Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Let's Bomb YemenFollow

#1 Dec 30 2009 at 10:00 AM Rating: Good
Linky

Quote:
Washington (CNN) -- The U.S. and Yemen are now looking at fresh targets in Yemen for a potential retaliation strike, two senior U.S. officials told CNN Tuesday, in the aftermath of the botched Christmas Day attack on an airliner that al Qaeda in Yemen claims it organized.

The officials asked not to be not be identified because of the sensitive nature of the information. They both stressed the effort is aimed at being ready with options for the White House if President Obama orders a retaliatory strike. The effort is to see whether targets can be specifically linked to the airliner incident and its planning.

U.S. special operations forces and intelligence agencies, and their Yemeni counterparts, are working to identify potential al Qaeda targets in Yemen, one of the officials said. This is part of a new classified agreement with the Yemeni government that the two countries will work together and that the U.S. will remain publicly silent on its role in providing intelligence and weapons to conduct strikes.

Officially the U.S. has not said it conducted previous airstrikes in Yemen, but officials are privately saying the Yemeni military could not have carried out the strikes on its own.

By all accounts, the agreement would allow the U.S. to fly cruise missiles, fighter jets or unmanned armed drones against targets in Yemen with the consent of that government.

U.S. military and intelligence officials describe to CNN an al Qaeda network with organized command and control that has evolved and grown over the past year. U.S. intelligence concludes there are several training camps similar to those established in other countries where one or two dozen fighters at a time train.

The U.S. and Yemenis are also looking into the possibility the Nigerian suspect in the airliner incident trained at one of the camps.

One of the camps was among the targets in each set of airstrikes earlier this month.


Working with the Yemini government to kill terrorists without ground troops?

I'm down.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#2REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 10:03 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Omega,
#3 Dec 30 2009 at 10:07 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Omega,

Quote:
Working with the Yemini government to kill terrorists without ground troops?

I'm down.

Air raids didn't work during the Clinton administration what makes you think they'll work now?

Ground troops didn't work during Ooh Saddam! Let's go get him!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#4 Dec 30 2009 at 10:10 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Omega,

Quote:
Working with the Yemini government to kill terrorists without ground troops?

I'm down.


Air raids didn't work during the Clinton administration what makes you think they'll work now?
Are you suggesting we get into, yet another, ground war?...against the wishes of the Yemen government?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#5REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 10:11 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
#6 Dec 30 2009 at 10:12 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
Air raids didn't work during the Clinton administration what makes you think they'll work now?


Clinton didn't exactly have help from the Taliban.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#7 Dec 30 2009 at 10:20 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Simply saying air raids havn't worked in the past. What makes you think they'll work now?
There have also been successful air raids in the past. Why would you make stupid assumptions?..Lol.

Oh yeah, because you have some shizo-obsession with the US President.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#8REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 10:22 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
#9 Dec 30 2009 at 10:23 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
There have also been successful air raids in the past.


Enlighten me.
Pearl Harbor.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#10REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 10:28 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
#11 Dec 30 2009 at 10:36 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
Pearl Harbor.


So the attack on Pearl Harbor was a successful attack against rogue elements within the borders of an ally?
That wasn't the question, was it?

Gees Varus, you're like a little kid that changes the game rules as he goes to insure he keeps winning. I'm done playing with you.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#12REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 10:39 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
#13 Dec 30 2009 at 10:41 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Elinda wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
Pearl Harbor.


So the attack on Pearl Harbor was a successful attack against rogue elements within the borders of an ally?
That wasn't the question, was it?

Gees Varus, you're like a little kid that changes the game rules as he goes to insure he keeps winning. I'm done playing with you.

It is, quite literally, his profession...
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#14 Dec 30 2009 at 11:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elinda wrote:
Gees Varus, you're like a little kid that changes the game rules as he goes to insure he keeps winning.

...and yet, ironically...
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Dec 30 2009 at 11:44 AM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
I'm done playing with you.


I've heard that before.


I always thought hookers stayed until the job was done... or was s/he one of those pay by the hour ones?
#16 Dec 30 2009 at 11:48 AM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Simply saying air raids havn't worked in the past. What makes you think they'll work now?



Wow, questioning the president in a time of war. I remember when republicans would tell us that gave comfort to the enemy.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#17 Dec 30 2009 at 11:51 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,211 posts
Debalic wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
Omega,

Quote:
Working with the Yemini government to kill terrorists without ground troops?

I'm down.

Air raids didn't work during the Clinton administration what makes you think they'll work now?

Ground troops didn't work during Ooh Saddam! Let's go get him!

It's funny how you blame the fact of ground troops that it didn't work when it really was first a question of the american people thinking it was a total slaughter (it pretty much was), then later a question of not getting nearly enough troops.

I think Varrus is just trolling with the question of air raids. Pot shot at Obama.

Edited, Dec 30th 2009 11:01am by manicshock
#18REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 12:42 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Anna,
#19REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 12:45 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Manic,
#20 Dec 30 2009 at 12:46 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Anna,

Quote:
Wow, questioning the president in a time of war. I remember when republicans would tell us that gave comfort to the enemy.


Actually the GOP just didn't want the liberals and media to detail out what the military was planning. You know letting them know what and when a certain mission was going down.





Uh-huh. Right. That's why anyone who did anything less congenial than offering Bush smiles and a hand job got branded as "unpatriotic" for the better part of four years following 9/11. Right.
#21REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 12:52 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ambrya,
#22 Dec 30 2009 at 1:00 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Ambrya,

Quote:
Uh-huh. Right. That's why anyone who did anything less congenial than offering Bush smiles and a hand job got branded as "unpatriotic" for the better part of four years following 9/11. Right.


You mean like accusing US soldiers of mass murder or proclaiming the war is "unwinnable"? Or accusing the military of engaging in habitual torture?

I can't imagine what would have caused the GOP to label these people as "unpatriotic".
To be patriotic, one must support murder and torture?

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#23 Dec 30 2009 at 1:16 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Ambrya,

Quote:
Uh-huh. Right. That's why anyone who did anything less congenial than offering Bush smiles and a hand job got branded as "unpatriotic" for the better part of four years following 9/11. Right.


You mean like accusing US soldiers of mass murder


If the shoe fits...


Quote:
or proclaiming the war is "unwinnable"?


Here we are ringing in our 7th year of the war, and not even the capital of Iraq is safe or stable yet. Perhaps your criteria for having "won" the war are too low.

Quote:
Or accusing the military of engaging in habitual torture?



Because Abu Ghraib was actually a day-spa, right?


Quote:
I can't imagine what would have caused the GOP to label these people as "unpatriotic".


Apparently "truth" has no relationship whatsoever to "patriotism." Who knew?!

#24REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 1:50 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ambrya,
#25REDACTED, Posted: Dec 30 2009 at 1:52 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Elinda,
#26 Dec 30 2009 at 2:24 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Elinda,

Quote:
To be patriotic, one must support murder and torture?


Waterboarding is not torture no matter how many times you say it.

so you say.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 285 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (285)