Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

climategateFollow

#302 Dec 08 2009 at 2:45 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
There's no way you can know that what you do will ultimately have no bearing on your trajectory. Smiley: tongue


Well if there are no resources with which to do so, then yes you can.

If you do not know that to be the case, then of course you have a reason to assess your situation.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#303 Dec 08 2009 at 2:45 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
We shall see then. I have rejected another similarly stupid one. What do you think will happen?


Heavy flooding in Japan.
#304 Dec 08 2009 at 2:47 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
We shall see then. I have rejected another similarly stupid one. What do you think will happen?


Heavy flooding in Japan.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#305 Dec 08 2009 at 2:49 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Quote:
I can't imagine how I've told you three times that you aren't arguing something incompatible with me and you continue to ask things like this.


Really?


I can imagine it if you were being purposefully obstinate. The truth of that is irrelevant to my desire to assert good arguments though, because whether or not it is sincere, I find value in fighting poor ethical theory.
#306 Dec 08 2009 at 2:53 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
I doubt belkira would assert that she was. It's not merely for your own ego. It's also for potential future endeavors of yours and how you relate to other individuals such that your character is more cultivated and prepared to deal with things when they will make some sort of practical difference. The preparedness of your own ego directly impacts the continuity of the world


You know another way to prepare yourself for future endeavors?

Knowing when to act and when not to.

Quote:
I can imagine it if you were being purposefully obstinate. The truth of that is irrelevant to my desire to assert good arguments though, because whether or not it is sincere, I find value in fighting poor ethical theory.


Is this another of your "I know you are but what am I" equivalencies?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#307 Dec 08 2009 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good
Timelordwho wrote:
Quote:
We shall see then. I have rejected another similarly stupid one. What do you think will happen?


Heavy flooding in Japan.


You can't do this!
#308 Dec 08 2009 at 2:57 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
Quote:
We shall see then. I have rejected another similarly stupid one. What do you think will happen?


Heavy flooding in Japan.


You can't do this!


Absence of believe will not bring believe of absence.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#309REDACTED, Posted: Dec 08 2009 at 3:12 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) bsphil,
#310 Dec 08 2009 at 3:16 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Distorting the meaning of bible passages to conform to your modern sense of right and wrong is frowned upon.


Tell that to those hacks that are editing a Conservative Bible.

#311 Dec 08 2009 at 3:37 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
publiusvarus wrote:
bsphil,

Quote:
p.s. Posting bible passages is not a reason.Really? I thought that was always a big deal with conservatives


Distorting the meaning of bible passages to conform to your modern sense of right and wrong is frowned upon the basis of the conservative movement.

You made a bit of a typo there. FTFY.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#312REDACTED, Posted: Dec 08 2009 at 3:49 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Cat,
#313 Dec 08 2009 at 3:50 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
That's right. Because we all know God spoke The King's English. Anything else is misrepresentation.
#314 Dec 08 2009 at 4:33 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Nadenu wrote:
That's right. Because we all know God spoke The King's English. Anything else is misrepresentation.

I've also heard terrifying rumors that Jesus may not have been a blue-eyed white man!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#315 Dec 08 2009 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
I loved how this one was kicking around for a while:

Psalm 109:8 wrote:
May his days be few; may another take his place of leadership.


However, if they actually read the whole Psalm, it was taken grossly out of context:

Psalm 109 in its entirety wrote:

1 O God, whom I praise,
do not remain silent,

2 For wicked and deceitful men
have opened their mouths against me;
they have spoken against me with lying tongues.


3 With words of hatred they surround me;
they attack me without cause.

4 In return for my friendship they accuse me,
but I am a man of prayer.

5 They repay me evil for good,
and hatred for my friendship.

6 Appoint an evil man to oppose him;
let an accuser stand at his right hand.

7 When he is tried, let him be found guilty,
and may his prayers condemn him.

8 May his days be few;
may another take his place of leadership.

9 May his children be fatherless
and his wife a widow.

10 May his children be wandering beggars;
may they be driven from their ruined homes.

11 May a creditor seize all he has;
may strangers plunder the fruits of his labor.

12 May no one extend kindness to him
or take pity on his fatherless children.

13 May his descendants be cut off,
their names blotted out from the next generation.

14 May the iniquity of his fathers be remembered before the Lord;
may the sin of his mother never be blotted out.

15 May their sins always remain before the Lord,
that he may cut off the memory of them from the earth.


So if you ever see a fundie wearing the "Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8" t-shirt, you can walk up to them and tell them they've just admitted they are a lying, wicked hypocrite who curses against a good man. Psalm 109:2 says so!

Edited, Dec 8th 2009 5:37pm by catwho
#316 Dec 08 2009 at 6:32 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Is this another of your "I know you are but what am I" equivalencies?


No, it is that I choose to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are not intentionally foolish, but merely have great psychological trauma in conceiving of ethics, and can therefore not understand how it is that what you say is an implication of what I say, and not a contradiction.
#317 Dec 08 2009 at 6:36 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
catwho wrote:
So if you ever see a fundie wearing the "Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8" t-shirt, you can walk up to them and tell them they've just admitted they are a lying, wicked hypocrite who curses against a good man. Psalm 109:2 says so!


