Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

I, for one, welcome our Japanese OverlordsFollow

#27 Feb 19 2010 at 11:56 AM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Nadenu Delivers on Time wrote:
I'll admit that I haven't looked at every online store, but most of them I checked a few weeks ago were out. They still list them for sale, though.


They're "theoretically" for sale.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#28 Feb 19 2010 at 12:01 PM Rating: Decent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Nadenu Delivers on Time wrote:
Yay! Our new overlords have granted us Wii boards! I'll start checking around again then. Thanks for the head's up, Ugly.
I'm pretty important, so maybe they jsut got 5 in and felt I was one of the people deserving of one of them. You know, priviledge white male stuff.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#29 Feb 19 2010 at 7:19 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Right now "The Bank Of" China has decided to downgrade your credit score, and has put a new, lower maximum on your credit card with them. You are going to have to wait a long time, and be a responsible repayer of debts before China is going to raise your credit max again.

Actually, the US has been paying its interest just fine which, in terms of debt, is really what the debtor cares about.


Not entirely. He also cares about the value of the currency the debt is in relative to his own. As the total quantity of debt increases, this concern becomes self fulfilling. In order to entice others to buy the bonds, you have to offer a higher interest rate. This (combined with other related factors) causes inflation, which affects the relative value of the bonds when they mature. This makes the next round of lenders demand even higher interest rates. Rinse and repeat and you end out in an inflationary spiral.

High public debt, no matter how you deal with it, risks creation of said inflation problem. While that *can* potentially help you get out of debt (cause you don't have to pay off as much as you borrowed relatively speaking), that only works if you stop spending more than you can afford at some point. So far, there's no sign of this coming from the Dems. One can only presume that their eventual solution will have to be massive tax increases (gee! If only someone had seen that coming...).

Quote:
These are bonds so China can't "call them in" or anything; they mature when they're set to mature and if you want your money earlier, you have to sell them to someone else who'll wait for them to mature.


Again. It's not really the selling of the bonds that is the problem, but the lack of people willing to buy them. This factor only highlights that. If you know you have to wait X amount of years for the bond to mature, you're going to be really really hesitant to invest if you're unsure that what you'll get out the other side is going to be worth more than what you pay in today.


Quote:
The situation with China is more political than fiscal; China is trying to "punish" the US for weapon sales to Taiwan and meeting with the Dali Lama but, at the same time, China's economy is wholly dependent upon the US so they can't do anything to legitimately hurt us.


Sure. Maybe. But it's not like we're doing that stuff to any greater degree today than 5 years ago, or 5 years before that... What has "changed"? I'd argue that the politics are the excuse for the economic decisions and not the other way around, but obviously we'd both just be speculating either way.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#30 Feb 19 2010 at 7:28 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

High public debt, no matter how you deal with it, risks creation of said inflation problem. While that *can* potentially help you get out of debt (cause you don't have to pay off as much as you borrowed relatively speaking), that only works if you stop spending more than you can afford at some point. So far, there's no sign of this coming from the Dems.


Nor should there be. There is zero indication that inflation will be a problem anytime soon. None. This is, literally, the worst possible time to be worrying about the long term consequences of debt. It's really idiotic in the extreme, and is *absolutely* a political ploy in every way.


The situation with China is more political than fiscal; China is trying to "punish" the US for weapon sales to Taiwan and meeting with the Dali Lama but, at the same time, China's economy is wholly dependent upon the US so they can't do anything to legitimately hurt us.


This is exceptionally naive. China may not be able to do much to hurt the US *without also hurting China*, but this is in no way the same as China not being able to hurt us.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#31 Feb 19 2010 at 10:05 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
This is exceptionally naive. China may not be able to do much to hurt the US *without also hurting China*

Yeah, I kind of thought that was obvious from context Smiley: rolleyes
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Feb 20 2010 at 12:51 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Yeah, I kind of thought that was obvious from contex


It wasn't. It isn't. Maybe I'm wrong, though, maybe what you meant was that China could damage the US while also damaging itself and there's really nothing to indicate they wouldn't do this if they thought there was long term benefit. Which there is ample reason to believe they may. The worldview in China isn't the same as the world view in the US. They frequently do things that are obviously against their short term (as in the next 25 years) financial interest. Pretending it's a simplistic situation where we can predict with any accuracy how the government there will react based on what we perceive to be their self interest is, one more time now, exceptionally naive. Although, in fairness, ignorant is probably a more accurate term.

