Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Incendiary TItle: Starring a Witty Obama Portmanteau Follow

#27 Jan 26 2010 at 6:14 PM Rating: Good
Hilariously misspelled reference to prior poster showing inability to properly use the quote function,

Quote:
Quote taken out of context.


Comment entirely irrelevant to the above out-of-context quote that insinuates that certain people who are vaguely right of center are liberals.
#28 Jan 26 2010 at 6:24 PM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
These threads are so 2007.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#29 Jan 26 2010 at 6:37 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
lolcat.

Rated down by a purist old Asylumite or two.

Rated back up to "Good" by one of my OOT pals, and an anonymous Asylumite that got a quiet giggle out of its vaguely relevant silliness.
#30 Jan 26 2010 at 6:38 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
Notification of rate-down for mentioning one's karma.
#31 Jan 26 2010 at 7:04 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Ambrya wrote:
Notification of rate-down for mentioning one's karma.

Rule #1

Ha ha ha!

Claim that you rated me down right on schedule!

Edited, Jan 26th 2010 8:07pm by Aripyanfar
#32 Jan 27 2010 at 10:37 PM Rating: Good
**
300 posts
Obligatory post wondering when Varus will come and turn this into a reason liberals damage the system.

Also followed by obligatory mention that rate ups were given since someone rated everyone else down.
#33 Jan 30 2010 at 6:28 AM Rating: Decent
Ham-fisted attempt to stay on-topic.

Edited, Jan 30th 2010 7:30am by Lefein
#34 Jan 30 2010 at 6:41 AM Rating: Good
Comment noting that the preceding poster has been gone a long fucking time, and needs to be present and posting more frequently.
#35 Jan 30 2010 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
***
1,594 posts
Sincere attempt to argue against the OP's point, but failing due to complete lack of practice in debating and a lack of cited references. Usually followed shortly by someone much more intelligent saying what was attempted here.
#36 Jan 30 2010 at 1:14 PM Rating: Good
Piped in liberal snark, followed by veiled insult to Varrus or Gbaji.
#37 Jan 31 2010 at 12:18 AM Rating: Decent
Ehcks wrote:
Sincere attempt to argue against the OP's point, but failing due to complete lack of practice in debating and a lack of cited references. Usually followed shortly by someone much more intelligent saying what was attempted here.


Demanding rebuttal cite to OP cite and refusing to debate the merits until said cite is produced.

A mom joke.
#38 Jan 31 2010 at 12:22 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Dramatic attentionwhoring derail with potential cross-thread shenanigans
#39 Jan 31 2010 at 9:08 PM Rating: Good
**
300 posts
Halfassed attempt at a GTFO reply.

followed by half intellectual gibberish that will get me sub-defaulted.
#40 Jan 31 2010 at 10:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Obligatory admin post of doom.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 199 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (199)