the law says you have to hire a footman to follow your car around with a light warning people that this is actually the case. No one accepts checks not issued by a bank. No one...

Try swiping a duped card in a machine and it'll work every single time because the cashier never sees the card (or even cares what it looks like). All that matters is the data on the strip on the card.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#37 Feb 24 2010 at 6:36 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Lady GwynapNud wrote:
Now, unless I'm missing something and its different in the US from the UK, you are covered against fraud when using a debit card with chip and pin.


Yes. But while you're sorting that out, you have no money. A debit card subtracts from your account first. If you challenge a charge, the money is gone until the challenge is settled. If the bank wants to be a pain, it'll ***** you on this (and yes, I know many people who have been so screwed).

A credit card is much safer to use than a debit card, for exactly the reason that the money is only paid by you after the fact. If you challenge the charge, you don't lose any money until the matter is resolved. My reasons for not using credit cards are not related at all to safety or security.

My reasons for preferring using plain old checks back when I originally made that statement on this forum were about the relative safety of checks versus debit cards. At the time, debit card security was pretty much non-existent.

Quote:
Also you have to be pretty stupid to put enough cash in your current account to have thousands drained. I know my bank monitors my spending habits habits. I have been called for payments made outside the norm, or in different locations to those expected. So in actual fact banking with a card is potentially more secure than a cheque.



How much is enough? If you have direct deposit into your bank account, and have automatic payments for things like a mortgage, car payment, gas and electricity bill, etc, then it really doesn't matter how much is in there, does it? If the account is drained, you can't pay for those things, can you? It could be a few thousand dollars. It could be a few hundred dollars. It doesn't matter. Zero money in the account means whatever money you normally use to pay your bills is not there.


I'll also point out that "thousands" is relative. I put a few thousand dollars into the separate checking account with the debit card attached exactly because for me that's a small amount which on the off chance I get ripped off, I can afford to lose and more importantly doesn't affect the primary account which is used to pay my major bills. As I pointed out before, if it was less than that, then what is the point? Small amounts I'll just pay cash. The only reason to use any method other than that is for larger purchases (typically in the thousand(s) range). I don't use my debit card to buy groceries.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#38 Feb 24 2010 at 6:41 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Really? Try it sometime Smash. Let me know how that works out for you. I'm quite certain no store will accept a check written on a pancake (or anything else that doesn't look like a bank issued check for that matter). You're repeating one of those urban myths, which while technically legally true, doesn't actually happen in real life. It's like arguing that since the law says you have to hire a footman to follow your car around with a light warning people that this is actually the case. No one accepts checks not issued by a bank. No one...


Yeah, fucking crazy talk. Anyone that accepts personal checks would accept any even vaguely reasonable facsimile of something check-like. While they should and might not accept a pancake, they'd absolutely accept something I drew in MS Paint and printed at home. There's an entire 3rd party check printing industry, for Christ's sake. The checks you write aren't "issued" by a bank. They're issued by you. Checks issued by a bank generally have a much higher level of acceptance than personal checks. Didn't you ever wonder what the "personal" part meant?

At any rate, you aren't any safer. If you want to pay more money for less convenience and less security because you're too lazy to deal with reality, that's fine with me. I was just curious if there were some actual reason. If it's typical abject falsely placed panicky fear, that's really pretty boring. We could have already surmised that from your political views.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#39 Feb 24 2010 at 6:42 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Lady GwynapNud wrote:
I had an argument with a friend recently, about money, savings and insurance. The topic we argued about was contingency for the unexpected, illness or unemployment. How to plan for it.

My solution is to be insured to the hilt. If I lose my job I keep most of my yearly salary for a year, my small personal loan has protection on it and would be paid off for me. Healthwise, I am covered dually by a benefit from work and also by personal insurance.

My friend was saying I do not keep enough back in savings. I prefer to insure myself instead and spend savings on more important things, like buying a home!

What would you do if you could not work, due to ill health or redundancy. Are you covered?


Do you buy the extended warranties on your appliances?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#40 Feb 24 2010 at 6:43 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,901 posts
I just assumed that gbaji prefers checks because he likes to write. I'll bet he has custom checks with 5 memo lines.
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
#41 Feb 24 2010 at 6:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
PunkFloyd, King of Bards wrote:
I just assumed that gbaji prefers checks because he likes to write. I'll bet he has custom checks with 5 memo lines.