My mistake if I was supposed to infer from context that you intended the opposite of what you posted. I'm sure Gbaji could explain the semantic difference to me if you can't.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#33 Feb 20 2010 at 1:35 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Siding with Smash on this one. I had an argument with a history prof once based on his statement that the Great Leap Forward was a miscalculation. I contended that it was a deliberate sacrifice.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#34 Feb 20 2010 at 1:42 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
2,228 posts
Gentlemen, behold! The future of middle America:
Screenshot

This is doin something for me.
____________________________
[ffxisig]188740[/ffxisig]
Busa's Cloth Guide 1-100
Zaredx wrote:
Gjallihorn + Carnwenhan = Green Ranger's Flute! DRAGONZORD!
#35 Feb 20 2010 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
maybe what you meant was that China could damage the US while also damaging itself

That's pretty much what I meant. Or rather that it wasn't worth it to China to attempt to drive the nation that supports its own economy into collapse. You might well disagree on that point but that was the point I was making. I suppose I should have been clearer.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Feb 20 2010 at 2:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
You guys following the story about what happened to the bonds they divested? Turns out they were all bought in a large chunk by an unknown asian buyer operating via several European based brokerage firms.

My read on the situation is that hjapan would have bought them outright to **** off china if they had the chance. Russia is a possibility, also china buying them back for economic stability but doing so without admitting they have it?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#37 Feb 21 2010 at 2:07 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
AlexanderrOfAsura wrote:
Its only a matter of time before the mecha start flying in.

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Most mecha anime I've watched that have flying mecha tend to be set at a bit later stage of technological development(or on a non-Earth planet) than what we currently have.

The most I'd expect right now is mecha that have rocket assisted jumping.

Quote:
Siding with Smash on this one. I had an argument with a history prof once based on his statement that the Great Leap Forward was a miscalculation. I contended that it was a deliberate sacrifice.

I'm interested in hearing more about this.
#38 Feb 21 2010 at 5:14 AM Rating: Good
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
You guys following the story about what happened to the bonds they divested? Turns out they were all bought in a large chunk by an unknown asian buyer operating via several European based brokerage firms.

My read on the situation is that hjapan would have bought them outright to **** off china if they had the chance. Russia is a possibility, also china buying them back for economic stability but doing so without admitting they have it?
An "unknown Asian buyer" could also mean that it's Tiger Woods trying to establish dominance in a third sport, in addition to his established reputation in golf and sex.
#39 Feb 21 2010 at 10:16 AM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Poldaran wrote:
I'm interested in hearing more about this.


I'm sure there are smarter people than I who have actual facts and figures at hand. But my theory is based on the fact that Mao and his gang had made very few actual missteps, and by the 60s gave every appearance of having learned from those.

What they planned to do was absolutely revolutionary. They were determined to drag China into its rightful position in the world, and to do that they knew they had to break it and rebuild it from an agricultural economy to a manufacturing economy, and the means they chose to do that was to move people off of their family farms and into collectives. This was not going to be a simple or clean process, and the People (remember them? People's Republic and all) were not going to go along with it willingly. So they had to be forced, for the good of the nation and their own descendants.

My professor I mentioned above then stated that Mao had, indeed must have had, no idea how much loss of life this would entail. I averred that he couldn't know the actual numbers but he must have a rough idea, and factored a few million deaths into the equation. One expendable resource China had was small-p people, and he was willing to spend as many as it took. The warm fuzzy feeling based on the idea that he didn't, and by the time he realized it the process was too far gone, is incorrect in my view because at that point he would have faltered, and as far as I can see he did not falter.

Mind you, until recently and to some extent even now China has been and is a closed book. It's all theory, on my part at least.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#40 Feb 21 2010 at 11:30 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Mao wrote:
China is such a populous nation, it is not as if we cannot do without a few people.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#41 Feb 22 2010 at 11:30 PM Rating: Good
***
1,025 posts
Jophiel wrote:

"We're owned by the Japanese!" just doesn't have the same panache as "We're owned by the Chi-Coms!".


Could always say "We're owned by the Empire!". It has a good ring to it, though I don't think we really qualify as an Empire anymore.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 135 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (135)