Pentagon repealing DADTFollow

If you're gay and thinking gay thoughts about me, I might be Infected By The GAY!!11eleven

You might say he has a phobia about it.

A "stiff" wind, huh? Whatcha trying to say? ;-)


Any guy who hasn't gotten aroused over literally nothing was never a teenager. Or they might have been Allegory. No offense Al.

Another poster already answered that, but I'll quote them again.



It's uncomfortable for someone, that's the point. If it's uncomfortable for the straight guy, doesn't he have a right to feel that way? On the other hand, a person shouldn't have to hide themselves. So a compromise was made and that was DADT. Can anyone seriously tell me they aren't grossed out by hearing about someone's sexual life. Parents tend to be a good example. As I got older, I knew my parents were doing it, but it something that grossed me out because they did it. The homosexual lifestyle is just like that. It's something people don't want to see. They typically don't care if you do it, they just rather not know about it.

I have gay friends both male and female. I'm not comfortable talking about the sexual preferences that they have so we talk about other things. I return the favor by not talking about my sexual partners. It makes both sides happy. If someone can explain my point better, please do so.

Sure, he can be uncomfortable all he wants. It's his problem. Does that mean his comfort should be considered before everyone elses rights? **** no.

Further, just because he's uncomfortable, doesn't mean he gets to harass or belittle that person, regardless of orientation.

Sure, but like Kaelesh said, not at the expense of someone elses rights.



So if it was redacted, why would anything change? Why would you suddenly know if someone was gay or not?



What a nice friend you are. "You can hang out with me, but anyone you're dating can't, and I don't want to hear about any of your problems with your significant other. You make me uncomfortable. But let's hang out anyway."

Dude, you're nothing if you're not a homophobe.

And a prude.

So if a peeping tom is looking at a girl in her backyard, that's ok because this guy has rights. Of course not, it's criminal to spy on someone like that. Both individuals should have their rights enforced. If a guy is uncomfortable with a gay male using a locker room especially if said gay was checking him out, doesn't the person being gawked at have rights? You're covering the gay man's rights, but you keep forgetting the other guy.



I 100% agree with this.

Ha, ha, I remember one of my roommates in college had a stack of Penthouse and he'd read the letters to us. I was so naive. I was like, "Are those real?" Like the ones where the busty teenager was dying to be @#%^ed by her loving uncle and sh*t.

You gotta remember, this was preinternets. It was an innocent time. :P

Edited, Feb 2nd 2010 5:19pm by Annabella

There is a large difference between Sexual Harassment and some ******* worried about a gay man checking him out in the shower because of his macho marine attitude.



Then what's the god damn problem?

Its uncomfortable to be stuck in a M1114 for eight hours while you wait for EOD to come check out a pile of rocks with a coke can sticking out of it, but we ended up doing that for close to a year. What military were you in? Being uncomfortable is status ******* quo.

You're right, the military can afford to keep discharging gay translators.


We've got waaaay too many of them as it is!