You win a rare Jophiel rate-up.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#42 Feb 24 2010 at 6:44 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Do you buy the extended warranties on your appliances?


We've established previously that he does, but amazingly, only on those that fail before the warranty expires. It's some sort of savant like genius, really.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#43 Feb 24 2010 at 6:47 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
My card number is less important than my bank account number, which is all over a check. Which one is easier to change?


Once they get your bank account number, do you think it's actually difficult to counterfeit a check? Get one, swipe your information (it's all on there), order new ones! You don't need to prove anything to order new, real checks. Hell, why bother! Use Demand Drafting! Paperless checks!

Plus, the people accepting the check are the same minimum-wage nimrods who accept your debit without IDing. For the most part, you can lie and get past the meager protections an ID would offer, unless the store has strict ID requirements (by the way, those stores often have strict ID requirements for cards, too). Never underestimate the power of social engineering.



Edited, Feb 24th 2010 6:50pm by Sweetums
#44 Feb 24 2010 at 6:49 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Do you buy the extended warranties on your appliances?


We've established previously that he does, but amazingly, only on those that fail before the warranty expires. It's some sort of savant like genius, really.

Is this some creepy mindgame?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#45 Feb 24 2010 at 7:14 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Anyone that accepts personal checks would accept any even vaguely reasonable facsimile of something check-like.


No. They will not. Have you actually ever worked in any industry in which checks are handled?

Quote:
While they should and might not accept a pancake, they'd absolutely accept something I drew in MS Paint and printed at home.


No. They will not. They will only accept a personal check issued by a bank. Period. End of story. I have never heard of anyone or any business *ever* accepting a check written by hand. It's an urban myth that you can just write the information on a piece of paper and it'll be accepted. While it's technically legal to do so, every single business and individual is free to refuse to accept a check if they don't want to do so. And they don't take checks unless they are issued by a bank.

Quote:
There's an entire 3rd party check printing industry, for Christ's sake.


Sure. And just try walking up to one with a check you wrote on a piece of paper or in any other way not clearly one printed with a banks logo on it and looking and feeling like a check normally does and see how fast they look at you funny and then laugh when you insist they should cash it for you. It's a myth Smash. No one actually accepts anything that a bank did not print for you. Not except as a joke, or for someone they know personally.

Quote:
The checks you write aren't "issued" by a bank. They're issued by you. Checks issued by a bank generally have a much higher level of acceptance than personal checks. Didn't you ever wonder what the "personal" part meant?


Irrelevant. A "personal" check which is not written on a standard bank check issued by a bank to the person on their behalf will not be accepted by any of those businesses. Especially check cashing places. They'll only accept checks written by a business or bank to the individual cashing the check. Do you have a vague clue what you are talking about?

Personal checks are cashed by businesses (or individuals) at the bank itself. Yes, you can get them cashed at other businesses as well, and they usually charge a hefty fee specifically because third party checks are riskier. Also, those businesses are very very careful to check ID, since they are assuming the risk if the check is bad. You're not exactly helping your argument here...


Meanwhile, if I steal or copy your debit card, I can happily walk into any of a thousand different stores, and if they don't require ID or PIN, simply swipe the card for any purchase I want and walk out of the store with virtually zero chance of being refused or caught. It is easier to steal money with a debit card by an order of magnitude. Everyone who does business accepts them and 10 years ago, most of them did not require ID or PIN to use them. That is why they were extremely dangerous then. They're still more dangerous to your account today, just less so than they used to be.

In order to make a fraudulent purchase with a check, I have to walk into someplace that will accept the check, hand them a check that looks like a legitimate check written on bank or business script, and present ID. In order to make a fraudulent purchase with a debit card, I just have to swipe a card which the cashier might never see. Even the most strict businesses, I'll have to present an ID and type a PIN. Of course, if I duped the card by using a rigged box, I've got the PIN, so that's not a problem.


Find a place that will cash or even accept a check without checking ID. Most place will still accept a debit card without checking any form of ID. And that's the real difference right there. I can have all the information contained on a check, including the signature of the person and still will find it difficult to write a fraudulent check and get away with it. Once I have the equivalent information for a debit card (card data and PIN), there is no where I can't go to use it. And I can continue using it until I've drained the balance with essentially zero chance of getting caught.

Quote:
At any rate, you aren't any safer.


