Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Anyone have opinions on digital cameras?Follow

#1 Feb 05 2010 at 9:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
I haven't bought one in quite some time (to get an idea, I paid $400ish for a 5MP camera...that's how long ago it was, haha). Anyway, since dirty thieves stole mine, I now can justify buying another. I'd like to keep it at $150 or less. I'm debating whether it would be better to get a decent video camera separately this time since Hannah's getting into stuff like ballet and whatnot and I'll want to tape recitals and all that jazz.

I'm aware of sites like dpreview, I'm just curious if anyone has gotten anything they'd recommend for or against lately, especially with Christmas just having passed.

Thoughts?

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#2 Feb 05 2010 at 9:34 AM Rating: Excellent
I haven't purchased one in that price range in a few years, but I love my Canons. The last time I bought one of those it was a Canon. Nice optics, decent features. My son now uses the old Powershot, and we have 3 others for my wife and I.
#4 Feb 05 2010 at 9:43 AM Rating: Good
Canon is the way to go IMO. However, for the lower price range point and shoot, a Fuji Finepix is also quite capable. Also, don't be fooled by the megapixel marketing scheme. Anything over 8 megapixels is more than you need, and the more megapixels they cram on to a smaller sensor, the more photo quality is compromised.


Oh, and for me this is very important - your mileage may vary. Always look for a model powered by standard AA batteries. A lot of cameras these days have their own custom batteries which is a real pain in the *** when you're traveling and the battery dies. With a AA powered camera, all you have to do is stop at a convenience store or whatever to fix.

Edited, Feb 5th 2010 9:47am by BrownDuck
#5 Feb 05 2010 at 9:47 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
14,454 posts
Gonna have to echo and say Canons rock. I've had one for a few years and really havent had any huge issues. The only thing I found to be a pain in the *** is that somehow the video camera aspect got borked and now I cant unbork it. It takes small vids (sizewise) and I can not get it back to default. However Im sure it's user error and/or the kids got their sticky hands on it and broke it. Damn kids.

ETA I will completely disagree on the AA battery thing though. It doesnt take a genius to recharge the battery and bring the charger along which is not big and cumbersome. I also have two batteries so I always have one charging while I use the other one.

Edited, Feb 5th 2010 10:48am by DSD
#6 Feb 05 2010 at 9:51 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I think it's safe to say that with Nexa's obsessive compulsive disorderspersonality quirks, she won't be running out of charged batteries.

Edited, Feb 5th 2010 11:55am by Uglysasquatch
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#7 Feb 05 2010 at 9:59 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
I probably will go with another Cannon (stolen camera = Cannon...with the camera specific battery that the charger is no longer sold for...I have the charger in my purse so I like to think the bastards stole a brick).

I'm thinking that I'm going to get a separate camcorder for video taping...I kinda want something that takes better video than what comes with a digital camera in the right price range. Any suggestions for a relatively inexpensive video camera? I've never owned one, so anything I should be on the lookout for/avoid?

Thanks,

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#8 Feb 05 2010 at 10:04 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
I probably will go with another Cannon

Do you think you'll be able to find the same street vendor that sold you the knock off the first time? I think you can get a better warranty with a regular old Canon.
#9 Feb 05 2010 at 10:11 AM Rating: Good
***
1,162 posts
Quote:
I'm thinking that I'm going to get a separate camcorder for video taping...I kinda want something that takes better video than what comes with a digital camera in the right price range


You can get really decent video with standard still camera these days. Canon SX200 got HD video for example (around 300-350$) the only problem is storage. Video takes a lot of space on your memory card so a camcorder with built-in hard drive is a better choice if you want to film a lot.



Quote:
Oh, and for me this is very important - your mileage may vary. Always look for a model powered by standard AA batteries. A lot of cameras these days have their own custom batteries which is a real pain in the *** when you're traveling and the battery dies



While I agree that AA batteries are really more practical, you'll get better performances from lithium-ion battery pack. Faster shutter, faster flash recycling and longer autonomy. Just carry a second battery and you're golden.
#10 Feb 05 2010 at 10:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
feelz wrote:
Video takes a lot of space on your memory card so a camcorder with built-in hard drive is a better choice if you want to film a lot.
I'd only recommend something with a hard drive if you know you'r the type who will actually download it to another drive. We went with tapes (yea, old tech, but still useful, could've done disks too) which is better for us, as then we can just grab a new tape and toss it in if we realize we haven't saved the last recording. also, going with tapes will mean a much cheaper price tag and at $5-10 a tape for 8 hours plus filming, it'll take a ton of filming to make up the cost difference.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#11 Feb 05 2010 at 10:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
The storage issue is one of the reasons I'm thinking separate video recorder...I hate it when I run out of space filming and get to choose between deleting pictures or ceasing to film.

Fine Moe, Canon...Canon...:p

I would definitely download it onto the computer, I wouldn't need to worry about the tape issue. I would like something that can record for a couple of hours though.

While I know I like CANON for cameras, I know nothing about what's respected for video cameras.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#12 Feb 05 2010 at 10:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Nexa wrote:
I would like something that can record for a couple of hours though.

