Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Where's the work?Follow

#27 Jan 08 2010 at 3:26 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
Samira wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
You're not going to get workers in the U.S. to work for $.70/hour. Unless, of course, you provide food and housing for them on top of that wage.

Do you get paid in script?


And shop at the company store, yep!

Cause that worked so well for the coal miners, doncha know.
I bet your housing is positively luxurious.
#28 Jan 08 2010 at 3:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
It's the pride of the block.

Screenshot


____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#29 Jan 08 2010 at 4:50 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Q_Q Obama
The unemployment rate started increasing at an increasing rate in August '08 (we had been losing jobs at a steady rate since January '08), it wasn't until January '09 that we started decreasing the rate at which we lost jobs.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#30 Jan 08 2010 at 4:51 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
How's that going for ya?


Quite well actually - the school he was hired onto apparently has plans to make him assistant department head next year. (He's hoping that comes with a pay raise.) He's the first full-time education faculty member that they were able to hire at the branch campus he works at (thanks to stimulus funding and increased enrollment), and they've been inordinately pleased with his work. Plus he's doing what he loves (most of the time) which is teaching.

The manufacturing sector is still drained dry, but the stimulus gave a critical boost to education throughout the US. Everything from new teachers to new appliances in schools (some schools had been using the same boilers or food service equipment for 50+ years) to funding for new textbooks. Locally, we were able to fund a lot of these things on our own with SPLOST, but some projects that were slated for years down the road were able to be moved up with stimulus funding instead.

People complain that putting money into school systems is "wasting" it, but they don't stop to think that the $2000 for a new dishwasher system in an elementary school means that 1. the company that made the system sold a product and 2. contractors were hired to install it and made money for their business. Most contractors are independent, small business owners in their own right, so they're the biggest recipients of stimulus money for building infrastructure projects. And they're glad for the work, since the housing market is still flatlined.
#31ThiefX, Posted: Jan 08 2010 at 6:48 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) And to pay for that one job your children's children will be paying off the debt.
#32 Jan 08 2010 at 6:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
ThiefX wrote:
And to pay for that one job your children's children will be paying off the debt.

So I guess it was worth it.

Unless she doesn't have children. In which case it'll be your children's children so it'll be totally worth it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#33 Jan 08 2010 at 9:09 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
Whats more right? Keeping the jobs at home and paying more for stuff, or sending them overseas and paying less for stuff.

What's most right is jobs staying home and people paying less for stuff.

Now that's something I can totally get behind. Can't for the life of me see how that'll happen, though. Tariff the shit out of anything made outside the States?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#34 Jan 08 2010 at 10:33 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
And to pay for that one job your children's children will be paying off the debt.


Not having any kids, thus not contributing to the overpopulation of the planet.

Therefore, my nonexistent children won't be paying for anything.
#35 Jan 08 2010 at 11:41 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
And now all the Dems and media can talk about is how the economy is getting better. All this despite the fact that the numbers just don't support it.


Funny that. Media outlets talking about a strengthening economy.

Probably since that will in fact make the economy stronger. Unless you've invested in Gold, that is. It's part of the whole economic construct being a function of being only as powerful as people think it is.

It's an even cooler form of voodoo economics.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#36 Jan 09 2010 at 1:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
I bet some people's grandchildren are still paying for SDI.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#37 Jan 09 2010 at 5:22 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
ThiefX wrote:
Quote:
My husband has a stimulus job.

Thank you, have a nice day.


And to pay for that one job your children's children will be paying off the debt.

So I guess it was worth it.

Investment in education, health facilities and travel infrastructure in the present increases the tax take in the future, because they raise prosperity in the future population for both individuals and business.

Not that your stimulus package might have been most efficiently targeted. I don't know all the details. Certainly I'm extremely dubious as to the investment worth of bailout money that went to executive's bonuses. Beyond a large minimum of spending, all there is to spend on (and the wealthy usually do, to keep up with their Jonses) is luxury goods. Luxury goods by their nature tend to come at inflated prices compared to their worth, because at least half the cachet is their sheer expense. Thus a goodly amount of their income doesn't trickle down to employees or component suppliers, but just rolls around and around the income of the rich.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 278 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (278)