Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I'm a filthy Tory and say no to death taxesFollow

#1 Feb 13 2010 at 2:43 PM Rating: Good
***
2,086 posts
Browns new wonder tax

Quote:
Prime Minister Gordon Brown has come under fire over his plans to provide free personal care for the most vulnerable elderly people in England.

Conservative leader David Cameron asked "where is the money coming from?" and whether he would rule out a compulsory inheritance levy to pay for it.


Quote:
"What we want to know is where is the money coming from? People who work closely with you are completely opposed to the way this is being done," Mr Cameron said.

He said one option in the Green Paper was for a "£20,000 levy on every single elderly person in this country except the very poorest" and repeatedly urged Mr Brown to rule out a levy.


What .. the .. hell .. Smiley: oyvey

We are taxed enough, he can raise taxes directly from other existing sources. Inheritance tax already taxes those that die with enough assets. Why even discuss a mandatory 20k tax that will simply be another form to fill, another tax and yet another complexity.

He really wants to lose, doesn't he? Labour, the red tape party Smiley: rolleyes

Edited, Feb 13th 2010 8:44pm by GwynapNud
#2 Feb 13 2010 at 2:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Death to death taxes! and then tax them to death!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#3 Feb 13 2010 at 3:26 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Bring out your dead!

Taxing the elderly is pretty lame. Life insurance companies must have stock in burial services - tax them.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#4 Feb 13 2010 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
Maybe you should protest by dumping your elderly into Boston Harbor. Worked for us yanks.
#5 Feb 13 2010 at 5:01 PM Rating: Decent
*******
50,767 posts
Elinda wrote:
Taxing the elderly is pretty lame.
Maybe now they'll let us on their lawns.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#6 Feb 13 2010 at 6:15 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Flat non-linear estate tax is pretty fail.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#7 Feb 13 2010 at 6:17 PM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
Thanks to Nobby, I can only giggle every time I hear/read/see David Cameron's name.

Screenshot


Smiley: lol

Would have Nobby's chilluns.
#8 Feb 13 2010 at 6:20 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
If you go with some sort of irreducible percentile estate tax, that would go much better, and cost less, on average.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#9 Feb 14 2010 at 9:37 AM Rating: Good
**
300 posts
Assisted suicide is less expensive, and costs a lot less if done yourself.

Now where did I leave that plastic bag?
#10 Feb 14 2010 at 5:14 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Someone from your godforsaken country come explain this to us. "Death Tax" here is what the Pubbies call the inheritance tax. So this would just be a tax imposed upon anyone who died, to help offset health care costs for the elderly? If so, that seems pretty half-assed.
#11 Feb 14 2010 at 5:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
The proposal is not a 'Gordon Brown' proposal. Smiley: rolleyes

A group were asked to compile a list of all possible options for discussion at a summit next week. This includes 'all' possible options, including the 'fUck 'em all - let 'em rot in their own ****'.

The summit is to prioritise which strike the best balance between compassion and affordability. The 'death tax' is almost certain to be dismissed in the early stages.

The Tories have been invited to participate, but are making a big noise of refusing unless the 'death tax' option is ruled out before discussion.

I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the last Conservative Government were committed to this same 'death tax' if they hadn't lost the '97 election. This after they had alrrady introduced laws forcing old people to sell their homes to fund nursing home care.

FUcking hypocrites. Takes thickos like Gwyn with a short memory to fall for this.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#12 Feb 14 2010 at 5:49 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Thanks muchly. It did sound off.
#13 Feb 14 2010 at 5:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Thanks muchly. It did sound off.
As off as asking Goldie Hawn to sort out our Edjamacation system?

Srsly, they don't have a single policy, just a bunch of sound-bites that will get extra column inches in easy-to-read illustrated rags like Gwyn reads.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#14 Feb 15 2010 at 4:12 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
In other breaking news, Teh Conservatives is gudd at maffematics

The conservatives published a damning report that since Labour took over, teenage conception rates in deprived areas have gone from 19% under Conservative rule to 54% under laboUr! Fifty Four Percent of teenage girls in poor areas is preggers! ZOMG! Offishul LaboUr Figures!

Slight error - the figure is 5.4%, not 54%

Epic Oops! Smiley: lol
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#15 Feb 15 2010 at 4:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Lord Nobby wrote:
In other breaking news, Teh Conservatives is gudd at maffematics

The conservatives published a damning report that since Labour took over, teenage conception rates in deprived areas have gone from 19% under Conservative rule to 54% under laboUr! Fifty Four Percent of teenage girls in poor areas is preggers! ZOMG! Offishul LaboUr Figures!

Slight error - the figure is 5.4%, not 54%

Epic Oops! Smiley: lol


Nice to see grown men can miss a period, too.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#16 Feb 15 2010 at 4:23 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Samira wrote:
Lord Nobby wrote:
In other breaking news, Teh Conservatives is gudd at maffematics

The conservatives published a damning report that since Labour took over, teenage conception rates in deprived areas have gone from 19% under Conservative rule to 54% under laboUr! Fifty Four Percent of teenage girls in poor areas is preggers! ZOMG! Offishul LaboUr Figures!

Slight error - the figure is 5.4%, not 54%

Epic Oops! Smiley: lol


Nice to see grown men can miss a period, too.

Beer Spittingly witty. Smiley: mad

But you have to wonder how in touch with real life they are when their policy developers, proof-readers and leadership could possibly think a 54% figure was possible?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#17 Feb 15 2010 at 4:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
The public discourse seems to have sunk to the level of conspiracy theories over here. I can't say it's the same there, but consider the possibility.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#18 Feb 15 2010 at 10:04 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
Lord Nobby wrote:
Samira wrote:
Lord Nobby wrote:
In other breaking news, Teh Conservatives is gudd at maffematics

The conservatives published a damning report that since Labour took over, teenage conception rates in deprived areas have gone from 19% under Conservative rule to 54% under laboUr! Fifty Four Percent of teenage girls in poor areas is preggers! ZOMG! Offishul LaboUr Figures!

Slight error - the figure is 5.4%, not 54%

Epic Oops! Smiley: lol


Nice to see grown men can miss a period, too.

Beer Spittingly witty. Smiley: mad

But you have to wonder how in touch with real life they are when their policy developers, proof-readers and leadership could possibly think a 54% figure was possible?
Blind hope.

Edited, Feb 15th 2010 10:06pm by Sweetums
#19 Feb 15 2010 at 11:21 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Facts only get in the way of a good political discussion.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#20 Feb 17 2010 at 4:19 PM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
This after they had alrrady introduced laws forcing old people to sell their homes to fund nursing home care
if old people are stupid enough not to sell thier homes to thier children BEFORE going senile, **** them.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 159 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (159)