Wrong. You are much much safer. If for no other reason than there aren't a whole lot of automated systems for duplicating your checks, fewer people who know how to commit fraud with them, and higher risks when performing said fraud. I can't see how you can possibly judge a card to be safer in this case. The whole point of electronic payments methods is that they are easier to perform. That also makes them easier to commit fraud with.

Edited, Feb 24th 2010 5:17pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#46 Feb 24 2010 at 7:32 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Sweetums wrote:
My card number is less important than my bank account number, which is all over a check. Which one is easier to change?


Actually, your card number is vastly more important to thieves then your account number. Look. I know that this is confusing, but there are tens of thousands of POS boxes in the US in which you only need to type the number on the card to make a charge to the cards source (whether check or debit). That means that joe random store clerk making minimum wage can type in your card number, run up a charge on said card, and then pull an equal amount of that charge in cash out of the register. He's just stolen money from your bank account and it's almost impossible to be caught. The worst that happens is that someone traces the fraudulent charge to the store and it's assumed that a thief made a purchase there.

Anyone can do this. It takes zero training or skill. Compared to making a bogus check, it's a piece of cake.

Quote:
Once they get your bank account number, do you think it's actually difficult to counterfeit a check?


Yes. It's incredibly hard to make a counterfeit check. Even one just good enough to get past a random store clerk. It's easier than say making counterfeit money, but it's still much much much much much harder than simply typing in a card number in a machine, and it's harder than making a duplicate card.

Quote:
Get one, swipe your information (it's all on there), order new ones! You don't need to prove anything to order new, real checks. Hell, why bother! Use Demand Drafting! Paperless checks!


Uh huh. And where do the checks get delivered to? Dumb thieves do check cashing scams. They usually get caught pretty quickly. Smart thieves deal in credit and debit cards, where the likelihood of getting caught is virtually zero. When everyone paid with either checks, or credit cards which were manually scanned on paper, banks and businesses went to quite a bit of effort to prevent fraud. It didn't always work of course, but they did it because it was worth doing so and it reduced the rate of fraud. With the introduction of electronic purchase handling, the ease of theft has gotten so high that no one bothers anymore. Banks and credit card agencies simply accept that a certain percentage of money will be stolen and there isn't anything they can do about it. They just pass that cost on to their customers...

Cards are much much much less secure than paper. I can't believe we're even debating this.

Quote:
Plus, the people accepting the check are the same minimum-wage nimrods who accept your debit without IDing. For the most part, you can lie and get past the meager protections an ID would offer, unless the store has strict ID requirements (by the way, those stores often have strict ID requirements for cards, too). Never underestimate the power of social engineering.


Today? Maybe. 10 years ago? Almost no stores required any form of ID, or even a PIN to use a debit card. That's because their POS boxes were the old style originally designed to handle only credit cards (for which there were no PINs). They simply hooked that system up to the debit card system and went with it. At that time, every single store required ID for a check. Heck. Every single store I've ever seen required that the employee write the ID number on the check itself as an assurance that the ID was checked. If you didn't, and the check was bad, it went out of your paycheck.


Those exact same stores simply swiped the debit card, and if the swipe didn't work, you manually typed in the card number. Either one works to effect the transaction. A smart person then realized that the number of the card is sufficient to take money out of a bank account and is a hundred times easier and safer than trying to do the same thing using check routing numbers.


Most of those older POS systems are gone today. But even the newer systems aren't that secure...

Edited, Feb 24th 2010 5:45pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#47 Feb 24 2010 at 7:36 PM Rating: Good
****
7,861 posts
For the record, I still use checks to pay bills, use my debit as credit for just about everything else.
____________________________
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam

Sedao
#48 Feb 24 2010 at 7:40 PM Rating: Good
This is absurd.
#49 Feb 24 2010 at 7:42 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
This is absurd.


And that's unusual for the Asylum, how?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#50 Feb 24 2010 at 7:44 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
gbaji wrote:
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
This is absurd.


And that's unusual for the Asylum, how?
Oh, he was just taking a stab at the next Captain Obvious role.

Edited, Feb 24th 2010 9:44pm by Uglysasquatch
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#51 Feb 24 2010 at 7:46 PM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
gbaji wrote:
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
This is absurd.


And that's unusual for the Asylum, how?


More like these please. Short is good.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 315 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (315)