Um... No, it doesn't. The lying people are the followers of the leader who should be accused and removed by God. There's a minor switch between talking about evil "people", and a single "him", but it's not that hard to follow what's being written.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#318 Dec 08 2009 at 6:46 PM Rating: Decent
King David, who this verse is attributed to, was talking about himself as the leader.

The rest of the verse was what they (the wicked people) were saying about him.

Some versions include the implied quotation marks, but since that punctuation didn't exist in the original Hebrew, other versions leave it out. Such as this one.

Unless 2000 years of Biblical scholars got it as wrong as the fundies quoting this did.
#319 Dec 08 2009 at 6:55 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
catwho wrote:
King David, who this verse is attributed to, was talking about himself as the leader.


King David was saying that God should curse him? That doesn't even make sense.

Quote:
The rest of the verse was what they (the wicked people) were saying about him.


Yes. Then he's praying to God to punish the leader of the people who are saying mean things about him. He's asking God to put an evil man in the enemy leaders camp, and have that man accuse that leader of horrible things and have it ruin that mans position and life. It's punishment by proxy.

You don't ask God to do evil things. You ask God to allow evil things to happen to bad people. I'd explain the rationale for requesting it in this way, but you'd have to actually have an understanding of ancient Hebrew culture.


Quote:
Some versions include the implied quotation marks, but since that punctuation didn't exist in the original Hebrew, other versions leave it out. Such as this one.

Unless 2000 years of Biblical scholars got it as wrong as the fundies quoting this did.


I suspect that 2000 years of biblical scholars got it right, and the fundies got it right, and you just grossly misread it. Just a suspicion of course...

Edited, Dec 8th 2009 4:58pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#320 Dec 08 2009 at 6:59 PM Rating: Decent
King David wrote:
1 O God, whom I praise,
do not remain silent,

2 For wicked and deceitful men
have opened their mouths against me;
they have spoken against me with lying tongues.

3 With words of hatred they surround me;
they attack me without cause.

4 In return for my friendship they accuse me,
but I am a man of prayer.

5 They repay me evil for good,
and hatred for my friendship.


Wicked and Deceitful men wrote:
6 (They say:) "Appoint an evil man to oppose him;
let an accuser stand at his right hand.

7 When he is tried, let him be found guilty,
and may his prayers condemn him.

8 May his days be few;
may another take his place of leadership.

9 May his children be fatherless
and his wife a widow.

10 May his children be wandering beggars;
may they be driven from their ruined homes.

11 May a creditor seize all he has;
may strangers plunder the fruits of his labor.

12 May no one extend kindness to him
or take pity on his fatherless children.

13 May his descendants be cut off,
their names blotted out from the next generation.

14 May the iniquity of his fathers be remembered before the Lord;
may the sin of his mother never be blotted out."


King David, speaking again of his detractors wrote:
15 May their sins always remain before the Lord,
that he may cut off the memory of them from the earth.


The context clue comes from the use of singular "him" versus plural "they."
#321 Dec 08 2009 at 6:59 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Pensive the Ludicrous wrote:
Quote:
Is this another of your "I know you are but what am I" equivalencies?


No, it is that I choose to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are not intentionally foolish, but I merely have great psychological trauma in conceiving of ethics, and can therefore not understand how it is that what you say is an implication of what I say, and a contradiction.

Quote:
]Simple logic doesn't dictate our ethical status. Futility is no reason not to try. If it is a reason not to try, then the same simple logic tells us that we should have mass self-termination before that point of existence.


Please tell me why you would spend effort on futile enterprises.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#322 Dec 08 2009 at 7:19 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Cat? I don't know how to say this more politely. You're just plain wrong. The entire psalm is from David (or someone writing on his behalf). It's all from one person's perspective. He speaks first of the enemies and what they are doing against him. Then he speaks of what he wishes God would do about it.


Don't believe me? Go do some research. Every single interpretation I've ever seen on this psalm says the same thing. No one thinks that 6-20 is the evil people talking about David. He is praying to God to remove the leader of his enemies. The one who is speaking falsely of him and leading them to believe false things about him. And he's asking God to do some pretty darn nasty things to this guy.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#323 Dec 08 2009 at 7:23 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
You don't ask God to do evil things. You ask God to allow evil things to happen to bad people. I'd explain the rationale for requesting it in this way, but you'd have to actually have an understanding of ancient Hebrew culture.


This is the worst synopsis of any point of Christian theology that I've ever heard stated, both in it's dubious truth as well as rationale, and the disgustingly ironic appeal to historical authority. I am at a loss for words. God damn it.
#324 Dec 08 2009 at 7:26 PM Rating: Good
As much as I prefer Cat's reading of it... yeah, gbaji's right.
#325 Dec 08 2009 at 7:26 PM Rating: Good
Gbaji and people like him are the reason I'm no longer a Christian.

I can't bear to be around such ******* stupidity and stupid people who have the reading comprehension of middle schoolers.

#326 Dec 08 2009 at 7:28 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
If you're trying to get all biblical on Gbaji, at least be right.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 431 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (431)