Nexa
From my experience in shopping for video cameras two years ago, you'd want to go disks over hardrive. That's 2 years ago though, which in tech years is 40 years or something like that.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#13 Feb 05 2010 at 10:30 AM Rating: Excellent
The only problem I have with tape is the time it takes to get it to a hard drive. I keep 2 8gb cards in my camcorder bag, so I can get around 12 hours of footage. The camera has been in use since 2005, so between the two kids I figure I am about break even on tape cost vs. card cost, and it has been easy to share the video.
#14 Feb 05 2010 at 10:31 AM Rating: Good
For an inexpensive HD video camera, this gets rave reviews.
#15 Feb 05 2010 at 10:31 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Another vote for Canon. Have had 2 and the picture quality is top notch.
#16 Feb 05 2010 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
***
1,162 posts
Hard drive will have better storage but is a lot more fragile than disc or tape and also more expensive. There's pros and cons to the 3 systems.
#17 Feb 05 2010 at 10:41 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Another vote for Canon, although I tend to vacillate between the megazoom ones and the ones small enough to fit in my pocket.
For video, Joph bought me one of these for Christmas and I love it. Small, easy to use, hooks right up to pc.
#18 Feb 05 2010 at 10:51 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
We have a Flip also and it's been great. I recommend it, Nexa.
#19 Feb 05 2010 at 10:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
The Glorious Atomicflea wrote:
Another vote for Canon, although I tend to vacillate between the megazoom ones and the ones small enough to fit in my pocket.
For video, Joph bought me one of these for Christmas and I love it. Small, easy to use, hooks right up to pc.


I was considering one of those but they have a ton of negative reviews on Amazon...you haven't had any trouble with yours? Pros/cons? I really like the idea of it, but I want something reliable for taping special things that won't be happening again, like recitals and whatnot.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#20 Feb 05 2010 at 11:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
The only con I've had with mine is I had to get a USB extension since I don't have any USB ports on the front of my computer. Other than that, it's worked like a charm. Even comes with some decent software for "jazzing" up your videos.
#21 Feb 05 2010 at 11:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Nadenu Delivers on Time wrote:
The only con I've had with mine is I had to get a USB extension since I don't have any USB ports on the front of my computer. Other than that, it's worked like a charm. Even comes with some decent software for "jazzing" up your videos.


hmmm, I may have to consider it again. I was really pretty excited about them at first, but then there seemed to be so much negativity on Amazon that I got a bit scared off. Of course, now if I get one and there's a problem, I'll be blaming you and Flea.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#22 Feb 05 2010 at 11:08 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Nexa wrote:
I was considering one of those but they have a ton of negative reviews on Amazon...you haven't had any trouble with yours? Pros/cons? I really like the idea of it, but I want something reliable for taping special things that won't be happening again, like recitals and whatnot.

It reviewed well (compared to other similar cameras) on sites like C|Net and PC World so, for the price and what she wanted it for, I decided to go for it. She mainly wanted to be able to record things to share with the family in Virginia so I didn't bother to go with the HD version.

I haven't read the Amazon reviews lately but, from some other poor customer reviews I read, it seemed like people didn't understand that this isn't a $595 camcorder, it's a $150 fixed-lens video recorder for putting stuff on YouTube 'n stuff.

Edited, Feb 5th 2010 11:09am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#23 Feb 05 2010 at 11:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Nexa wrote:
I was considering one of those but they have a ton of negative reviews on Amazon...you haven't had any trouble with yours? Pros/cons? I really like the idea of it, but I want something reliable for taping special things that won't be happening again, like recitals and whatnot.

It reviewed well (compared to other similar cameras) on sites like C|Net and PC World so, for the price and what she wanted it for, I decided to go for it. She mainly wanted to be able to record things to share with the family in Virginia so I didn't bother to go with the HD version.

I haven't read the Amazon reviews lately but, from some other poor customer reviews I read, it seemed like people didn't understand that this isn't a $595 camcorder, it's a $150 fixed-lens video recorder for putting stuff on YouTube 'n stuff.

Edited, Feb 5th 2010 11:09am by Jophiel


Right, but see, I want a high end HD video camera with nearly unlimited battery life and storage capacity that actually takes off 10 pounds for $150. I'm not sure you people are really understanding me here.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#24 Feb 05 2010 at 11:15 AM Rating: Good
@#%^
*****
15,953 posts
Nexa wrote:
Right, but see, I want a high end HD video camera with nearly unlimited battery life and storage capacity that actually takes off 10 pounds for $150. I'm not sure you people are really understanding me here.

Nexa


Does it have to do lists as well? Or would that be considered a 'nice to have' feature?
____________________________
"I have lost my way
But I hear a tale
About a heaven in Alberta
Where they've got all hell for a basement"

#25 Feb 05 2010 at 11:19 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
We bought a Nikon Coolpix last year and love it. Very compact, nice quality pictures and easy interface. Love the touch screen too. It has a rechargeable battery with long battery life, and also takes video.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#26 Feb 05 2010 at 12:52 PM Rating: Excellent
I sold cameras and camcorders for a while and I absolutely agree with Canon being your best choice unless you do a lot of low light shots. Canon doesn't do well with low light at all. If you think that you'll be taking a large proportion of low light shots, I'd suggest a Sony or a Panasonic Lumix. Sony is usually more expensive for the same features and memory cards though. I definitely prefer lithium ion batteries, but if you go with AAs, try and get some Panasonic rechargables, as these seemed to last the longest of all the ones I tried. As for camcorders, I recommend Sony for you, as you said you would be taping stuff like recitals which are inside. Sony seems to be the best with low light in camcorders as well. I prefer flash drive camcorders, followed by hard drive. I hated mini-dvs and tapes.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 164 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (164)