Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Unemployment at 10%!Follow

#27 Dec 04 2009 at 10:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Joph has already threatened to karma camp me

Threatened!? I've been kamping you and you didn't notice??


Is "kamping" the new frennemy?
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#28 Dec 04 2009 at 10:49 AM Rating: Good
*****
12,049 posts
Jophiel wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Joph has already threatened to karma camp me

Threatened!? I've been kamping you and you didn't notice??

Man, next time I'm sending you a candy box full of dead mice or something. You'll pay attention to me then...


Well, if it's a candy box... hey, if they have chewy gooey centers, I can't complain all that much!
#29 Dec 04 2009 at 10:56 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:


I take it back. Pensive's mom sucks wonderfully, but Pensive is the fucking man.


I'm expressing disappointment!

Look man, you need to start pirating something or I'll rip your lungs out
#30REDACTED, Posted: Dec 04 2009 at 10:56 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#31 Dec 04 2009 at 11:06 AM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
ThiefX wrote:
Quote:
Because Christmas is in November. Gotcha.


I already know the answer to what I am about to ask and to be honest I nver really believed your IQ was any higher than the kids who ride the short bus to school but seriously are you this stupid?

Let me try to explain it to you.

You see Christmas is in December but Retail stores hire temp workers in Nov. Do you understand now?
lol no.

People don't get hired because of black friday.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#32 Dec 04 2009 at 11:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
A few more exerts from that article

You're acting as though its a surprise that people not actively looking for work don't count? They teach this in high school economics classes.

Also, that wasn't from my Marketwatch article. I quoted mine in its entirety Smiley: smile They may have expanded upon it since then.

I know it pains you to see positive leaning jobs data because you're praying for millions more Americans to be unemployed for political gain, but them's the breaks.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#33 Dec 04 2009 at 12:12 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Jophed,

A few more exerts from that article
Another Freudian slip? Since you really seem to be exerting to find excerpts.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#34REDACTED, Posted: Dec 04 2009 at 12:18 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Joph,
#35 Dec 04 2009 at 12:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
publiusvarus wrote:
do I need to explain, again, how not losing as many jobs as some "analyst" predicted is not positive economic news?

You can try but I doubt you'll sound less stupid this time. Give it a shot though.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Dec 04 2009 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
The bet's still open, by the way.
#37 Dec 04 2009 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
Joph,

Quote:
I know it pains you to see positive leaning jobs data


Ok good little liberal buddy do I need to explain, again, how not losing as many jobs as some "analyst" predicted is not positive economic news?
Decreasing at a decreasing rate. The derivative is positive, but I highly doubt you know a thing about calculus.

Losing 100,000 jobs will never be ideal in any scenario, but if your choices are losing 100,000 jobs or losing 700,000 jobs, I don't see why you would want to lose 700,000.

Maybe varus just hates America?
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#38 Dec 04 2009 at 12:41 PM Rating: Good
bsphil wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
Joph,

Quote:
I know it pains you to see positive leaning jobs data


Ok good little liberal buddy do I need to explain, again, how not losing as many jobs as some "analyst" predicted is not positive economic news?
Decreasing at a decreasing rate. The derivative is positive, but I highly doubt you know a thing about calculus.

Losing 100,000 jobs will never be ideal in any scenario, but if your choices are losing 100,000 jobs or losing 700,000 jobs, I don't see why you would want to lose 700,000.

Maybe varus just hates America?


No, the derivative is negative. The second derivative is positive.
#39 Dec 04 2009 at 1:56 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
bsphil wrote:
Maybe varus just hates America?

He's already stated this fact..3v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#40 Dec 04 2009 at 2:12 PM Rating: Good
***
3,118 posts
Quote:

Losing 100,000 jobs will never be ideal in any scenario, but if your choices are losing 100,000 jobs or losing 700,000 jobs, I don't see why you would want to lose 700,000.
That depends on if we get to pick the industry from which the jobs are lost. 700k lobbyists vs. 100k strippers is no contest.
#41 Dec 04 2009 at 4:24 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
bsphil wrote:
publiusvarus wrote:
Joph,

Quote:
I know it pains you to see positive leaning jobs data


Ok good little liberal buddy do I need to explain, again, how not losing as many jobs as some "analyst" predicted is not positive economic news?
Decreasing at a decreasing rate. The derivative is positive, but I highly doubt you know a thing about calculus.

Losing 100,000 jobs will never be ideal in any scenario, but if your choices are losing 100,000 jobs or losing 700,000 jobs, I don't see why you would want to lose 700,000.

Maybe varus just hates America?


No, the derivative is negative. The second derivative is positive.
Bleh, and I had second derivative written down the first time too.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#42 Dec 04 2009 at 5:41 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Great news! Until it's adjusted in January. Then, terrible news! :)
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#43 Dec 04 2009 at 7:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
Great news! Until it's adjusted in January. Then, terrible news! :)

Yeah but they adjusted Sept and October in our favor! So there's hope! Obama brand Hope!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#44 Dec 05 2009 at 12:56 AM Rating: Good
Debalic wrote:
bsphil wrote:
Maybe varus just hates America?

He's already stated this fact..3v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8
It's like I've said several times before: he's a terrorist.

He never disputes it, either.
#45 Dec 05 2009 at 1:06 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
MDenham wrote:
Debalic wrote:
bsphil wrote:
Maybe varus just hates America?

He's already stated this fact..3v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8v8
It's like I've said several times before: he's a terrorist.

He never disputes it, either.

I had more to say but Thom got a hold of my keyboard and then I forgot.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 163 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (163)